Catheter-directed thrombolysis for deep vein thrombosis: 2021 update

2021 ◽  
pp. 1358863X2110429
Author(s):  
Samuel Z Goldhaber ◽  
Elizabeth A Magnuson ◽  
Khaja M Chinnakondepalli ◽  
David J Cohen ◽  
Suresh Vedantham

Catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) has been utilized as an adjunct to anticoagulant therapy in selected patients with deep vein thrombosis (DVT) for approximately 30 years. CDT used to be limited to patients with DVT causing acute limb threat and those exhibiting failure of initial anticoagulation, but has expanded over time. Randomized trials evaluating the first-line use of CDT for proximal DVT have demonstrated that CDT does not produce a major reduction in the occurrence of post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) and that it is poorly suited for elderly patients and those with limited thrombus extent or major risk factors for bleeding. However, CDT does offer selected patients with acute iliofemoral DVT improvement in reducing early DVT symptoms, in achieving reduction in PTS severity, and in producing an improvement in health-related quality of life (QOL). Clinical practice guidelines from medical and surgical societies are now largely aligned with the randomized trial results. This review offers the reader an update on the results of recently completed clinical trials, and additional guidance on appropriate selection of patients with DVT for catheter-directed thrombolytic therapy.

1999 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 1173-1187 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan D. Mathias ◽  
Lee Ann Prebil ◽  
Caryn G. Putterman ◽  
Joseph J. Chmiel ◽  
Richard C. Throm ◽  
...  

SpringerPlus ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristin Kornelia Utne ◽  
Mazdak Tavoly ◽  
Hilde Skuterud Wik ◽  
Lars Petter Jelsness-Jørgensen ◽  
René Holst ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 6 (7) ◽  
pp. 1105-1112 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. R. KAHN ◽  
H. SHBAKLO ◽  
D. L. LAMPING ◽  
C. A. HOLCROFT ◽  
I. SHRIER ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 25 ◽  
pp. 107602961988394 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Monreal ◽  
G. Agnelli ◽  
L. H. Chuang ◽  
A. T. Cohen ◽  
P. D. Gumbs ◽  
...  

Objectives: Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a major health-care burden in Europe, but exact estimates are lacking. This study reports results from the PREFER venous thromboembolism (VTE) study concerning health-related quality of life (HrQoL) and mortality of patients with DVT. Methods: PREFER VTE was a prospective, observational study, conducted in 7 European countries, designed to provide data concerning treatment patterns, resource utilization, mortality, and QoL. First-time or recurrent patients with DVT were followed at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. Health-related QoL—as measured by the EuroQoL 5-Dimension 5-Level instrument ( EQ-5D-5L)—was analyzed using Tobit regression with repeated measures, assessing the impact of baseline characteristics stratified by cancer activity. Mortality was analyzed using logistic regression. Results: At baseline, patients with DVT had a 0.14 lower EQ-5D-5L index score (0.72 for total sample) compared to the reference UK population (0.85). The EQ-5D-5L index score improved from baseline to 12 months in patients with active cancer (from 0.70 to 0.79) and those without (0.72-0.87); 7.3% died within a year, a 5.2% excess mortality compared to the age- and gender-adfjusted general population. The 12-month mortality rate of DVT varied between 2.9% in the pooled data from Germany, Switzerland, or Austria and 15.4% in Italy. Furthermore, the mortality rate differed between patients with active cancer and those without (42.9% vs 4.7%). Conclusions: Deep vein thrombosis is associated with a substantial burden of illness in terms of HrQoL at baseline, which following treatment normalizes after 12 months and has a significant mortality rate. In addition, active cancer has a significant impact on mortality and the HrQoL of patients with DVT.


2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (9) ◽  
pp. A611
Author(s):  
M Monreal ◽  
G Agnelli ◽  
L Chuang ◽  
AT Cohen ◽  
PD Gumbs ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document