scholarly journals Ulcerative colitis: STRIDE-ing beyond symptoms with new standards

Author(s):  
SW Tay ◽  
KKJ Teh ◽  
TL Ang ◽  
M Tan

The landscape of ulcerative colitis has changed in the last two decades. Advancements in pharmacotherapeutics have heralded the introduction of new treatment options, with many agents in development. Better clinical outcomes are seen with tighter disease control, made possible with greater understanding of inflammatory pathways and their blockade with drugs. There has been a resultant shift in treatment targets, beyond symptoms to endoscopic and histological healing. Controlling the burden of disease activity also lowers the risk of developing colorectal cancer. Colorectal cancer screening now requires the use of dye-based agents and high definition colonoscopy to improve detection of colonic neoplasms.

2021 ◽  
Vol 72 (1) ◽  
pp. 199-213
Author(s):  
Robert P. Hirten ◽  
Bruce E. Sands

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a relapsing and remitting inflammatory disease of the colon with a variable course. Despite advances in treatment, only approximately 40% of patients achieve clinical remission at the end of a year, prompting the exploration of new treatment modalities. This review explores novel therapeutic approaches to UC, including promising drugs in various stages of development, efforts to maximize the efficacy of currently available treatment options, and non-medication-based modalities. Treatment approaches which show promise in impacting the future of UC management are highlighted.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (9) ◽  
pp. 558-573
Author(s):  
Muhammad Ali ◽  
Yang Wang ◽  
Qi Zhang

Colorectal cancer was infrequently diagnosed several decades ago. Nowadays, it is the world's fourth most deadly cancer with almost 900,000 deaths annually. Colorectal cancer had a low incidence several decades ago. However, it has become predominant cancer and now accounts for approximately 10% of cancer-related mortality in western countries. The ‘rise’ of colorectal cancer in developed countries can be attributed to the increasingly aging population, unfavorable modern dietary habits and an increase in risk factors such as smoking, low physical exercise and obesity. New treatments for primary and metastatic colorectal cancer have emerged, providing additional options for patients; these treatments include laparoscopic surgery for primary disease, more aggressive resection of metastatic disease (such as liver and pulmonary metastases), radiotherapy for rectal cancer and neoadjuvant and palliative chemotherapies. However, these new treatment options have had a limited impact on cure rates and long-term survival. Keywords: Colorectal cancer, Tumor marker, Hereditary colorectal cancer, Mediterranean diet.


2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S515-S516
Author(s):  
L Huynh ◽  
S Hass ◽  
B E Sands ◽  
M S Duh ◽  
H Sipsma ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Although originator biologics are effective therapies for patients with ulcerative colitis (UC), they can be costly and may not be widely available. Therefore, less expensive biosimilars have been developed and approved to treat and manage symptoms. In this new treatment landscape, UC-treatment preferences are unknown. Thus, this interim analysis aimed to characterise physician preferences for biologics for the treatment of UC in France, Germany and the UK. Methods As part of a broader chart review study, treatment preferences were also collected from participating gastroenterologists and general practitioners (GPs) in France, Germany and the UK who had treated patients (≥ 18 years) with moderate-to-severe UC who had received ≥ 1 UC-related biologic any time from 2014 to 25 October 2019. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the sample overall, and by physician speciality and treatment preference. Results Physicians (161 gastroenterologists; 57 GPs) were from different clinical settings in France (39.9%), Germany (28.4%) and the UK (31.7%). Overall, infliximab (33.0%) and adalimumab (32.1%) were selected more often as first treatment options than their biosimilars (17.0% and 9.6%, respectively). Gastroenterologists preferred biosimilars more frequently than GPs did (35.4% vs. 1.8%). More physicians who preferred biosimilars were from France (48.3%) than Germany (17.2%) or the UK (34.5%). In France and the UK, 93.8% of physicians who selected biosimilars worked in hospital settings; in Germany, 50.0% worked in clinics and 50.0% worked in practice settings with statutory and private patients. Physicians who preferred biosimilars treated more patients with UC in the preceding 12 months than those who preferred originators did (mean ± SD: 110.3 ± 113.9 vs. 94.0 ± 93.2). Although most physicians reported efficacy as a reason for biologic preference (93.6%), physicians who preferred originators were more likely to report good tolerability (73.8%) and patient preference (20.6%) and less likely to report affordability or availability (11.9%) than physicians who preferred biosimilars (63.8%, 10.3% and 44.8%, respectively). In patients who failed anti-TNF therapy, vedolizumab was the preferred treatment (78.9%), although this preference differed by speciality (gastroenterologists: 83.2%; GPs: 66.7%). Conclusion Originator biologics for treating patients with moderate-to-severe UC dominate the treatment landscape in Europe, driven primarily by efficacy, tolerability and patient preference. However, variations and differences in preferences by speciality and clinical setting may suggest a need to explore additional treatment options to manage disease symptoms among patients with UC.


2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (Supplement_4) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Correia ◽  
M Cancela ◽  
P Caldeira ◽  
J Morera ◽  
C Cardoso ◽  
...  

Abstract Problem The burden of disease for oncological problems is significant in Portugal. Population-based screenings, such as colorectal cancer screening (CCS) with faecal occult blood tests (FIT) is a priority program to reduce the burden of disease and a cost-effectiveness measure. Description problem Algarve CCS started in 2017,to early detect colorectal cancer reducing morbidity and mortality. Screening strategy to detect and remove cancer precursors (adenomas) and early cancer detection with less invasive treatment using a non-invasive stool test was selected. A quantitative faecal immunochemical test for haemoglobin (FIT) with higher sensitivity for adenoma and cancer, specific for human globin with no dietary restriction, with a single sample screening is considered a test with higher participation. Target population all gender from 50 to 75 are invited to participate in the CCS by letter. Screening interval is 2 years and FIT cut-off- 117 (ng Hb/mL). Software was used to manage all CCS. Health units distribute the test and a flyer. All FIT-positive were invited to do a full colonoscopy at University Hospital. Results A preliminary descriptive analysis (2017/2019) was made. After exclusions 25017 of target population participate 34,4%(n = 8594),27.5%(n = 6883) submitted it for analysis, 3.9% (n = 266) had positive FIT and were invited for a full colonoscopy with 57.5% (n = 153)participation rate. Cancer detection was 0.9‰ and adenomas detection rate was 9.9%. FIT positive with colonoscopy 3.9% (n = 6) had carcinoma and 44.4% (n = 68) had adenoma. Lessons Some operational changes were made to improve participants and professionals adherence to CCS. Pathology observed in the positive cases, reinforce the need to implement strategies to increase literacy, raise public awareness, keep the screening test and improve accessibility of health facilities. Key messages The importance of a colorectal cancer early diagnosis prevent aggressive interventions in a precancerous phase. The importance of a colorectal cancer early diagnosis improves survival and population quality of life.


2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (12) ◽  
pp. 2169
Author(s):  
Christine Verdon ◽  
Talat Bessissow ◽  
Peter L. Lakatos

Acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) is a medical emergency which occurs in about 20%–30% of patients with ulcerative colitis during their lifetime, and does carry a mortality risk of 1%. The management of inflammatory bowel diseases has evolved with changes in objective patient monitoring, as well as the availability of new treatment options with the development of new biological and small molecules; however, data is limited regarding their use in the context of ASUC. This review aims to discuss the emerging data regarding biologicals and small molecules therapies in the context of ASUC.


2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 2540-2547
Author(s):  
Anuj Arora ◽  
Sami A Chadi ◽  
Tyler Chesney

The current recommendation to stop colorectal cancer screening for older adults is based on a lack of evidence due to systematic exclusion of this population from trials. Older adults are a heterogenous population with many available strategies for patient-centered assessment and decision-making. Evolutions in management strategies for colorectal cancer have made safe and effective options available to older adults, and the rationale to screen for treatable disease more reasonably, especially given the aging Canadian population. In this commentary, we review the current screening guidelines and the evidence upon which they were built, the unique considerations for screening older adults, new treatment options, the risks and benefits of increased screening and potential considerations for the new guidelines.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document