Risk of Malocclusion Among Patients Undergoing Single-Stage Versus Two-Stage Cleft Palate Repair

2022 ◽  
pp. 105566562110449
Author(s):  
Hilary McCrary ◽  
Vanessa Torrecillas ◽  
Sarah Hatch Pollard ◽  
Dave S. Collingridge ◽  
Duane Yamashiro ◽  
...  

Objective Evaluate impact of single-stage versus staged palate repair on the risk of developing malocclusion among patients with cleft palate (CP). Design Retrospective cohort study 2000–2016 Setting Academic, tertiary children’s hospital. Patients Patients undergoing CP repair between 1999–2015. Interventions CP repair, categorized as either single-stage or staged. Main Outcome Measure Time to development of Class III malocclusion. Results 967 patients were included; 60.1% had a two-stage CP repair, and 39.9% had single-stage. Malocclusion was diagnosed in 28.2% of patients. In the model examining all patients at ≤5 years ( n = 659), patients who were not white had a higher risk of malocclusion (HR 2.46, p = 0.004) and staged repair was not protective against malocclusion (HR 0.98, p = 0.91). In all patients >5 years ( n = 411), higher Veau classification and more recent year of birth were significantly associated with higher hazard rates ( p < 0.05). Two-staged repair was not protective against developing malocclusion (HR 0.86, p = 0.60). In the model examining patients with staged repair ≤5 years old ( n = 414), higher age at hard palate closure was associated with reduced malocclusion risk (HR 0.67, p < 0.001) and patients who were not white had increased risk (HR 2.56, p = 0.01). In patients with staged repair >5 years old, more recent birth year may be associated with a higher risk of malocclusion (HR 1.06, p = 0.06) while syndrome may be associated with lower risk of malocclusion diagnosis (HR 0.46, p = 0.07). Conclusion Our data suggests that staged CP repair is not protective against developing Class III malocclusion.

2020 ◽  
Vol 57 (8) ◽  
pp. 975-983
Author(s):  
Hilary McCrary ◽  
Sarah Hatch Pollard ◽  
Vanessa Torrecillas ◽  
Leon Khong ◽  
Helene M. Taylor ◽  
...  

Objective: To evaluate the association of 2-stage cleft palate (CP) surgery on velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) incidence, speech surgeries, and cleft-related surgical burden. Design: Retrospective cohort with follow-up of 4 to 19 years. Setting: Academic, tertiary children’s hospital. Patients: Patients who underwent CP surgery between 2000 and 2017. Exclusions included submucous CP or age at last contact under 3.9. Interventions: Cleft palate surgery, completed in either a single-stage or 2-stage repair. Main Outcome Measure(s): Rates of VPI diagnosis and speech surgery and total cleft surgeries; t tests, tests of proportion, and linear and logistic regression were performed. Total cleft-related surgeries were examined in a subset (n = 418) of patients with chart reviews. Results: A total of 1047 patients were included; 59.6% had 2-stage CP repair, 40.4% had single-stage repair. Approximately 32% of children with 2-stage CP repair were diagnosed with VPI, as opposed to 22% of single-stage patients ( P < .001). Children with 2-stage CP repair were 1.8 times as likely to be diagnosed with VPI ( P < .001). Speech surgery rates were similar across groups. Patients who had 2-stage repair received an average of 2.3 more cleft-related procedures, when excluding prosthesis management procedures. Conclusion: Our data show an increased risk of VPI diagnosis and increased surgical burden among patients receiving 2-stage CP repair.


2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiwon Sarah Crowley ◽  
Tzyynong L. Friesen ◽  
Rodney A. Gabriel ◽  
Sun Hsieh ◽  
Amanda Wacenske ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 56-57
Author(s):  
Sun T. Hsieh ◽  
William Y. Zhu ◽  
Tzyynong Liou ◽  
December Deal ◽  
Jiwon Sarah Crowley ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 58 (5) ◽  
pp. 603-611
Author(s):  
Giap H. Vu ◽  
Christopher L. Kalmar ◽  
Carrie E. Zimmerman ◽  
Laura S. Humphries ◽  
Jordan W. Swanson ◽  
...  

Objective: This study assesses the association between risk of secondary surgery for oronasal fistula following primary cleft palate repair and 2 hospital characteristics—cost-to-charge ratio (RCC) and case volume of cleft palate repair. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: This study utilized the Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) database, which consists of clinical and resource-utilization data from >49 hospitals in the United States. Patients and Participants: Patients undergoing primary cleft palate repair from 2004 to 2009 were abstracted from the PHIS database and followed up for oronasal fistula repair between 2004 and 2015. Main Outcome Measure(s): The primary outcome measure was whether patients underwent oronasal fistula repair after primary cleft palate repair. Results: Among 5745 patients from 45 institutions whom met inclusion criteria, 166 (3%) underwent oronasal fistula repair within 6 to 11 years of primary cleft palate repair. Primary palatoplasty at high-RCC facilities was associated with a higher rate of subsequent oronasal fistula repair (odds ratio [OR] = 1.84 [1.32-2.56], adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 1.81 [1.28-2.59]; P ≤ .001). Likelihood of surgery for oronasal fistula was independent of hospital case volume (OR = 0.83 [0.61-1.13], P = .233; AOR = 0.86 [0.62-1.20], P = .386). Patients with complete unilateral or bilateral cleft palate were more likely to receive oronasal fistula closure compared to those with unilateral-incomplete cleft palate (AOR = 2.09 [1.27-3.56], P = .005; AOR = 3.14 [1.80-5.58], P < .001). Conclusions: Subsequent need for oronasal fistula repair, while independent of hospital case volume for cleft palate repair, increased with increasing hospital RCC. Our study also corroborates complete cleft palate and cleft lip as risk factors for oronasal fistula.


2007 ◽  
Vol 44 (5) ◽  
pp. 528-531 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Fenlon ◽  
N. Somerville

Objective: To ascertain the quality of analgesia provided by morphine in comparison to codeine. Design: The study is a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial of analgesic effect employing validated pain scores. Patients: Infants having primary cleft palate repair with informed parental consent to enter the study. Interventions: Infants received one of two analgesics intraoperatively for immediate postoperative pain relief. Morphine was given by intravenous injection and codeine by the intramuscular route. Main Outcome Measure: Pain scores in the immediate postoperative period for 2 hours following surgery; this outcome measure was decided prior to data collection. Results: The pain score and other outcome measures were all blinded. Measurements are all evident from the nature of the results. Conclusions: There was no clinically significant difference observed in the analgesic effect of either drug on the two groups studied.


2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 143-148 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maurice Y. Mommaerts ◽  
Karsten KH. Gundlach ◽  
Ana Tache

2013 ◽  
Vol 59 (6) ◽  
pp. 302-305 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stoicescu Simona ◽  
Enescu Dm

Abstract Introduction: Although cleft lip and palate (CLP) is one of the most common congenital malformations, occurring in 1 in 700 live births, there is still no generally accepted treatment protocol. Numerous surgical techniques have been described for cleft palate repair; these techniques can be divided into one-stage (one operation) cleft palate repair and two-stage cleft palate closure. The aim of this study is to present our cleft palate team experience in using the two-stage cleft palate closure and the clinical outcomes in terms of oronasal fistula rate. Material and methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on medical records of 80 patients who underwent palate repair over a five-year period, from 2008 to 2012. All cleft palate patients were incorporated. Information on patient’s gender, cleft type, age at repair, one- or two-stage cleft palate repair were collected and analyzed. Results: Fifty-three (66%) and twenty-seven (34%) patients underwent two-stage and one-stage repair, respectively. According to Veau classification, more than 60% of them were Veau III and IV, associating cleft lip to cleft palate. Fistula occurred in 34% of the two-stage repairs versus 7% of one-stage repairs, with an overall incidence of 24%. Conclusions: Our study has shown that a two-stage cleft palate closure has a higher rate of fistula formation when compared with the one-stage repair. Two-stage repair is the protocol of choice in wide complete cleft lip and palate cases, while one-stage procedure is a good option for cleft palate alone, or some specific cleft lip and palate cases (narrow cleft palate, older age at surgery)


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document