LAight® Therapy Significantly Enhances Treatment Efficacy of 16 Weeks of Topical Clindamycin Solution in Hurley I and II Hidradenitis Suppurativa: Results from Period A of RELIEVE, a Multicenter Randomized, Controlled Trial

Dermatology ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Michael Schultheis ◽  
Petra Staubach ◽  
Georgios Nikolakis ◽  
Stephan Grabbe ◽  
Christian Ruckes ◽  
...  

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, inflammatory, burdensome skin disease where medical first-line treatment is still limited to long-term, topical and/or systemic antibiotics. The RELIEVE study aimed at evaluating the efficacy of LAight® therapy – a combination of intense pulsed light and radiofrequency – as an adjunct treatment to first-line therapies in Hurley stage I and II HS. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> The RELIEVE study was performed as a two-period multicenter randomized controlled trial with blinded assessment. For period A from week 0 to week 16, the 88 participating subjects were randomized into either an intervention group (IG) or a control group (CG). The IG received topical clindamycin 1% solution combined with 8 additional bi-weekly treatments with LAight® therapy. The CG was treated with topical clindamycin 1% solution only. After 16 weeks, patients entered open-label period B and both groups were treated exclusively with LAight® therapy for an additional 16 weeks (8 sessions). The primary efficacy endpoint was the change in International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Score System (∆IHS4) at week 16 to baseline. Secondary endpoints were DLQI, HiSCR, Pain-NRS, and HADS. <b><i>Results:</i></b> In total, from the 88 patients enrolled in RELIEVE, 81 patients were included in the endpoint analysis after period A. After 16 weeks of treatment, the ∆IHS4 of the group treated with the combination of LAight® therapy and topical clindamycin 1% solution was −7.2 ± 6.7 (−60.0%), which was significantly higher in magnitude than the ∆IHS4 in the group treated with clindamycin 1% solution alone (−1.8 ± 5.6, −17.8%, <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001). Secondary endpoints, including other clinical scores as well as patient-reported outcomes, confirmed that the efficacy of the combined treatment was superior to monotherapy. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> The results of the primary endpoint analysis of period A of the RELIEVE study show that the combined therapy with LAight® and topical clindamycin 1% solution, resulted in a significantly higher decrease in disease severity and an improvement of quality of life in comparison to topical clindamycin 1% solution monotherapy. Treatment was well tolerated, and side effects were all mild and transitory. These data speak for the implementation of the combined treatment as a first-line therapy in Hurley stage I and II HS. LAight® therapy as long-term monotherapy (results from period B), will be analyzed in a consecutive paper.

Burns ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 37 (7) ◽  
pp. 1222-1228 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pauline D.H.M. Verhaegen ◽  
Martijn B.A. van der Wal ◽  
Monica C.T. Bloemen ◽  
Jan Dokter ◽  
Paris Melis ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyuk-Joon Lee ◽  
Hyung-Ho Kim ◽  
Sang Uk Han ◽  
Min-Chan Kim ◽  
Woo Jin Hyung ◽  
...  

4 Background: Laparoscopy assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) is widely performed for gastric cancer in Eastern countries, although large scale prospective data are still lacking. We conducted a phase III, multicenter randomized controlled trial (KLASS-01) to compare the short and long term outcomes of LADG versus open distal gastrectomy (ODG) in patients with clinical stage I gastric cancer in Korea. Methods: The primary end point was 5-year overall survival. The morbidity within 30 postoperative days and the surgical mortality were compared to evaluate the safety of LADG as a secondary end point. A total of 1,416 patients were randomly assigned to the LADG group (n = 705) or the ODG group (n = 711) between Feb 1, 2006 and Aug 31, 2010. Results: 1,256 were eligible for per protocol (PP) analysis (644 and 612, respectively). The overall complication rate was significantly lower in the LADG group (LADG vs. ODG; 13.0% vs. 19.9%, P =.001). In detail, the wound complication rate of the LADG group was significantly lower than that of the ODG group (3.1% vs. 7.7%, P <.001). The major intra-abdominal complication (7.6% vs. 10.3%, P =.095) and mortality rates (0.6% vs. 0.3%, P =.450) were similar between groups. Modified intention-to-treat analysis showed similar results with PP analysis. Conclusions: LADG for patients with clinical stage I gastric cancer is safe and has a benefit of lower occurrence of wound complication compared with conventional ODG. Clinical trial information: NCT00452751.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document