scholarly journals Differences in advance care planning among nursing home care staff

2021 ◽  
pp. 096973302199418
Author(s):  
Gilissen Joni ◽  
Wendrich-van Dael Annelien ◽  
Gastmans Chris ◽  
Vander Stichele Robert ◽  
Deliens Luc ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Home ◽  
Nursing Homes ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Advance Care Planning ◽  
Self Efficacy ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Mean Difference ◽  
Care Staff ◽  
Care Planning ◽  
Advance Care

Background A team-based approach has been advocated for advance care planning in nursing homes. While nurses are often put forward to take the lead, it is not clear to what extent other professions could be involved as well. Objectives To examine to what extent engagement in advance care planning practices (e.g. conversations, advance directives), knowledge and self-efficacy differ between nurses, care assistants and allied care staff in nursing homes. Design Survey study. Participants/setting The study involved a purposive sample of 14 nursing homes in Flanders, Belgium. Nurses, care assistants and allied care staff (e.g. social workers, physical therapists) completed a survey. Ethical considerations The study was approved by the University Hospital of Brussels (B.U.N. 143201834759), as part of a cluster randomized controlled trial (clinicaltrials.gov NCT03521206). Results One hundred ninety-six nurses, 319 care assistants and 169 allied staff participated (67% response rate). After adjusting for confounders, nurses were significantly more likely than care assistants to have carried out advance care planning conversations (odds ratio 4; 95% confidence interval 1.73–9.82; p < 0.001) and documented advance care planning (odds ratio 2.67; 95% confidence interval 1.29–5.56; p < 0.001); differences not found between allied staff and care assistants. Advance care planning knowledge total scores differed significantly, with nurses (estimated mean difference 0.13 (score range 0–1); 95% confidence interval 0.08–0.17; p < 0.001) and allied staff (estimated mean difference 0.07; 95% confidence interval 0.03–0.12; p < 0.001) scoring higher than care assistants. We found no significant differences regarding self-efficacy. Discussion While nursing home nurses conducted more advance care planning conversations and documentation than allied care staff and care assistants, these two professional groups may be a valuable support to nurses in conducting advance care planning, if provided with additional training. Conclusions Allied care staff and care assistants, if trained appropriately, can be involved more strongly in advance care planning to enhance relational and individual autonomy of nursing home residents, alongside nurses. Future research to improve and implement advance care planning should consider this finding at the intervention development stage.

scholarly journals Advance care planning in nursing homes: new conversation and documentation tools

2021 ◽  
pp. bmjspcare-2021-003008
Author(s):  
Annelien Wendrich-van Dael ◽  
Joni Gilissen ◽  
Liesbeth Van Humbeeck ◽  
Luc Deliens ◽  
Robert Vander Stichele ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Home ◽  
Nursing Homes ◽  
Advance Care Planning ◽  
Healthcare Professionals ◽  
Nursing Home Residents ◽  
Care Staff ◽  
Care Planning ◽  
Nursing Home Staff ◽  
Advance Care ◽  
Context Specific

Although advance care planning (ACP) is highly relevant for nursing home residents, its uptake in nursing homes is low. To meet the need for context-specific ACP tools to support nursing home staff in conducting ACP conversations, we developed the ACP+intervention. At its core, we designed three ACP tools to aid care staff in discussing and documenting nursing home resident’s wishes and preferences for future treatment and care: (1) an extensive ACP conversation guide, (2) a one-page conversation tool and (3) an ACP document to record outcomes of conversations. These nursing home-specific ACP tools aim to avoid a purely document-driven or ‘tick-box’ approach to the ACP process and to involve residents, including those living with dementia according to their capacity, their families and healthcare professionals.

scholarly journals PRagmatic trial Of Video Education in Nursing homes: The design and rationale for a pragmatic cluster randomized trial in the nursing home setting

2017 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 140-151 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vincent Mor ◽  
Angelo E Volandes ◽  
Roee Gutman ◽  
Constantine Gatsonis ◽  
Susan L Mitchell
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Home ◽  
Nursing Homes ◽  
Advance Care Planning ◽  
Pragmatic Trial ◽  
Healthcare Systems ◽  
Care Planning ◽  
Home Setting ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Advance Care ◽  
Video Education

Background/Aims Nursing homes are complex healthcare systems serving an increasingly sick population. Nursing homes must engage patients in advance care planning, but do so inconsistently. Video decision support tools improved advance care planning in small randomized controlled trials. Pragmatic trials are increasingly employed in health services research, although not commonly in the nursing home setting to which they are well-suited. This report presents the design and rationale for a pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial that evaluated the “real world” application of an Advance Care Planning Video Program in two large US nursing home healthcare systems. Methods PRagmatic trial Of Video Education in Nursing homes was conducted in 360 nursing homes (N = 119 intervention/N = 241 control) owned by two healthcare systems. Over an 18-month implementation period, intervention facilities were instructed to offer the Advance Care Planning Video Program to all patients. Control facilities employed usual advance care planning practices. Patient characteristics and outcomes were ascertained from Medicare Claims, Minimum Data Set assessments, and facility electronic medical record data. Intervention adherence was measured using a Video Status Report embedded into electronic medical record systems. The primary outcome was the number of hospitalizations/person-day alive among long-stay patients with advanced dementia or cardiopulmonary disease. The rationale for the approaches to facility randomization and recruitment, intervention implementation, population selection, data acquisition, regulatory issues, and statistical analyses are discussed. Results The large number of well-characterized candidate facilities enabled several unique design features including stratification on historical hospitalization rates, randomization prior to recruitment, and 2:1 control to intervention facilities ratio. Strong endorsement from corporate leadership made randomization prior to recruitment feasible with 100% participation of facilities randomized to the intervention arm. Critical regulatory issues included minimal risk determination, waiver of informed consent, and determination that nursing home providers were not engaged in human subjects research. Intervention training and implementation were initiated on 5 January 2016 using corporate infrastructures for new program roll-out guided by standardized training elements designed by the research team. Video Status Reports in facilities’ electronic medical records permitted “real-time” adherence monitoring and corrective actions. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Virtual Research Data Center allowed for rapid outcomes ascertainment. Conclusion We must rigorously evaluate interventions to deliver more patient-focused care to an increasingly frail nursing home population. Video decision support is a practical approach to improve advance care planning. PRagmatic trial Of Video Education in Nursing homes has the potential to promote goal-directed care among millions of older Americans in nursing homes and establish a methodology for future pragmatic randomized controlled trials in this complex healthcare setting.

scholarly journals Nurses’ self-efficacy, rather than their knowledge, is associated with their engagement in advance care planning in nursing homes: A survey study

2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (7) ◽  
pp. 917-924 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joni Gilissen ◽  
Lara Pivodic ◽  
Annelien Wendrich-van Dael ◽  
Wilfried Cools ◽  
Robert Vander Stichele ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Homes ◽  
Advance Care Planning ◽  
Self Efficacy ◽  
Social Cognitive ◽  
Cognitive Theory ◽  
Survey Study ◽  
Care Planning ◽  
Advance Care ◽  
Randomised Controlled ◽  
Purposive Sample

Background: Considering social cognitive theory and current literature about successful advance care planning in nursing homes, sufficient knowledge and self-efficacy are important preconditions for staff to be able to carry out advance care planning in practice. Aim: Exploring to what extent nurses’ knowledge about and self-efficacy is associated with their engagement in advance care planning in nursing homes. Design: Survey study as part of a baseline measurement of a randomised controlled cluster trial (NCT03521206). Setting/participants: Nurses in a purposive sample of 14 nursing homes in Belgium. Methods: A survey was distributed among nurses, evaluating knowledge (11 true/false items), self-efficacy (12 roles and tasks on 10-point Likert-type scale) and six advance care planning practices (yes/no), ranging from performing advance care planning conversations to completing advance directives. Results: A total of 196 nurses participated (66% response rate). While knowledge was not significantly associated with advance care planning practices, self-efficacy was. One unit’s increase in self-efficacy was statistically associated with an estimated 32% increase in the number of practices having carried out. Conclusions: Nurses’ engagement in advance care planning practices is mainly associated with their self-efficacy rather than their knowledge. Further research is necessary to improve the evidence regarding the causal relationship between constructs. However, these results suggest that educational programmes that focus solely on knowledge might not lead to increasing uptake of advance care planning in nurses.

scholarly journals Developing and evaluating online COVID-centric advance care planning training and information resources for nursing staff and family members in nursing homes: the necessary discussions study protocol

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Harding ◽  
Nancy Preston ◽  
Julie Doherty ◽  
Emily Cousins ◽  
Sandra Varey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Nursing Home ◽  
Nursing Homes ◽  
Advance Care Planning ◽  
Family Members ◽  
Nursing Home Residents ◽  
Online Training ◽  
Information Resources ◽  
Care Planning ◽  
Advance Care

Abstract Background Nursing home residents are typically older adults with high levels of chronic illness and impairment. As such, they are particularly susceptible to severe complications and mortality from COVID-19. Since all nursing home residents are at increased risk, nursing home care staff need to know what residents would want to happen should they become infected with COVID-19. This study aims to develop and evaluate advance care planning (ACP) COVID-centric online training and information resources for nursing home staff and family members of residents, to improve care at the end of life during a COVID-19 outbreak. Based on the findings we will develop implementation guidelines for nursing homes to ensure wider impact and application during the pandemic and beyond. Methods The content of the training and information resources will be based on a rapid review of literature and guidance on ACP in the context of COVID-19 and consultation with the study expert reference group. An integrated communications company will then work alongside the research team to design the online training and information resources. To evaluate the resources, we will employ a multiple case study design where a nursing home (defined as an institutional setting in which nursing care is provided to older adults on-site 24 h a day) will be the unit of analysis or ‘case’. The RE-AIM (reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, maintenance) framework will guide the evaluation of implementation of the training and information resources. We will recruit and interview staff and family members from between 6 and 9 nursing homes across Northern Ireland, England and Scotland and gather quantitative data from a feedback survey included in the training and information resources. Discussion The Necessary Discussions study is very timely given the challenging experiences of nursing homes, their staff, residents and their family members during the COVID-19 pandemic. It meets a key need and addresses an important gap in research and practice. The training and information resources will be ‘COVID-centric’, but they will also have a longstanding relevance for future ACP practice in UK care homes. Trial registration ISRCTN registry (ID 18003630) on 19.05.21

scholarly journals ‘Traversing difficult terrain’. Advance care planning in residential aged care through multidisciplinary case conferences: A qualitative interview study exploring the experiences of families, staff and health professionals

2021 ◽  
pp. 026921632110132
Author(s):  
Suzanne Rainsford ◽  
Sally Hall Dykgraaf ◽  
Rosny Kasim ◽  
Christine Phillips ◽  
Nicholas Glasgow
Keyword(s):  
Advance Care Planning ◽  
Health Professionals ◽  
Aged Care ◽  
Shared Responsibility ◽  
Care Staff ◽  
Residential Aged Care ◽  
Care Planning ◽  
Qualitative Interview Study ◽  
Case Conferences ◽  
Advance Care

Background: Advance care planning improves the quality of end-of-life care for older persons in residential aged care; however, its uptake is low. Case conferencing facilitates advance care planning. Aim: To explore the experience of participating in advance care planning discussions facilitated through multidisciplinary case conferences from the perspectives of families, staff and health professionals. Design: A qualitative study (February–July 2019) using semi-structured interviews. Setting: Two residential aged care facilities in one Australian rural town. Participants: Fifteen informants [family ( n = 4), staff ( n = 5), health professionals ( n = 6)] who had participated in advance care planning discussions facilitated through multidisciplinary case conferences. Results: Advance care planning was like navigating an emotional landscape while facing the looming loss of a loved one. This emotional burden was exacerbated for substitute decision-makers, but made easier if the resident had capacity to be involved or had previously made their wishes clearly known. The ‘conversation’ was not a simple task, and required preparation time. Multidisciplinary case conferences facilitated informed decision-making and shared responsibility. Opportunity to consider all care options provided families with clarity, control and a sense of comfort. This enabled multiple stakeholders to bond and connect around the resident. Conclusion: While advance care planning is an important element of high quality care it involves significant emotional labour and burden for families, care staff and health professionals. It is not a simple administrative task to be completed, but a process that requires time and space for reflection and consensus-building to support well-considered decisions. Multidisciplinary case conferences support this process.

scholarly journals Nursing Home Characteristics Associated With Implementation of an Advance Care Planning Video Intervention

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (7) ◽  
pp. 804-809.e1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lacey Loomer ◽  
Ellen McCreedy ◽  
Emmanuelle Belanger ◽  
Jennifer A. Palmer ◽  
Susan L. Mitchell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Home ◽  
Advance Care Planning ◽  
Care Planning ◽  
Video Intervention ◽  
Advance Care

Training Nursing Home Staff in Advance Care Planning Using Medical Orders for Scope of Treatment

2015 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. B15
Author(s):  
Preetkanwal Brar ◽  
Preetkanwal Brar ◽  
Amity Onders ◽  
Elizabeth Gatten ◽  
Amelia Kiser ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Home ◽  
Advance Care Planning ◽  
Care Planning ◽  
Nursing Home Staff ◽  
Advance Care

scholarly journals Economic (gross cost) analysis of systematically implementing a programme of advance care planning in three Irish nursing homes

2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronan O’Sullivan ◽  
Aileen Murphy ◽  
Rónán O’Caoimh ◽  
Nicola Cornally ◽  
Anton Svendrovski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Homes ◽  
Cost Analysis ◽  
Advance Care Planning ◽  
Care Planning ◽  
Advance Care

scholarly journals Advance care planning in Norwegian nursing homes – limited awareness of the residents’ preferences and values? A qualitative study

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisbeth Thoresen ◽  
Reidar Pedersen ◽  
Lillian Lillemoen ◽  
Elisabeth Gjerberg ◽  
Reidun Førde
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Nursing Homes ◽  
Advance Care Planning ◽  
Health Care Professionals ◽  
Qualitative Content Analysis ◽  
Care Planning ◽  
Next Of Kin ◽  
Medical Issues ◽  
Interdisciplinary Approaches ◽  
Advance Care

Abstract Background 52% of all deaths in Norway occur in nursing homes. Still advance care planning (ACP) is scarce and heterogeneous. To improve the implementation and practice of ACP in nursing homes, knowledge about health care professionals’ views on ACP is vital. The objective of this study is to explore nurses and physicians’ aims and experiences with carrying out ACP in nursing homes. Methods Semi-structured group interviews were conducted with 20 health care professionals, recruited from nursing homes where ACP was performed regularly. Qualitative content analysis was used to analyse the data. Results The primary aim of the nursing home professionals when doing ACP in nursing homes were to build alliances with next of kin to avoid misunderstandings and future conflicts. Two main experiences with ACP were described: i) due to the sensitivity of ACP issues, it was important to balance directness with being sensitive, and ii) when the physicians raised questions concerning future medical treatment, the answers from residents as well as next of kin were often hesitant and unclear. Conclusion Our study add insights into how ACP is practiced in nursing homes and the professionals’ agenda. A focus on medical issues and achieving consensus with next of kin may result in lack of involvement of the residents and limited awareness of the residents’ needs. Interdisciplinary approaches, ACP-training and tailored guidelines may improve the implementation and practice of ACP.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document