Do we still need professional boundaries? The multiple influences of boundaries on interprofessional collaboration

2022 ◽  
pp. 017084062210741
Author(s):  
Tomas Farchi ◽  
Sue Dopson ◽  
Ewan Ferlie

Although a body of research suggests that interprofessional collaboration is hindered by the presence of professional boundaries, more recent work has demonstrated that removing these boundaries also has negative consequences for collaboration. To address these paradoxical findings, we examine two different team-level initiatives that aimed at softening and breaking down professional boundaries, drawing on data gathered from 78 in-depth interviews and two years of observations of four cross-occupational teams in the English National Health Service. Our inductive analysis of this data shows that professionals use boundaries and their manifestations —which become apparent through materialization, articulation, and embodiment— to identify and retrieve professional categories. The conspicuous presence of boundaries allows professionals to anticipate other team members’ expertise and roles, as well as different aspects of team tasks. We theorize our findings by showing how professional boundaries can be positively interlaced with interprofessional collaboration by making visible and grounding naturalized systems of classification.

2018 ◽  
Vol 64 (3) ◽  
pp. 659-693 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rene Wiedner ◽  
Saku Mantere

Based on a longitudinal, qualitative analysis of developments in the English National Health Service, we develop a process model of how organizations divest or spin off units with the aim of establishing two or more autonomous organizational entities while simultaneously managing their continued interdependencies. We find that effective organizational separation depends on generating two types of respect—appraisal and recognition respect—between the divesting and divested units. Appraisal respect involves showing appreciation for competence or the effort to achieve it, while recognition respect requires considering what someone cares about—such as values or concerns—and acknowledging that they matter. The process model we develop shows that open communication is crucial to the development of both. We also find that certain attempts to gain organizational independence and respect may unintentionally undermine the development of autonomy. Counterintuitively, we find that increasing or maintaining interorganizational links via communication may facilitate organizational separation, while attempts by units to distance themselves from one another may unintentionally inhibit it. By linking organizational separation, autonomy, independence, and respect, this paper develops theory on organizational separation processes and more generally enhances our understanding of organizational autonomy and its relations with mutual respect.


Author(s):  
Russell Mannion ◽  
Huw Davies ◽  
Stephen Harrison ◽  
Frederick Konteh ◽  
Rowena Jacobs ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 28 (8) ◽  
pp. 482-489 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Aggarwal ◽  
J. Nossiter ◽  
P. Cathcart ◽  
J. van der Meulen ◽  
J. Rashbass ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document