Risk Factors for Febrile Neutropenia among Breast, Lung, and Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Retrospective Analysis of Health Plan Databases

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 4696-4696
Author(s):  
Scott Davi d Ramsey ◽  
Jeannine S McCune ◽  
David K Blough ◽  
Lauren C Clarke ◽  
Cara L McDermott ◽  
...  

Abstract Chemotherapy regimens, patient factors, and the use of colony stimulating factor (CSF) influence cancer patients’ risk for febrile neutropenia (FN) when they receive myelosuppressive chemotherapy. The incidence of FN and patient factors influencing that risk are relatively unknown in community settings. Using claims from Medicare, Medicaid and two private health insurance plan enrollees linked to the Puget Sound SEER registry, we examined the incidence of FN among breast, lung and colorectal cancer patients diagnosed 2002–05 who received adjuvant chemotherapy. We used logistic regression models to determine factors influencing the risk for FN within the first chemotherapy cycle, controlling for cancer stage, age, sex, race, comorbidities, chemotherapy-regimen related FN risk (as designated by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network), CSF use, health insurance type, and surgery or radiation ≤30 days from administration of first chemotherapy. Over the time horizon, 1096 breast, 1142 lung, and 755 colorectal cancer patients received chemotherapy. The incidence of any FN in the first chemotherapy cycle was (counts per 100 recipients by high, intermediate, and low-risk myelosuppressive chemotherapy according to NCCN categories respectively) 7.36, 10.0, 4.70 for breast cancer, 17.12, 14.15, 12.22 for lung cancer, and 25.0, 8.96, 6.37 for colorectal cancer. Significant predictors (p<0.05) of any FN were: breast cancer—radiation ≤ 30 days from first chemotherapy administration (OR 2.90, 95% CI 1.21–6.94), other non-black race vs. white race (OR 2.82, 95% CI 1.29–6.17), or Medicaid insurance (OR 2.31, 95% CI 1.10–4.89); lung cancer—radiation ≤ 30 days from first chemotherapy administration (OR 1.63, 95% CI 1.01–2.61), surgery ≤ 30 days from first chemotherapy administration (OR 2.08, 95% CI 1.02–4.25), Medicaid insurance (OR 2.29, 95% CI 1.08–4.84), or a Charlson comorbidity score ≥ 2 (OR 2.56, 95% CI 1.11–5.91); colorectal cancer—female gender (OR 1.86, 95% CI 1.02–3.41) or high myelosuppressive risk chemotherapy regimen (OR 7.66, 95% CI 2.95–19.89). In this analysis, predictors of FN varied between cancers. Limitations of this analysis include lack of information about chemotherapy and CSF doses, as this is not captured in the SEER registry or claims data. These results indicate that several factors may interact to influence a patient’s likelihood of developing FN in the first cycle of adjuvant chemotherapy.

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhou Jie ◽  
Zeng Zhiying ◽  
Li Li

AbstractUsing the method of meta-analysis to systematically evaluate the consistency of treatment schemes between Watson for Oncology (WFO) and Multidisciplinary Team (MDT), and to provide references for the practical application of artificial intelligence clinical decision-support system in cancer treatment. We systematically searched articles about the clinical applications of Watson for Oncology in the databases and conducted meta-analysis using RevMan 5.3 software. A total of 9 studies were identified, including 2463 patients. When the MDT is consistent with WFO at the ‘Recommended’ or the ‘For consideration’ level, the overall concordance rate is 81.52%. Among them, breast cancer was the highest and gastric cancer was the lowest. The concordance rate in stage I–III cancer is higher than that in stage IV, but the result of lung cancer is opposite (P < 0.05).Similar results were obtained when MDT was only consistent with WFO at the "recommended" level. Moreover, the consistency of estrogen and progesterone receptor negative breast cancer patients, colorectal cancer patients under 70 years old or ECOG 0, and small cell lung cancer patients is higher than that of estrogen and progesterone positive breast cancer patients, colorectal cancer patients over 70 years old or ECOG 1–2, and non-small cell lung cancer patients, with statistical significance (P < 0.05). Treatment recommendations made by WFO and MDT were highly concordant for cancer cases examined, but this system still needs further improvement. Owing to relatively small sample size of the included studies, more well-designed, and large sample size studies are still needed.


2016 ◽  
Vol 24 (12) ◽  
pp. 4921-4928 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine L. Paul ◽  
Emilie Cameron ◽  
Christopher Doran ◽  
David Hill ◽  
Finlay Macrae ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (22;3) ◽  
pp. E147-E155
Author(s):  
Michael T. Halpern

Background: Pain is common among cancer patients. Nonclinical factors may affect receipt of pain management among Medicaid beneficiaries with cancer. Objectives: To examine associations of patient characteristics and US state-level Medicaid policies on receipt of interventional pain management among Medicaid beneficiaries with breast or colorectal cancer. Study Design: A retrospective analysis of 2006-2008 Medicaid claims data. Setting: Claims data from facilities providing care to Medicaid beneficiaries. Methods: Interventional pain management among Medicaid beneficiaries aged 18-64 years with breast or colorectal cancer was identified using procedure codes in Medicaid claims data. State-level Medicaid policy variables included physician visit reimbursements, required patient copayments, and time period for Medicaid eligibility recertification (12 vs. < 12 months). Analyses also examined beneficiary race/ethnicity, age, comorbidities, and cancer treatment. Generalized estimating equations controlling for clustering by state assessed factors influencing receipt of interventional pain management. Results: The study included 8,438 Medicaid beneficiaries with breast or colorectal cancer. Colorectal cancer (vs. breast cancer) patients were significantly more likely to receive interventional pain management. Medicaid policies were not significantly associated with receipt of interventional pain services. Among breast cancer patients, older age and non-Hispanic white race/ethnicity were associated with decreased likelihood of receiving interventional pain management; more comorbidities and receipt of breast conserving surgery were associated with increased likelihood. Demographic characteristics were not significantly associated with receipt of interventional pain management among colorectal cancer patients. Limitations: Sample size of Medicare beneficiaries with cancer receiving interventional pain management; limited information included in Medicare claims data. Conclusions: State-level Medicaid policies were not significantly associated with receipt of interventional pain management for breast or colorectal cancer patients; disparities in receipt of these services were observed only for breast cancer patients. These results may help develop policies to enhance access to appropriate pain management services. Key words: Cancer pain, pain management, Medicaid, health care disparities, breast neoplasms, colorectal neoplasms, health policies, physician practice patterns, retrospective studies, claims analyses


Author(s):  
Pham Thi Bich ◽  
Nguyen Thi Van ◽  
Ta Van To ◽  
Trinh Hong Thai

Some mutations of mt-DNA which encode tRNA (mt-tRNA) were previously reported  to be associated with clinical manifestations of neuromuscular disorders syndrome. In addition, alterations of the mitochondrial genome have been suggested to contribute to mitochondrial dysfunction and tumorigenesis. Alterations in some mt-tRNA genes have also been identified in breast cancer, lung cancer and colorectal cancer. However, so far, we have not found any report on mt-tRNA gene alteration in the Vietnamese colorectal cancer patients. So that, in this study, we analyzed the alterations of some mt-tRNA genes in a group of  Vietnamese colorectal cancer patients and predicted influence of the alterations to secondary structure of tRNA based on bioinformatic tools. PCR-RFLP and DNA sequencing methods were used to screening alterations, secondary structure of tRNA was predicted in silico by using a tool of the  Vienna RNA Websuite. Results: both A12309G and A12310G of tRNALeu were identified together in two out of 98 patients, and both T12150G and C12154G of tRNAHis were indentified in one  out of 19 patients. All of these alterations were heteroplasmic and have not been reported in cancer patients. In particular, the C12154G  alteration in the DHR loop led to change of secondary structure of  tRNAHis and may affect to function of this tRNA molecule. Keywords mt-tRNA, Vietnamese colorectal cancer, PCR-RFLP, DNA sequencing References [1] http://globocan.iarc.fr/Pages/online.aspx (30/11/2017).[2] M. Brandon, P. Baldi, D.C Wallace, Mitochodrial mutations in cancer, Oncogen 25(34) (2006) 4647.[3] G. Li, YX. Duan, XB. Zhang, F Wu, Mitochondrial RNA mutations may be infrequent in hepatocellular carcinoma patients, Genet Mol Res15(2) (2016) doi: 10.4238/gmr.15027665.[4] F. Mohammed, AR. Rezaee, E. Mosaieby, M. Houshmand, Mitochondrial A12308G alteration in RNA Leu (CUN)) in colorectal cancer samples, Diagn Pathol (2015) doi: 10.1186/s13000-015-0337-6.[5] S. Datta, M. Majumder, NK. Biswas, N. Sikdar, B. Roy, Increased risk of oral cancer in relation to common Indian mitochondrial polymorphisms and Autosomal GSTP1 locus, Cancer, 110 (2007) 1999.[6] L .Wang , ZJ. Chen , YK. Zhang , HB. Le, The role of mitochondrial RNA mutations in lung cancer, Int J Clin Exp Med 8(8) (2015) 13341.[7] AR. Gruber, R. Lorenz, SH. Bernhart, R. Neubock, IL Hofacker The Vienna ARN Websuite, Nucleic Acids Res 36 (2008) 70.[8] https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi (11/2017).[9] Y. Goto, I Nonaka, S Horai, A mutation in the RNALeu (UUR) gene associated with the MELAS subgroup of mitochondrial encephalomyopathies, Nature 348(6302 (1990) 651[10] http://www.mitomap.org/MITOMAP (11/2017).[11] A. Lorenc, J. Bryk Golik P, Homoplasmic MELAS A3243G mtDNA mutation in a colon cancer sample, Mitochondrion 3(2) (2003) 119.[12] EL. Blakely, J.W Yarham , C.L. Alston , K Craig , J. Poulton , C. Brierley , SM. Park , A. Dean , JH. Xuereb , KN. Anderson , A. Compston , C. Allen , S. Sharif , P. Enevoldson , M. Wilson , SR. Hammans , DM. Turnbull , R. McFarland , RW.Taylor , Pathogenic mitochondrial tRNA point mutations: nine novel mutations affirm their importance as a cause of mitochondrial disease, Hum Mutat 34(9) (2013) 1260.[13] S. DiMauro, Mitochondrial ADN medicine, Biosci Rep 27(3) (2007) 5.[14] DC. Wallace, D. Chalkia, Mitochondrial ADN genetics and the heteroplasmy conundrum in evolution and disease”, Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 5(11) (2013), doi:10.1101/cshperspect. a021220  


Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 5909-5909 ◽  
Author(s):  
Derek Weycker ◽  
Amanda Silvia ◽  
Kathryn Richert-Boe ◽  
Mark Bensink ◽  
James O. Brady ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Supportive care with colony-stimulating factors (CSFs) and antimicrobials (AMBs) is recommended for many patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy for solid tumors or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). However, evidence on the use and patterns of pharmacotherapy given to prevent, control, or relieve complications and side effects (such as febrile neutropenia [FN]), and to improve patient comfort and quality of life, among this patient population in US clinical practice is limited. Method s: A retrospective cohort design and data from four US health systems-Geisinger Health System, Henry Ford Health System, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, and Reliant Medical Group-spanning 2009-2013 were employed. The study population comprised all patients who received myelosuppressive chemotherapy for invasive breast cancer, invasive colorectal cancer, invasive lung cancer, or NHL. Data were collected via a standardized case report form (CRF) using electronic medical records systems, administrative data warehouses, medical charts, and cancer registries, and included patient demographics and clinical profile, cancer, treatment, and outcomes. For each subject, the first qualifying chemotherapy course, and each cycle and each FN episode within the course, was identified. Supportive care included prophylactic use of CSF agents (i.e., filgrastim, tbo-filgrastim, pegfilgrastim, and sargramostim) and AMBs (including antibiotics, antifungals, and antivirals), and were characterized on a cycle-specific basis in terms of agent received, dose, route of administration, timing, and duration of administration, as appropriate. Analyses described herein were descriptive in nature, and were based on an interim dataset. Results: The study population included a total of 527 patients who received myelosuppressive chemotherapy for breast cancer (n=281), colorectal cancer (n=95), lung cancer (n=95), or NHL (n=56) (Table). Among all subjects, mean (SD) age was 60 (13) years (40% aged ≥65 years), 17% had cardiovascular disease, 16% had lung disease, and 11% had diabetes; 33% of all patients had metastatic disease (7% of these patients had metastasis to bone), and 36% had previously received myelosuppressive therapy. Forty-two percent of all patients received CSF prophylaxis in cycle 1, and 55% received CSF prophylaxis in ≥1 cycles during their course; the mean number of CSF prophylaxis cycles, among those receiving these agents, was 3.9 (mean number of cycles in total, 7.1). Most patients received prophylaxis with pegfilgrastim (66%), and the remainder with filgrastim (34%). AMB prophylaxis was administered to 5% of patients in cycle 1 and 10% of patients at any time during their course. FN incidence proportion during the chemotherapy course was 14.2%, and was highest in cycle 1 (6.6%). Conclusion: In this retrospective evaluation of patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy for breast cancer, colorectal cancer, lung cancer, or NHL, less than one-half of all patients (on average) received supportive care with CSF or AMB prophylaxis beginning in cycle 1 and few additional patients received CSF/AMB prophylaxis in subsequent cycles. FN was not uncommon, especially in the first cycle. Careful consideration should be given to identifying patients within this population who are at elevated risk of FN to ensure appropriate use of supportive care. Disclosures Weycker: Amgen, Inc.: Research Funding. Silvia:Amgen, Inc.: Research Funding. Richert-Boe:Amgen, Inc.: Research Funding. Bensink:Amgen, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Brady:Amgen, Inc.: Research Funding. Lamerato:Amgen, Inc.: Research Funding. Lipkovich:Amgen, Inc.: Research Funding. Siddiqui:Amgen, Inc.: Research Funding. Chandler:Amgen, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership.


2020 ◽  
pp. 107815522095184
Author(s):  
Jolene Guenter ◽  
Shirin Abadi ◽  
Howard Lim ◽  
Stephen Chia ◽  
Ryan Woods ◽  
...  

Introduction Carcinogenesis is driven by an array of complex genomic patterns; these patterns can render an individual resistant or sensitive to certain chemotherapy agents. The Personalized Oncogenomics (POG) project at BC Cancer has performed integrative genomic analysis of whole tumour genomes and transcriptomes for over 700 patients with advanced cancers, with an aim to predict therapeutic sensitivities. The aim of this study was to utilize the POG genomic data to evaluate a discrete set of biomarkers associated with chemo-sensitivity or-resistance in advanced stage breast and colorectal cancer POG patients. Methods This was a retrospective multi-centre analysis across all BC CANCER sites. All breast and colorectal cancer patients enrolled in the POG program between July 1, 2012 and November 30, 2016 were eligible for inclusion. Within the breast cancer population, those treated with capecitabine, paclitaxel, and everolimus were analyzed, and for the colorectal cancer patients, those treated with capecitabine, bevacizumab, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin were analyzed. The expression levels of the selected biomarkers of interest ( EPHB4, FIGF, CD133, DICER1, DPYD, TYMP, TYMS, TAP1, TOP1, CKDN1A, ERCC1, GSTP1, BRCA1, PTEN, ABCB1, TLE3, and TXNDC17) were reported as mRNA percentiles. Results For the breast cancer population, there were 32 patients in the capecitabine cohort, 15 in the everolimus cohort, and 12 in the paclitaxel cohort. For the colorectal cancer population, there were 29 patients in the bevacizumab cohort, 12 in the oxaliplatin cohort, 29 in the irinotecan cohort, and 6 in the capecitabine cohort. Of the biomarkers evaluated, the strongest associations were found between Bevacizumab-based therapy and DICER1 (P = 0.0445); and between capecitabine therapy and TYMP (P = 0.0553). Conclusions Among breast cancer patients, higher TYMP expression was associated with sensitivity to capecitabine. Among colorectal cancer patients, higher DICER1 expression was associated with sensitivity to bevacizumab-based therapy. This study supports further assessment of the potential predictive value of mRNA expression of these genomic biomarkers.


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6521-6521 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xuesong Han ◽  
Chun Chieh Lin ◽  
Ahmedin Jemal

6521 Background: Extensive evidence links inadequate insurance with later stage at cancer diagnosis, particularly for cancers that can be detected by screening. The Affordable Care Act (ACA) implemented in 2014 has substantially increased insurance coverage for Americans 18-64 years old. This study aims to examine any changes in stage at diagnosis after the ACA for the following cancers for which screening is recommended for individuals at risk: female breast cancer, colorectal cancer, cervical cancer, prostate cancer, and lung cancer. Methods: We used National Cancer Data Base, a nationally hospital-based cancer registry capturing 70% new cancer cases in the US each year, to identify nonelderly cancer patients with screening-appropriate age who were diagnosed during 2013-2014. The percentage of stage I disease was calculated for each cancer type before (2013 Q1-Q3) and after (2014 Q2-Q4) the ACA. 2013 Q4-2014 Q1 was excluded as a washout/phase-in period. Prevalence ratios (PR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using log-binomial models controlling for age, race/ethnicity and sex if applicable. Results: 121,855 female breast cancer patients aged 40-64 years, 39,568 colorectal cancer patients aged 50-64 years, 11,265 cervical cancer patients aged 21-64 years, 59,626 prostate cancer patients aged 50-64 years, and 41,504 lung cancer patients aged 55-64 years were identified. After the implementation of the ACA, the percentage of stage I disease increased statistically significantly for female breast cancer (47.8% vs. 48.9%; PR = 1.02 [95%CI 1.01-1.03]), colorectal cancer (22.8% vs. 23.7%; PR = 1.04 [95%CI 1-1.08]), and lung cancer (16.6% vs. 17.7%; PR = 1.06 [95% CI 1.02-1.11]). A shift to stage I disease was also observed for cervical cancer (47.2% vs. 48.7%; PR = 1.02 [95% CI 0.98-1.06]) although not statistically significant. In contrast, the percentage of stage I decreased for prostate cancer (18.5% vs. 17.2%; PR = 0.93 [95%CI 0.9-0.96]) in 2014. Conclusions: The implementation of the ACA is associated with a shift to early stage at diagnosis for all screenable cancers except prostate cancer, which may reflect the recent US Preventive Services Task Force recommendations against routine prostate cancer screening.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document