Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Using EndoTrac, a Novel Traction Device

Digestion ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Hidetoshi Kaku ◽  
Takashi Toyonaga ◽  
Shinwa Tanaka ◽  
Hiroshi Takihara ◽  
Shinichi Baba ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Submucosal Layer ◽  
Preparation Time ◽  
Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Traction Device ◽  
Gi Cancers ◽  
Procedural Success

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is recognized as a minimally invasive and curative treatment for superficial gastrointestinal (GI) cancers. However, ESD is still challenging and time-consuming with a high risk of adverse events such as bleeding and perforation. Various traction methods have been explored for maintaining good visualization of the submucosal layer during ESD. We developed a novel traction device (the EndoTrac) which can easily tie the thread and has the ability to change the towing direction. The aim of this study is to evaluate safety and feasibility of ESD using the EndoTrac for GI neoplasms. <b><i>Patients and Methods:</i></b> We retrospectively analyzed 44 patients (45 lesions) with esophageal, gastric, duodenal, and colorectal neoplasms who had undergone ESD using the EndoTrac device between June 2018 and May 2019. Primary outcome measures were preparation time, procedural success using the EndoTrac device, and ease of ability to change towing direction. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Mean preparation time was 2 (2–5) min in esophagus, 3 (1–5) min in stomach, 6 (5–9) min in duodenum, and 4 (2–8) min in colorectum. The procedural success rate was 100% (8/8) in esophagus, 100% (21/21) in stomach, 100% (4/4) in duodenum, and 100% (12/12) in colorectum. The rate of successful towing to both proximal and distal sides was 100% (8/8) in esophagus, 100% (21/21) in stomach, 0% (0/4) in duodenum, and 100% (12/12) in colorectum. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Use of the EndoTrac device appears to be a feasible approach to ESD for GI neoplasms.

scholarly journals Feasibility of a modified search, coagulation, and clipping method with and without the use of polyglycolic acid sheets and fibrin glue for preventing delayed bleeding after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Satoshi Abiko ◽  
Soichiro Oda ◽  
Akimitsu Meno ◽  
Akane Shido ◽  
Sonoe Yoshida ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Fibrin Glue ◽  
Polyglycolic Acid ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Antithrombotic Agents ◽  
Delayed Bleeding ◽  
Submucosal Dissection

Abstract Background Methods have been developed for preventing delayed bleeding (DB) after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (GESD). However, none of the methods can completely prevent DB. We hypothesized that DB could be prevented by a modified search, coagulation, and clipping (MSCC) method for patients at low risk for DB and by combining the use of polyglycolic acid sheets and fibrin glue with the MSCC method (PMSCC method) for patients at high risk for DB (antibleeding [ABI] strategy). This study assessed the technical feasibility of this novel strategy. Method We investigated 123 lesions in 121 consecutive patients who underwent GESD in Kushiro Rosai Hospital between April 2018 and January 2020. The decision for continuation or cessation of antithrombotic agents was based on the Guidelines for Gastroenterological Endoscopy in Patients Undergoing Antithrombotic Treatment. Results Oral antithrombotic agents were administered to 28 patients (22.8%). The en bloc R0 resection rate was 98.4%. The MSCC method and the PMSCC method for preventing DB were performed in 114 and 9 lesions, respectively. The median time of the MSCC method was 16 min, and the median speed (the resection area divided by the time of method used) was 3.6 cm2/10 min. The median time of the PMSCC method was 59 min, and the median speed was 1.3 cm2/10 min. The only delayed procedural adverse event was DB in 1 (0.8%) of the 123 lesions. Conclusions The ABI strategy is feasible for preventing DB both in patients at low risk and in those at high risk for DB after GESD, whereas the PMSCC method may be necessary for reduction of time.

PS02.146: LARYNX-PRESERVING SURGERY FOR CERVICAL ESOPHAGEAL CANCER USING INTRAOPERATIVE ENDOSCOPIC SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION: A CASE REPORT

2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 162-162
Author(s):  
Yoshiki Taniguchi ◽  
Koji Tanaka ◽  
Yasuhiro Miyazaki ◽  
Tomoki Makino ◽  
Tsuyoshi Takahashi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Tumor Invasion ◽  
Pathological Examination ◽  
Submucosal Layer ◽  
Cervical Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Submucosal Dissection

Abstract Background We sometimes experience cases of cervical esophageal cancer which requires laryngectomy due to spread of cancer to larynx. We report a case of esophageal cancer resection with preservation of larynx using intraoperative endoscopic submucosal dissection. Methods The patient was a 59-year-old woman who had dysphagia. She had received total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction for gastric cancer in 2001, chemoradiation (61.2Gy) for esophageal cancer in 2008. Argon plasma coagulation (APC) was performed for the carcinoma in situ of cervical esophagus in 2016. This time superficial 0-IIc tumor was observed at the same site of the scar of APC, and a biopsy revealed squamous cell carcinoma. An endoscopic findings revealed two 0-IIc lesions at distance of 18–22 cm, and 32–34 cm from the incisors, and biopsy resulted in a diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma. Since tumor was close to the esophageal orifice, the tumor invasion to the larynx was suspected. On the other hand, there were no obvious findings of the submucosal layer invasion, and the both tumor were thought to be limited to the epithelium or lamina propria mucosae (EP/LPM). We performed mediastinoscopic and thoracoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy, subcutaneous ileocolic reconstruction. Results After confirming the tumor invasion to the esophageal orifice by chromoendoscopy with 1% Lugol's iodine solution, we dissected the whole circumference of esophagus in submucosal layer just above the tumor by ESD, put an incision outside of esophageal wall, and resected the esophagus. We preserved short length of muscle layer and performed reconstruction with hypopharynx-ileum anastomosis. Pathological examination revealed squamous cell carcinoma, pT1a-EP, ly0, v0, pPM0, pDM0, pIM0, and curative resection was performed. The postoperative course was uneventful. Conclusion There were no reports of successful larynx-preserving surgery for cervical esophageal cancer using intraoperative ESD. When the tumor was limited in the mucosa, esophagectomy with intraoperative ESD may enable larynx preservation even if the tumor invaded to the esophageal orifice. Disclosure All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

A New Traction Device Assisting Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Superficial Colorectal Neoplasm

2007 ◽  
Vol 65 (5) ◽  
pp. AB272 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naoto Sakamoto ◽  
Taro Osada ◽  
Yuji Shimada ◽  
Kazuko Beppu ◽  
Tomoyoshi Shibuya ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Colorectal Neoplasm ◽  
Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Traction Device

scholarly journals The Efficacy of an Endoscopic Grasp-and-Traction Device for Gastric Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: AnEx VivoComparative Study (with Video)

2015 ◽  
Vol 48 (3) ◽  
pp. 221 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dirk W. Schölvinck ◽  
Osamu Goto ◽  
Jacques J. G. H. M. Bergman ◽  
Naohisa Yahagi ◽  
Bas L. A. M. Weusten
Keyword(s):  
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Traction Device

scholarly journals Polysaccharide hemostatic powder to prevent bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection in high risk patients: A randomized controlled trial

Endoscopy ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Da Hyun Jung ◽  
Chan Hyuk Park ◽  
Hee Seok Moon ◽  
Jun Chul Park
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Gastric Neoplasms ◽  
Control Group ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Hemostatic Powder

Background and aims: Bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a severe adverse event. Several methods to prevent post-ESD bleeding (PEB) have been introduced; however, they have not been widely used because of technical difficulties. We aimed to investigate whether polysaccharide hemostatic powder (PHP), which is very easy to apply, can prevent early PEB, especially in patients with high risk of PEB. Methods: This was a prospective, multicenter, randomized, open-label, controlled trial. Patients with a high risk for PEB were enrolled. Patients with gastric neoplasms in whom the resected specimen size was expected to be >40 mm and those who were regularly taking antithrombotic agents were defined as high-risk patients. Patients were randomly assigned to the PHP or control group. Results: Between May 2017 and September 2018, 143 patients were enrolled (PHP group: 73, control group: 70). The total PEB rate was 6.3% (PHP group: 5% vs. control group: 7.1%, P=0.742). There was no bleeding within 7 days after ESD in the PHP group. Continued antithrombotic use was an independent risk factor of PEB. In subgroup analysis excluding patients who continued to take antithrombotics (n=129) during ESD, the rate of PEB was tended to be lower in the PHP group than in the control group (0% vs. 6.3%, P=0.058). Conclusion: PHP did not demonstrate a significant effect on the prevention of PEB in this study. Further larger-scale, randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm this.(ClinicalTrials.gov 03169569)

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document