Imatinib plasma levels in patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia under routine clinical practice conditions

2021 ◽  
pp. 107815522110525
Author(s):  
Betel Del Rosario García ◽  
Iris González García ◽  
María Micaela Viña Romero ◽  
Jonathan González García ◽  
Ruth Ramos Díaz ◽  
...  

Introduction The addition of imatinib to the therapeutic arsenal for chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) has changed the natural course of the disease, in such a way that it is now considered a chronic pathology. However, to achieve therapeutic success, it is necessary to reach adequate plasma concentrations to ensure efficacy and safety. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the plasma concentration of imatinib, analysing its influence on effectiveness and safety in patients with CML. Methods We performed a descriptive, multicentre study in which imatinib plasma levels from patients diagnosed with CML between 2019–2020 were analysed. An optimal therapeutic range of 750–1500 ng/mL was established for the stratification of patients, according to their minimum plasma concentrations measured at steady state (Cssmin). Results A total of 28 patients were included, of whom only 39.3% (n = 11) showed Cssmin within the therapeutic range. 100% of patients with Cssmin >750 ng/mL achieved an optimal molecular response, while only 50% of patients with Cssmin <750 ng/mL achieved an optimal molecular response ( p = 0.0004). The toxicity rate was 36.4% for patients with Cssmin >1500 ng/mL and 5.9% for those with Cssmin <1500 ng/mL ( p = 0.039). Conclusions This study aimed to describe the correlation between the toxicity and effectiveness of imatinib according to its Cssmin in routine clinical practice conditions. Based on our findings, it would be certainly justified to monitor patient plasma concentrations of imatinib on a daily routine basis in our hospitals.

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 5435-5435
Author(s):  
Jane F. Apperley ◽  
Jenny L. Byrne ◽  
Graeme Smith ◽  
Simone Claudiani ◽  
Andrea Viqueira ◽  
...  

Abstract Objectives.Bosutinib is a second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) indicated for patients with previously treated Philadelphia chromosome positive chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) when imatinib, nilotinib and dasatinib are not appropriate. Data describing the use of bosutinib in patients with CML in the real world clinical setting are limited. The objective of this study was to describe the efficacy and safety of bosutinib in patients with CML used under routine clinical practice. Methods.An international, multi-centre, retrospective, non-interventional study in hospitals in the UK (n=7) and the Netherlands (n=2). Fifty-three patients (32 [60%] male) with CML, aged ≥18 years at bosutinib initiation and with ≥3 months data available post-initiation were recruited. Surviving patients provided written informed consent for data collection; data from deceased patients were collected by a member of the direct care team to preserve confidentiality. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics with no imputation of missing values (denominators presented where data are missing). Results.Median age at bosutinib initiation was 63.6 (range: 25.5 to 90.1) years; median time from CML diagnosis to bosutinib initiation was 7.1 (range: 0.5 to 35.7) years; 74% (39/53) of patients had one or more co-morbidities at initiation. Bosutinib was 3rd-line TKI in 32% (17/53) of patients and 4th-line TKI in 53% (28/53) of patients. Fifty-seven percent (30/53) of patients switched to bosutinib due to intolerance and 26% (14/53) due to resistance to a previous TKI. The most common bosutinib starting dose was 300 mg/day (28% [15/53] of patients). Median bosutinib treatment duration was 15.6 (range: 0.4 to 66.0) months. The proportions of patients with cumulative complete cytogenetic response (CCyR), major molecular response (MMR), molecular response 4.0 (MR4.0) and molecular response 4.5 (MR4.5) with bosutinib were 62%, 54%, 34% and 26%, respectively (see figure). At data collection (median follow-up 25.1 [range: 3.0 to 66.0] months), 38% (20/53) of patients had discontinued bosutinib; 2% (1/53) discontinued due to progression, 8% (4/53) due to treatment failure, 15% (8/53) due to adverse events (AE), 6% (3/53) due to loss of response, and 4% (2/53) due to patient request. Ninety-two percent (49/53) of patients experienced ≥1 AE, most commonly diarrhoea (55% [29/53] of patients); 26% (14/53) of patients had grade 3/4 AEs (diarrhoea grade 3/4: 4% [2/53] of patients). Conclusions.Bosutinib used in normal clinical practice in pre-treated patients with CML demonstrates high rates of cytogenetic and major molecular response similar to those seen in clinical trials. Bosutinib is generally well tolerated, with the majority of patients not experiencing grade 3/4 AEs, despite most patients having pre-existing co-morbidities. Disclosures Apperley: Pfizer: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Ariad: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Byrne:Bristol Myers Squipp: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Smith:Pfizer: Honoraria, Other: Advisory boards and talks at regional sponsored meetings. Viqueira:Pfizer: Employment. Ferdinand:Pfizer: Employment. Carter:pH Associates: Employment. Nock:pH Associates: Employment. Milojkovic:Ariad: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria.


2017 ◽  
Vol 28 ◽  
pp. iv41-iv51 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Hochhaus ◽  
S. Saussele ◽  
G. Rosti ◽  
F.-X. Mahon ◽  
J.J.W.M. Janssen ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Hilbeen Hisham Saifullah ◽  
Claire Marie Lucas

Following the development of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), the survival of patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) drastically improved. With the introduction of these agents, CML is now considered a chronic disease, for some patients. Taking into consideration the side effects, toxicity, and high cost, discontinuing TKIs became a goal for patients with chronic phase CML. Patients who achieved deep molecular response (DMR) and discontinued TKI, remained in treatment-free remission (TFR). Currently, the data from the published literature demonstrate that 40-60% of patients achieve TFR, with relapses occurring within the first six months. In addition, almost all patients who relapsed regained a molecular response upon re-treatment, indicating TKI discontinuation is safe. However, there is still a gap in the understanding the mechanisms behind TFR, and whether there are prognostic factors that can predict the best candidates who qualify for TKI discontinuation with a view to keeping them in TFR. Furthermore, the information about a second TFR attempt and the role of gradual de-escalation of TKI before complete cessation is limited. This review highlights the factors predicting success or failure of TFR. In addition, it ex-amines the feasibility of a second TFR attempt after the failure of the first one, and the current guidelines concerning TFR in clinical practice.


2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 2018027 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ekaterina Chelysheva ◽  
Sergey Aleshin ◽  
Evgenia Polushkina ◽  
Roman Shmakov ◽  
Igor Shokhin ◽  
...  

Breastfeeding in patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) who take tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) is not recommended but interruption of TKI treatment may cause the loss of remission. We observed the kinetics of the leukaemic clone in 3 women with CML in accordance with treatment interruptions for pregnancy and breastfeeding. The concentrations of nilotinib and imatinib in maternal milk were measured when the breastfeeding period was over. Nilotinib transfer into human breast milk was demonstrated for the first time and had a maximum concentration (Cmax) 129 ng/ml after 4 hours of the drug intake at a dose of 400 mg. The Cmax of imatinib in maternal milk ranged from 420 to 1411 ng/ml after 4-8 hours of the drug intake at a dose of 400-600 mg. Breastfeeding without TKI treatment may be safe with molecular monitoring, but preferably in those patients with CML who have durable deep molecular response.


Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 4036-4036
Author(s):  
Alexandra Smith ◽  
Eve Roman ◽  
Daniel Painter ◽  
Debra Howell ◽  
Graeme Smith ◽  
...  

Abstract The use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has transformed the treatment of chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML), changing it from a disease that was fatal in non-transplant patients to a long-term condition managed by oral medication. However, survival rates in the US SEER populations are much poorer than predicted by clinical trials. The aim of this study was to investigate whether these differences were also apparent in the UK. To address this, we present contemporary (2004-13) population-based (3.6 million) data from an established patient cohort (www.hmrn.org). All of the patients were treated within the UK's National Health Service (NHS) where TKIs are freely available on the basis of clinical need. 242 patients were diagnosed with CML in the study region Sept 2004 to Aug 2011; a crude annual incidence rate of 0.97 per 100,000. Using established methods, time to event analyses was used to calculate overall survival (OS), relative survival (RS), and loss of molecular response; and the quintile distribution of the income domain of the index of deprivation (IMD) was used as marker of socio-economic status. 47 (19.5%) patients died before the 1st April 2013; minimum follow-up 1.5 yrs and maximum 8.5 yrs. The 5-year OS was 78.9% and RS, taking into account background general population mortality, was 88.6% (Fig 1). Only 8 (3.3%) of the 242 patients were not treated with TKIs within the study region: 2 died before treatment could be started, 1 refused treatment, 1 had another cancer, 2 had supportive care only, and 2 moved to another part of the country (both were alive on 1st April 2013). 219 (93.6%) of the 234 treated patients received first-line Imatinib, the remainder receiving Dasatinib as part of a clinical trial. The efficacy of TKI treatment across all ages is demonstrated in Fig 2. Whilst the age-specific crude survival curves continue to diverge (P=0.001), the relative survival curves for the two age groups remain closely aligned (5-year RS< 60 =89.9%, ≥ 60= 87.2%). Gender had little impact on outcome (5-year RS men = 90.1%, women = 89.1%). By contrast, the deprivation-specific RS curves remain as disparate from each other as the OS curves (P=0.0014); the 5-year RS estimates of the most affluent (quintiles 1 to 3) and the least affluent (quintiles 4 to 5) being 94.9% and 79.5% respectively. These deprivation differences could not be explained by variations in acquisition of TKI resistance (n=10) or acquisition of additional cytogenetic abnormalities (n=7), both of which were rare in this population: for deprivation categories1-3 and 4-5 TKI resistance was 4/140 and 6/94 respectively, and for acquisition of additional cytogenetic abnormalities it was 7/140 and 0/94 respectively. As can be seen from Table 1, however, differences in survival associated with deprivation were evident both for molecular response achievement and maintenance; defined here as one or more readings ≤ 0.1 (MMR) or ≤ 1.0 (MR). Whilst the differences by deprivation are not statistically significant in the case of the former, the findings for loss of response combined with death from CML are, as expected, consistent with the findings for survival (Fig 2). In contrast to findings reported by SEER, the outcome for patients with CML in the UK treated mainly with Imatinib is excellent, and almost identical to the results of clinical trials. Age and gender no longer have prognostic significance and incidence of adverse biological events is low and appears sporadic. However, despite free access to TKI therapy, clinical outcomes are significantly poorer in lower socio-economic groups, and this is now one of the strongest predictors of outcome in CML in the UK. Identification of the mechanism of this effect and the design of appropriate interventions could further improve survival. Disclosures: Patmore: Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria. Jack:Roche /Genentech: Research Funding.


Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 5201-5201
Author(s):  
Heledd Thomas ◽  
Jane F Apperley ◽  
Richard M Szydlo ◽  
Gareth Gerrard ◽  
David Marin ◽  
...  

Abstract Background There is currently no universal definition of complete molecular response (CMR) in chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML). This has implications for studies of TKI withdrawal as CMR is the main criterion for entry into these trials. We aimed to assess the proportion of patients in our practice who achieved CMR by a variety of definitions. We hoped to identify a definition that was predictive of sustained CMR and could therefore be recommended to predict those patients who might be able to stop treatment in the longer term. Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of a comprehensive CML database of serial RT-qPCR results of 215 patients achieving deep molecular responses on TKI therapy. The least stringent definition of CMR was defined as BCR-ABL1 transcripts <11 and ABL1 control value (CV)>10,000. The depth of CMR was categorised according to transcript number and CV. Probability of molecular relapse according to depth of CMR at 2 and 5 years from initial CMR (ICMR) was estimated using the Kaplan Meier method. Results Patients with 6-10 transcripts (any CV) were most likely to lose CMR by 2 years (86.4%) while patients with 0 transcripts (any CV) were least likely to do so (7.6%). There was no difference in the probability of molecular relapse between patients with 1-5 transcripts (CV>32,000) and those with 0 transcripts (any CV) (RR at 2 years=1 p=0.945, RR at 5 years=3.7 p = 0.114). Conclusion Depth of CMR predicts molecular relapse at 2 and 5 years from ICMR. CMR4.5 (<6 transcripts) is the least stringent response that is required to sustain CMR. Patients with <6 transcripts (CV>32,000) are equally as likely to sustain CMR as patients with 0 transcripts up to 5 years from ICMR. These patients may be suitable for a stopping trial. Disclosures: Apperley: Ariad: Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria. Milojkovic:BMS: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Ariad: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document