scholarly journals A Phase II Trial of the Combination of Ixazomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone in High-Risk Smoldering Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2749-2749
Author(s):  
Omar Nadeem ◽  
Robert A. Redd ◽  
Julia Prescott ◽  
Kelsey Tague ◽  
Veronica Romines ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Bone Marrow ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Induction Phase ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Study Therapy

Abstract Background: Early therapeutic intervention in high-risk SMM (HR-SMM) has demonstrated benefit based on previous studies that included treatment with lenalidomide or lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Mateos et al. N Engl J Med 2013; Lonial et al. J Clin Oncol 2020). Combination therapy with triplets has shown higher rates of deep response and improved outcomes in patients with multiple myeloma, including the combination of ixazomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (Moreau et al. N Eng J Med 2016). We present our results of phase II study of ixazomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone in HR-SMM. Methods: Patients enrolled on the study met eligibility for high-risk SMM based on the defined criteria proposed by Rajkumar et al. (Blood 2014). The treatment plan was designed to be administered on an outpatient basis where patients receive 9 cycles of induction therapy of ixazomib (4mg) at days 1, 8, and 15, in combination with lenalidomide (25mg) at days 1-21 and dexamethasone at days 1, 8, 15, and 22. The induction phase was followed by ixazomib (4mg) and lenalidomide (15mg) maintenance for another 15 cycles. A treatment cycle was defined as 28 consecutive days for a total of 24 months period. Bone marrow samples of all patients were obtained before starting therapy for baseline assessment for minimal residual disease (MRD) testing, whole-exome sequencing (WES), and RNA sequencing of plasma and bone marrow microenvironment cells. Moreover, blood samples were obtained at screening and before each cycle for isolating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) and circulating tumor cells (CTCs). Results: Sixty-one patients have been enrolled in this study from February 2017 to 2020. The median age of the patients at enrollment was 64 years (range, 40 to 84), with 33 males (54.1%). The analysis was conducted on patients who have completed at least 2 cycles of therapy (n=55). Thus far, 42 (69%) patients have completed the planned 24 cycles of therapy. High-risk cytogenetics (defined as the presence of t(4;14), 17p deletion, and 1q gain) were found in 14 patients out of the 33 evaluable (42.4%) Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (iFISH) results. The median number of cycles completed was 24 cycles (range: 2-24). According to the new IMWG risk stratification model (20-2-20), baseline markers showed that 32 patients (58%) were high risk, 18 (33%) were intermediate risk, and 5 (9%) were low risk. The most common grades 3 or greater toxicities were neutropenia (20%), hypophosphatemia (13%), leukopenia (11%), rash (9%), lymphocytopenia (5%), and thrombocytopenia (5%). Stem cells were collected from all eligible patients by the end of the induction phase. No patients discontinued treatment due to toxicity. At the time of data cut off, the overall response rate (partial response or better) in participants who completed at least 2 cycles of treatment was 90.9% (50 of 55), with 12 complete responses (CR, 21.8%), 10 very good partial responses (VGPR, 18.2%), 28 partial responses (50.9%), and 4 minimal responses (MR, 7.3%). ORR in patients who completed the induction phase (≥9 cycles) was 92.3% (n= 48 of 52), with 22 (40%) deep remissions including 12 (23.1%) and 10 (19.2%) having achieved a CR and VGPR, respectively. All patients who had a CR have also achieved a stringent CR. No patients developed progression to overt or active MM while on study therapy. After completion of study therapy, 4 patients progressed to active MM during follow up, 3 additional patients developed biochemical progression and started a new course of therapy but did not meet CRAB criteria and 7 patients confirmed biochemical PD and remain off therapy. Conclusions: The combination of ixazomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone is an effective all oral well-tolerated intervention in high-risk smoldering myeloma that demonstrated an ORR of >90% and deep remission in >40% of patients. While no patients progressed to overt MM while on therapy, some developed progression after completion of planned study therapy, indicating the possible need for higher intensification of therapy or maintenance therapy beyond 2 years in this high-risk group of patients. Longer follow-up for disease outcome is ongoing. Disclosures Nadeem: BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Mo: Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria; GSK: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Epizyme: Consultancy; Eli Lilly: Consultancy; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVIE: Consultancy. Sperling: Adaptive: Consultancy. Richardson: AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Secura Bio: Consultancy; Regeneron: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Research Funding; Protocol Intelligence: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Oncopeptides: Consultancy, Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy; Celgene/BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding. Ghobrial: AbbVie, Adaptive, Aptitude Health, BMS, Cellectar, Curio Science, Genetch, Janssen, Janssen Central American and Caribbean, Karyopharm, Medscape, Oncopeptides, Sanofi, Takeda, The Binding Site, GNS, GSK: Consultancy.

scholarly journals Heavy and Light Chain Monitoring in High Risk Smoldering Multiple Myeloma Patients Included in the GEM-CESAR Trial: Comparison with Conventional and Minimal Residual Disease IMWG Response Assessment

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 1852-1852
Author(s):  
Noemi Puig ◽  
Teresa Contreras ◽  
Bruno Paiva ◽  
María Teresa Cedena ◽  
José J Pérez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Bone Marrow ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Response Assessment ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Minimal Residual

Introduction: The GEM-CESAR trial is a potentially curative strategy for high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma (HRsMM) patients (pts) in which the primary endpoint is the achievement of bone marrow minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity. However, other methods of disease evaluation in serum such as heavy+light chain (HLC) assessment, with a potential complementary value to the IMWG response criteria, have also been tested. Aim: To evaluate the performance of HLC assay in HRsMM pts at diagnosis and after consolidation, comparing the results with standard serological methods and Next Generation Flow (NGF) for the assessment of bone marrow MRD. Patients and Methods: Ninety HRsMM pts included in the GEM-CESAR trial received six 4-weeks cycles of carfilzomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone followed by high dose melphalan and 2 further cycles of consolidation with the same regimen. All pts received maintenance treatment with lenalidomide for up to 2 years. SPEP and IFE were performed using standard procedures. Serum IgGk, IgGl, IgAk and IgAl HLC concentrations were measured using Hevylite (The Binding Site Group Ltd, Birmingham, UK) on a SPA PLUS turbidimeter. HLC concentrations and ratios were considered abnormal if they were outside the 95% reference ranges provided by the manufacturer. MRD was analyzed by flow cytometry following EuroFlow recommendations (sensitivity, 2x10-6). Standard response assignment was carried out as per the IMWG guidelines. Hevylite responses were assigned and HLC-pair suppression was defined as in Michalet et al (Leukemia 2018). Results: Out of 90 HRsMM pts, 75 had monoclonal intact immunoglobulin and samples available at diagnosis (50 IgG and 25 IgA). HLC ratio was abnormal in 98% of IgG pts and in 100% of IgA pts. Response assessment by Hevylite and standard IMWG criteria were available in 62 pts post-consolidation (Table 1). A good agreement was found between the two methods (kappa quadratic weighting = 0,6327 (0,4016 - 0,8638)). Among 46 pts with assigned CR as per the IMWG response criteria, there were 3 and 8 pts in PR and VGPR according to the Hevylite method, respectively. In 62 cases, paired Hevylite and MRD assessment data were available. Concordant results were found in 72.5% of cases (45/62; HLC+/NGF+ in 15 and HLC-/NGF- in 30 cases) while in the remaining 27.4% of cases results were discordant (17/62; HLC-/NGF+ in 6 and HLC+/NGF- in 11 cases). Post-consolidation, 24, 25.8 and 42.3% of the 62 samples were positive by SPEP, NGF and Hevylite, respectively. HLC-pair suppression was identified in 13/62 pts; 10 had severe HLC-pair suppression at the end of consolidation. After a median follow-up of 32 months (8-128), 93% of pts remain alive and progression-free. Three patients that have already progressed had their responses assessed post-consolidation. The first pt was assigned VGPR by the standard IMWG criteria and PR by Hevylite and was MRD positive by NGF; the second pt was assigned CR by IMWG criteria and Hevylite but had severe HLC-pair immunosuppression and was MRD positive by NGF; the third pt was in CR by IMWG and HLC criteria and was MRD positive by MFC. Conclusions: Moderate agreement was found between response assessment by Hevylite and the standard IMWG methods as well as between Hevylite and MRD assessment by NGF. Most discordances were a result of Hevylite detecting disease in samples negative by the standard methods, but longer follow-up is needed to ascertain its clinical value. HLC assessment could have anticipated the progression noted in 2 (out of 3) patients. Disclosures Puig: Takeda, Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; The Binding Site: Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Paiva:Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Roche and Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene, Janssen, Sanofi and Takeda: Consultancy. Rodriguez Otero:Kite Pharma: Consultancy; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy. Oriol:Celgene, Amgen, Takeda, Jansse: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Rios:Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Alegre:Celgene, Amgen, Janssen, Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. de la Rubia:Amgen: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy. De Arriba:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria. Ocio:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Array Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Pharmamar: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Mundipharma: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; AbbVie: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Bladé:Janssen, Celgene, Amgen, Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Irctures: Honoraria. Mateos:Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pharmamar: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; EDO: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals Phase II Trial of the Combination of Ixazomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone in High-Risk Smoldering Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 580-580 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Bustoros, MD ◽  
Omar Nadeem ◽  
Adam S Sperling ◽  
Giada Bianchi ◽  
Lily Ardente ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
Induction Phase ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Smoldering Multiple Myeloma

Background.This study aimed to determine the progression-free survival and response rate using early therapeutic intervention in patients with high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) using the combination of ixazomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone. Methods.Patients enrolled on study met eligibility for high-risk SMM based on the newly defined criteria proposed by Rajkumar et al. (Blood 2014). The treatment plan was designed to be administered on an outpatient basis where patients receive 9 cycles of induction therapy of ixazomib (4mg) at days 1, 8, and 15, in combination with lenalidomide (25mg) at days 1-21 and dexamethasone at days 1, 8, 15, and 22. The induction phase was followed by ixazomib (4mg) and lenalidomide (15mg) maintenance for another 15 cycles. A treatment cycle was defined as 28 consecutive days for a total of 24 months period. Bone marrow samples of all patients were obtained before starting therapy for baseline assessment for minimal residual disease (MRD) testing, whole-exome sequencing (WES), and RNA sequencing of plasma and bone marrow microenvironment cells. Moreover, blood samples were obtained at screening and before each cycle for isolating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) and circulating tumor cells (CTCs). Results.In total, 53 of the planned 62 patients have been enrolled in this study from February 2017 to May 2019. The median age of the patients enrolled was 61 years (range, 41 to 84) with 22 male (41.5%). The analysis was conducted on patients who have completed at least 1 cycle of therapy (n=45). The median follow-up for the trial is 14.4 months (range: 2- 27.6). Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (iFISH) was successful in 37 patients (82.2%). High-risk cytogenetics (defined as the presence of t(4;14), 17p deletion, and 1q gain) were found in 20 patients (54%). The median number of cycles completed was 14 cycles (range: 1-24). According to the study's inclusion criteria, baseline markers showed that 15, 14, and 13 patients had 3, 4, and 5 high-risk features, respectively. Moreover, 24 patients (53.3%) met the criteria of high-risk SMM, according to the Mayo 2018 model. The most common grade 3 adverse events were hypertension (6.3%), hypophosphatemia (4.2%), and rash (4.2%). Grade 4 thrombocytopenia and neutropenia were each reported in 4.4% of patients, and hyperglycemia was reported in 2.2%. Stem cells were collected in all eligible patients by the end of the induction phase. As of the abstract date, the overall response rate (partial response or better) in participants who completed at least 1 cycle of treatment was 91.1% (41/45), with 14 Complete Responses (CR, 31.1%), 9 very good partial responses (VGPR, 20%), 18 partial responses (40%), and 4 minimal Responses (MR, 10%). ORR in patients who completed the induction phase (≥9 cycles) was 97% (n= 32/33), with 14(42.4%) and 9 (27.2%) having CR and VGPR, respectively. All patients who had a CR have also achieved a stringent CR. Six patients have completed the treatment protocol and are currently on follow-up. As of July 2019, none of the patients have progressed to overt MM. MRD testing by next-generation sequencing is ongoing for patients who achieved CR or VGPR and will be presented at the meeting. Conclusion.The combination of ixazomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone is an effective and well-tolerated intervention in high-risk smoldering myeloma with 91% ORR and 54.7% CR and VGPR to date. The high response rate, convenient schedule and manageable toxicity build on prior studies which have shown efficacy of lenalidomide and dexamethasone in high risk smoldering myeloma. Longer follow-up for disease outcome is ongoing. Disclosures Bustoros, MD: Takeda: Honoraria. Nadeem:Celgene: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy. Prescott:Janssen: Equity Ownership. Munshi:Takeda: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Adaptive: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Adaptive: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Oncopep: Consultancy; Oncopep: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy. Anderson:OncoPep: Other: Scientific founder ; C4 Therapeutics: Other: Scientific founder ; Gilead Sciences: Other: Advisory Board; Janssen: Other: Advisory Board; Sanofi-Aventis: Other: Advisory Board. Richardson:Oncopeptides: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Ghobrial:Amgen: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy. OffLabel Disclosure: Ixazomib, Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone is an investigational combination in high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma and has not been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration or any other regulatory agency worldwide for the use under investigation.

scholarly journals B-PRISM (Precision Intervention Smoldering Myeloma): A Phase II Trial of Combination of Daratumumab, Bortezomib, Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone in High-Risk Smoldering Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4782-4782
Author(s):  
Omar Nadeem ◽  
Robert A. Redd ◽  
Julia Prescott ◽  
Amada Metivier ◽  
Kelsey Tague ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Bone Marrow ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Plasma Cells ◽  
M Protein ◽  
Focal Lesion ◽  
Advisory Committees

Abstract Background: Early therapeutic intervention with lenalidomide and dexamethasone in patients with high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma (HR-SMM) has shown to be effective by delaying time to progression to overt myeloma (Lonial J Clin Oncol 2020 Apr 10;38(11):1126-1137). Triplet and quadruplet combination therapies utilizing a proteasome inhibitor, immunomodulatory agent and a CD38 monoclonal antibody are used extensively in patients with multiple myeloma due to far greater efficacy compared to lenalidomide and dexamethasone alone. These combinations have been studied in HR-SMM, demonstrating encouraging activity, including ixazomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone and elotuzumab, lenalidomide and dexamethasone. There are also current ongoing studies with curative intent utilizing more potent therapy in HR-SMM, including carfilzomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone with autologous stem cell transplantation (Mateos EHA 2019, abstract S871) and daratumumab, carfilzomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone (NCT03289299). Daratumumab, bortezomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone (D-RVD) combination is highly effective and well-tolerated in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma at achieving high response rates as well as minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity based on results from the phase II GRIFFIN trial (Voorhees Blood 2020 Aug 20;136(8):936-945). Thus, we propose to examine the activity and safety of D-RVD in patients with HR-SMM. Study Design and Methods: This is a phase II single center, single-arm, open label study evaluating the combination of D-RVD in HR-SMM. Primary objective of this study is to determine the proportion of HR-SMM patients who are MRD negative at 2 years after receiving D-RVD. Secondary objectives include MRD negativity rate at 6 months, 12 months, 24 months and 36 months, progression-free survival, response rates and safety. Exploratory objectives include assessment of mass spectrometry quantification of M protein, examination of molecular evolution of tumor cells and to determine role of immune cells in progression of SMM. Patients must meet criteria for HR-SMM based on bone marrow clonal plasma cells ≥10% and any one or more of the following: Serum M protein ≥3.0 gm/dL, immunoparesis with reduction of two uninvolved immunoglobulin isotypes, serum involved/uninvolved free light chain ratio ≥8 (but less than 100), progressive increase in M protein level (evolving type of SMM), bone marrow clonal plasma cells 50-60%, abnormal plasma cell immunophenotype (≥95% of bone marrow plasma cells are clonal) and reduction of one or more uninvolved immunoglobulin isotypes, high risk FISH defined as any one or several of the following: t(4;14), t(14;16), t(14;20), del 17p or 1q gain, MRI with diffuse abnormalities or 1 focal lesion (≥5mm), PET-CT with one focal lesion (≥5mm) with increased uptake without underlying osteolytic bone destruction. Patients that meet high risk definition by the new Mayo/IMWG 2018 "20-2-20" criteria are also eligible if they have 2 out of the following 3 criteria: Bone marrow plasmacytosis ≥20% , ≥2g/dl M protein, ≥20 involved: uninvolved serum free light chain ratio. Treatment duration with D-RVD is for 2 years (24 cycles). Daratumumab is administered at a dose of 1800mg subcutaneously (SQ) weekly for cycles 1-2, biweekly for cycles 3-6 and monthly until completion of cycle 24. Bortezomib is given at a dose of 1.3mg/m2 SQ on days 1, 8, 15 for cycles 1-6 and then biweekly until completion of cycle 24. Lenalidomide is administered on days 1-21 at a dose of 25mg for cycles 1-6 and 15mg for cycles 7-24. Dexamethasone is administered weekly at 20mg cycles 1-6 and biweekly during cycles 7-24. All eligible patients will undergo stem cell collection after cycle 6 of therapy. A single-stage design will be employed with 30 eligible patients entered. If 12 or more of the 30 eligible patients are MRD negative at 2 years (observed rate of >=40%), we will conclude that this treatment warrants further study. The probability of concluding that the treatment is effective if the true rate is 25% is 0.051 and is 0.90 if the true rate is 50%. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Nadeem: Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Mo: Karyopharm: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria; GSK: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Epizyme: Consultancy; Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Eli Lilly: Consultancy. Sperling: Adaptive: Consultancy. Richardson: Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy; Celgene/BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; Secura Bio: Consultancy; Protocol Intelligence: Consultancy; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy; Regeneron: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Research Funding; Oncopeptides: Consultancy, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding. Ghobrial: AbbVie, Adaptive, Aptitude Health, BMS, Cellectar, Curio Science, Genetch, Janssen, Janssen Central American and Caribbean, Karyopharm, Medscape, Oncopeptides, Sanofi, Takeda, The Binding Site, GNS, GSK: Consultancy.

scholarly journals Phase II Trial of the Combination of Ixazomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone in High-Risk Smoldering Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 804-804 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Bustoros ◽  
Chia-jen Liu ◽  
Kaitlen Reyes ◽  
Kalvis Hornburg ◽  
Kathleen Guimond ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Bone Marrow ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Rna Sequencing ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract Background. This study aimed to determine the progression-free survival and response rate using early therapeutic intervention in patients with high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) using the combination of ixazomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone. Methods. Patients enrolled on study met eligibility for high-risk SMM based on the newly defined criteria proposed by Rajkumar et al., Blood 2014. The treatment plan was designed to be administered on an outpatient basis where patients receive 9 cycles of induction therapy of ixazomib (4mg) at days 1, 8, and 15, in combination with lenalidomide (25mg) at days 1-21 and Dexamethasone at days 1, 8, 15, and 22. This induction phase is followed by ixazomib (4mg) and lenalidomide (15mg) maintenance for another 15 cycles. A treatment cycle is defined as 28 consecutive days, and therapy is administered for a total of 24 cycles total. Bone marrow samples from all patients were obtained before starting therapy for baseline assessment, whole exome sequencing (WES), and RNA sequencing of plasma and bone marrow microenvironment cells. Moreover, blood samples were obtained at screening and before each cycle to isolate cell-free DNA (cfDNA) and circulating tumor cells (CTCs). Stem cell collection is planned for all eligible patients. Results. In total, 26 of the planned 56 patients were enrolled in this study from February 2017 to April 2018. The median age of the patients enrolled was 63 years (range, 41 to 73) with 12 males (46.2%). Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (iFISH) was successful in 18 patients. High-risk cytogenetics (defined as the presence of t(4;14), 17p deletion, and 1q gain) were found in 11 patients (61.1%). The median number of cycles completed was 8 cycles (3-15). The most common toxicities were fatigue (69.6%), followed by rash (56.5%), and neutropenia (56.5%). The most common grade 3 adverse events were hypophosphatemia (13%), leukopenia (13%), and neutropenia (8.7%). One patient had grade 4 neutropenia during treatment. Additionally, grade 4 hyperglycemia occurred in another patient. As of this abstract date, the overall response rate (partial response or better) in participants who had at least 3 cycles of treatment was 89% (23/26), with 5 Complete Responses (CR, 19.2%), 9 very good partial responses (VGPR, 34.6%), 9 partial responses (34.6%), and 3 Minimal Responses (MR, 11.5%). None of the patients have shown progression to overt MM to date. Correlative studies including WES of plasma cells and single-cell RNA sequencing of the bone microenvironment cells are ongoing to identify the genomic and transcriptomic predictors for the differential response to therapy as well as for disease evolution. Furthermore, we are analyzing the cfDNA and CTCs of the patients at different time points to investigate their use in monitoring minimal residual disease and disease progression. Conclusion. The combination of ixazomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone is an effective and well-tolerated intervention in high-risk smoldering myeloma. The high response rate, convenient schedule with minimal toxicity observed to date are promising in this patient population at high risk of progression to symptomatic disease. Further studies and longer follow up for disease progression are warranted. Disclosures Bustoros: Dava Oncology: Honoraria. Munshi:OncoPep: Other: Board of director. Anderson:C4 Therapeutics: Equity Ownership; Celgene: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Takeda Millennium: Consultancy; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncopep: Equity Ownership. Richardson:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Oncopeptides: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Ghobrial:Celgene: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy.

scholarly journals EARLY Results of TOTAL Therapy 7 (TT7): High Response Rates of NEWLY Diagnosed High Risk Myeloma to Daratumumab

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 4569-4569 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frits van Rhee ◽  
Sharmilan Thanendrarajan ◽  
Carolina D. Schinke ◽  
Jeffery R. Sawyer ◽  
Adam Rosenthal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Response Rates ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Early Results ◽  
Research Grant

Background. The TT approach has significantly improved the outcome of multiple myeloma (MM) by combining new drugs with a regimen that comprises induction, tandem autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), consolidation and maintenance. However, a group of 15% of patients with high risk multiple myeloma (HRMM) have derived little benefit despite similar response rates to induction chemotherapy and ASCT when compared to low risk MM. The poor outcome of HRMM is explained by early relapse post ASCT resulting in a short progression free survival (PFS) with only 15-20% of patients surviving long-term. Daratumumab (Dara) is a human IgG1k anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody that has shown favorable results in early single-arm studies and more recently in phase III studies for relapsed/refractory and newly diagnosed MM. In TT7, we introduced Dara during all phases of therapy, including immune consolidation early post ASCT, to improve responses rate and PFS in HRMM. Methods. Patients had newly diagnosed HRMM as defined by high risk cytogenetic abnormalities, presence of extramedullary disease, >3 focal lesions on CT-PET, elevated LDH due to MM, or ISS II/III with cytogenetic abnormality. Dara (16mg/kgx1) was added to induction with KTD-PACE (carfilzomib, thalidomide, dexamethasone; and four-day continuous infusions of cisplatin, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, etoposide). Conditioning for tandem autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) was with fractionated melphalan (50mg/m2x4) (fMEL) based on prior observations that patients with adverse cytogenetics fare better with fMEL rather than single high dose MEL200mg/m2.In the inter tandem ASCT period immunological consolidation with Dara (16mg/kg) alone for 2 doses was followed by Dara (16mg/kg) on day 1 combined with K (36mg/m2) and D (20mg) weekly for 2 cycles. DaraKD was administered to avoid treatment free periods allowing for myeloma regrowth. The 2nd ASCT was followed by further immunological consolidation with Dara (16mg/k) for 2 doses, and maintenance therapy for 3 yrs with 3-months block of alternating Dara-KD (dara 16mg/kg day 1; K 36mg/m2 and dex 20mg weekly) and Dara-lenalidomide (R)D (dara 16mg/kg day 1; R 15mg day 1-21 q28 and D 20mg weekly). Results. TT7 enrolled 43 patients thus far. The median follow-up was 11 months (range: 1-22). The median age was 61 yrs (range 44-73). Sixteen patients were ≥65 yrs (37.2%). A mean of 29.4x106 CD34+ cells/kg (range: 4.6-86.4) were collected. 36 patients completed ASCT #1 (83.7%) and 18 (41.9%) ASCT #2, whilst 14 patients have proceeded to the maintenance phase. R-ISS II/III or metaphase cytogenetic abnormalities were present in 85.1 and 58.1% of patients, respectively. Elevated LDH or >3FL on CT-PET were noted in 30 and 41.8%. The 1-yr cumulative incidence estimates for reaching VGPR and PR were 87 and 83%, respectively. A CR or sCR was achieved in 68 and 46%. The 1-yr estimates of PFS and OS were 91.6 and 87.2%. 40 subjects are alive, whilst 5 progressed on study therapy and 3 subsequently died. 38 patients are progression free at the time of reporting. Dara was well-tolerated and no subjects discontinued therapy due to dara-related side effects. The CR and sCR rates compared favorably to the predecessor HRMM TT5 protocol where CR and sCR rates were 59 and 27%. Conclusion. The early results of TT7 point to increased response rates of HRMM to a dara-based TT regimen with especially higher rates of CR and sCR. Longer follow-up is required to determine if these early results translate into superior PFS and OS. Figure Disclosures van Rhee: Karyopharm Therapeutics: Consultancy; Kite Pharma: Consultancy; Adicet Bio: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Sanofi Genzyme: Consultancy; Castleman Disease Collaborative Network: Consultancy; EUSA: Consultancy. Walker:Celgene: Research Funding. Morgan:Amgen, Roche, Abbvie, Takeda, Celgene, Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Other: research grant, Research Funding. Davies:Amgen, Celgene, Janssen, Oncopeptides, Roche, Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Consultant/Advisor; Janssen, Celgene: Other: Research Grant, Research Funding.

scholarly journals A Phase II Study of Pomalidomide, Daily Low Dose Oral Cyclophosphamide, and Dexamethasone in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 4520-4520
Author(s):  
Ajai Chari ◽  
Hearn Jay Cho ◽  
Samir Parekh ◽  
Kenneth Lau ◽  
Gillian Morgan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Common Grade ◽  
Metronomic Therapy ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Study Therapy

Abstract Background A treatment option for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) is pomalidomide(pom) and dexamethasone (dex), with an overall response rate (ORR) of 33% and median progression free survival (PFS) of 4.2 months. Adding the alkylatingagent cyclophosphamide(Cy) to pom and steroids improves ORR and PFS. Baz et al (Blood, 26 May 2016) combined daily pom with weekly dosing ofCy anddex (PCD), with an ORR of 64.7% and a median PFS of 9.5 months, although grade 3/4 neutropenia increased from 31% to 52%. In our experience, compared to weekly Cy, low dose daily oral Cy is better tolerated with less myelosuppression. Palumbo et al (Blood, 17 Oct 2013) in fact combined pom with alternate day dosing ofCy and prednisone, with an ORR of 51% and a median PFS of 10.4 months and a grade 3/4 neutropenia rate of 42%. However, importantly, granulocyte stimulating factor (G-CSF) and platelet transfusion support wereprohibited, resulting in a lower maximum tolerated dose of pom of 2.5 mg (vs 4 mg in the Baz) and therefore, the rates of neutropenia cannot be compared between the two studies. In the present study, we explored PCD at the doses/schedule shown in table 1 with hematologic support even in patients with baselinecytopenias. This type of metronomic therapy has demonstrated efficacy in refractory B cell malignancies, possibly because the anti-angiogenic effects of metronomic therapy may be synergetic with conventional anti-neoplastic agents. Methods This was an open label, single arm, and single center phase 2study. The primary objective was to evaluate the best ORR. Secondary objectives were to evaluate safety, clinical benefit response (CBR), PFS, and overall survival (OS). Inclusion criteria included lenalidomide refractory, pom naïve RRMM patients with at least 2 prior lines of therapy. Patients were required to have measurable disease, adequate performance status, Cr <3 mg/dL, normal hepatic function, and ANC > 1000/uL and platelets > 50,000/uL if bone marrow plasma cells were < 50%, otherwise >30,000/uL. G-CSF and platelet support were permitted during screening and study treatment if needed. Each drug was administered at the doses and schedule shown in Table 1. Results Overall, 28 evaluable patients with progressive disease (PD) at screening have been enrolled. The median age is 66 (57% > 65 yr) with a median of 3 lines of prior therapy over 5 years since diagnosis. 3 (11%) had ANC<1.5 and 2 (7%) hadplts<50,000/µL at study entry.High-risk molecular findings were present in 13 patients (46%), including 3 with del p53 and 6 with gain of 1q21 by FISH (2 with concurrentt(4;14) and 2 with concurrent del p53). With 8 patients still on study therapy, responses include 3 complete responses (CR), 7 very good partial responses (VGPR), 9 partial responses (PR), 3 minor responses (MR), 5 stable disease (SD), and 1 PD, for an ORR of 67%, CBR (i.e. MR or better) of 78% and a median PFS of approximately 14.5 months. The median OS has not been reached. The most common grade 3/4 toxicity (regardless of drug attribution) was neutropenia with 20 (71%) of subjects experienced grade 3/4 neutropenia. Importantly, there was only 1 episode of febrile neutropenia during study therapy. Grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia was seen in 25% of subjects, and 3/4 anemia seen in 18%. The most common grade 3/4 non-hematologic toxicity was pulmonary disease with Grade 3 lung infections occurring in 21% of subjects (3 viral, 2 bacterial, 1 unknown) and 1 additional grade 3 URI. Of note, all of these admissions occurred at local hospitals and none of these occurred in the setting of neutropenia. One additional pt hadpneumonitisattributed to pom requiring study discontinuation. Grade 3rashwas also observed in 14% of subjects leading to pom dose reductions. Correlative data from peripheral blood and bone marrow aspirates taken at baseline, Cycle 3 Day 15, and at disease progression from all patients will be updated at the time of conference. These include PCD-associated changesin gene expression, clonal evolution and immune microenvironment during therapy and on progression. Conclusions With toxicities similar to those in other studies, the ORR of 67% and PFS of 14 months in our study of PCD compares very favorably to pomdexas well as other triplet regimens containingCy. Disclosures Chari: Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Array Biopharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Amgen Inc.: Honoraria, Research Funding. Cho:Genentech Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Agenus, Inc.: Research Funding; Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Catamero:Celgene: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Verina:Celgene: Speakers Bureau. Jagannath:Bristol Myer Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

EBMT Risk Score for Pre Transplant Risk Assessment in Patients with Multiple Myeloma.

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 3094-3094 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zartash Gul ◽  
Hasan Khan ◽  
Qaiser Bashir ◽  
Nina Shah ◽  
Simrit Parmar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Risk Score ◽  
Cumulative Incidence ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Response Status

Abstract Abstract 3094 Background: Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT) is a potentially curative treatment for patients with multiple myeloma (MM) but its use is limited by high non-relapse mortality (NRM). European Group for Bone Marrow transplant (EBMT) risk score is a validated predictor of outcome for patients undergoing allo-HCT for hematological malignancies. It takes into consideration patient's age, donor's gender and type, disease status and the interval from diagnosis to allo-HCT, with the score ranging from 0 to 7. We assessed the impact of EBMT risk score in MM patients undergoing allo-HCT. Methods: A total of 189 patients with MM who underwent HSCT between November 1985 and June 2010 at MD Anderson Cancer Center were included in the analysis. Results: Patient characteristics are summarized in Table 1. There were 110 males (58%) and 79 females (42%) with a mean age of 50 years (range 28–70). Donors were related in 146 patients (HLA-identical=131, 1 antigen mismatched (AGMM) = 5, 2 AGMM =1, 3AGMM=1, syngeneic=8) and unrelated in 43 patients (HLA identical= 37, 1AGMM=4, 2AGMM=1, unknown=1). One-hundred and twelve patients had prior autologous transplants (auto-HCT). Of these 83 had 1, 28 had 2 and 1 had 3 prior auto-HCT, respectively. Median time from diagnosis to allo-HCT was 24.7 months (range 3.3–232) and median overall follow up was 13 months (0.2–266). Overall 94 patients (49%) had progressed before last follow-up. Incidence of all-cause mortality was 138 (73.4%) with 69 (36%) of all deaths attributed to NRM. KM estimates of 2-year PFS and OS were 25% and 42%, and 5-year PFS and OS were 16% and 27%, respectively. Cumulative incidence (CI) of grade 2–4 and grade 3–4 acute graft versus host disease (aGVHD) was 33% and 13%, respectively. Cumulative incidence of overall and extensive chronic GVHD (cGVHD) was 47% and 17%, respectively. EBMT risk score was, 0–3 for 41 (21.7%), 4 for 72 (38.1%) 4 and 5–7 for 76 (40.2%) patients. EBMT risk score was higher for males, African-Americans and older allo-HCT recipients, patients with higher LDH levels (>618mg/dl), ß2-microglobulin >3.5mg/dl and patients with bone marrow plasmacytosis. Median PFS in patients with EBMT scores 0–3, 4 and 5–7 were 10.1, 8.4 and 6.4 months, respectively (P=0.0036). Median OS in patients with EBMT scores 0–3, 4 and 5–7 were 39, 15.8 and 9.6 months, respectively (p=0.001). Cumulative NRM in patients with EBMT scores 0–3, 4 and 5–7 were 37% (15/41), 36.1% (26/72) and 37.3% (28/75), respectively (p= 0.234). Cumulative incidence of progression in patients with EBMT scores 0–3, 4 and 5–7 were 36.5% (15/41), 50% (36/72) and 56.5% (43/76), p=0.119. Compared to those with EBMT risk score (0–3), individuals with EBMT risk scores >5 had a higher risk of all-cause mortality (HR 2.34, 95% CI 1.44–3.80), and disease progression (HR 3.06, 95% CI 1.67–5.61). Addition of ß2-microglobulin, BM plasma cells or prior response status alone or in combination with EBMT risk score significantly improved the discrimination properties of the model containing EBMT score alone (p<0.05). Conclusions: EBMT risk score is an independent predictor of survival in MM patients undergoing allo-HCT. Addition of myeloma-specific factors predictors (ß2-microglobulin, plasma cell infiltration and prior response status) to EBMT score significantly improves its prognostic impact. Disclosures: Giralt: Millenium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Onyx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Two Year Update of Phase II Trial of Pembrolizumab, Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone As Post -Autologous Stem Cell Transplant Consolidation in Patients with High-Risk Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 1911-1911 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meena Bansal ◽  
David S. Siegel ◽  
Jaeil Ahn ◽  
Rena Feinman ◽  
David H. Vesole ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Autologous Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Grade 3

Introduction: Patients with high-risk multiple myeloma (HRMM) who have undergone autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) will inevitably relapse and have a progression free survival (PFS) ranging from 8-14 months (Gaballa et al, American Journal of Hematology, 2016) and 24-39 months while on lenalidomide (Len) maintenance therapy (Jackson et al, The Lancet Oncology, 2019). Unlike in solid tumors, PD-1 blockade has no single agent activity in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (MM) patients suggesting that immune stimulating agents, immunomodulatory agents (IMiDs), such as lenalidomide (Len) or pomalidomide (Pom) are necessary in combination with anti-PD-1 blockade to increase depth and duration of response post-ASCT. The Keynote-023 study revealed an overall response rate (ORR) of 76% with the combination of pembrolizumab (Pem), Len and dexamethasone (Dex). Similarly, the Keynote 135 study using the combination of Pem, Pom, and Dex revealed an ORR of 60%. Unfortunately, the phase III studies comparing an IMiD vs Pem with the IMiD upfront at the early relapsed setting were halted because of increased deaths on the Pem arm and a decreased median PFS. With our Phase II study currently on clinical hold by the FDA, we are presenting here the 2-year follow-up of the original patient cohort including some preliminary safety and efficacy data of Pem-Len-Dex in HRMM patients as post-ASCT consolidation (NCT02906332). Methods: Patients with HRMM who have undergone induction therapy followed by single or tandem melphalan-based ASCT were considered eligible 2-6 months post ASCT. HRMM criteria are defined by any of the following: ISS stage 3; del 13q by cytogenetics; FISH with 1q amplification, 1p deletion (del), p53 del, t(4;14), t(14;16), t(14;20), hypodiploidy; or a high-risk gene expression profile score. Patients were excluded if they had progression of disease at time of screening or if there was evidence of organ dysfunction. Patients received Pem 200 mg IV at day 1;Len 25 mg po daily at days 1-14; and Dex 40 mg daily at days 1,8,15 of a 21-day cycle for a total of 2 cycles and then an additional 2 cycles of Pem + Len without Dex at the same dose and frequency. Survival outcomes post-ASCT were measured using the log-rank test. Results: Of 15 patients screened, 12 received at least one dose of therapy and were deemed evaluable. One patient withdrew consent and did not follow up after cycle 2. Baseline characteristics are shown in Table 1. Thirty-three percent were ISS 3, 66.7% had a p53 deletion by FISH, 41.6% received induction Bortezomib-Len-Dex; 33% received induction Carfilzomib-Len-Dex, and the remaining 24.9% received other bortezomib-based induction. Best ORR during the 2 year follow up showed 8 patients (73%) achieving stringent complete remission, 2 patients (18%) showing complete remission and 1 (9%) achieving very good partial remission. Table 2 shows best response to treatment by cycle of therapy. Table 3 shows best response during follow-up visits, which were 3 months apart. Of the 11 patients who completed therapy, 8 had minimal residual disease (MRD) status assessed and among them, 7 were MRD negative by flow cytometry, tested 30 days after the fourth cycle. With a median follow-up of 32.2 months, median PFS was 27.6 months. The PFS rates at 1 year and 2 year are 91.3% and 65.2%, respectively. All patients had adverse events (AEs), AEs were attributed to Pem, Len, or Dex rather than from ASCT. Of the 90 AEs that were reported, 5.6% were grade 3 and 94% were grade 1 or 2 (Table 3). The most common hematologic AE was neutropenia (41.7%), with 3 pts (25%) grade 1 and 2, and 2 pts (16.6%) grade 3. The most common non-hematologic AEs were intermittent constipation (16.6%), diarrhea (16.6%), fatigue (8.3%), and increased ALT (8.3%) and were graded as 1 or 2. Non-hematologic grade 3 AEs occurred in 2 pts and included hypoxia and maculopapular rash. There was 1 serious AE, H. influenza pneumonia requiring inpatient admission, which was not considered to be related to Pem. Conclusions: The combination of Pem, Len, and Dex given to HRMM patients in the post-ASCT consolidation setting is well tolerated. In comparison to historical controls of HRMM patients post-ASCT with a median PFS of 8-14 months, the PFS rates of 91.3% and 65.2% at 1 and 2 year post-ASCT respectively suggest an efficacy signal for the use of Pem, Len, and Dex as post-ASCT consolidation. Larger prospective studies are needed to validate these results. Disclosures Siegel: Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Rowley:Allergan: Equity Ownership; Fate Therapeutics: Consultancy. Biran:Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol Meyers Squibb: Research Funding.

Advanced Imaging and Targeted Myeloma Lesion Biopsies to Enhance Global Response Assessment and Evaluate Spatial Heterogeneity in Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 20-22
Author(s):  
Sabrina L. Browning ◽  
Terri L. Parker ◽  
Noffar Bar ◽  
Tara Anderson ◽  
Madhav V. Dhodapkar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Bone Marrow ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Response Assessment ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Advanced Imaging ◽  
Advisory Committees

Background: Multiple myeloma (MM) is a heterogeneous plasma cell neoplasm with significant genetic and biologic complexity. Limitations remain in our standard assessment of response to therapy, as random bone marrow biopsy may misrepresent the varied histologic and molecular features of this multifocal disease. Advanced imaging is crucial in evaluating bone and extramedullary (EM) lesions. We aim to refine global response assessment in MM, with incorporation of advanced imaging-guided lesion biopsies, to improve knowledge of residual tumor burden critical to patient outcomes. Methods: Patients ≥18 years of age with standard or high risk newly diagnosed clinical MM were eligible to participate in this study. Advanced imaging with positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) or whole body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) based on access, standard bone marrow biopsy and aspiration, and targeted lesion biopsy occurred at enrollment and after 4 cycles of carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (CRd). Carfilzomib was administered intravenously at a dose of 36 mg/m2 twice weekly, lenalidomide orally 25 mg daily days 1-21, and dexamethasone orally 40 mg weekly, with dose modifications as needed. Conventional clinical response, using IMWG Response Criteria (Kumar S et al, 2016), was assessed after each cycle of treatment. Results: An interim analysis was completed on 17 patients enrolled between June 2018 and March 2020, with 14 evaluable for global treatment response. Median age was 61 years (range, 43-76 years) and 82.4% of patients were male. 76.5% had Revised International Staging System (R-ISS) stage II or III disease and 58.8% had EM disease arising from bone (EM-B, 41.2%) or independently in soft tissue (EM-S, 17.6%). 70.6% of patients had at least one high risk feature at the time of diagnosis (Table 1). Of the 16 patients with conventional skeletal survey (CSS) at study entry, 68.8% had at least 1 myeloma-defining lesion on advanced imaging that was missed on CSS. Four patients had adequate sample from initial lesion biopsy for cytogenetics and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), 3 of whom demonstrated discordant FISH results when compared to standard bone marrow samples. Clinical response rates after 4 cycles of CRd were notable with 85.7% of patients achieving ≥ very good partial response (VGPR) and 3 patients with stringent complete response (sCR) and minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity by flow cytometry with a sensitivity of 10-5. However, of the 12 patients with ≥ VGPR by conventional response assessment, 9 had residual disease on advanced imaging with PET/CT (2 patients), WB-MRI (6 patients), or total spine MRI (1 patient) (Figure 1). Repeat myeloma lesion biopsy was limited to 6 patients with targetable lesions after induction therapy, with diagnostic yield impacted by the presence of sclerotic tissue and insufficient marrow elements in some of the lesions sampled (Table 2). 85.7% of patients continued CRd or proceeded to high dose therapy and autologous stem cell rescue, with no patients transitioning directly to maintenance treatment after 4 cycles of CRd. At a median follow-up of 8 months, 14.3% (2/14) of patients have had progression of disease. Both individuals had residual lesions on imaging at end of treatment, despite one with flow MRD-negative sCR and normal FISH by standard assessment. There were no grade 4 serious adverse events or deaths. Conclusions: In our cohort of high risk newly diagnosed MM, CRd induction was potent and well-tolerated. While deep clinical responses were observed by conventional clinical assessment, two thirds of patients had persistent abnormalities on advanced imaging with concern that these sites could give rise to progressive MM. Our patients demonstrated spatial heterogeneity, highlighting the limitations of standard bone marrow evaluation. Use of advanced imaging and targeted lesion biopsies in response assessment enhances our understanding of tumor growth pattern in MM and consideration could be given to integrating these into clinical care when available. Current limitations of this study include a small number of patients with lesions amendable to repeat biopsy and their incomplete diagnostic yield. Ongoing investigation includes whole exome sequencing of paired bone marrow and focal lesion biopsies and application of a WB-MRI lesion scoring system to further augment this novel response assessment method. Disclosures Anderson: Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Speakers Bureau. Dhodapkar:Roche/Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Advisory Board; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Advisory Board; Lava Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Advisory Board; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Advisory Board; Celgene/BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Advisory Board; Kite: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Advisory Board. Prebet:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding. Xu:Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Haims:Pfizer: Consultancy. Neparidze:Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Advisory board; Eidos Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Diagnostic committee member ; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: Carfilzomib has been shown to have significant anti-myeloma activity in relapsed myeloma. Phase I/II studies as well as one phase III study also showed favorable outcomes with carfilzomib-based regimens in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, including in patients with high risk disease. We utilized an induction regimen with carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone given that patients enrolled in this study were required to have bone or soft tissue disease on advanced imaging, indicating a likely high risk feature with potentially aggressive disease biology. It has been shown that the combination of carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone is a safe regimen for patients with multiple myeloma. This combination is approved in the relapsed/refractory setting and included in NCCN guidelines for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.

scholarly journals The PRIMA-Prognostic Index (PI) Is Valid in Follicular Lymphoma (FL) Patients with Rituximab Chemo-Free First-Line Treatment

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4150-4150 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eva Kimby ◽  
Sandra Lockmer ◽  
Harald Holte ◽  
Björn E Wahlin ◽  
Hans Hagberg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Follicular Lymphoma ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
Bone Marrow Involvement ◽  
First Line ◽  
Advisory Committees

Abstract Background: Follicular lymphoma (FL) is a heterogenous disease. The optimal timing, sequence and choice of therapy remain matters of debate and there is no optimal prognostic tool. The FLIPI (Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index) is based on five bio-clinical parameters and is widely used, but not as guide for choice of treatment. Recently a new prognostic score (PRIMA-PI), based solely on two parameters, bone marrow involvement and serum beta2 microglobulin (ß2m) was proposed for patients treated with immunochemotherapy (Bachy E., Blood 2018). The Nordic Lymphoma Group (NLG) performed two randomized trials including patients with symptomatic/progressive indolent CD20+ lymphoma, with rituximab monotherapy or rituximab in combination with interferon (IFN)-α2a as primary treatment, without maintenance (Kimby E., 2008, 2015). The 10 years follow-up of these patients showed a good survival with no major safety issues and no need for later chemotherapy in 38% of FL patients (Lockmer S, JCO 2018). Aim/Purpose: To evaluate two different prognostic systems (the new PRIMA-PI and the FLIPI), for overall survival (OS) and time to treatment failure (TTF) in a cohort of symptomatic/progressive FL patients treated with a rituximab-containing first-line regimen without chemotherapy. Methods: Previously untreated patients with a confirmed FL diagnosis (n=269) or indolent lymphoma not otherwise specified (n=22, most FLs with insufficient material for grading), treated in the NLG randomized trials with two cycles rituximab (375 mg/m2 x 4 weeks), with or without IFN-α2a, were classified into the three PRIMA-PI categories: high-risk: ß2m> 3mg / L, intermediate-risk: ß2m ≤ 3 mg / L with bone marrow involvement and low-risk: ß2m ≤ 3 mg / without bone marrow involvement. The FLIPI scores were also assessed. TTF, defined as the interval between randomization and either initiation of new lymphoma therapy due to relapse or intolerance, or death from any cause, as well as OS were estimated using the Kaplan Meier method. The log-rank test was used for comparison between risk groups. Results: Out of 291 patients, 252 had complete data on PRIMA-PI and FLIPI (at the time of randomization in the original trials) and were available for analyses of TTF and OS. Patient characteristics are shown in Table 1. PRIMA-PI seemed to identify a true high-risk group of 47 patients, 32 of them being high risk also according to FLIPI, while a larger patient group (n=117) was classified as FLIPI high-risk. After a long follow-up time, median 9.9 years (0.4 -18.8) from randomization, median 10.6 years for the 214 patients (74%) still alive, 76 patients (26%) were failure-free and 108 (37%) without need of any chemotherapy, Patients with PRIMA-PI high showed a shorter TTF compared to PRIMA-PI intermediate and low (Fig 1a), whereas the FLIPI risk-groups were not significantly separated (Fig 1b). Evidence of transformation to aggressive disease was seen in 55 patients, with no significant difference in frequency between the PRIMA-PI groups, nor between FLIPI groups. Both PRIMA-PI and FLIPI were of significant value for predicting OS, most evident after a long follow-up time (Fig 1c and d). In 41 patients the cause of death was progressive disease or therapy complications, regarded as lymphoma-related death, whereas 21 died of other causes. The lymphoma-specific survival was related to the PRIMA-PI (log-rank p=0.03), but not to the FLIPI (n.s). Prognosis was worse for the PRIMA-PI high-risk group than the for the low-risk, also when adjusted for sex, high age (>60 years), diagnosis, stage, ECOG and FLIPI risk-group; TTF HR 1.82 (95% CI 1.16-2.85, p=0.01) and OS HR 2.3 (95% CI 1.00-5.38, p=0.05). Conclusion: FL patients included in two NLG trials with complete clinical data and a median follow-up of >10 years after randomization have been assessed for validation of different prognostic indices. In these patients, all with chemo-free first-line therapy, the PRIMA-PI was shown a valid predictor of both TTF and OS and seemed more useful than the FLIPI. The PRIMA-PI high risk identified a group of patients (19% of all) with true poor prognosis. Disclosures Kimby: Roche: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Honoraria; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Holte:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche, Norway: Research Funding. Wahlin:Roche: Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Hagberg:Roche: Honoraria.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document