Polysubstance Use, Mood Disorders, and Chronic Conditions With Anxiety in Opioid Patients

2021 ◽  
pp. 019394592110319
Author(s):  
Sophia Liu ◽  
Christian Nwabueze ◽  
Yue Pan ◽  
Suzy Mascaro Walter ◽  
Brenda Su ◽  
...  

This study examined the associations of polysubstance use, mood disorders, and chronic conditions with the history of anxiety disorder among patients with opioid use disorder (OUD). We performed a secondary analysis of the baseline data from a clinical trial including 1,645 individuals with OUD, of which 513 had anxiety disorder. Substance use disorders (SUDs) included alcohol, amphetamines, cannabis, cocaine, and sedative use disorders. Mood disorders included major depressive disorder (MDD) and bipolar disorder (BD). Chronic conditions were allergies, gastrointestinal problem(s), skin problem(s), and hypertension. Sedative use disorder, MDD, BD, skin problems, and hypertension were significantly associated with anxiety disorder ( p < 0.05). Additionally, more than two SUDs, two mood disorders, and more than two chronic conditions were significantly associated with anxiety disorder ( p < 0.05). These findings highlight the comorbid mental health and physical health problems in individuals with OUD, as well as the need for integrated multidisciplinary treatment plans.

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Edsall ◽  
Kim A. Hoffman ◽  
Dinh Thanh Thuy ◽  
Pham Phuong Mai ◽  
Nguyen Thu Hang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Heroin use continues to drive HIV transmission in Vietnam, but methamphetamine and alcohol use are growing rapidly and, as in other countries, polysubstance use is widespread. The objective of this study was to understand the interplay between heroin, methamphetamine, and alcohol use among people with opioid use disorder (OUD) and HIV in Vietnam. Methods We conducted 44 in-depth, face-to-face qualitative interviews with people with OUD and HIV who participated in the BRAVO trial of buprenorphine versus methadone in five Vietnam HIV clinics. Interviews probed participants’ experiences of heroin, methamphetamine, and alcohol use and their interplay with HIV/OUD treatment. Interviews were professionally transcribed and analyzed using a thematic analysis approach. Results Of 44 participants interviewed 42 were male, on average 38.8 years of age, with 30 reporting a history of methamphetamine use and 33 reporting a history of alcohol use. Several themes emerged: 1) Methamphetamine and alcohol were perceived to have lower addiction potential than heroin 2) Social settings were key facilitators of alcohol and methamphetamine use 3) Some participants, but not all, used methamphetamine to help quit heroin 4) Consuming alcohol blunted the effects of heroin, while paradoxically serving as a catalyst for heroin use 5) Use of methamphetamine was perceived by many participants to be incompatible with treatment for HIV. Conclusions Participant experiences reflected a significant impact of polysubstance use on treatment of HIV and OUD. Patterns of polysubstance use are subject to common preconceptions of alcohol and methamphetamine as having a low addictive potential, and these substances are deeply enmeshed in the social life of many people with OUD in Vietnam. Interventions to address complex social norms and potential harms of polysubstance use are urgently needed as the population of people receiving medication for OUD (MOUD) increases in Vietnam and globally. Trial registration BRAVO - NCT01936857, September 2013.


2016 ◽  
Vol 33 (S1) ◽  
pp. S300-S301
Author(s):  
S. Herrera ◽  
A. Riquelme ◽  
T. León ◽  
M. Babul

IntroductionOver the past two decades the prescription of opioid analgesics has increased with a subsequent escalating in prescription opioid misuse. It is estimated that 4.5 million (2.5%) of the United States of America population abuse of pain relievers; opioids are among the most commonly.In Chile there are few reports about the prevalence of opioid use disorder.ObjectivesThe aim of this study is to describe the demographic characteristics, medical and psychiatric comorbidity of patients that suffer from opioid addiction.Patients and methodsThis transversal study examined data of 7 patients with opioid use disorder (OUD; DSM-5) that consulted at the addiction unit of “Red de Salud, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile”, between November 2013 and October 2015. Data included: demographics, medical and psychiatric history, laboratory and imaging tests.ResultsOf all the patients, 57% were men, 25 to 67 years of age, 43% between 35-40 years; 57% were married; 57% had completed studies at university. 43% had also alcohol use disorder, 28% marijuana, 28% cocaine and 28% benzodiazepines than in most cases began before OUD. In addition; 57% had medical comorbidity among which stand out obesity (17%), osteoarthritis (17%) and chronic low back pain (17%). Eighty-three percent require hospitalization. Twenty-eight percent had abnormal liver tests and one patient had positive hepatitis B core antibody. Opioids used were: morphine(14%), codeine (43%), tramadol (42%).ConclusionThese results emphasize on the misuse of prescription opioids analgesics, the complexity of patients with OUD and the prevalence of other substance use disorder that precedes and accompany OUD.Disclosure of interestThe authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.


2020 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Matisyahu Shulman ◽  
Sean Luo ◽  
Aimee N. C. Campbell ◽  
Jennifer Scodes ◽  
Martina Pavlicova ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mathieu CHAPPUY ◽  
Fadi MEROUEH ◽  
Benoit TROJAK ◽  
Jérôme BACHELLIER ◽  
Patrick BENDIMERAD ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Extended-release buprenorphine (XR-BUP) are new pharmaceutical products that offer a one-week-, one-month- or six-months-long buprenorphine treatment for subjects with opioid use disorder (OUD). OUD is frequent in incarcerated populations, and XR-BUP has been suggested to be an interesting treatment option in prison. However, some opioid users have deemed that XR-BUP could constitute a threat to the individual freedom of occasionally using drugs, and was also at risk to be coercively used in some situations. It was thus needed to explore whether incarcerated people with OUD were ready to try XR-BUP formulations, and which reasons could warrant their possible interest or apprehension.Methods: This is a secondary analysis of a survey performed between 12/02/2018 and 05/31/2019 among 366 patients with OUD. Participants were recruited in 68 addiction French settings, among which six were prison medical centers. Bivariable and multivariable comparisons between incarcerated and non-incarcerated interviewees with respect to their readiness to try XR-BUP and the reasons of interest in this new option. Odds ratios and their 95% confidence intervals (aORs; 95%CI) were adjusted for gender, age category, level of education, and type of opioid agonist treatment.Results: The data of 317 participants were included in the analyses. While 108 (48.9%) of the 221 non-incarcerated interviewees declared being ready to try XR-BUP, they were 63.5% (61 out of 96) among those incarcerated (p =0.016). Adjusted comparisons found that incarcerated were significantly less attracted by the potential of XR-BUP to reduce withdrawal symptoms (aOR= 0.54; 95%CI= 0.29 – 0.99), and to reduce misuse of buprenorphine (aOR= 0.56; 95%CI= 0.34 – 0.94), but more attracted by receiving a constantly efficacious treatment for a week or month (aOR= 2.91; 95%CI= 1.21 – 6.98), and have a more discreet treatment (aOR= 1.76; 95%CI= 1.01 – 3.10).Conclusions: Relative to non-incarcerated subjects with OUD, those in prison were readier to try XR-BUP and they seemed more attracted by practicability and discretion features.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Walter C. Prozialeck ◽  
Peter C. Lamar ◽  
Michael Krupp ◽  
Matthew Moon ◽  
Laura E. Phelps ◽  
...  

Kratom (Mitragyna speciosa, Korth.) is an evergreen tree that is indigenous to Southeast Asia. When ingested, kratom leaves or decoctions from the leaves have been reported to produce complex stimulant and opioid-like effects. For generations, native populations in Southeast Asia have used kratom products to stave off fatigue, improve mood, alleviate pain and manage symptoms of opioid withdrawal. Despite the long history of kratom use in Asia, it is only within the past 10–20 years that kratom has emerged as an important herbal agent in the United States, where it is being used for the self-treatment of pain, opioid withdrawal symptoms, and mood disorders. The increase in the use of kratom in the United States has coincided with the serious epidemic of opioid abuse and dependence. Since 2015, efforts to restrict access to prescription opioids have resulted in a marked increase in the use of “street” opioids such as heroin and illicit fentanyl. At the same time, many patients with chronic pain conditions or opioid use disorder have been denied access to appropriate medical help. The lack of access to care for patients with chronic pain and opioid use disorder has been magnified by the emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic. In this report, we highlight how these converging factors have led to a surge in interest in kratom as a potential harm reduction agent in the treatment of pain and opioid use disorder.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-3
Author(s):  
John Koo ◽  
Gregory D. Deans

Bacteria of the Burkholderia cepacia complex have rarely been reported to cause septic arthritis. Cases have been reported in patients who were immunocompromised, at extremes of age or who had history of steroid injection or penetrating trauma. A 67-year-old man with a history of opioid use disorder, osteoarthritis, and gout but no known immunocompromise was admitted to hospital with pain and swelling of his right knee. Cultures of synovial fluid and urine grew Burkholderia cepacia complex. Microscopy of synovial fluid also identified intracellular calcium pyrophosphate crystals. The patient’s symptoms improved with joint irrigation and debridement and prolonged antimicrobial therapy. This case highlights the importance of diagnostic aspiration of an acutely inflamed joint to obtain a specific etiological diagnosis.


2020 ◽  
pp. 193864002095010
Author(s):  
James M. Parrish ◽  
Rushabh M. Vakharia ◽  
Dillon C. Benson ◽  
Aaron K. Hoyt ◽  
Nathaniel W. Jenkins ◽  
...  

Background Patients with a history of opioid use disorder (OUD) tend to have more complications, higher readmission rates, and increased costs following orthopaedic procedures. This study evaluated patients undergoing hallux valgus correction for their odds of increased (1) readmission rates, (2) emergency room (ER) visits, and (3) costs. Methods Patients undergoing hallux valgus corrections with OUD history were identified using a national Medicare administrative claims database of approximately 24 million orthopaedic surgery patients. OUD patients were matched to non–opioid use disorder (NUD) patients in a 1:4 ratio by age, sex, Elixhauser-Comorbidity Index (ECI), diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, and tobacco use. The query yielded 6318 patients (OUD = 1276; NUD = 5042) who underwent a hallux valgus correction. Primary outcomes analyzed included odds of 90-day readmission rates, 30-day ER visits, and 90-day episode-of-care costs. Demographics, odds ratios (ORs), ECI, and cost were assessed as appropriate using a Pearson χ2 test, logistic regression, and a t test. A P value <.05 was considered statistically significant. Results There were no significant differences in demographics between OUD and NUD patients. OUD patients had higher incidence and odds of 90-day readmission (9.56% vs 6.04%; OR = 1.55; P < .001) and 30-day ER visits (0.86% vs 0.35%; OR = 2.42; P = .021) and incurred greater 90-day episode-of-care costs ($7208.28 vs $6134.75; P < .001) compared with NUD patient controls. Conclusion The study demonstrates the possible influence of OUD on higher odds of readmission, ER visits, and costs following a hallux valgus correction. Levels of Evidence Level III: Retrospective cohort study


2020 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
pp. 117822182095339
Author(s):  
Andrea J Yatsco ◽  
Rachel D Garza ◽  
Tiffany Champagne-Langabeer ◽  
James R Langabeer

Opioid overdoses continue to be a leading cause of death in the US. This public health crisis warrants innovative responses to help prevent fatal overdose. There is continued advocacy for collaborations between public health partners to create joint responses. The high correlation between persons with opioid use disorder who have a history of involvement in the criminal justice system is widely recognized, and allows for treatment intervention opportunities. Law enforcement-led treatment initiatives are still relatively new, with a few sparse early programs emerging almost a decade ago and only gaining popularity in the past few years. A lack of published methodologies creates a gap in the knowledge of applied programs that are effective and can be duplicated. This article seeks to outline an interagency relationship between police and healthcare that illustrates arrest is not the only option that law enforcement may utilize when encountering persons who use illicit substances. Program methods of a joint initiative between law enforcement and healthcare in a large, metropolitan area will be reviewed, supplemented with law enforcement overdose data and statistics on law enforcement treatment referrals.


2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-11
Author(s):  
James B. Talmage

Abstract The duration of opioid therapy after surgery is the strongest known predictor of ultimate misuse, and researchers have reported that the number of days for which medication was prescribed and the total number of postoperative prescriptions each predicts long-term use. This article addresses the question of rating the impairment for an individual with no history of substance use disorder before a work injury, who is prescribed opioids for this injury, and who subsequently develops opioid use disorder (OUD). The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, should be used in conjunction with the AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment, (AMA Guides), Sixth Edition. A person who is prescribed opioids is not yet at maximum medical improvement (MMI) and cannot be rated. Referral for substantiation of the diagnosis and for initiation of treatment are necessary before OUD is confirmed and the patient is at MMI. The AMA Guides is based on impairments of activities of daily living (ADL), so a patient's MMI should result in a happy outcome and no impairment, although the burden of treatment compliance may be a relevant consideration. The article concludes with an extensive literature review, including abstracts of published articles regarding OUD in various settings.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document