A systematic review of evidence-based aftercare for older adults following self-harm

2022 ◽  
pp. 000486742110671
Author(s):  
Anne PF Wand ◽  
Roisin Browne ◽  
Tiffany Jessop ◽  
Carmelle Peisah
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Qualitative Studies ◽  
Assessment Tools ◽  
Screening Tools ◽  
Safety Planning ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Heritage Foundation ◽  
Quality Ratings ◽  
Self Harm

Objective: Self-harm is closely associated with suicide in older adults and may provide opportunity to intervene to prevent suicide. This study aimed to systematically review recent evidence for three components of aftercare for older adults: (1) referral pathways, (2) assessment tools and safety planning approaches and (3) engagement and intervention strategies. Methods: Databases PubMed, Medline, PsychINFO, Embase and CINAHL were searched from January 2010 to 10 July 2021 by two reviewers. Empirical studies reporting aftercare interventions for older adults (aged 60+) following self-harm (including with suicidal intent) were included. Full text of articles with abstracts meeting inclusion criteria were obtained and independently reviewed by three authors to determine final studies for review. Two reviewers extracted data and assessed level of evidence (Oxford) and quality ratings (Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research Standard Quality Assessment Criteria for quantitative and Attree and Milton checklist for qualitative studies), working independently. Results: Twenty studies were reviewed (15 quantitative; 5 qualitative). Levels of evidence were low (3, 4), and quality ratings of quantitative studies variable, although qualitative studies rated highly. Most studies of referral pathways were observational and demonstrated marked variation with no clear guidelines or imperatives for community psychiatric follow-up. Of four screening tools evaluated, three were suicide-specific and one screened for depression. An evidence-informed approach to safety planning was described using cases. Strategies for aftercare engagement and intervention included two multifaceted approaches, psychotherapy and qualitative insights from older people who self-harmed, carers and clinicians. The qualitative studies identified targets for improved aftercare engagement, focused on individual context, experiences and needs. Conclusion: Dedicated older-adult aftercare interventions with a multifaceted, assertive follow-up approach accompanied by systemic change show promise but require further evaluation. Research is needed to explore the utility of needs assessment compared to screening and evaluate efficacy of safety planning and psychotherapeutic approaches.

scholarly journals Validation of the detection of elder abuse through emergency care technicians (DETECT) screening tool: a study protocol

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. e037170
Author(s):  
Brad Cannell ◽  
Julie Weitlauf ◽  
Melvin D Livingston ◽  
Jason Burnett ◽  
Megin Parayil ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Emergency Care ◽  
Screening Tool ◽  
Elder Abuse ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Living Environment ◽  
Community Dwelling ◽  
Screening Tools ◽  
Semistructured Interview

IntroductionElder mistreatment (EM) is a high prevalence threat to the health and well-being of older adults in the USA. Medics are well-positioned to help with identification of older adults at risk for EM, however, field robust screening tools appropriate for efficient, observation-based screening are lacking. Prior work by this team focused on the development and initial pilot testing of an observation-based EM screening tool named detection of elder abuse through emergency care technicians (DETECT), designed to be implemented by medics during the course of an emergency response (911) call. The objective of the present work is to validate and further refine this tool in preparation for clinical dissemination.Methods and analysisApproximately 59 400 community-dwelling older adults who place 911 calls during the 36-month study observation period will be screened by medics responding to the call using the DETECT tool. Next, a random subsample of 2520 of the 59 400 older adults screened will be selected to participate in a follow-up interview approximately 2 weeks following the completion of the screening. Follow-up interviews will consist of a medic-led semistructured interview designed to assess the older adult’s likelihood of abuse exposure, physical/mental health status, cognitive functioning, and to systematically evaluate the quality and condition of their physical and social living environment. The data from 25% (n=648) of these follow-up interviews will be presented to a longitudinal, experts and all data panel for a final determination of EM exposure status, representing the closest proxy to a ‘gold standard’ measure available.Ethics and disseminationThis study has been reviewed and approved by the Committee for the Protection of Human Subjects at the University of Texas School of Public Health. The results will be disseminated through formal presentations at local, national and international conferences and through publication in peer-reviewed scientific journals.

scholarly journals Comparison of drug-related problem risk assessment tools for older adults: a systematic review

2019 ◽  
Vol 76 (3) ◽  
pp. 337-348
Author(s):  
Emmi Puumalainen ◽  
Marja Airaksinen ◽  
Sanni E. Jalava ◽  
Timothy F. Chen ◽  
Maarit Dimitrow
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Risk Assessment ◽  
Web Of Science ◽  
Assessment Tools ◽  
Screening Tools ◽  
Content Development ◽  
Disease Therapy ◽  
Risk Assessment Tools ◽  
Based Medicine ◽  
Development Methods

Abstract Purpose This study aims to systematically review studies describing screening tools that assess the risk for drug-related problems (DRPs) in older adults (≥ 60 years). The focus of the review is to compare DRP risks listed in different tools and describe their development methods and validation. Methods The systematic search was conducted using evidence-based medicine, Medline Ovid, Scopus, and Web of Science databases from January 1, 1985, to April 7, 2016. Publications describing general DRP risk assessment tools for older adults written in English were included. Disease, therapy, and drug-specific tools were excluded. Outcome measures included an assessment tool’s content, development methods, and validation assessment. Results The search produced 15 publications describing 11 DRP risk assessment tools. Three major categories of risks for DRPs included (1) patient or caregiver related risks; (2) pharmacotherapy-related risks; and (3) medication use process-related risks. Of all the risks included in the tools only 8 criteria appeared in at least 4 of the tools, problems remembering to take the medication being the most common (n=7). Validation assessments varied and content validation was the most commonly conducted (n = 9). Reliability assessment was conducted for 6 tools, most commonly by calculating internal consistency (n = 3) and inter-rater reliability (n = 2). Conclusions The considerable variety between the contents of the tools indicates that there is no consensus on the risk factors for DRPs that should be screened in older adults taking multiple medicines. Further research is needed to improve the accuracy and timeliness of the DRP risk assessment tools.

Predictive Validity of Health-Related Fitness Tests on Back Pain and Related Disability: A 6-Year Follow-Up Study Among High-Functioning Older Adults

2012 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 249-258 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pauliina Husu ◽  
Jaana Suni
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Community Dwelling ◽  
Screening Tools ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Fitness Tests ◽  
Health Related ◽  
Side Bending ◽  
Health Related Fitness

Background:Back pain and related disability seem to be increasing among older adults. Health-related fitness tests have been developed to identify individuals at risk for mobility difficulties. However, poor fitness as a risk factor for back problems has seldom been studied. The purpose of the current study was to investigate whether performance in fitness tests predicts back pain and related disability during 6 years of follow-up.Methods:Study population consisted of community-dwelling men and women, born 1927 to 1941, who participated in assessment of health-related fitness and reported no long-term back pain or related disability at baseline (n = 517). The assessment included measurements of body mass index (BMI), one-leg stand, backward tandem walk, trunk side-bending, dynamic back extension, forward squat, 6.1-m walking speed and 1-km walk time.Results:Prospective analyses indicated that poor fitness (poorest-third) in one-leg stand and trunk side-bending tests were the most powerful predictors of back pain. Regarding disability, poor fitness in dynamic back extension and overweight in terms of BMI ≥ 27 increased the risk.Conclusions:Tests of balance, trunk flexibility and trunk muscle endurance, as well as BMI can be implemented as screening tools for identifying persons with increased risk of back pain and related disability.

scholarly journals Platelet-Rich Plasma Augmentation to Microfracture Provides a Limited Benefit for the Treatment of Cartilage Lesions: A Meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 232596712091050 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angelo Boffa ◽  
Davide Previtali ◽  
Sante Alessandro Altamura ◽  
Stefano Zaffagnini ◽  
Christian Candrian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Comparative Studies ◽  
Platelet Rich Plasma ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Risk Of Bias ◽  
Assessment Tools ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Cartilage Lesions

Background: Microfracture is the most common first-line option for the treatment of small chondral lesions, although increasing evidence shows that the clinical benefit of microfracture decreases over time. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has been suggested as an effective biological augmentation to improve clinical outcomes after microfracture. Purpose: To evaluate the clinical evidence regarding the application of PRP, documenting safety and efficacy of this augmentation technique to improve microfracture for the treatment of cartilage lesions. Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A systematic review was performed in PubMed, EBSCOhost database, and the Cochrane Library to identify comparative studies evaluating the clinical efficacy of PRP augmentation to microfracture. A meta-analysis was performed on articles that reported results for visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), and American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scores. Risk of bias was documented through use of the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias 2.0 and Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions assessment tools. The quality assessment was performed according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation guidelines. Results: A total of 7 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the meta-analysis: 4 randomized controlled trials, 2 prospective comparative studies, and 1 retrospective comparative study, for a total of 234 patients. Of the 7 studies included, 4 studies evaluated the effects of PRP treatment in the knee, and 3 studies evaluated effects in the ankle. The analysis of all scores showed a difference favoring PRP treatment in knees (VAS, P = .002 and P < .001 at 12 and 24 months, respectively; IKDC, P < .001 at both follow-up points) and ankles (both VAS and AOFAS, P < .001 at 12 months). The improvement offered by PRP did not reach the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). Conclusion: PRP provided an improvement to microfracture in knees and ankles at short-term follow-up. However, this improvement did not reach the MCID, and thus it was not clinically perceivable by the patients. Moreover, the overall low evidence and the paucity of high-level studies indicate further research is needed to confirm the potential of PRP augmentation to microfracture for the treatment of cartilage lesions.

scholarly journals Paramedic assessment of frailty: An exploratory study of perceptions of frailty assessment tools

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Wayne Harris ◽  
Peter Vincent Lucas ◽  
Helen Eyles ◽  
Leigh Parker
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Clinical Care ◽  
Frailty Index ◽  
Economic Benefits ◽  
Assessment Tools ◽  
Screening Tools ◽  
Hospital Environment ◽  
Significant Variable ◽  
Frailty Assessment

<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Frailty is recognised as a significant variable in the health of older adults. Early identification by paramedics of those at risk of frailty may assist in timely entry to an appropriate clinical care pathway. Early referral to such pathways has been shown to improve patient outcomes and quality of life, as well as deliver economic benefits. To date, little research has been completed regarding assessment of frailty by paramedic professionals using validated assessment tools. The objective of this study was to determine paramedicine students’ perceptions of screening tools to facilitate assessment and knowledge of frailty of older adults. The Edmonton Frail Scale (EFS) and the Groningen Frailty Index (GFI) were determined suitable for this purpose.</p><p><strong>Methods</strong>: The research adopted a mixed methods approach using a survey tool developed to gather both qualitative and quantitative data from students at the completion of a structured aged care clinical placement. Thematic analysis of the qualitative data identified key features of the tools, while a Likert-type scale was used to measure perspectives about the suitability of the tools for use in paramedic practice.</p><p><strong>Results</strong>: Thirty-seven paramedicine students were invited to participate in the study. Thirteen were able to use both tools to conduct frailty assessments and submitted survey responses. Student perspectives indicated both the EFS and GFI are potentially suitable for paramedicine and as clinical learning tools regarding geriatric assessments. Median time to administer the tools was eight minutes for the EFS and ten minutes for the GFI.</p><p><strong>Conclusion</strong>: Paramedicine students support a frailty assessment tool to assist clinical decision making regarding older adults. Further appraisal of validated frailty assessment tools by operational paramedics in a pre-hospital environment is warranted to determine absolute utility for Australian paramedics.</p>

Associations of sleep phenotypes with severe intentional self-harm: a prospective analysis of the UK Biobank cohort

SLEEP ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Binbin Lei ◽  
Jihui Zhang ◽  
Sijing Chen ◽  
Jie Chen ◽  
Lulu Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Mental Disorders ◽  
Sleep Duration ◽  
Uk Biobank ◽  
Middle Aged ◽  
Long Sleep ◽  
Self Harm ◽  
Future Risk ◽  
The Uk

Abstract Study objectives We aimed to investigate the prospective associations of sleep phenotypes with severe intentional self-harm (ISH) in middle-aged and older adults. Methods A total of 499,159 participants (mean age: 56.55 ± 8.09 years; female: 54.4%) were recruited from the UK Biobank between 2006 and 2010 with follow-up until February 2016 in this population-based prospective study. Severe ISH was based on hospital inpatient records or a death cause of ICD-10 codes X60-X84. Patients with hospitalized diagnosis of severe ISH before the initial assessment were excluded. Sleep phenotypes, including sleep duration, chronotype, insomnia, sleepiness, and napping, were assessed at the initial assessments. Cox regression analysis was used to estimate temporal associations between sleep phenotypes and future risk of severe ISH. Results During a follow-up period of 7.04 years (SD: 0.88), 1,219 participants experienced the first hospitalization or death related to severe ISH. After adjusting for demographics, substance use, medical diseases, mental disorders, and other sleep phenotypes, short sleep duration (HR: 1.50, 95% CI: 1.23-1.83, P &lt; .001), long sleep duration (HR: 1.56, 95% CI: 1.15-2.12, P = .004), and insomnia (usually: HR: 1.57, 95% CI: 1.31-1.89, P &lt; .001) were significantly associated with severe ISH. Sensitivity analyses excluding participants with mental disorders preceding severe ISH yielded similar results. Conclusion The current study provides the empirical evidence of the independent prediction of sleep phenotypes, mainly insomnia, short and long sleep duration, for the future risk of severe ISH among middle-aged and older adults.

Predictive factors of nonfatal self-harm among community-dwelling older adults assessed for support services

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-14
Author(s):  
Gary Cheung ◽  
Yi Chai ◽  
M. Isabela Troya ◽  
Hao Luo
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Older Adults ◽  
At Risk ◽  
Predictive Factors ◽  
Functional Impairment ◽  
Support Services ◽  
Community Dwelling ◽  
First Year ◽  
Self Harm

ABSTRACT Background: Older adults receiving support services are a population at risk for self-harm due to physical illness and functional impairment, which are known risk factors. This study aims to investigate the relative importance of predictive factors of nonfatal self-harm among older adults assessed for support services in New Zealand. Methods: interRAI-Home Care (HC) national data of older adults (aged ≥ 60) were linked to mortality and hospital discharge data between January 1, 2012 and December 31, 2016. We calculated the crude incidence of self-harm per 100,000 person-years, and gender and age-adjusted standardized incidence ratios (SIRs). The Fine and Gray competing risk regression model was fitted to estimate the hazard ratio (HR; 95% CIs) of self-harm associated with various demographic, psychosocial, clinical factors, and summary scales. Results: A total of 93,501 older adults were included. At the end of the follow-up period, 251 (0.27%) people had at least one episode of nonfatal self-harm and 36,333 (38.86%) people died. The overall incidence of nonfatal self-harm was 160.39 (95% CI, 141.36–181.06) per 100,000 person-years and SIR was 5.12 (95% CI, 4.51–5.78), with the highest incidence in the first year of follow-up. Depression diagnosis (HR, 3.02, 2.26–4.03), at-risk alcohol use (2.38, 1.30–4.35), and bipolar disorder (2.18, 1.25–3.80) were the most significant risk factors. Protective effects were found with cancer (0.57, 0.36–0.89) and severe level of functional impairment measured by Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Hierarchy Scale (0.56, 0.35–0.89). Conclusion: Psychiatric factors are the most significant predictors for nonfatal self-harm among older adults receiving support services. Our results can be used to inform healthcare professionals for timely identification of people at high risk of self-harm and the development of more efficient and targeted prevention strategies, with specific attention to individuals with depression or depressive symptoms, particularly in the first year of follow-up.

Oncologists' perception of frailty.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e24012-e24012
Author(s):  
Zuhair Alam ◽  
Brian Patrick Singeltary
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Professional Education ◽  
Online Survey ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Geriatric Oncology ◽  
Screening Tools ◽  
Quality Improvement Initiative ◽  
Community Oncology ◽  
Oncology Providers

e24012 Background: Frailty is an under recognized yet clinically important consideration in treatment decision making for older adults with cancer. The Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) is considered gold standard for recognition of frailty and is endorsed by the International Society of Geriatric Oncology. Additionally, multiple screening tools have been validated to reliably detect frailty. Nevertheless, studies suggest that formal screening for frailty is not prevalent in community oncology practices and that oncologists’ clinical judgement is not as sensitive in identifying frailty as CGA. This survey was designed to assess the perceptions of frailty amongst oncology providers, as well as the prevalence and method of frailty screening in these practices. Methods: After approval by an independent research ethics board, a secure online survey was circulated amongst community oncology providers within the TriHealth Cancer Institute, including MD’s, DO’s, and NP’s, via email. Survey was live from January 24th to February 12th. Data was analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results: There were 20 total respondents from medical, surgical, gynecologic, and radiation oncology, 70% MD/DO. 70% of total respondents reported having > 50% of their patients over the age of 65. All respondents reported being familiar with the concept of frailty and the ECOG performance status, while only 45% had heard of CGA. 40% respondents reported that they screen for frailty and all used ECOG alone or along with Karnofsky, none used CGA or other validated screening tools. 60% respondents did not formally assess frailty, however all but one felt frailty assessment to be beneficial. Most commonly cited barriers to screening were time restraints and lack of availability of follow up services. Conclusions: Despite proven clinical benefit of CGA and various validated screening tools, few oncology providers screen for frailty. Furthermore, only 45% report having heard of CGA while none incorporate it in their practice. This shows that professional education amongst oncology providers is needed to promote the use of CGA or alternative frailty screening measures to improve outcomes in older adults with cancer. Additionally, strategies must be implemented that would mitigate time restraints and lack of access to follow up services so that these providers may be more inclined to conduct such frailty assessments. Limitations of this study include potential for reporting bias and indeterminate generalizability. Next steps include quality improvement initiative of implementing a frailty screening tool in these practices.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document