Apnea–hypopnea index severity as an independent predictor of post-tonsillectomy respiratory complications in pediatric patients: A retrospective study

2021 ◽  
pp. 014556132110594
Author(s):  
Nicholas A Rossi ◽  
Jordan Spaude ◽  
Jason F Ohlstein ◽  
Harold S Pine ◽  
Shiva Daram ◽  
...  

Introduction Despite the presence of clinical practice guidelines for overnight admission of pediatric patients following adenotonsillectomy, variance in practice patterns exists between pediatric otolaryngologists. The purpose of this study is to examine severity of apnea–hypopnea index (AHI) as an independent predictor of postoperative respiratory complications in children undergoing adenotonsillectomy. Methods Retrospective chart review of all children undergoing adenotonsillectomy at a large tertiary referral center between January 2015 and December 2019 who underwent preoperative polysomnography and were admitted for overnight observation. Charts were reviewed for total adverse events and respiratory events occurring during admission. Results Overall, respiratory events were seen in 50.6% of patients with AHI ≥10 and in 39.6% of patients with AHI <10. The overall mean AHI was 19.2, with a mean of 28.1 in the AHI ≥10 subgroup vs 4.6 in the AHI <10 subgroup. There was no statistical correlation or increased risk between an AHI ≥10 and having a pure respiratory event, with a relative risk of 1.19 (.77–1.83, P = .43). There was a statistically significant difference between the mean AHI of those with any adverse event and those without (21.6 vs 13.4, P = .008). There is additionally an increased risk of any event with an AHI over 10, with a relative risk of 1.51 (1.22–1.88, P < .0001). Conclusion Preoperative AHI of 10 events per hour was not a predictor of postoperative respiratory complications. However, there was a trend for those with a higher AHI requiring additional supportive measures or a prolonged stay. Practitioners should always use their best judgment in deciding whether a child warrants postoperative admission following adenotonsillectomy.

2013 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 269-276 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marianne R. Whittaker

BACKGROUND Pediatric patients may be at an increased risk of adverse effects from various medications. Recently, there have been a number of serious adverse events, including several pediatric patients experiencing severe respiratory depression and death as a result of the use of codeine for pain control following tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy. OBJECTIVE To assess the safety of opioid agonists in pediatric patients undergoing operative procedures or have experienced trauma and to evaluate the risk of respiratory depression and death among this population. METHODS PubMed and Medline were searched to identify randomized controlled studies from 1994 to 2012 addressing postsurgery/trauma opioid use in pediatric patients. Relative risks and confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using data available in clinical trials. RESULTS A total of 16 clinical trials were evaluated for this review. Randomized controlled trials included studies comparing opioids versus non-opioids for a variety of painful conditions. The relative risk of respiratory depression associated with opioid use in 1 trial was 1.63 (95% CI: 0.64–6.13). The remaining 15 trials reviewed described no significant difference in respiratory depression or adverse effects associated with treatment. No deaths were attributed to opioid use in any of these studies. CONCLUSION Opioid-associated respiratory depression was very rare and no deaths were reported in the reviewed studies. These findings under the well-defined conditions of controlled studies may not be the best means of determining overall opioid-associated side effects in pediatric patients.


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S177-S177
Author(s):  
Kate Pape ◽  
Sarah Zavala ◽  
Rita Gayed ◽  
Melissa Reger ◽  
Kendrea Jones ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Oxandrolone is an anabolic steroid that is the standard of care for burn patients experiencing hypermetabolism. Previous studies have demonstrated the benefits of oxandrolone, including increased body mass and improved wound healing. One of the common side effects of oxandrolone is transaminitis, occurring in 5–15% of patients, but little is known about associated risk factors with the development of transaminitis. A recent multicenter study in adults found that younger age and those receiving concurrent intravenous vasopressors or amiodarone were more likely to develop transaminitis while on oxandrolone. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence and identify risk factors for the development of transaminitis in pediatric burn patients receiving oxandrolone therapy. Methods This was a multicenter, retrospective risk factor analysis that included pediatric patients with thermal burn injury (total body surface area [TBSA] &gt; 10%) who received oxandrolone over a 5-year time period. The primary outcome of the study was the development of transaminitis while on oxandrolone therapy, which was defined as aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) &gt;100 mg/dL. Secondary outcomes included mortality, length of stay, and change from baseline ALT/AST. Results A total of 55 pediatric patients from 5 burn centers met inclusion criteria. Of those, 13 (23.6%) developed transaminitis, and the mean time to development of transaminitis was 17 days. Patients who developed transaminitis were older (12 vs 6.4 years, p = 0.01) and had a larger mean %TBSA (45.9 vs 34.1, p = 0.03). The odds of developing transaminitis increased by 23% for each 1 year increase in age (OR 1.23, CI 1.06–1.44). The use of other concurrent medications was not associated with an increased risk of developing transaminitis. Renal function and hepatic function was not associated with the development of transaminitis. There was no significant difference in length of stay and mortality. Conclusions Transaminitis occurred in 23.6% of our study population and was associated with patients who were older and had a larger mean %TBSA burn. Older pediatric patients with larger burns who are receiving oxandrolone should be closely monitored for the development of transaminitis. Applicability of Research to Practice Future research is needed to identify appropriate monitoring and management of transaminitis in oxandrolone-treated pediatric burn patients.


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S148-S149
Author(s):  
Andrea C Grote ◽  
Alexandra M Lacey ◽  
Warren L Garner ◽  
Justin Gillenwater ◽  
Ellen Maniago ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction American Burn Association guidelines recommend that all pediatric burns be transferred to a burn center if their presenting hospital lacks the necessary personnel or equipment for their care. Our institution often treats small (&lt; 10% TBSA) burns in pediatric patients as outpatients with a non-daily dressing. The aim of this study was to determine if small pediatric burns could be managed in an outpatient manner and risk factors for failure. Methods A retrospective chart review was conducted from July 2016 to July 2019 at a single ABA-verified burn center. All patients under the age of 18 who presented for evaluation were included. Post burn day, age, sex, TBSA, burn etiology, body area burned, burn dressing type, outpatient versus inpatient management, reason(s) for admission, and any operative intervention were collected. Results In total, 742 patients were included in our cohort (Table 1). The most common burn etiologies were scald (68%), contact (20%), and flame (5%). From initial presentation, 101 patients (14%), mean TBSA 9%, were admitted to the burn unit and 641 patients (86%), mean TBSA 3%, were treated outpatient. Of those, 613 (96%) were treated entirely outpatient and 28 (4%) were admitted at a later date. There were no significant differences in age (p=0.6) nor gender distribution between those who were successfully treated outpatient and those who failed. There was a significant difference (p &lt; 0.001) in TBSA between the patients who were treated successfully as outpatients (3±2%) versus those who failed outpatient care (4±3%). The primary reason for admission of these patients was nutrition optimization (61%). Conclusions The vast majority of small pediatric burns can be treated as an outpatient with a non-daily dressing with good results. Over 80% of pediatric patients seen in our clinic were successfully managed in this manner. As suspected, when the burns are larger in size (&gt;4% TBSA) there is a potential increased risk for admission especially with regards to poor PO intake, so this requires close monitoring and family education. Applicability of Research to Practice Pediatric patients with small burns can be safely managed in an outpatient setting with a non-daily dressing. Those who fail will most likely fail from poor PO intake at home.


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. e000483 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tham Thi Le ◽  
Siyeon Park ◽  
Michelle Choi ◽  
Marniker Wijesinha ◽  
Bilal Khokhar ◽  
...  

BackgroundOpioids and sedatives are commonly prescribed in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients for symptoms of dyspnoea, pain, insomnia, depression and anxiety. Older adults are advised to avoid these medications due to increased adverse events, including respiratory events. This study examines respiratory event risks associated with concomitant opioid and sedative use compared with opioid use alone in older adults with COPD.MethodsA 5% nationally representative sample of Medicare beneficiaries with COPD and opioid use between 2009 and 2013 was used for this retrospective cohort study. Current and past concomitant use were identified using drug dispensed within 7 days from the censored date: at respiratory event, at death, or at 12 months post index. Concomitant opioid and sedative use were categorised into no overlap (opioid only), 1 to 10, 11 to 30, 31 to 60 and >60 days of total overlap. The primary outcome was hospitalisation or emergency department (ED) visits for respiratory events (COPD exacerbations or respiratory depression). Propensity score matching was implemented and semi-competing risk models were used to address competing risk by death.ResultsAmong 48 120 eligible beneficiaries, 1810 (16.7%) concomitant users were matched with 9050 (83.3%) opioid only users. Current concomitant use of 1 to 10, 11 to 30 and 31 to 60 days was associated with increased respiratory events (HRs (95% CI): 2.8 (1.2 to 7.3), 9.3 (4.9 to 18.2) and 5.7 (2.5 to 12.5), respectively), compared with opioid only use. Current concomitant use of >60 days or past concomitant use of ≤60 days was not significantly associated with respiratory events. Consistent findings were found in sensitivity analyses, including in subgroup analysis of non-benzodiazepine sedatives. Additionally, current concomitant use significantly increased risk of death.ConclusionShort-term and medium-term current concomitant opioid and sedative use significantly increased risk of respiratory events and death in older COPD Medicare beneficiaries. Long-term past concomitant users, however, demonstrated lower risks of these outcomes, possibly reflecting a healthy user effect or developed tolerance to the effects of these agents.


2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10029-10029
Author(s):  
S. L. Eichstadt ◽  
G. V. Dahl ◽  
P. G. Fisher ◽  
J. M. Ford ◽  
J. D. Schiffman

10029 Background: The association between family history of cancer (FHC) and outcome remains uncertain. Relapse and survival of children with FHC has not been well studied. Such information would be valuable for prognosis, refining treatment protocols, and long-term follow-up in pediatric patients with FHC. Methods: An historical cohort study of all pediatric patients diagnosed with cancer at Lucile Packard Children's Hospital at Stanford from 1999 - 2002 was performed (n = 363, mean age: 8.4 yrs [0–28 yrs]). FHC among 1st, 2nd and 3rd degree relatives was obtained from the first 10 consecutive encounters in the electronic medical record. Relapse, secondary malignancy, and survival data were also acquired. The relative risks for these endpoints were calculated between patients with FHC among 1st and/or 2nd degree relatives and those with negative FHC. Patients without documented FHC were excluded (n = 100). Results: 108 (41%) newly diagnosed pediatric patients had reported FHC (1st Degree: n = 14 [5%], 2nd Degree: n = 58 [22%], 3rd Degree: n = 36 [14%]). Patients with reported FHC among 1st and/or 2nd degree relatives were at increased relative risk [RR] for relapse (1.96, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.27–3.02) compared to patients with negative FHC (n = 191). In particular, patients with Hodgkin Disease (HD) and FHC (n = 12) were more likely to relapse (RR 1.79, 95% CI 1.19–2.72) and at increased risk of death (RR 1.72, 95% CI 1.18–2.53), compared to HD with negative FHC (n = 8). Similarly, patients diagnosed with ALL and FHC (n = 22) had increased risk of death (RR 2.25, 95% CI 1.06–4.8) compared to ALL patients with negative FHC (n = 56). For patients diagnosed with any pediatric cancer and positive FHC in 1st degree relative, RR of death was significantly elevated (3.74, 95% CI 1.20–11.70). Conclusions: Pediatric cancer patients with positive FHC among 1st and/or 2nd degree relatives appear to have higher relative risk of relapse compared to those with negative FHC. Additionally, an increased risk of death was associated with HD and ALL patients with positive FHC. Patients with 1st degree relative with malignancy had an increased risk for death compared to those without cancer among 1st degree relatives. These findings may reflect underlying genetic predispositions in children which contribute to outcome. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9622-9622
Author(s):  
D. T. Chu ◽  
S. Hapani ◽  
S. Wu

9622 Background: Bevacizumab is a recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody that inhibits vascular endothelial growth factor. It is a widely used angiogenesis inhibitor in the treatment of colorectal cancer (CRC) and other solid tumors. Gastrointestinal (GI) perforation is a potentially fatal adverse event associated with bevacizumab, but the risk unclear. This study was conducted to determine the risk of developing GI perforation among CRC and non-CRC patients receiving bevacizumab. Methods: Databases from PUBMED and the Web Science from January 1966 until July 2008 and abstracts presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology conferences from January 2000 to through July 2008 were searched to identify relevant studies. Eligible studies included prospective phase III clinical trials in which standard anti-neoplastic therapy was administered with and without the use of bevacizumab with available data for GI perforation. Summary incidence rate, relative risk (RR), and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using fixed or random effect models based upon the heterogeneity of the included studies. Results: A total of 12084 patients with various solid tumors from 14 phase III trials were included for analysis. Among patients receiving bevacizumab, the incidence of GI perforation was 0.8% (95% CI: 0.6–1.1%), and RR was 2.0 (95% CI: 1.1–3.8, p = 0.028) in compared with controls. The risk of GI perforation was significantly increased in patients receiving bevacizumab at 5 mg/kg/week (RR 2.6, 95% CI: 1.0–6.6, p=0.04), but not at 2.5 mg/kg/week (RR=1.5, 95%CI: 0.7–3.3, p=0.3). Among 2151 patients with CRC, the incidence of GI perforation was 0.8% (95% CI: 0.5–1.6%); while for 2.999 patients with non-CRC malignancies, the incidence of GI perforation was 0.7% (95% CI: 0.5–1.1%); The relative risk of GI perforation varied with tumor type, with significantly increased risk observed in patients with CRC (RR = 3.1, 95% CI: 1.2–8.2, p<0.023), but not non-CRC (RR=1.5, 95% CI: 0.67–3.4, p=0.3). Conclusions: There is a significant difference in the risk of developing GI perforation in CRC and non-CRC patients receiving bevacizumab with a higher relative risk in patients with CRC. Further investigation into the etiology of this difference is recommended. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. E6-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruce Gao ◽  
Taylor Remondini ◽  
Navraj Dhaliwal ◽  
Adrian Frusescu ◽  
Premal Patel ◽  
...  

Introduction: Circumcision is the most common surgical procedure performed by pediatric urologists. Ketorolac has been shown to have an efficacy similar to morphine in multimodal analgesic regimens without the commonly associated adverse effects. Concerns with perioperative bleeding limit the use of ketorolac as an adjunct for pain control in surgical patients. As such, we sought to evaluate our institutional outcomes with respect to ketorolac and postoperative bleeding.Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all pediatric patients undergoing circumcision from January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2015 at the Alberta Children’s Hospital. Demographics, perioperative analgesic regimens, and return to emergency department or clinic for bleeding were gathered through chart review.Results: A total of 475 patients undergoing circumcisions were studied, including 150 (32%) who received perioperative ketorolac and 325 (68%) who received standard analgesia. Patients receiving ketorolac were more likely to return to the emergency department or clinic for bleeding (ketorolac group 19/150 [13%], non-ketorolac group 16/325 [5.0%]; p=0.005). Patients receiving ketorolac were more likely to have postoperative sanguineous drainage (ketorolac group 96/150 [64%], non-ketorolac group 150/325 [46%]; p<0.001). There was no significant difference in the number of patients requiring postoperative admission or further medical intervention.Conclusions: Although a promising analgesic, ketorolac requires additional investigation for safe usage in circumcisions due to possible increased risk of bleeding.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yang Ge ◽  
Huiyun Zhang ◽  
Nathaniel Weygant ◽  
Jiannan Yao

Background: As immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) transition to the forefront of cancer treatment, a better understanding of immune related adverse events (IRAEs) is essential to promote safe clinical practice. Dermatologic adverse events are the most common IRAEs and can lead to drug withdrawal and decreased quality of life. This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the risk of the most prevalent dermatologic adverse events (pruritus and rash) among various ICI treatment regimens.Methods: A systematic search of electronic databases was performed to identify qualified randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Data for any grade and high grade pruritus and rash were extracted for meta-analysis. Two reviewers independently assessed methodological quality. The relative risk summary and 95% confidence interval were calculated.Results: 50 RCTs involving 29941 patients were analyzed. The risk of pruritus (2.15 and 4.21 relative risk respectively) and rash (1.61 and 3.89 relative risk respectively) developing from CTLA-4 or PD-1/-L1 inhibitor were increased compared to placebo, but this effect was not dose-dependent. PD-1/-L1 plus CTLA-4 inhibitor was associated with increased risk of pruritus (1.76 and 0.98 relative risk respectively) and rash (1.72 and 1.37 relative risk respectively) compared to either monotherapy. Compared with CTLA-4 inhibitor, PD-1/-L1 inhibitor had a significantly decreased risk of pruritus and rash in both monotherapy and combination therapy (0.65 and 0.29 relative risk respectively). No significant difference was found between PD-1/-L1 inhibitor combined with chemotherapy and PD-1/-L1 monotherapy in any grade and high grade rash (0.84 and 1.43 relative risk respectively). In subgroup analyses, PD-1 inhibitor was associated with reduced risk of pruritus and rash compared to PD-L1 inhibitor.Conclusion: Our meta-analysis demonstrates a better safety profile for PD-1/-L1 inhibitor compared to CTLA-4 inhibitor in terms of pruritus and rash among both monotherapy and multiple combination therapies. PD-L1 inhibitor may contribute to an increased risk of pruritus and rash compared to PD-1 inhibitor.


Author(s):  
Daniel R. Morales ◽  
Mitchell M. Conover ◽  
Seng Chan You ◽  
Nicole Pratt ◽  
Kristin Kostka ◽  
...  

AbstractIntroductionAngiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) could influence infection risk of coronavirus disease (COVID-19). Observational studies to date lack pre-specification, transparency, rigorous ascertainment adjustment and international generalizability, with contradictory results.MethodsUsing electronic health records from Spain (SIDIAP) and the United States (Columbia University Irving Medical Center and Department of Veterans Affairs), we conducted a systematic cohort study with prevalent ACE, ARB, calcium channel blocker (CCB) and thiazide diuretic (THZ) users to determine relative risk of COVID-19 diagnosis and related hospitalization outcomes. The study addressed confounding through large-scale propensity score adjustment and negative control experiments.ResultsFollowing over 1.1 million antihypertensive users identified between November 2019 and January 2020, we observed no significant difference in relative COVID-19 diagnosis risk comparing ACE/ARB vs CCB/THZ monotherapy (hazard ratio: 0.98; 95% CI 0.84 - 1.14), nor any difference for mono/combination use (1.01; 0.90 - 1.15). ACE alone and ARB alone similarly showed no relative risk difference when compared to CCB/THZ monotherapy or mono/combination use. Directly comparing ACE vs. ARB demonstrated a moderately lower risk with ACE, non-significant for monotherapy (0.85; 0.69 - 1.05) and marginally significant for mono/combination users (0.88; 0.79 - 0.99). We observed, however, no significant difference between drug-classes for COVID-19 hospitalization or pneumonia risk across all comparisons.ConclusionThere is no clinically significant increased risk of COVID-19 diagnosis or hospitalization with ACE or ARB use. Users should not discontinue or change their treatment to avoid COVID-19.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhongxing Zhang ◽  
Ming Qi ◽  
Gordana Hügli ◽  
Ramin Khatami

AbstractObstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) is a common sleep disorder. Severe OSAS defined as apnea–hypopnea index (AHI) ≥ 30/h is a risk factor for developing cerebro-cardiovascular diseases. The mechanisms of how repetitive sleep apneas/hypopneas damage cerebral hemodynamics are still not well understood. In this study, changes in blood volume (BV) and oxygen saturation (StO2) in the left forehead of 29 newly diagnosed severe OSAS patients were measured by frequency-domain near-infrared spectroscopy during an incremental continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) titration protocol together with polysomnography. The coefficients of variation of BV (CV-BV) and the decreases of StO2 (de-StO2) of more than 2000 respiratory events were predicted using linear mixed-effect models, respectively. We found that longer events and apneas rather than hypopneas induce larger changes in CV-BV and stronger cerebral desaturation. Respiratory events occurring during higher baseline StO2 before their onsets, during rapid-eye-movement sleep and those associated with higher heart rate induce smaller changes in CV-BV and de-StO2. The stepwise increased CPAP pressures can attenuate these changes. These results suggest that in severe OSAS the length and the type of respiratory event rather than widely used AHI may be better parameters to indicate the severity of cerebral hemodynamic changes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document