Safety and feasibility of outpatient high-dose cytarabine and intermediate-dose cytarabine for consolidation therapy in acute myeloid leukemia

2021 ◽  
pp. 107815522110465
Author(s):  
Wenhui Li ◽  
Katherine Richter ◽  
Jamie Lee ◽  
Kevin McCarthy ◽  
Timothy Kubal
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Outpatient Setting ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Consolidation Therapy ◽  
High Dose Cytarabine ◽  
Incidence Of Hospitalization ◽  
Acute Myeloid ◽  
Intermediate Dose

Introduction The standard of care consolidation therapy for acute myeloid leukemia is high-dose cytarabine or intermediate-dose cytarabine, which are traditionally given inpatient. At Moffitt Cancer Center, we have moved the administration of high-dose cytarabine and intermediate-dose cytarabine to the outpatient setting through the inpatient/outpatient program. To facilitate outpatient administration, high-dose cytarabine and intermediate-dose cytarabine are given in a shorter interval of every 10 h instead of 12 h. The safety of a shorter duration interval of high-dose cytarabine and intermediate-dose cytarabine is unknown. This study aims to assess the safety and feasibility of administering high-dose cytarabine and intermediate-dose cytarabine consolidation therapy in the inpatient/outpatient setting. Methods This is a retrospective chart review to analyze acute myeloid leukemia patients treated with inpatient/outpatient high-dose cytarabine or intermediate-dose cytarabine consolidation therapy at Moffitt Cancer Center from January 1, 2015, through November 1, 2018. The primary objective was to determine the incidence of hospitalization during the inpatient/outpatient administration of high-dose cytarabine or intermediate-dose cytarabine. Results Two hundred fifty-three of 255 cycles of high-dose cytarabine/intermediate-dose cytarabine were delivered outpatient over the reviewed time period to 118 patients. No patients receiving outpatient high-dose cytarabine/intermediate-dose cytarabine consolidation required hospitalization during chemotherapy. Our incidence of hospitalization (24%) after chemotherapy is consistent with the reported literature. Through the inpatient/outpatient administration of high-dose cytarabine and intermediate-dose cytarabine, 1265 inpatient days were saved with an approximate revenue of $3,135,176 generated in our study period. Conclusion Inpatient/outpatient administration of high-dose cytarabine and intermediate-dose cytarabine is both safe and feasible. Moving high-dose cytarabine/intermediate-dose cytarabine administration to the outpatient setting resulted in significant additional revenue vs. inpatient administration.

High-Dose Cytarabine Alone Versus Cytarabine Plus Anthracycline for Consolidation Therapy in Non-Promyelocytic Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 4890-4890
Author(s):  
Sung-Hyun Kim ◽  
So Yeon Kim ◽  
Ji Hyun Lee ◽  
Suee Lee ◽  
Sung Yong Oh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Consolidation Therapy ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
High Dose Cytarabine ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Acute Myeloid ◽  
Intermediate Dose

Abstract Standard consolidation therapy of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) contains high-dose cytarabine (HiDC). However, optimal dose of cytarabine and benefit of additional chemotherapeutic agents remain unresolved problems. One hundred and forty-two patients among 173 newly diagnosed AML patients, who achieved complete remission following induction chemotherapy and subsequently received different consolidation therapies in 4 independent institutes, were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into 3 groups by consolidation regimens: HiDC (1.5-3g/m2, bid, Days 1,3,5) alone in 44 patients (Group A), HiDC plus anthracycline in 46 patients (Group B), and intermediate-dose cytarabine (1g/m2, bid, Days 1,3,5) plus anthracycline in 52 patients (Group C). Overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival (RFS), disease-free survival (DFS), and event-free survival (EFS), were not significantly different in Group A vs. Group B. However, Group B showed longer RFS, DFS, and EFS, as compared with Group C. Treatment-related mortality was significantly higher in Group B, as compared with Group A (P=0.040) and Group C (P=0.013). Cytogenetic risk was the only significant prognostic factor in OS, RFS, DFS and EFS. In this study, the addition of anthracycline to HiDC as consolidation chemotherapy in AML patients did not improve treatment outcomes, and had more toxicity. HiDC enhanced RFS, DFS, and EFS, as compared with intermediate-dose cytarabine. Therefore, HiDC single therapy could be considered as standard consolidation therapy for non-promyelocytic AML Disclosures Choi: Alexion Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Varying intensity of postremission therapy in acute myeloid leukemia

Blood ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 79 (8) ◽  
pp. 1924-1930 ◽  
Author(s):  
PA Cassileth ◽  
E Lynch ◽  
JD Hines ◽  
MM Oken ◽  
JJ Mazza ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Mortality Rate ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Allogeneic Bone ◽  
Consolidation Therapy ◽  
High Dose Cytarabine ◽  
Postremission Therapy ◽  
Acute Myeloid

The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) conducted a randomized trial in patients less than or equal to 65 years old (median, 44 years) to determine whether increasing the intensity of postremission therapy in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) would improve the outcome. After uniform induction therapy, patients in complete remission (CR) who were less than 41 years old and who had a histocompatible sibling underwent allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (alloBMT) (54 patients). The remainder of patients in CR were randomized to receive either 2 years of continuous outpatient maintenance therapy with cytarabine and 6- thioguanine (83 patients) or a single course of inpatient consolidation therapy consisting of 6 days of high-dose cytarabine plus 3 days of amsacrine (87 patients). The median duration of follow-up is now 4 years, and patients are included in the analyses of outcome regardless of whether they relapsed before starting the intended treatment. Four- year event-free survival (EFS) was 27% +/- 10% for consolidation therapy versus 16% +/- 8% for maintenance therapy (P = .068) and 28% +/- 11% versus 15% +/- 9% (P = .047) in patients less than 60 years old. The outcome for patients receiving alloBMT was compared with the subset of patients less than 41 years old who received consolidation therapy (N = 29) or maintenance therapy (N = 21). Four-year EFS was 42% +/- 13% for alloBMT, 30% +/- 17% for consolidation therapy, and 14% +/- 15% for maintenance therapy. AlloBMT had a significantly better EFS (P = .013) than maintenance therapy, but was not different from consolidation therapy. In patients less than 41 years old, 4-year survival after alloBMT (42% +/- 14%) did not differ from consolidation therapy (43% +/- 18%), but both were significantly better than maintenance therapy (19% +/- 17%), P = .047 and .043, respectively. The mortality rate for maintenance therapy was 0%, consolidation therapy, 21%; and alloBMT, 36%. Consolidation therapy caused an especially high mortality rate in the patients greater than or equal to 60 years old (8 of 14 or 57%). The toxicity of combined high-dose cytarabine and amsacrine is unacceptable, especially in older patients, and alternative approaches to consolidation therapy such as high-dose cytarabine alone need to be tested. In AML, a single course of consolidation therapy or alloBMT after initial CR produces better results than lengthy maintenance therapy. Although EFS and survival of alloBMT and consolidation therapy do not differ significantly, a larger number of patients need to be studied before concluding that they are equivalent.

Repetitive Cycles of High-Dose Cytarabine Benefit Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia and inv(16)(p13q22) or t(16;16)(p13;q22): Results from CALGB 8461

2004 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 1087-1094 ◽  
Author(s):  
John C. Byrd ◽  
Amy S. Ruppert ◽  
Krzysztof Mrózek ◽  
Andrew J. Carroll ◽  
Colin G. Edwards ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Consolidation Therapy ◽  
High Dose Cytarabine ◽  
The Impact ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Purpose To study the impact of repetitive (three to four courses) versus a single course of high-dose cytarabine (HDAC) consolidation therapy on outcome of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and inv(16)(p13q22) or t(16;16)(p13;q22). Patients and Methods We examined the cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), relapse-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS) for 48 adults younger than 60 years with inv(16)/t(16;16) who had attained a complete remission on one of four consecutive clinical trials and were assigned to receive HDAC consolidation therapy. Twenty-eight patients were assigned to either three or four courses of HDAC, and 20 patients were assigned to one course of HDAC followed by alternative intensive consolidation therapy. Results Pretreatment features were similar for the two groups. The CIR was significantly decreased in patients assigned to receive three to four cycles of HDAC compared with patients assigned to one course (P = .03; 5-year CIR, 43% v 70%, respectively). The difference in RFS also approached statistical significance (P = .06). In a multivariable analysis that adjusted for potential confounding covariates, only treatment assignment (three to four cycles of HDAC) predicted for superior RFS (P = .02). The OS of both groups was similar (P = .93; 5-year OS, 75% for the three to four cycles of HDAC group v 70% for the one cycle of HDAC group), reflecting a high success rate with stem-cell transplantation salvage treatment administered among patients in both treatment groups. Conclusion We conclude that, in AML patients with inv(16)/t(16;16), repetitive HDAC therapy decreases the likelihood of relapse compared with consolidation regimens including less HDAC.

Safety and feasibility of outpatient high-dose cytarabine (HIDAC) and intermediate-dose cytarabine (IDAC) for consolidation therapy in acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18509-e18509
Author(s):  
Wenhui Li ◽  
Katherine Simondsen ◽  
Jamie Lee ◽  
Maher Elharake ◽  
Timothy Edward Kubal
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Risk Stratification ◽  
Induction Therapy ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Cost Savings ◽  
Outpatient Setting ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Inpatient Setting ◽  
Consolidation Therapy ◽  
Acute Myeloid

e18509 Background: Patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who achieve complete remission with induction therapy require consolidation therapy. The standard of care consolidation is HIDAC or IDAC depending on age and risk stratification. Consolidation therapy has historically been administered in the inpatient setting. The rising cost of AML care has prompted institutions to consider shifting therapy to the outpatient setting. However, the safety and feasibility of outpatient HIDAC/IDAC consolidation therapy has not been established. Moffitt Cancer Center (MCC) developed an Inpatient/Outpatient (IPOP) program to facilitate administration of complicated regimens in the outpatient setting. We hypothesized that IPOP administration of HIDAC/IDAC consolidation therapy is safe and may have cost-savings implications. Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review on AML patients who were 18 years or older and received HIDAC/IDAC consolidation therapy at MCC following induction therapy from January 1, 2015 to November 1, 2018. Data collected included age, risk stratification, treatment history, clinic visits, number of cycles received in the IPOP versus inpatient setting, supportive care, hospitalizations, and chemotherapy related adverse events. Results: 258 of 270 cycles of HIDAC/IDAC were delivered outpatient over the reviewed time period to 122 patients. 45 patients (37%) required hospitalization during consolidation with the primary reason being neutropenic fever (72%), consistent with historical data (50 to 90%). No patients receiving outpatient consolidation required hospitalization during chemotherapy. Specific details regarding administration of HIDAC/IDAC in IPOP, including infusion times, frequency of visits, laboratory frequency, supportive medications, and home antimicrobials will be reported. 1,290 hospital days were saved through IPOP administration. Financial assessment of cost-savings is being determined and will be reported. Conclusions: Outpatient administration of HIDAC/IDAC consolidation therapy for AML is a safe option for AML patients undergoing consolidation.

scholarly journals Does high-dose cytarabine cause cumulative toxicity in patients undergoing consolidation therapy for acute myeloid leukemia?

2013 ◽  
Vol 88 (6) ◽  
pp. 533-534 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andres Wiernik ◽  
Wolfgang R. Sperr ◽  
Daniel Weisdorf ◽  
Peter Valent ◽  
Celalettin Ustun
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Consolidation Therapy ◽  
Cumulative Toxicity ◽  
High Dose Cytarabine ◽  
Acute Myeloid

High-dose cytarabine and daunorubicin as consolidation therapy for acute myeloid leukemia in first remission: long-term follow-up and results.

1989 ◽  
Vol 7 (9) ◽  
pp. 1260-1267 ◽  
Author(s):  
S N Wolff ◽  
R H Herzig ◽  
J W Fay ◽  
G L Phillips ◽  
H M Lazarus ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Complete Remission ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Allogeneic Bone ◽  
Consolidation Therapy ◽  
High Dose Cytarabine ◽  
Acute Myeloid

In an effort to increase the proportion of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remaining in continued complete remission (CCR), we administered intensive postremission consolidation therapy with high-dose cytarabine (Ara-C) and daunorubicin. Eighty-seven patients, with a median age of 38 years (range, 7 to 71), received consolidation therapy after first complete remission was obtained with standard induction chemotherapy that included conventional doses of Ara-C. Consolidation therapy consisted of from one to three cycles of high-dose Ara-C (3 g/m2 intravenously [IV] over 1 hour every 12 hours for 12 doses) followed by daunorubicin (30 mg/m2/d IV bolus for 3 days). After completion of the high-dose Ara-C and daunorubicin, no further therapy was administered. Myelosuppression encountered with consolidation resulted in a median duration of neutropenia and thrombocytopenia of 3 weeks. Four patients (5%) died during consolidation due to infection and/or hemorrhage; 59% of patients experienced severe but nonfatal infectious or extramedullary organ toxicity. With a median follow-up of more than 3.5 years from diagnosis, the proportion of patients, by Kaplan-Meier product-limit estimate, remaining in CCR is 49% (95% confidence limits, 37% to 61%). In a Cox multivariate analysis, only age significantly (P less than .001) influenced the probability of remaining in CCR. The probability of remaining in CCR was 83%, 50%, and 23% for age groups of 25 or less, 26 to 45, and more than 45 years, respectively. These survival curves all have stable long-term plateaus, suggesting cure. In this study, the administration of brief, intensive nonmarrow ablative chemotherapy resulted in a large proportion of patients with AML remaining in CCR, results similar to those reported with allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Relapse of acute leukemia was still the major reason for therapy failure, suggesting that more effective or additional postremission therapy will be required to further improve the likelihood of cure especially for older patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document