How Is Psychological Outcome Related to Knee Function and Return to Sport Among Adolescent Athletes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction?

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (7) ◽  
pp. 1567-1575 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susanne Beischer ◽  
Eric Hamrin Senorski ◽  
Christoffer Thomeé ◽  
Kristian Samuelsson ◽  
Roland Thomeé
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Self Efficacy ◽  
Muscle Function ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Return To Sport ◽  
Adolescent Athletes ◽  
Psychological Outcome ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Background: Adult patients who succeed in returning to their preinjury levels of sport after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction have been characterized by a more positive psychological response. It is not known whether this relationship is valid for adolescent athletes. Purpose: To investigate psychological readiness to return to sport, knee-related self-efficacy, and motivation among adolescent (15-20 years old) and adult (21-30 years old) athletes after ACL reconstruction. A further aim was to compare athletes (15-30 years old) who had recovered their muscle function and returned to sport with athletes who had not. Study Design: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Data were extracted from a rehabilitation-specific register 8 and 12 months after ACL reconstruction. Athletes previously involved in knee-strenuous sport who had undergone primary ACL reconstruction were included. Data comprised psychological patient-reported outcomes and results from 5 tests of muscle function. Comparisons were performed between age groups, between athletes who had and had not recovered their muscle function, and between patients who had returned to sport and not. Results: In all, 384 (50% females) and 271 athletes (52% females) were included at the 8- and 12- month follow-ups, respectively. Enhanced self-efficacy was reported at both follow-ups by adolescents and by athletes who had recovered their muscle function. Athletes who had recovered their muscle function reported higher ( P = .0007) motivation to achieve their goals. Subgroup analyses on patient sex revealed findings similar to those in the main analyses for females but not for males. Moreover, adolescent and adult athletes who had returned to sport reported significantly higher levels on the Knee Self-Efficacy Scale and the ACL–Return to Sport After Injury scale at both follow-ups. Conclusion: Adolescent athletes, especially females, perceived enhanced self-efficacy, had a higher return-to-sport rate, and were more motivated to reach their goals after ACL reconstruction compared with adults. Regardless of age, athletes who had returned to sport and athletes with more symmetrical muscle function had a stronger psychological profile.

Timeline for Maximal Subjective Outcome Improvement After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

2018 ◽  
Vol 47 (10) ◽  
pp. 2501-2509 ◽  
Author(s):  
Avinesh Agarwalla ◽  
Richard N. Puzzitiello ◽  
Joseph N. Liu ◽  
Gregory L. Cvetanovich ◽  
Anirudh K. Gowd ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Clinical Significance ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Return To Sport ◽  
Pubmed Database ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Clinically Significant ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Background: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears are one of the most common traumatic knee injuries experienced by athletes. Return to sport is considered the pinnacle endpoint among patients receiving ACL reconstruction. However, at the time of return to sport, patients may not be participating at their previous levels of function, as defined by clinical metrics. Purpose: To establish when patients perceive maximal subjective medical improvement according to patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Study Design: Systematic review. Methods: A systematic review of the PubMed database was conducted to identify studies that reported sequential PROMs up to a minimum of 2 years after ACL reconstruction. Pooled analysis was conducted for PROMs at follow-up points of 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years. Clinically significant improvement was determined between pairs of intervals with the minimal clinically important difference. Results: This review contains 30 studies including 2253 patients who underwent ACL reconstruction. Clinically significant improvement in the KOOS (Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score) was seen up to 1 year after ACL reconstruction, but no clinical significance was noted from 1 to 2 years. Clinically significant improvement in the IKDC (International Knee Documentation Committee) and Lysholm questionnaires was seen up to 6 months postoperatively, but no clinical significance was noted beyond that. Conclusion: After ACL reconstruction, maximal subjective medical improvement is established 1 year postoperatively, with no further perceived clinical improvement beyond this time point according to current PROMs. The KOOS may be a more responsive metric to subjective improvements in this patient cohort than other patient-reported outcomes, such as the IKDC and Lysholm. Clinical Relevance: After ACL reconstruction, patients perceive interval subjective improvements until 1 year postoperatively.

scholarly journals 726 Return to Sport, Patient Reported Outcomes and Satisfaction Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
C Simpson ◽  
D MacDonald ◽  
J Keating
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Return To Sport ◽  
Healthcare Experience ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Abstract Introduction Anterior Cruciate Ligament(ACL) rupture is a common sporting injury. Return to sport is a key objective for patients. The aim of this study was to investigate return to pre-injury level sport at 12- and 24-months post reconstruction and to relate this to types of sport and to patient satisfaction. Method A questionnaire was developed, piloted, and then completed by 77 patients that had undergone ACL reconstruction between 2013-2016. Results 30% of patients returned to pre-injury level of sport at 12 months and 43% by 24 months’ post ACL reconstruction. There was a significant(P = 0.037) relationship between the type of sports that participants played prior to injury and the return to pre-injury level. Sports that involved jumping, hard pivoting and cutting were associated with a lower rate of return to sport. General health profile of the patients was found to be significantly higher in patients that returned to sport(P = 0.024). There was a significant association with return to sport and higher satisfaction and healthcare experience score(P = 0.001). Conclusions Patient satisfaction correlated with return to sport. This was inversely related to sports involving jumping, hard pivoting and cutting. Which further illustrates how patient satisfaction post ACL reconstruction was linked to type of sport.

scholarly journals Hop tests and psychological PROs provide a demanding and clinician-friendly RTS assessment of patients after ACL reconstruction, a registry study.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ramana Piussi ◽  
Susanne Beischer ◽  
Roland Thomeé ◽  
Eric Hamrin Senorski
Keyword(s):  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Muscle Function ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Return To Sport ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Reconstruction Method ◽  
Psychological Outcome ◽  
Hop Tests ◽  
Passing Rates ◽  
Patient Reported

Abstract Background There is growing interest in assessing psychological well-being in patients after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. It is unknown whether an assessment of psychological outcome in addition to tests of muscle function can facilitate decisions on return to sport (RTS). Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate passing rates in different physical RTS test batteries, with and without the inclusion of psychological outcome measures 1 year after ACL reconstruction. Method In this cross-sectional cohort study a total of 320 patients (51% men) aged 18-65 years were included 1 year after ACL reconstruction. Passing rates on different muscle function (MF) test batteries (with results presented as Limb Symmetry Index (LSI)), consisting of knee extension and flexion strength tests, 3 hop tests, and 2 psychological patient-reported outcomes (PROs); Quality of Life subscale from the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS-QoL) and ACL Return to Sport after Injury (ACL-RSI), were evaluated 1 year after ACL reconstruction. Muscle function test batteries comprised: 2 MF tests (vertical hop and hop for distance; pass=90% LSI); 2 MF tests and 2 PRO (pass=90% LSI, 62.5 on KOOS-QoL and 76.6 on ACL-RSI), 5 MF tests (2 strength and 3 hop tests, pass=90% LSI), and 5 MF tests and 2 PRO (pass=90% LSI, 62.5 on KOOS-QoL and 76.6 on ACL-RSI). Results Passing rates in the different test batteries were 47% for 2 MF tests, 19% for 2 MF tests and 2 PROs, 29% for 5 MF tests and 13% for 5 MF tests and 2 PROs. The use of psychological PROs together with tests of muscle function gave the lowest passing rates (13%). There was a very strong correlation between passing 2 hop tests and 2 PROs and passing 5 MF tests (rφ=0.41) as well as passing 5 MF tests and 2 PROs (rφ=0.79). Conclusion The use of hop tests together with psychological PROs provides a clinician-friendly RTS test battery for assessment 1 year after ACL reconstruction as the passing rate was 19% when using 2 hop-tests combined with 2 PROs, compared with 29% when using 5 tests of MF requiring advanced testing equipment.

scholarly journals Patient-Reported Outcomes, Return-to-Sport Status, and Reinjury Rates After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Adolescent Athletes: Minimum 2-Year Follow-up

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
pp. 232596712096447
Author(s):  
Lilah Fones ◽  
Regina O. Kostyun ◽  
Andrew D. Cohen ◽  
J. Lee Pace
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Return To Sport ◽  
Knee Function ◽  
Adolescent Athletes ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Adolescent Patients ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Background: Significant variation exists in the published rates of return to sport after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR). Functional outcomes and psychological response to injury have been implicated as factors that influence return to sport. Most studies focus on patients aged in the mid-20s, and less is known about this topic in adolescents. Purpose: To report midterm ACLR results for adolescent patients with regard to return to primary sport, patient-reported outcomes, and reinjury rate. Study Design: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Adolescent athletes were contacted at a minimum of 2 years after ACLR. Patients completed 2 patient-reported outcome measures, the ACL--Return to Sport After Injury (ACL-RSI) and the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective form, and responded to questions regarding preinjury primary sport and level of competition, post-ACLR return to primary sport status, and reinjury. Results: A total of 74 patients (mean ± SD surgical age, 15.9 ± 1.5 years; follow-up age, 19.9 ± 2.0 years; response rate, 24.5%) completed the surveys at a mean of 4.0 ± 2.0 years after primary ACLR. Outcome scores averaged 90.3 ± 12.3 for IKDC and 81.6 ± 20.4 for ACL-RSI. Questionnaire responses indicated that 27.0% of patients did not return to or sustain primary sport participation after ACLR; the principal reasons were poor knee function, team/training change, and fear of another injury. Both IKDC and ACL-RSI scores were statistically lower in patients who did not successfully return to their primary sport in contrast to patients who successfully resumed their primary sport (IKDC, P = .026; ACL-RSI, P < .001). IKDC and ACL-RSI scores were moderately positively correlated with one another ( r Spearman = 0.60). There were 18 patients (reinjury rate, 24.3%) who suffered another ACL injury; 8 of these injuries included ipsilateral ACL graft tear (retear rate, 10.8%). Conclusion: In our cohort, 73% of adolescent patients successfully returned to their primary preinjury sport at a minimum of 2 years after ACLR. Both knee function and psychological responses to injury were important in determining an adolescent athlete’s return to sport. The findings support the use of the IKDC and ACL-RSI at midterm follow-up, with higher scores associated with a greater likelihood of adolescent patients returning to sport after ACLR.

scholarly journals Hop tests and psychological PROs provide a demanding and clinician-friendly RTS assessment of patients after ACL reconstruction, a registry study.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ramana Piussi ◽  
Susanne Beischer ◽  
Roland Thomeé ◽  
Eric Hamrin Senorski
Keyword(s):  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Muscle Function ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Return To Sport ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Psychological Outcome ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Hop Tests ◽  
Passing Rates ◽  
Patient Reported

Abstract Background There is growing interest in assessing psychological well-being in patients after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. It is unknown whether an assessment of psychological outcome in addition to tests of muscle function can facilitate decisions on return to sport. Therefore, the aim was to evaluate different return to sport (RTS) test batteries, comprising both muscle function and psychological outcomes 1 year after ACL. Method In this cross-sectional cohort study a total of 320 patients (51% men) aged 18-65 years were included 1 year after ACL reconstruction. Different muscle function (MF) test batteries consisting of knee extension and flexion strength tests, 3 hop tests, and 2 psychological patient-reported outcomes (PROs); Quality of Life subscale from the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS QoL) and ACL Return to Sport after Injury (ACL-RSI), 1 year after ACL reconstruction. Results Passing rates in the different test batteries varied from 47% for 2 hop tests to 13% for 5 MF tests + 2 PROs. The use of psychological PROs together with tests of muscle function gave the lowest passing rates. There was a very strong correlation between passing 2 hop tests + 2 PROs and passing 5 MF tests as well as passing 5 MF tests + 2 PROs. Conclusion The use of hop tests together with psychological PROs provides a demanding and clinician-friendly RTS test battery for assessment 1 year after ACL reconstruction.

scholarly journals Hop tests and psychological PROs provide a demanding and clinician-friendly RTS assessment of patients after ACL reconstruction, a registry study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ramana Piussi ◽  
Susanne Beischer ◽  
Roland Thomeé ◽  
Eric Hamrin Senorski
Keyword(s):  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Muscle Function ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Return To Sport ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Reconstruction Method ◽  
Psychological Outcome ◽  
Hop Tests ◽  
Passing Rates ◽  
Patient Reported

Abstract Background There is growing interest in assessing psychological well-being in patients after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. It is unknown whether an assessment of psychological outcome in addition to tests of muscle function can facilitate decisions on return to sport (RTS). Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate passing rates in different physical RTS test batteries, with and without the inclusion of psychological outcome measures 1 year after ACL reconstruction. Method In this cross-sectional cohort study a total of 320 patients (51% men) aged 18-65 years were included 1 year after ACL reconstruction. Passing rates on different muscle function (MF) test batteries (with results presented as Limb Symmetry Index (LSI)), consisting of knee extension and flexion strength tests, 3 hop tests, and 2 psychological patient-reported outcomes (PROs); Quality of Life subscale from the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS-QoL) and ACL Return to Sport after Injury (ACL-RSI), were evaluated 1 year after ACL reconstruction. Muscle function test batteries comprised: 2 MF tests (vertical hop and hop for distance; pass=90% LSI); 2 MF tests and 2 PRO (pass=90% LSI, 62.5 on KOOS-QoL and 76.6 on ACL-RSI), 5 MF tests (2 strength and 3 hop tests, pass=90% LSI), and 5 MF tests and 2 PRO (pass=90% LSI, 62.5 on KOOS-QoL and 76.6 on ACL-RSI). Results Passing rates in the different test batteries were 47% for 2 MF tests, 19% for 2 MF tests and 2 PROs, 29% for 5 MF tests and 13% for 5 MF tests and 2 PROs. The use of psychological PROs together with tests of muscle function gave the lowest passing rates (13%). There was a very strong correlation between passing 2 hop tests and 2 PROs and passing 5 MF tests (rφ=0.41) as well as passing 5 MF tests and 2 PROs (rφ=0.79). Conclusion The use of hop tests together with psychological PROs provides a clinician-friendly RTS test battery for assessment 1 year after ACL reconstruction as the passing rate was 19% when using 2 hop-tests combined with 2 PROs, compared with 29% when using 5 tests of MF requiring advanced testing equipment.

scholarly journals Association Between Psychological Readiness, Patient Reported Outcomes and Return to Sports Following Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Readiness Outcomes Affecting Return-to-Sport (ROAR)

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (7_suppl6) ◽  
pp. 2325967120S0048
Author(s):  
Jessica Traver ◽  
Melissa Christino ◽  
Ryan Coene ◽  
Kathryn Williams ◽  
Dai Sugimoto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Return To Sport ◽  
Functional Testing ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Anterior Cruciate ◽  
Primary Acl Reconstruction

Objectives: Successful return-to-sport (RTS) following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction can be affected by several variables, including a patient’s physical and psychological states throughout the rehabilitation process. Several studies have reported patients with increased fear-of-reinjury may be at risk for secondary injury following ACL reconstruction. The primary objective was to compare the relationship between ACL-RSI, Pedi-IKDC, Pedi-FABS, and PROMIS-Psychological Stress Experiences (PSE) across various age groups and graft types between patients undergoing primary ACL reconstruction at the 6 month post-operative visit. Secondary outcome was timing of RTS clearance. Methods: Patients prospectively enrolled were 8-30 years old who underwent primary ACL reconstruction at a large pediatric academic sports medicine center from August 2018 until February 2019. They were evaluated at their 6 month follow-up appointment and underwent functional RTS testing. Patients were divided into 3 groups based on their age: Pre-Adolescent (ages 8-14), Adolescent (ages 15-18), and Adult (ages >18) to reflect their psychological/emotional maturity. Demographic information, time to RTS clearance, and functional testing measurements were collected. Analysis included one-way ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis tests. Results: A total of 100 patients were included in the study (57 males, 43 females; mean age, 17.3±2.9 years). RTS functional testing was performed at a mean of 6.3±0.7 months after primary ACL reconstruction. The 3 age groups consisted of Pre-Adolescent (n=13), Adolescent (n=62), and Adult (n=25). The graft types were HS (n=79), BTB (n=14), ITB (n=7). Mean ACL-RSI scores were significantly different among age groups (Pre-Adolescent 80.3±10.6, Adolescent 60.4±23.3, Adult 54.3±21.3; p=0.003) and graft type (HS 61.2±22.0, BTB 52.9±26.4, ITB 82.1±9.7; p=0.019). Scores were significantly different among the 3 age groups for IKDC (Pre-Adolescent 85.4±12.1, Adolescent 77.5±13.8, Adult 61.0±8.4; p<0.001). Scores were not significantly different among the three age groups for Pedi-FABS (Pre-Adolescent 24.9±5.4, Adolescent 23.6±8.1, Adult 20.6±9.2; p=0.212). The mean PROMIS-PSE t-scores were significantly different among the age groups (Pre-Adolescent 45.8±8.6, Adolescent 52.0±7.2, Adult 53.8±8.1; p=0.009) and graft type (HS 52.4±7.7, BTB 52.7±6.6, ITB 40.9±4.9; p<0.001). There were no significant differences for average timing of RTS clearance among the 3 age groups (Pre-Adolescent 8.5±1.5 months, Adolescent 8.0±1.3 months, Adult 8.1±1.2 months; p=0.618). Conclusion: This study suggests that psychological profiles and subjective perceptions of knee function following ACL reconstruction may vary in young patients of different ages. Pre-adolescent patients had better scores on all patient reported outcomes compared to adolescent and adult patients. Age-related differences in patient reported outcomes should be considered when evaluating young athletes. [Figure: see text]

Assessing Physical Activity After ACL Injury: Moving Beyond Return to Sport

2021 ◽  
pp. 194173812110253
Author(s):  
Christopher Kuenze ◽  
Katherine Collins ◽  
Karin Allor Pfeiffer ◽  
Caroline Lisee
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Young Patients ◽  
Return To Sport ◽  
Acl Injury ◽  
Noncommunicable Diseases ◽  
Successful Recovery ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Context: Return to sport is widely utilized by sports medicine researchers and clinicians as a primary outcome of interest for successful recovery when working with young patients who have undergone anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR). While return-to-sport outcomes are effective at tracking progress post-ACLR, they are limited because they do not necessarily capture physical activity (PA) engagement, which is important to maintain knee joint health and reduce the risk of noncommunicable diseases. Therefore, there is a critical need (1) to describe current PA participation and measurement recommendations; (2) to appraise common PA measurement approaches, including patient-reported outcomes and device-based methodologies; and (3) to provide clinical recommendations for future evaluation. Evidence Acquisition: Reports of patient-reported or device-based PA in patients with ACL injury were acquired and summarized based on a PubMed search (2000 through July 2020). Search terms included physical activity OR activity AND anterior cruciate ligament OR ACL. Study Design: Clinical review. Level of Evidence: Level 5. Results: We highlight that (1) individuals with ACLR are 2.36 times less likely to meet the US Department of Health and Human Services PA recommendations even when reporting successful return to sport, (2) common patient-reported PA assessments have significant limitations in the data that can be derived, and (3) alternative patient-reported and device-based assessments may provide improved assessment of PA in this patient population. Conclusion: Clinicians and researchers have relied on return to sport status or self-reported PA participation via surveys. These approaches are not consistent with current recommendations for PA assessment and do not allow for comparison with contemporary PA recommendations or guidelines. Return to sport, patient-reported outcome measures, and device-based assessment approaches should be used in complementary manners to comprehensively assess PA participation after ACLR. However, appropriate techniques should be used when assessing PA in adult and adolescent populations.

Twenty-Year Outcomes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review of Prospectively Collected Data

2021 ◽  
pp. 036354652110273
Author(s):  
Joshua S. Everhart ◽  
Sercan Yalcin ◽  
Kurt P. Spindler
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Knee Function ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Background: Several long-term (≥20 years) follow-up studies after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction have been published in recent years, allowing for a systematic evaluation of outcomes. Purpose: To summarize outcomes at ≥20 years after ACL reconstruction and identify patient and surgical factors that affect these results. Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Prospective studies of primary ACL reconstructions with hamstring or bone–patellar tendon—bone (BTB) autograft via an arthroscopic or a mini-open technique and with a mean follow-up of ≥20 years were identified. When possible, the mean scores for each outcome measure were calculated. Factors identified in individual studies as predictive of outcomes were described. Results: Five studies met the inclusion and exclusion criteria with a total of 2012 patients. The pooled mean follow-up for patient-reported outcome measures was 44.2% (range, 29.6%-92.7%) and in-person evaluation was 33.2% (range, 29.6%-48.9%). Four studies (n = 584) reported graft tears at a mean rate of 11.8% (range, 2%-18.5%) and 4 studies (n = 773) reported a contralateral ACL injury rate of 12.2% (range, 5.8%-30%). Repeat non-ACL arthroscopic surgery (4 studies; n = 177) to the ipsilateral knee occurred in 10.4% (range, 9.5%-18.3%) and knee arthroplasty (1 study; n = 217) in 5%. The pooled mean of the International Knee Documentation Committee subjective knee function (IKDC) score was 79.1 (SD, 21.8 [3 studies; n = 644]). In 2 studies (n?= 221), 57.5% of patients continued to participate in strenuous activities. The IKDC-objective score was normal or nearly normal in 82.3% (n = 496; 3 studies), with low rates of clinically significant residual laxity. Moderate-severe radiographic osteoarthritis (OA) (IKDC grade C or D) was present in 25.9% of patients (n = 605; 3 studies). Medial meniscectomy is associated with increased risk of radiographic OA. Radiographic OA severity is associated with worse patient-reported knee function, but the association with knee pain is unclear. Conclusion: Currently available prospective evidence for ACL reconstruction with hamstring or BTB autograft provides several insights into outcomes at 20 years. The rates of follow-up at 20 years range from 30% to 93%. IKDC-objective scores were normal or nearly normal in 82% and the mean IKDC-subjective score was 79 points.

scholarly journals HOP TEST AS A TOOL FOR THE ASSESSMENT AND PREVENTION OF INJURIES IN FOOTBALLERS DURING PRESEASON

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (6_suppl3) ◽  
pp. 2325967118S0004
Author(s):  
F García-Bol ◽  
V Posada-Franco ◽  
A Roldán-Valero ◽  
R Del Caño-Espinel
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Reference Values ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Return To Sport ◽  
Performance Criteria ◽  
Return To Sports ◽  
Hop Tests ◽  
Hop Test ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Hop Tests (unipodal horizontal jumps) have been recommended as one of the reliable assessment tests when allowing a return to competition for a sportsperson after an anterior cruciate ligament injury1,2,3,4. Currently, comparison is made of the results with the contralateral limb through the symmetry index, a method which might not provide sufficient security upon the return to competitive sport5. Hop tests can be used in preseason to gain reference values prior to a possible injury. The objective of this review is to analise the scientific literature such as the F-Marc6 (reference manual of FIFA) to confirm whether include said tests in preseason for football teams. A search was conducted in the Pubmed y Cochrane databases (17/04/17) with the search terms “Hop Test”, “Football”, “Soccer”, and “Preseason”. Articles in English and Spanish were both accepted. Articles excluded were those that did not make reference to the knee, to football, and those that did not conduct tests during preseason. From a total of 33 articles, 4 with these search criteria were included, 5 articles were added trough the bibliography of other studies, and the F-Marc manual was analised. 4 of the articles used the hop tests in preseason for some type of study, of which 3 were used as part of a prospective assessment for the season. On the other hand, the F-Marc does not consider Hop Tests as an assessment test. Hop tests were not found to be used in preseason as reference values prior to possible future injuries, data which could be beneficial for a safe return to sport. Harris J, Abrams G, Bach B, Williams D, Heidloff D, Bush-Joseph C, Verma N, Forsythe B, Cole B. Return to Sport After ACL Reconstruction. ORTHOPEDICS. 2014; 37: e103-e108. Barber-Westin SD, Noyes FR. Factors used to determine return to unrestricted sports activities after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2011 Dec;27(12):1697-705. Thomeé R, Kaplan Y, Kvist J, Myklebust G, Risberg MA, Theisen D, Tsepis E, Werner S, Wondrasch B, Witvrouw E. Muscle strength and hop performance criteria prior to return to sports after ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011 Nov;19(11):1798-805. Bolgla LA, Keskula DR. Reliability of lower extremity functional performance tests. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1997 Sep;26(3):138-42. Wellsandt E, Failla MJ, Snyder-Mackler L. Limb Symmetry Indexes Can Overestimate Knee Function After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2017 Mar 29:1-18. F-MARC. Football Medicine Manual. 2nd Edition. Available from: http://f-marc.com . 2017.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document