scholarly journals The Impact of Corticosteroid Injection Timing on Infection Rates Following Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
pp. 219256822110266
Author(s):  
Gregory S. Kazarian ◽  
Michael E. Steinhaus ◽  
Han Jo Kim

Study Design/Setting: Systematic review/meta-analysis. Objectives: The objective of this review was to assess how the risk of infection following lumbar spine surgery varies as a function of the timing of preoperative corticosteroid spinal injections (CSIs). Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched and data was pooled for meta-analysis. Results: Six studies were identified for inclusion. Two (33.3%) demonstrated a significant relationship between the timing of preoperative CSIs and the risk of postoperative infection, while 4 (66.7%) demonstrated no impact. A total of 2.5% (110/4,448) of patients who underwent CSI <1 month before surgery experienced a postoperative infection, as compared to 1.2% (1,466/120, 943) of controls, which was statistically significant (RR = 1.986 95% CI 1.202-3.282 P = 0.007). A total of 1.6% (25/1,600) of patients who underwent CSI 0-3 months before surgery experienced a postoperative infection, as compared to 1.6% (201/12, 845) of controls (RR = 0.887 95% CI 0.586-1.341, P = 0.569). A total of 1.1% (199/17 870) of patients who underwent CSI 3-6 months before surgery experienced a postoperative infection, as compared to 1.3% (1,382/102, 572) of controls (RR = 1.053 95% CI 0.704-1.575, P = 0.802). Differences in infection risk for 0-3 months and 3-6 months were not statistically significant. Conclusions: CSIs <1 month prior to lumbar spine surgery are a significant risk factor for infection, while CSIs beyond that point showed no such association. Surgeons should consider avoiding CSIs <1 month of the use of CSIs of the spine.

2015 ◽  
Vol 15 (5) ◽  
pp. 1118-1132 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dexter K. Bateman ◽  
Paul W. Millhouse ◽  
Niti Shahi ◽  
Abhijeet B. Kadam ◽  
Mitchell G. Maltenfort ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 177 ◽  
pp. 27-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anshit Goyal ◽  
Mohamed Elminawy ◽  
Panagiotis Kerezoudis ◽  
Victor M. Lu ◽  
Yagiz Yolcu ◽  
...  

Neurosurgery ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 65 (CN_suppl_1) ◽  
pp. 131-131
Author(s):  
Anshit Goyal ◽  
Mohamed Elminawy ◽  
Panagiotis Kerezoudis ◽  
Yagiz U Yolcu ◽  
Victor M Lu ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Fabrizio Russo ◽  
Sergio De Salvatore ◽  
Luca Ambrosio ◽  
Gianluca Vadalà ◽  
Luca Fontana ◽  
...  

Low back pain (LBP) is currently the leading cause of disability worldwide and the most common reason for workers’ compensation (WC) claims. Studies have demonstrated that receiving WC is associated with a negative prognosis following treatment for a vast range of health conditions. However, the impact of WC on outcomes after spine surgery is still controversial. The aim of this meta-analysis was to systematically review the literature and analyze the impact of compensation status on outcomes after lumbar spine surgery. A systematic search was performed on Medline, Scopus, CINAHL, EMBASE and CENTRAL databases. The review included studies of patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery in which compensation status was reported. Methodological quality was assessed through ROBINS-I and quality of evidence was estimated using the GRADE rating. A total of 26 studies with a total of 2668 patients were included in the analysis. WC patients had higher post-operative pain and disability, as well as lower satisfaction after surgery when compared to those without WC. Furthermore, WC patients demonstrated to have a delayed return to work. According to our results, compensation status is associated with poor outcomes after lumbar spine surgery. Contextualizing post-operative outcomes in clinical and work-related domains helps understand the multifactorial nature of the phenomenon.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document