scholarly journals The Diagnostic Efficacy of the American College of Radiology (ACR) Thyroid Imaging Report and Data System (TI-RADS) and the American Thyroid Association (ATA) Risk Stratification Systems for Thyroid Nodules

2022 ◽  
Vol 2022 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Fei Chen ◽  
Yungang Sun ◽  
Guanqi Chen ◽  
Yuqian Luo ◽  
Guifang Xue ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Stratification ◽  
Thyroid Nodules ◽  
Data System ◽  
Receiver Operating Curve ◽  
American Thyroid Association ◽  
Diagnostic Efficacy ◽  
Thyroid Imaging ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Stratification System ◽  
Receiver Operating

Background. This study is aimed at evaluating the diagnostic efficacy of ultrasound-based risk stratification for thyroid nodules in the American College of Radiology (ACR) Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS) and the American Thyroid Association (ATA) risk stratification systems. Methods. 286 patients with thyroid cancer were included in the tumor group, with 259 nontumor cases included in the nontumor group. The ACR TI-RADS and ATA risk stratification systems assessed all thyroid nodules for malignant risks. The diagnostic effect of ACR and ATA risk stratification system for thyroid nodules was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis using postoperative pathological diagnosis as the gold standard. Results. The distributions and mean scores of ACR and ATA rating risk stratification were significantly different between the tumor and nontumor groups. The lesion diameter > 1  cm subgroup had higher malignant ultrasound feature rates detected and ACR and ATA scores. A significant difference was not found in the ACR and ATA scores between patients with or without Hashimoto’s disease. The area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) for the ACR TI-RADS and the ATA systems was 0.891 and 0.896, respectively. The ACR had better specificity (0.90) while the ATA system had higher sensitivity (0.92), with both scenarios having almost the same overall diagnostic accuracy (0.84). Conclusion. Both the ACR TI-RADS and the ATA risk stratification systems provide a clinically feasible thyroid malignant risk classification, with high thyroid nodule malignant risk diagnostic efficacy.

COMPARISON OF DIAGNOSTIC PERFORMANCE BETWEEN THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY THYROID IMAGING REPORTING AND DATA SYSTEM AND AMERICAN THYROID ASSOCIATION GUIDELINES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 552-563 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qing Zhang ◽  
Jian Ma ◽  
Weijing Sun ◽  
Lanlan Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Receiver Operating Characteristic ◽  
Operating Characteristic ◽  
Thyroid Nodules ◽  
Needle Aspiration ◽  
Data System ◽  
American Thyroid Association ◽  
Summary Receiver Operating Characteristic ◽  
Thyroid Imaging ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Receiver Operating

Objective: We aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of the American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (ACR TI-RADS) with the American Thyroid Association (ATA) guidelines in risk stratification of thyroid nodules. Methods: We performed a computerized search of Medline, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar to identify eligible articles published before July 31, 2019. We included studies providing head-to-head comparison between ACR TI-RADS and ATA guidelines, with fine-needle aspiration biopsy cytology results or pathology results as the reference standard. Quality assessment of included studies was conducted using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies–2 tool. Summary estimates of sensitivity and specificity were calculated by bivariate modeling and hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic modeling. We also performed multiple subgroup analyses and meta-regression. Results: Twelve original articles with 13,000 patients were included, involving a total of 14,867 thyroid nodules. The pooled sensitivity of ACR TI-RADS and ATA guidelines was 0.84 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76–0.89) and 0.89 (95% CI, 0.80–0.95), with specificity of 0.67 (95% CI, 0.56–0.76) and 0.46 (95% CI, 0.29–0.63), respectively. There were no significant differences between the two classification criteria in terms of both sensitivity ( P = .26) and specificity ( P = .05). For five studies providing direct comparison of ACR TI-RADS, ATA guidelines, and Korean TI-RADS, our analyses showed that the Korean TI-RADS yielded the highest sensitivity (0.89; 95% CI, 0.82–0.94), but at the cost of a significant decline in specificity (0.23; 95% CI, 0.17–0.30). Conclusion: Both classification criteria demonstrated favorable sensitivity and moderate specificity in the stratification of thyroid nodules. However, use of ACR TI-RADS could avoid a large number of biopsies at the cost of only a slight decrease in sensitivity. Abbreviations: ACR = American College of Radiology; ATA = American Thyroid Association; FNAB = fine-needle aspiration biopsy; HSROC = hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic; SROC = summary receiver operating characteristic; TI-RADS = Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System; US = ultrasonography

scholarly journals A retrospective study correlating Ultrasound based Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System(TIRADS) with Bethesda System for Thyroid cytopathology in thyroid nodule risk stratification

2021 ◽  
Vol 03 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rajeev Chaturvedi ◽  
Ashok Kumar ◽  
Balaji Balasubramanian ◽  
Sreekala Sreehari
Keyword(s):  
Risk Stratification ◽  
Thyroid Nodule ◽  
Thyroid Nodules ◽  
Data System ◽  
Receiver Operating Curve ◽  
Thyroid Imaging ◽  
Risk Of Malignancy ◽  
Bethesda System ◽  
Thyroid Cytopathology ◽  
Undetermined Significance

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of the ultrasound based Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TIRADS)in estimating risk of malignancy in thyroid nodules by correlating it with Bethesda system of thyroid cytopathology. Methods: A retrospective single center study was conducted in a specialty hospital in UAE from November 2017 to November 2019 on 259 thyroid nodules which underwent ultrasound and fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC). Thyroid nodules were evaluated using American College of Radiology (ACR) TIRADS and categorized as benign (TR1), not suspicious (TR2), mildly suspicious (TR3), moderately suspicious (TR4), or highly suspicious (TR5) for malignancy. The risk of malignancy associated with each TIRADS category was evaluated by comparing it with the Bethesda system classification of cytopathology. Results: Ultrasound and FNAC data of 259 nodules was reviewed. Out of these 33 (12.7%) nodules were excluded because FNAC revealed atypia of undetermined significance or follicular lesion of undetermined significance. The estimated risk of malignancy in TR 3 was 13.6%, in TR4 was 27% and TR5 was 63.6%. There was statistically significant correlation between –TIRADS and Bethesda system using Chi-square test (p<0.001). The receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis revealed specificity of 81.3 % [95% CI, 74.9-86.6%], NPV of 91 % [95% CI, 87.1–93.8%] and accuracy of 77.9% [95% CI, 71.9–83.1%] in differentiating benign from malignant nodules. Conclusion: The ultrasound based ACR- TIRADS scoring correlates well with the Bethesda cytopathology in thyroid nodule risk stratification. Thus, it can be used as a simple and effective tool to decide further management and avoid unnecessary FNAC and surgeries in thyroid nodules.

scholarly journals Combine preoperative estimation of serum thyroglobulin and ACR-thyroid imaging reporting and data system scoring could accurately define malignant thyroid nodules

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 32
Author(s):  
Waseem A. Shoda
Keyword(s):  
Roc Curve ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Thyroid Nodules ◽  
Curve Analysis ◽  
Data System ◽  
Operating Characteristics ◽  
Roc Curve Analysis ◽  
Serum Thyroglobulin ◽  
Thyroid Imaging ◽  
Significant Difference

Background: Evaluation of diagnostic ability of preoperative estimation of serum thyroglobulin (TG) to detect malignant thyroid nodules (TN) in comparison to the American College of Radiology, Thyroid imaging reporting and data system (ACR-TIRADS), fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) and intraoperative frozen section (IO-FS).Methods: 34 patients with ACR-TIRADS 2-4 TN were evaluated preoperatively for identification of malignancy and all underwent total thyroidectomy with bilateral neck block dissection if indicated. Results of preoperative investigations were statistically analyzed using the Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis as predictors for malignancy in comparison to postoperative paraffin sections.Results: Preoperative serum TG levels had 100% sensitivity and negative predictive value, while ACR-TIRADS scoring had 100% specificity and positive predictive value with accuracy rates of 95.35% and 97.67% for TG and TIRADS, respectively. ROC curve analysis defined preoperative ACR-TIRADS class and serum TG as highly diagnostic than FNAC for defining malignancy with non-significant difference between areas under curve for TIRADS and TG. For cases had intermediate risk of malignancy on TIRADS, IO-FS had missed 3, FNAC missed 4, while serum TG levels were very high in the 13 cases and were defined by ROC curve as the only significant predictor for malignancy.Conclusions: Preoperative estimation of serum TG showed higher diagnostic validity than FNAC, high predictability of cancer and ability to verify the intermediate findings on TIRADS. Combined preoperative TIRADS and TG estimation could accurately discriminate malignant TN with high accuracy and spare the need for preoperative FNAC or IO-FS. 

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document