Outcomes of day case shoulder replacement surgery in a stand-alone day care unit in the United Kingdom

Background: This review aims to compare the outcomes for day case shoulder replacement with in-patient shoulder replacement surgery in a district general hospital. Methods: Seventy-three patients had 82 shoulder arthroplasty procedures. Forty-six procedures were undertaken in a dedicated stand-alone day-case unit and 36 were undertaken as in-patient cases. Patient were followed up at 6 weeks, 6 months and annually. Results: There was no significant difference between the outcomes of shoulder arthroplasty procedures performed in the day case or in-patient settings making this a safe option for surgical care in a unit with an appropriate care pathway. Six complications in total were observed, three in each group. Operation time was statistically shorter for day cases by 25.1 min (95% CI - 36.5 to −13.7; d = −0.95, 95% CI −1.42 to 0.48). Estimated marginal means (EMM) revealed lower post-surgery oxford pain scores in day cases (EMM = 3.25, 95% CI 2.35, 4.16) compared with inpatients (EMM = 4.65, 95% CI 3.64 to 5.67). Constant shoulder scores were higher in day cases versus inpatients. Conclusion: Day case shoulder replacement is safe with comparable outcomes to routine inpatient care for patients up to ASA 3 classification with high satisfaction and excellent functional outcomes.

Download Full-text

A New Method to Determine the Humerus Height and Humeral Head Retroversion for Hemiarthroplasty

10.21203/rs.3.rs-31603/v1 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Wanfu Wei ◽

Jian`an Li ◽

Guoyun Bu ◽

Tao Yang

Keyword(s):

Linear Regression ◽

Blood Loss ◽

Linear Relationship ◽

Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽

Humeral Head ◽

Shoulder Joint ◽

Operation Time ◽

Treatment Groups ◽

Constant Murley Score ◽

Significant Difference

Abstract Background Placement of shoulder prosthesis used for reconstruction of a complex proximal humerus fractures is critical because it is related to clinical outcomes after hemiarthroplasty. To achieve the anatomical placement of the prosthesis, we introduced a simple operative method to determine the humerus height and humeral head retroversion, and retrospectively investigated the clinical and radiographic outcomes of our procedure.Method 34 patients, treated by shoulder arthroplasty for 4-part or 3–part proximal humeral fracture during the period between June 2016 and December 2018, were enrolled in the study. Eventually 29 patients, 18 women and 11 men with an average age of 68.4 years (range 58–85 years), were followed up successfully. Of which 13 patients treated with classic method were matched to 19 of the 29 new method treated patients by operation time, blood loss, pain, range of motion, Constant-Murley score and radiographic features.Results There was a significant difference between the two treatment groups in operation time (p = 0.024), while there was no significant difference in blood loss (p = 0.078). No significant difference was found between the two treatment groups in Visual Analog scale (p = 0.225), Constant-Murley score (p = 0.930), and radiological outcomes (p = 0.504). There was linear regression and correlation between Constant-Murley score and age (p = 0.027), while there was no linear relationship between status of tuberosity and the function of the shoulder joint (p = 0.931).Conclusion We introduce a new operative technique to determine the humerus height and humeral head retroversion for shoulder arthroplasty operation. Based on the data, there is linear regression and correlation between Constant-Murley score and age, while there is no linear relationship between status of tuberosity and the function of the shoulder joint. Our present analyses reveal that our protocol is personalized, easy, effective and feasible.

Download Full-text

Day case shoulder arthroplasty: needed now more than ever

British Journal of Hospital Medicine ◽

10.12968/hmed.2021.0233 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 1-7

Author(s):

Tanujan Thangarajah

Keyword(s):

Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽

Waiting Times ◽

Total Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽

Cost Savings ◽

Team Approach ◽

Ageing Population ◽

Day Case ◽

Safe Alternative ◽

Joint Replacement Surgery ◽

Replacement Surgery

The demand for total shoulder arthroplasty has grown over the years and is set to continue in a similar trend because of the ageing population. Following a global reduction in elective orthopaedic treatment and an exponential rise in surgical waiting times, innovative strategies are desperately needed to mitigate against the harmful effects of delaying vital operations on both patients and the wider society. Day case shoulder arthroplasty is a safe alternative to a traditional inpatient approach, with evidence supporting substantial cost savings, improved outcomes and fewer complications. Rigorous patient selection and a multidisciplinary team approach are paramount when adopting a day case service to deliver joint replacement surgery. This review outlines the principles of day case total shoulder arthroplasty and highlights key considerations when transitioning to this approach.

Download Full-text

A Modified Method to Determine the Humerus Height and Humeral Head Retroversion for Hemiarthroplasty

10.21203/rs.3.rs-68852/v1 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Wanfu Wei ◽

Jian`an Li ◽

Guoyun Bu ◽

Tao Yang

Keyword(s):

Linear Regression ◽

Blood Loss ◽

Linear Relationship ◽

Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽

Humeral Head ◽

Shoulder Joint ◽

Operation Time ◽

Treatment Groups ◽

Constant Murley Score ◽

Significant Difference

Abstract Background Placement of shoulder prosthesis used for reconstruction of a complex proximal humerus fractures is critical because it is related to clinical outcomes after hemiarthroplasty. To achieve the anatomical placement of the prosthesis, we introduced a simple operative method to determine the humerus height and humeral head retroversion, and retrospectively investigated the clinical and radiographic outcomes of our procedure.Method 34 patients, treated by shoulder arthroplasty for 4-part or 3–part proximal humeral fracture during the period between June 2016 and December 2018, were enrolled in the study. Eventually 29 patients, 18 women and 11 men with an average age of 68.4 years (range 58-85 years), were followed up successfully. Of which 13 patients treated with classic method were matched to 19 of the 29 new method treated patients by operation time, blood loss, pain, range of motion, Constant-Murley score and radiographic features. Results There was a significant difference between the two treatment groups in operation time (p=0.024), while there was no significant difference in blood loss (p=0.078). No significant difference was found between the two treatment groups in Visual Analog scale (p=0.225), Constant-Murley score (p=0.930), and radiological outcomes (p=0.504). There was linear regression and correlation between Constant-Murley score and age (p=0.027), while there was no linear relationship between status of tuberosity and the function of the shoulder joint (p=0.931). Conclusion We introduce a new operative technique to determine the humerus height and humeral head retroversion for shoulder arthroplasty operation. Based on the data, there is linear regression and correlation between Constant-Murley score and age, while there is no linear relationship between status of tuberosity and the function of the shoulder joint. Our present analyses reveal that our protocol is personalized, easy, effective and feasible.Trial registration: https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN28175069.

Download Full-text

204 A Systematic Review of Clinical Outcomes for Outpatient vs Inpatient Shoulder Arthroplasty

British Journal of Surgery ◽

10.1093/bjs/znab259.973 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽

Author(s):

E Perera ◽

B Flood ◽

K Madden ◽

D Goel ◽

T Leroux ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Clinical Outcomes ◽

Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽

Outpatient Surgery ◽

Care Pathway ◽

Hospital Readmissions ◽

Cost Effective ◽

Outpatient Setting ◽

Inpatient Setting ◽

Operative Care ◽

Significant Difference

Abstract Aim Outpatient shoulder arthroplasty is growing in popularity as a cost-effective and potentially equally safe alternative to inpatient arthroplasty. We investigated literature relating to outpatient shoulder arthroplasty, looking at clinical outcomes, complications, readmission, and cost compared to inpatient arthroplasty. Method We systematically searched Medline, Embase, PubMed using relevant search terms. Methodological quality of included studies was assessed using Methodological Index for Non-Randomised Studies score. Results We included 17 studies in our review with 11 included in the meta-analyses. A meta-analysis of hospital readmissions demonstrated that there was no statistically significant difference between outpatient and inpatient cohorts (OR = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.63-1.25, p = 0.49, I2=56%). Pooling results for all post-operative complications identified decreased complications in those undergoing outpatient surgery (OR = 0.70; 95% CI: 0.52-0.94, p = 0.02, I2=50%). No statistically significant difference was identified with respect to medical complications (OR = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.74-1.01, p = 0.07, I2=0%) or surgical complications (OR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.45-1.12, p = 0.14, I2=26%). Considerable cost saving of between $3 614 – $53 202 (19.7 – 69.9%) per patient were present in the outpatient setting. Conclusions Shoulder arthroplasty in the outpatient setting is as safe as shoulder arthroplasty in the inpatient setting, with a significant reduction in cost. There is no demonstrable statistically significant difference with regards to readmissions between outpatient and inpatient shoulder arthroplasty. In the appropriately selected patient, outpatient shoulder arthroplasty is safe and cost-effective; however, we still need to work towards understanding who the appropriate patients are for this post-operative care pathway.

Download Full-text

Day case versus inpatient total shoulder arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Shoulder & Elbow ◽

10.1177/1758573220944411 ◽

2020 ◽

pp. 175857322094441

Author(s):

Michael-Alexander Malahias ◽

Stefania Kokkineli ◽

Alex Gu ◽

Dimitris Karanikas ◽

Scott G Kaar ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Length Of Stay ◽

Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽

Clinical Characteristics ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Total Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽

Surgical Site Infections ◽

Cardiac Complications ◽

Day Case ◽

Significant Difference

Background A number of papers have been published comparing the safety and efficacy of day case and inpatient anatomic or reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. However, no systematic review of the literature has been published to date. The aim of this review was to determine if day case total shoulder arthroplasty (length of stay <24 h) leads to similar outcomes as standard-stay inpatients (length of stay ≥24 h). Methods The US National Library of Medicine (PubMed/MEDLINE), EMBASE, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviewers were queried for publications utilizing keywords that were pertinent to total shoulder arthroplasty, day case, outpatient and inpatient, clinical or functional outcomes, and complications. In order to determine the quantitative impact of day case total shoulder arthroplasty on readmission and revision rate, a meta-analysis was performed on articles that observed 30- or 90-day readmission or revision. Results Eight articles were found to be suitable for inclusion in the present study which included 6103 day case total shoulder arthroplasty and 147,463 inpatient total shoulder arthroplasty. Following meta-analysis, there was no significant difference among patients who underwent day case total shoulder arthroplasty compared to inpatient total shoulder arthroplasty regarding revision rates (OR: 1.001; 95% CI: 0.721–1.389; p = 0.995) and 30-day readmission rates (OR: 0.940; 95% CI: 0.723–1.223; p = 0.646). In contrast, patients who underwent day case total shoulder arthroplasty were less likely to have a readmission within 90 days compared to their inpatient counterparts (OR: 0.839; 95% CI: 0.704–0.999; p = 0.049). Two out of eight studies reported comparable baseline clinical characteristics among groups, while five studies reported significant differences and one study did not provide information regarding clinical characteristics, such as medical comorbidities or American Society of Anaesthesiologists'(ASA) score. No significant difference among groups was found in all or almost all studies regarding mortality rates, and rates of cardiac complications, cerebrovascular events, thromboembolic events, pulmonary complications, cardiac complications, and nerve complications. Finally, results were rather conflicting regarding the correlation of day case total shoulder arthroplasty to the rate of surgical site infections. Conclusions This study showed that day case total shoulder arthroplasty might lead to similar rates of mortality, complications, revisions, and readmissions compared to inpatient total shoulder arthroplasty when used in a selected population of younger, healthier, and more male patients. In contrast, there was no consensus regarding the impact of day case total shoulder arthroplasty on the rate of surgical site infections. Finally, further research of higher quality is required to establish patient demographic criteria, ASA score, or comorbidity index cut off that might be used to define day case-treated patients who seem to have equivalent outcomes compared to inpatient-treated patients. Level of evidence: Systematic review of level III studies (lowest level included).

Download Full-text

Serious adverse events and lifetime risk of reoperation after elective shoulder replacement: population based cohort study using hospital episode statistics for England

BMJ ◽

10.1136/bmj.l298 ◽

2019 ◽

pp. l298 ◽

Cited By ~ 10

Author(s):

Richard S Craig ◽

Jennifer C E Lane ◽

Andrew J Carr ◽

Dominic Furniss ◽

Gary S Collins ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Adverse Events ◽

Revision Surgery ◽

Population Based ◽

Hospital Episode Statistics ◽

Lifetime Risk ◽

Shoulder Replacement ◽

Serious Adverse Events ◽

Serious Adverse Event ◽

Replacement Surgery ◽

Post Surgery

AbstractObjectivesTo provide accurate risk estimates of serious adverse events after elective shoulder replacement surgery for arthritis, including age and sex specific estimates of the lifetime risk of revision surgery.DesignPopulation based cohort study.SettingHospital episode statistics for NHS England, including civil registration mortality data.Participants58 054 elective shoulder replacements in 51 895 adults (aged ≥50 years) between April 1998 and April 2017.Main outcome measuresThe lifetime risk of revision surgery, calculated using an actuarial life table approach and the cumulative probability method. Rates of serious adverse events at 30 and 90 days post-surgery: pulmonary embolism, myocardial infarction, lower respiratory tract infection, acute kidney injury, urinary tract infection, cerebrovascular events, and all cause death. Secondary outcome measures were the number of surgeries performed each year and Kaplan-Meier estimates of revision risk at 3, 5, 10, and 15 years.ResultsThe number of shoulder replacements performed each year increased 5.6-fold between 1998 and 2017. Lifetime risks of revision surgery ranged from 1 in 37 (2.7%, 95% confidence interval 2.6% to 2.8%) in women aged 85 years and older to 1 in 4 (23.6%, 23.2% to 24.0%) in men aged 55-59 years. The risks of revision were highest during the first five years after surgery. The risk of any serious adverse event at 30 days post-surgery was 1 in 28 (3.5%, 3.4% to 3.7%), and at 90 days post-surgery was 1 in 22 (4.6%, 4.4% to 4.8%). At 30 days, the relative risk of pulmonary embolism compared with baseline population risk was 61 (95% confidence interval 50 to 73) for women aged 50-64. Serious adverse events were associated with increasing age, comorbidity, and male sex. 1 in 5 (21.2%, 17.9% to 25.1%) men aged 85 years and older experienced at least one serious adverse event within 90 days.ConclusionsYounger patients, particularly men, need to be aware of a higher likelihood of early failure of shoulder replacement and the need for further and more complex revision replacement surgery. All patients should be counselled about the risks of serious adverse events. These risks are higher than previously considered, and for some could outweigh any potential benefits. Our findings caution against unchecked expansion of shoulder replacement surgery in both younger and older patients. The more accurate age and sex specific estimates of risk from this study are long overdue and should improve shared decision making between patients and clinicians.Study registrationClinicalTrials.govNCT03573765.

Download Full-text

Patient Satisfaction with Colorectal Rapid Access Clinic

Journal of Advances in Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences ◽

10.9734/jamps/2020/v22i1230205 ◽

2020 ◽

pp. 1-8

Author(s):

Kirsty Cattle ◽

Thomas Athisayaraj ◽

Neil Keeling ◽

Ami Mishra

Keyword(s):

Patient Satisfaction ◽

Care Pathway ◽

District General Hospital ◽

Cancer Symptoms ◽

Rapid Access ◽

Level Of Satisfaction ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Red Flag ◽

Rapid Access Clinic ◽

Outpatient Appointments

Aims: Patients referred with red flag colorectal cancer symptoms are seen within 2 weeks of referral and require completion of treatment within 62 days of referral. The demand on resources is such that the remit of this rapid access pathway (RAP) is to diagnose or exclude cancer quickly. It is hypothesised that patients on these pathways are less likely to have their symptoms addressed and more likely to be dissatisfied with the service received. Study Design: Questionnaire based study of all patients attending new colorectal outpatient appointments, both routine and RAP. Place and Duration of Study: All patients referred the colorectal department at West Suffolk Hospital, a district general hospital, during January 2018 were sent a questionnaire 6 months later. Methodology: Results were analysed for statistically significant differences between the two groups in relation to patient satisfaction. Results: Of 273 new patients, questionnaires were returned by 78 patients attending rapid access clinics and 61 attending routine new appointments. There was no significant difference in the overall level of satisfaction with the overall investigation and management process between patients seen in rapid access clinics or routine new appointments (P = 0.867). Patients on the RAP were less likely to have been given a diagnosis (p = 0.001) or advice on managing their symptoms (P = 0.002). When assessing a number of variables, only patients whose symptoms had resolved were significantly more satisfied with the overall care pathway (P = 0.037). Conclusion: Patients seen on the RAP are not less satisfied with their care.

Download Full-text

Return to Sport After Shoulder Arthroplasty in Recreational Athletes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

The American Journal of Sports Medicine ◽

10.1177/0363546517714449 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 46 (5) ◽

pp. 1251-1257 ◽

Cited By ~ 8

Author(s):

Florence Aim ◽

Jean-David Werthel ◽

Julien Deranlot ◽

Marie Vigan ◽

Geoffroy Nourissat

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽

Return To Sport ◽

Rate Of Return ◽

Shoulder Replacement ◽

Recreational Athletes ◽

Replacement Surgery ◽

Radiological Data

Background: One of the most frequent demands from patients after shoulder replacement surgery is to return to sport. Purpose: To determine the rate of return to sport after shoulder arthroplasty (total shoulder arthroplasty, reverse shoulder arthroplasty, hemiarthroplasty) in recreational athletes. Study Design: Meta-analysis and systematic review. Methods: The PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines were followed to perform this systematic review and meta-analysis of the results in the literature as well as the presentation of results. A search of the literature was performed in the electronic databases MEDLINE, Scopus, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. The quality of the included studies was evaluated according to the MINORS (Methodological Index for Nonrandomized Studies) score. Inclusion criteria were studies in English evaluating return to sport after shoulder replacement surgery and on patients practicing a sport regularly, whatever the level, with all ages and sports included. The main criterion was the rate of patients who returned to a sport activity. Results: Nine studies were selected among the 35 identified, including a total of 613 patients (39% male and 61% female) with a mean age of 71.7 years (range, 22.6-92.6 years). All the included patients practiced sports before surgery. The most common reported sports were golf (n = 140), swimming (n = 128), and tennis (n = 54). The mean rate of return to sport was 80.7% (range, 57.1%-97.3%). All patients who returned to sport were practicing in the 3 months before surgery. No radiological data were reported in the literature. The subgroup analysis for resuming golf after shoulder arthroplasty revealed a rate of return to sport of 79.2% (95% CI, 62.9%-89.5%). In the swimming subgroup, the rate was 75.6% (95% CI, 61.3%-85.8%) and in the tennis subgroup was 63.5% (95% CI, 34.1%-85.5%). The subgroup analysis for reverse shoulder arthroplasty reported a lower rate of return to sport than for all types of shoulder arthroplasty combined: 76.5% (95% CI, 60%-87%) versus 80.7% (95% CI, 70.9%-87.8%), respectively. Conclusion: Most patients returned to sport after surgery, and all who returned to sport were practicing their sport in the 3 months before surgery. No radiological data were reported in the literature.

Download Full-text

Efficacy evaluation of three-dimensional printing assisted osteotomy guide plate in accurate osteotomy of adolescent cubitus varus deformity

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research ◽

10.1186/s13018-019-1403-7 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 14 (1) ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Yuan-Wei Zhang ◽

Xin Xiao ◽

Wen-Cheng Gao ◽

Yan Xiao ◽

Su-Li Zhang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

3D Printing ◽

Blood Loss ◽

Three Dimensional ◽

Operation Time ◽

Varus Deformity ◽

Conventional Group ◽

Intraoperative Blood Loss ◽

Cubitus Varus ◽

Guide Plate ◽

Significant Difference

Abstract Background This present study is aimed to retrospectively assess the efficacy of three-dimensional (3D) printing assisted osteotomy guide plate in accurate osteotomy of adolescent cubitus varus deformity. Material and methods Twenty-five patients (15 males and 10 females) with the cubitus varus deformity from June 2014 to December 2017 were included in this study and were enrolled into the conventional group (n = 11) and 3D printing group (n = 14) according to the different surgical approaches. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, osteotomy degrees, osteotomy end union time, and postoperative complications between the two groups were observed and recorded. Results Compared with the conventional group, the 3D printing group has the advantages of shorter operation time, less intraoperative blood loss, higher rate of excellent correction, and higher rate of the parents’ excellent satisfaction with appearance after deformity correction (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, P = 0.019, P = 0.023). Nevertheless, no significant difference was presented in postoperative carrying angle of the deformed side and total complication rate between the two groups (P = 0.626, P = 0.371). Conclusions The operation assisted by 3D printing osteotomy guide plate to correct the adolescent cubitus varus deformity is feasible and effective, which might be an optional approach to promote the accurate osteotomy and optimize the efficacy.

Download Full-text

Clinical Evaluation of Microendoscopy-Assisted Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion

Medicina ◽

10.3390/medicina57020135 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 57 (2) ◽

pp. 135

Author(s):

Tomohide Segawa ◽

Hisashi Koga ◽

Masahito Oshina ◽

Katsuhiko Ishibashi ◽

Yuichi Takano ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Interbody Fusion ◽

Outcome Measure ◽

Operation Time ◽

Secondary Outcome ◽

Invasive Technique ◽

Lateral Interbody Fusion ◽

Surgical Methods ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion ◽

Lateral Interbody

Background and objectives: Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion (OLIF) is a widely performed, minimally invasive technique to achieve lumbar lateral interbody fusion. However, some complications can arise due to constraints posed by the limited surgical space and visual field. The purpose of this study was to assess the short-term postoperative clinical outcomes of microendoscopy-assisted OLIF (ME-OLIF) compared to conventional OLIF. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively investigated 75 consecutive patients who underwent OLIF or ME-OLIF. The age, sex, diagnosis, and number of fused levels were obtained from medical records. Operation time, estimated blood loss (EBL), and intraoperative complications were also collected. Operation time and EBL were only measured per level required for the lateral procedure, excluding the posterior fixation surgery. The primary outcome measure was assessed using the Japanese Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ). The secondary outcome measure was assessed using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and the European Quality of Life–5 Dimensions (EQ-5D), measured preoperatively and 1-year postoperatively. Results: This case series consisted of 14 patients in the OLIF group and 61 patients in the ME-OLIF group. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of the mean operative time and EBL (p = 0.90 and p = 0.50, respectively). The perioperative complication rate was 21.4% in the OLIF group and 21.3% in the ME-OLIF group (p = 0.99). In both groups, the postoperative JOABPEQ, EQ-5D, and ODI scores improved significantly (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Although there was no significant difference in clinical results between the two surgical methods, the results suggest that both are safe surgical methods and that microendoscopy-assisted OLIF could serve as a potential alternative to the conventional OLIF procedure.

Download Full-text