An Open-Label, Phase 1 Study of R-CVP in Combination with Inotuzumab Ozogamicin in Patients with CD22-Positive B-Cell Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma: Preliminary Safety and Efficacy Data

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 1633-1633
Author(s):  
Michinori Ogura ◽  
Kiyohiko Hatake ◽  
Andrew Davies ◽  
Michael Crump ◽  
Kensei Tobinai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Efficacy Data ◽  
Inotuzumab Ozogamicin ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Common Grade ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 1633 Background: Inotuzumab ozogamicin (INO) is a humanized anti-CD22 antibody conjugated to calicheamicin, a potent antitumor antibiotic. CD22 is expressed on the majority of B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (NHL). This phase 1 study was conducted to identify the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of INO when given in combination with R-CVP (rituximab 375 mg/m2, cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2, and vincristine 1.4 mg/m2 all on Day 1 and prednisone 40 mg/m2on Days 1–5) every 21 days, and to obtain preliminary safety and efficacy data for this regimen. Patients and methods: The study enrolled patients with relapsed/refractory CD22+ B-cell NHL. The dose-escalation part (Part 1; previously presented) identified the MTD as INO 0.8 mg/m2 given on Day 2 with R-CVP q3wks [Blood. 2011;118:3715]. Subsequent cohorts included the MTD confirmation cohort (Part 2) and MTD expansion cohort (Part 3), for collection of additional safety and preliminary efficacy data. Untreated patients who were not candidates for anthracyclines were allowed in Part 2 and Part 3 of the study. In Part 2 (n = 10), confirmation of the MTD required a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) rate of <33% in Cycle 1 and fewer than 1/3 of patients discontinuing prior to Cycle 3 due to an adverse event (AE). In Part 3 (n = 22), additional patients were enrolled to explore preliminary signs of activity of INO when given in combination with R-CVP. Results: In Parts 2 and 3, a total of 32 patients with follicular lymphoma (FL; n = 15), diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL; n = 16), or mantle cell lymphoma (n = 1) were enrolled. CD22 expression was confirmed by immunohistochemistry or flow cytometry prior to enrollment. The median age was 65 years (range, 44–81 years); 34% of patients had 1 prior anti-lymphoma regimen, 34% had 2, 28% had ≥3, and 3% (n = 1) had no previous therapy (median, 2; range, 0–6). The median number of cycles received was 5 (range, 1–6). In Part 2, the MTD was confirmed as standard-dose R-CVP plus INO 0.8 mg/m2, with 2 of 10 patients presenting with a DLT (grade 3 increase in alanine/aspartate aminotransferases [ALT/AST] and grade 4 neutropenia requiring granulocyte-colony stimulating factor). Four patients discontinued due to AEs after 2 cycles (n = 1), 3 cycles (n = 2), and 5 cycles (n = 1), respectively. Across Parts 2 and 3, the most common treatment-related AEs (all grades) were thrombocytopenia (78%), neutropenia (66%), fatigue (53%), constipation (50%), leukopenia (50%), and nausea (41%); the most common grade 3/4 AEs included neutropenia (63%), thrombocytopenia (53%), leukopenia (38%), lymphopenia (31%), increased ALT (9%), increased AST (6%), and febrile neutropenia (6%). There was 1 case of treatment-related fatal pneumonia associated with grade 4 neutropenia. Ten patients discontinued study treatment due to AEs, with thrombocytopenia or delayed recovery from thrombocytopenia being the leading AE causing study drug discontinuation (n = 9 [grade 1/2, n = 6; grade 3/4, n = 3]). The best overall response (ORR; partial + complete response [CR]) from Part 2 and 3 (31 evaluable patients) was 77% (n = 24/31), including 29% (n = 9/31) with CR. Of patients with FL, the ORR was 100% (n = 15/15), including 53% (n = 8/15) with CR. Of patients with DLBCL, the ORR was 60% (n = 9/16), including 7% (n = 1/16) with CR. Conclusions: Results from this phase I study showed that R-CVP in combination with INO 0.8 mg/m2 may have acceptable toxicity and promising activity in patients with relapsed or refractory CD22+ B-cell NHL, based on the response rates in FL and DLBCL. The most common grade 3/4 AEs were hematological toxicities, notably thrombocytopenia and neutropenia. Follow-up for progression-free survival and overall survival is currently ongoing; however, the observed results warrant additional study in both indolent and aggressive B-cell NHL. Disclosures: Ogura: Pfizer Inc: Research Funding. Hatake:Pfizer Inc: Research Funding. Davies:Pfizer Inc: Research Funding. Crump:Pfizer, Celgene, Roche, Millennium, Seattle Genetic: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Tobinai:Merck, Zenyaku, Symbio, Biomedics, Pfizer, GSK, Chugai/Roche: Research Funding. Smith:Pfizer Inc: Research Funding. Offner:Pfizer Inc: Research Funding. Wang:Pfizer Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Ishibashi:Pfizer Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Paccagnella:Pfizer Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Vandendries:Pfizer Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. MacDonald:Roche Canada: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Phase II Study of the Pan-Deacetylase Inhibitor Panobinostat in Combination with Bortezomib and Dexamethasone in Relapsed and Bortezomib-Refractory Multiple Myeloma (PANORAMA 2)

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 814-814 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul G. Richardson ◽  
Melissa Alsina ◽  
Donna M. Weber ◽  
Steven E. Coutre ◽  
Sagar Lonial ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Treatment Phase ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Overall Response ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Stage 1

Abstract Abstract 814FN2 Background: Patients with refractory multiple myeloma (MM) have limited treatment options and an extremely poor prognosis. A recent study of patients who were refractory to bortezomib and were relapsed following, refractory to or ineligible to receive an immunomodulatory drug (IMiD, thalidomide or lenalidomide) demonstrated a median event-free survival of only 5 months (Kumar S et al, Leukemia, 2011). Panobinostat is an oral pan-deacetylase inhibitor (pan-DACi) that increases acetylation of proteins involved in multiple oncogenic pathways. Preclinical studies have demonstrated synergistic anti-myeloma activity of the combination of panobinostat and bortezomib through dual inhibition of the aggresome and proteasome pathways. In a phase I study (B2207) of patients with relapsed or relapsed/refractory MM treated with panobinostat + bortezomib, clinical responses (≥ minimal response [MR]) were observed in 65% of patients, including in patients with bortezomib-refractory disease. PANORAMA 2 seeks to expand upon these preliminary results and seeks to determine whether panobinostat can sensitize resistant patients to a bortezomib-containing therapeutic regimen. Methods: PANORAMA 2 is a single arm, phase II study of panobinostat + bortezomib + dexamethasone in patients with bortezomib-refractory MM. Patients with relapsed and bortezomib-refractory MM (≥ 2 prior lines of therapy including an IMiD and who had progressed on or within 60 days of the last bortezomib-based therapy) are treated in 2 phases. Treatment phase 1 consists of 8 three-week cycles of oral panobinostat (20 mg days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, 12) + intravenous bortezomib (1.3 mg/m2 days 1, 4, 8, 11) + oral dexamethasone (20 mg on day of and after bortezomib). Patients demonstrating clinical benefit (≥ stable disease) can proceed to treatment phase 2, consisting of 4 six-week cycles of panobinostat (20 mg TIW 2 weeks on 1 week off, and repeat) + bortezomib (1.3 mg/m2 days 1, 8, 22, 29) + dexamethasone (20 mg on day of and after bortezomib). The primary endpoint is overall response (≥ partial response [PR]), as defined by the European Group of Blood and Marrow Transplantation 1998 criteria, in the first 8 cycles of treatment phase 1. A Simon 2-stage design is used to test the primary endpoint where ≥ 4 responses (≥ PR) in 24 patients are needed in stage 1 in order to proceed to stage 2, where ≥ 9 responses in all patients (N = 47) are required to reject the null hypothesis (overall response rate ≤ 10%). Results: A sufficient number of responses ≥ PR were observed in stage 1 to allow for enrollment to continue to stage 2. As of 15 July 2011, 53 patients with bortezomib-refractory MM were enrolled. Safety and demographic data were available for 48 patients. The median age was 61 (41–88) years. Patients were heavily pretreated, with a median of 4 (2–14) prior regimens, and most patients (69%) received prior autologous stem cell transplant. Efficacy data were available for 44 patients. At the time of this analysis, 9 patients achieved ≥ PR (2 near CR [nCR] and 7 PR) as best overall response, and an additional 7 patients achieved an MR. Responders exhibited a long duration on therapy, and, to date, 8 patients have proceeded to treatment phase 2. The 2 patients with nCR have received ≥ 10 cycles of treatment (duration of therapy 190 and 253 days). Four patients who achieved PR have received ≥ 9 cycles (duration of therapy 155–225 days). Updated response data will be presented. Common adverse events (AEs) of any grade included, fatigue (52%), diarrhea (41%), thrombocytopenia (38%), nausea (38%), and anemia (21%). Gastrointestinal AEs were generally mild, with a relatively low incidence of grade 3/4 events. Grade 3/4 AEs were generally hematologic in nature, with grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia, anemia, and neutropenia reported in 38%, 12%, and 10% of patients, respectively. Other common nonhematologic grade 3/4 AEs included fatigue (10%) and pneumonia (10%). Of note, to date, a relatively low rate of peripheral neuropathy (17%) has been observed. No grade 3/4 peripheral neuropathy has been observed. Conclusions: The combination of panobinostat and bortezomib is a promising treatment for patients with bortezomib-refractory MM. These data, along with forthcoming data from the phase III study of panobinostat/placebo + bortezomib + dexamethasone in patients with relapsed MM (PANORAMA 1), will further define the potential role of panobinostat in the treatment of patients with MM. Disclosures: Richardson: Johnson & Johnson: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Alsina:Novartis: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Ortho Biotech: Research Funding; Onyx: Research Funding; Millennium: Consultancy, Research Funding. Weber:Millennium: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Lonial:Millennium: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy. Gasparetto:Millennium: Speakers Bureau. Warsi:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. Ondovik:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. Mukhopadhyay:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. Snodgrass:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership.

scholarly journals Interim Analysis of a Phase 1 Study of the Antibody-Drug Conjugate SGN-CD19A in Relapsed or Refractory B-Lineage Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 1741-1741 ◽  
Author(s):  
Craig H. Moskowitz ◽  
Andres Forero-Torres ◽  
Bijal D. Shah ◽  
Ranjana Advani ◽  
Paul Hamlin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Antibody Drug Conjugate ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Non Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background CD19, a B-cell specific marker, is expressed in the majority of patients with B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). SGN-CD19A is a novel antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) composed of a humanized anti-CD19 monoclonal antibody conjugated to the microtubule-disrupting agent monomethyl auristatin F (MMAF) via a maleimidocaproyl linker. Methods This ongoing phase 1, open-label, dose-escalation study investigates the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity of SGN-CD19A in patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell NHL (NCT 01786135). Eligible patients are ≥12 years of age and must have a confirmed diagnosis of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), including transformed follicular histology; mantle cell lymphoma (MCL); follicular lymphoma grade 3 (FL3); Burkitt lymphoma; or B-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma. Patients must be relapsed or refractory to at least 1 prior systemic regimen. Patients with DLBCL or FL3 must have also received intensive salvage therapy with or without autologous stem cell transplant (SCT), unless they refused or were deemed ineligible. A modified continual reassessment method is used for dose allocation and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) estimation. SGN-CD19A is administered IV on Day 1 of 21-day cycles (0.5–6 mg/kg). Response is assessed with CT and PET scans according to the Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma (Cheson 2007). Results To date, 44 patients have been treated: 39 patients (89%) with DLBCL (including 10 with transformed DLBCL), 4 (9%) with MCL, and 1 (2%) with FL3. Median age was 65 years (range, 33–81). Patients had a median of 2 prior systemic therapies (range, 1–7), and 10 patients (23%) had autologous SCT. Twenty-six patients (59%) were refractory to their most recent prior therapy, and 18 (41%) were relapsed. Patients received a median of 3 cycles of treatment (range, 1–12) at doses from 0.5–6 mg/kg. Eleven patients (25%) remain on treatment, and 33 have discontinued treatment (18 due to progressive disease [PD], 5 for investigator decision, 5 for adverse events [AE], 4 because of patient decision/non-AE, and 1 for SCT). No dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) in Cycle 1 has been reported. Treatment-emergent AEs reported in ≥20% of patients were blurred vision (59%), dry eye (39%), fatigue (39%), constipation (32%), keratopathy (23%), and pyrexia (20%). Corneal exam findings consistent with superficial microcystic keratopathy were observed in 25 patients (57%) and were mostly Grade 1/2. Grade 3/4 corneal AEs were observed in 4 patients at the higher doses; the majority resolved or improved to Grade 1/2 at last follow-up. Corneal AEs were treated with ophthalmic steroids, and during the trial steroid eye drop prophylaxis was instituted with each dose of study drug. SGN-CD19A ADC plasma exposures were approximately dose-proportional. Accumulation was observed following multiple dose administrations, consistent with a mean terminal half-life of about 2 weeks, suggesting less frequent dosing might be possible. In the 43 efficacy-evaluable patients, the objective response rate (ORR) is 30% (95% CI [17, 46]), including 7 complete responses (CRs; 16%) and 6 partial responses (PRs; 14%). Of the 13 patients with an objective response, 8 are still on study with follow-up times of 0.1–31 weeks; 2 are no longer on study; and 3 had subsequent PD or death with response durations of 14, 19, and 31 weeks. Table Best Clinical Response by Disease Status Relative to Most Recent Therapy, n (%) Relapsed N=17 Refractory N=26 Total N=43 CR 5 (29) 2 (8) 7 (16) PR 4 (24) 2 (8) 6(14) SD 4 (24) 9 (35) 13 (30) PD 4 (24) 13 (50) 17 (40) ORR (CR + PR), (95% CI) 53 (28, 77) 15 (4, 35) 30 (17, 46) Conclusions To date, SGN-CD19A has shown evidence of clinical activity with an ORR of 30% and CR rate of 16%. Enrollment in the trial is ongoing to further refine optimal dose and schedule. SGN-CD19A is generally well-tolerated. No DLTs have been observed in tested dose levels. Observed ocular AEs are manageable with steroid eye drops and dose modifications. The high response rate (53%) in relapsed patients and low rate of bone marrow suppression or neuropathy suggest that SGN-CD19A could be incorporated into novel combination regimens in earlier lines of therapy. Disclosures Moskowitz: Merck: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding. Off Label Use: SGN-CD19A is an investigational agent being studied in patients with B-cell malignancies. SGN-CD19A is not approved for use. . Forero-Torres:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Shah:Pharmacyclics: Speakers Bureau; SWOG: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; NCCN: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding; Janssen: Speakers Bureau. Advani:Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Takeda International Pharmaceuticals Co.: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding, Travel expenses Other. Hamlin:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding. Kim:Bayer: Consultancy; Eli Lily: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding. Kostic:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Sandalic:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Zhao:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Fanale:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Travel expenses Other.

Phase 1 Clinical Trial of the Novel Structure Proteasome Inhibitor NPI-0052 in Patients with Relapsed and Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (MM).

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 431-431 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Richardson ◽  
Craig Hofmeister ◽  
Andrzej Jakubowiak ◽  
Todd M. Zimmerman ◽  
Matthew A. Spear ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Light Chain ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Proteasome Inhibition ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 431 Background: NPI-0052 has a novel, non-peptide based, bicyclic structure resulting in a unique proteasome inhibition and safety profile. In contrast to other proteasome inhibitors, NPI-0052 produces rapid, broad and prolonged inhibition of all 3 catalytic activities. Preclinical data subsequently suggested improvements in toxicology and efficacy, including activity MM resistant to bortezomib (BZ) and other agents (Chauhan et al, Cancer Cell 2005), thus this Phase 1 dose escalation trial in patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory MM was initiated. Materials and Methods: Patients (pts) were treated with NPI-0052 IV weekly for 3 weeks in 4-week cycles. Measurable disease by EBMT criteria was not required. The dose of NPI-0052 was escalated using a combination of accelerated titration and 3+3 design. PK and proteasome inhibition (blood and PBMCs) were assayed after the first and third doses. Preliminary Results: 27 pts have been treated at doses ranging from 0.025 to 0.7 mg/m2; median age is 62; 18 males/9 females; IgG/IgA/light chain/non-secretory 14/4/2/6; median of 4 prior regimens and 27% refractory to prior bortezomib. Reversible DLT was observed in two out of eight patients treated at 0.7 mg/m2 (Grade 3 fatigue; Grade 3 mental status changes and loss of balance), with 2 additional pts undergoing dose reductions in Cycle 1 (nausea and vomiting; vertigo and confusion/word-finding difficulties). Prophylactic anti-emetics have been instituted with a decrease in infusion-related nausea; similarly, pts with dizziness/vertigo have been administered meclizine with symptomatic improvement. Other drug-related adverse events have consisted principally of mild-to-moderate fatigue, nausea, vomiting, dizziness, headache and diarrhea; interestingly, myelosuppression, neuropathy and thrombosis do not appear to be elicited by NPI-0052. PK assessment demonstrates a rapid elimination half-life (<20 minutes) and relatively large Vz. NPI-0052 produces dose dependent proteasome inhibitions. At 0.7 mg/m2, Day 1/Day 15 inhibition of chymotrypsin-like activity in whole blood is 73% and 99%, respectively (the value for bortezomib at 1.3 mg/m2 is 65%). One patient with IgA MM (4 prior regimens plus ASCT; relapsed after prior BZ, not refractory) had a 71% decrease in M-protein (unconfirmed PR; off study after 3 cycles). A second pt with non-secretory disease (4 prior regimens;relapsed after prior BZ, not refractory) had a nearly 50% reduction in involved light chain; this pt remains active on study at 5+ months. In addition, 8 pts with relapsed/refractory MM remained on study for between 6-15 months (3 pts were on-study for over one year) with stable disease and no significant toxicity; 2 of these pts were BZ-refractory. Conclusions: Tolerability of 0.7 mg/m2 continues to be investigated in pts with MM, with prophylactic antiemetics and meclizine to reduce common drug-related toxicities of nausea and dizziness. The safety profile of NPI-0052 is importantly different from bortezomib in spite of higher and more durable proteasome inhibition; peripheral neuropathy and thrombocytopenia were not seen. Accrual continues to expand upon these results and assess the new lyophile formulation of NPI-0052. Disclosures: Richardson: Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Keryx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gentium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Off Label Use: Vorinostat is a histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor that was approved in the FDA in October 2006 for the treatment of cutaneous manifestations in patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) who have progressive, persistent, or recurrent disease on or following two systemic therapies. Jakubowiak:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Millennium: Consultancy, Honoraria; Centocor Ortho Biotech: Consultancy, Honoraria; Exelixis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers-Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria. Spear:Nereus Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Equity Ownership. Palladino:Nereus Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Equity Ownership. Longenecker:Nereus Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Equity Ownership. Neuteboom:Nereus Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Equity Ownership. Cropp:Nereus Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Lloyd:Nereus Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Equity Ownership. Hannah:Nereus Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Anderson:Nereus Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Initial Findings From the PACE Trial: A Pivotal Phase 2 Study of Ponatinib in Patients with CML and Ph+ ALL Resistant or Intolerant to Dasatinib or Nilotinib, or with the T315I Mutation

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 109-109 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorge E. Cortes ◽  
Dong-Wook Kim ◽  
Javier Pinilla-Ibarz ◽  
Philipp D. Le Coutre ◽  
Charles Chuah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Initial Response ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Primary Endpoints ◽  
T315i Mutation ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 109 Background: Despite progress in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), patients (pts) who fail dasatinib or nilotinib or pts with T315I mutation have no treatment options. Ponatinib is a potent, oral, pan-BCR-ABL inhibitor active against the native enzyme and all tested resistant mutants, including the uniformly resistant T315I mutation. Methods: The PACE trial (Ponatinib Ph+ALL and CML Evaluation) was initiated in September 2010. The objective of this international, single-arm, open-label, phase 2 trial is to establish the efficacy and safety of ponatinib. Pts with refractory CML in chronic, accelerated or blast phase (CP, AP or BP), or Ph+ acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), resistant or intolerant (R/I) to dasatinib or nilotinib or with the resistant T315I mutation received 45 mg ponatinib orally once daily in one of 6 cohorts: CP R/I; CP T315I; AP R/I; AP T315I; BP/ALL R/I; BP/ALL T315I. The primary endpoints are major cytogenetic response (MCyR) for CP and major hematologic response (MaHR) for AP, BP or ALL. The trial is ongoing; projected enrollment is approximately 450. Data as of 18 July 2011 are reported. Results: At analysis, 403 pts were enrolled; 397 were treated and eligible. The median age was 59 (range, 18–94) years, 52% were male. Diagnoses were: CP R/I, n=188; CP T315I, 48; AP R/I, 52; AP T315I, 15; BP/ALL R/I, 51; BP/ALL T315I, 43. Median time from initial diagnosis to start of ponatinib was 6.2 years. Prior TKIs included imatinib (93%), dasatinib (85%), nilotinib (66%), and bosutinib (8%); 94% failed >2 prior TKIs, and 57% failed >3 prior TKIs. Overall, 88% had a history of resistance to dasatinib or nilotinib, and 12% were purely intolerant. Mutation status was determined centrally by MolecularMD. Overall, 106 pts had the T315I mutation. Of 291 R/I pts, 110 (38%) had non-T315I BCR-ABL mutations, most frequently F317L (10%), F359V (5%), E255K (4%), and G250E (4%). To date, 343 (85%) pts remain on therapy, 60 (15%) have discontinued (42 BP/ALL): 24 (6%) progressive disease (20 BP/ALL); 11 (3%) AE (3 pain, 3 thrombocytopenia, 1 each haemorrhage, loss of consciousness, enterocolitis, cytokine release syndrome, hepatotoxicity/pleuro-pericardial effusion after overdose); 8 (2%) died (3 related; 7 BP/ALL); 17 (4%) other. The most common drug-related AEs (≥10% any grade) were thrombocytopenia (19%; 15% grade 3/4), rash (18%), dry skin (13%), myalgia (12%), abdominal pain (11%; 3% grade 3/4), headache (11%), arthralgia (11%). Overall, 67 (17%) pts experienced at least 1 related SAE. The most common related SAEs (>5 cases) were pancreatitis 15 cases (3.7%), 5 cases each (1.2%) diarrhea, anemia, febrile neutropenia, and pyrexia. At the time of reporting, 159/397 eligible pts were evaluable for the primary endpoints. Median follow-up was 57 days. Of CP pts, 83 had an assessment at 3 months (10 at 6 months) or discontinued. In CP R/I, 25/60 (42%) attained MCyR (15 CCyR). In CP T315I, 13/23 (57%) had MCyR (11 CCyR). The overall CP MCyR rate was 38/83 (46%) (26 CCyR). Of AP, BP/ALL pts, 76 had an assessment at 1 month or later or discontinued. In AP, 17/23 (74%) R/I and 1/1 T315I pts achieved MaHR. In BP/ALL, 11/30 (37%) R/I and 6/22 (27%) T315I pts had MaHR. Conclusion: In this first analysis of the pivotal PACE trial, ponatinib has a favorable early safety profile, similar to that observed in phase 1, but with a lower incidence of pancreatitis. Initial response data after short follow-up indicate ponatinib has substantial anti-leukemic activity in this heavily pretreated population, and in pts with refractory T315I. These early efficacy signals replicate initial response results reported in the phase 1 setting. Updated data will be presented at the annual meeting. Disclosures: Cortes: Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy, Research Funding. Kim:BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; ARIAD: Research Funding. Pinilla-Ibarz:ARIAD: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Le Coutre:Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; ARIAD: Research Funding. Paquette:ARIAD: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Apperley:Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Sqibb: Honoraria; Ariad: Honoraria; Chemgenex: Honoraria; Genzyme: Honoraria. DiPersio:Genzyme: Honoraria. Rea:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Talpaz:ARIAD: Research Funding. Abruzzese:Novartis: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy. Baccarani:Pfizer Oncology: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Ariad: Consultancy; Novartis: Research Funding; Pfizer Oncology: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Ariad: Honoraria; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Ariad: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Wong:MolecularMD: Employment, Equity Ownership. Lustgarten:ARIAD: Employment. Turner:ARIAD: Employment, Equity Ownership. Rivera:ARIAD: Employment, Equity Ownership. Clackson:ARIAD: Employment, Equity Ownership. Haluska:ARIAD: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kantarjian:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; ARIAD: Research Funding.

scholarly journals CC-486 (Oral Azacitidine) in Patients with Hematological Malignancies Who Had Received Prior Treatment with Injectable Hypomethylating Agents (HMAs): Results from Phase 1/2 CC-486 Studies

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 905-905 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guillermo Garcia-Manero ◽  
Michael R. Savona ◽  
Steven D. Gore ◽  
Bart L. Scott ◽  
Christopher R. Cogle ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Therapeutic Effects ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Hematologic Response ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background: Injectable HMAs (azacitidine [AZA], decitabine) are the standard of care in higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (HR-MDS) (NCCN, 2016). When other treatment (Tx) options are no longer feasible, HMAs may be used to treat patients (pts) with lower-risk MDS (LR-MDS) and have demonstrated efficacy in older pts with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) (Dombret, Blood, 2015; Kantarjian, JCO, 2012). Injectable HMAs induce hematologic response or improvement (HI) in ~50% of pts (Grinblatt, Haematologica, 2014; Lyons, JCO, 2009; Silverman, JCO, 2002), but responses may lack durability. There are no standard Tx options indicated for use after HMA failure; the mainstay of Tx in this setting for pts ineligible for stem cell transplant is a clinical trial or supportive care. CC-486, the oral formulation of AZA, was evaluated in 3 phase 1/2 studies that did not exclude pts who had received HMA Tx before study entry. Aim: Determine clinical outcomes for pts with MDS, chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML), or AML, treated with CC-486 monotherapy who had previously failed injectable HMA Tx. Methods: Pts with MDS, CMML, or AML from 3 phase 1/2 CC-486 studies (2 of which included dose-finding periods) who had received HMA Tx before receiving CC-486 are included in these analyses. CC-486 Tx regimens were: 120-600mg x7 days (d) following a single SC AZA cycle (75mg/m2/d x7d), or 300mg QD or 200mg BID x14d or 21d (with no initial SC AZA cycle). All dosing regimens were administered in repeated 28d cycles. Overall response rate (ORR) included complete remission (CR), partial remission (PR), CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi; AML pts only), HI, and transfusion independence (TI). Marrow CR (mCR) was assessed in MDS pts with ≥5% bone marrow blasts at baseline. Results: In all, 40 pts had received prior HMA Tx: 26 pts with MDS, 2 with CMML, and 12 with AML. In the MDS/CMML and AML groups, respectively, median ages were 75 years (range 55-84) and 71 years (60-93) and median times since diagnosis were 28 (2-140) and 4 (0-32) months (Table). Before receiving CC-486, 12 pts (30%) had failed >1 prior injectable HMA course. Most pts (58%) had previously received >4 HMA Tx cycles. Six pts with AML (50%) had received prior HMAs for Tx of antecedent MDS. Of 29 pts for whom outcomes with prior HMAs were known, 16 pts relapsed and 13 pts were refractory to the injectable HMA. The median number of CC-486 Tx cycles was 5 (range 1-52). For all pts treated with CC-486, ORR was 35%. ORR and rates of specific responses were similar between pts with MDS/CMML and pts with AML (Figure). Five of 13 pts (38%) who were refractory to prior HMAs responded, including 1 AML pt who attained CR with CC-486. Six of 16 pts (38%) who had relapsed during or after prior HMA Tx responded. During CC-486 Tx, 32% of pts attained any HI and 31% achieved RBC TI. Of pts who had received ≥6 cycles of prior HMA Tx (n=20), ORR was 35% (7/20). ORR was not statistically different between 7d (n=26) and extended (n=14) CC-486 dosing (P=0.288). The most frequent (≥10%) grade 3-4 hematologic TEAEs were anemia (33%), thrombocytopenia (23%), neutropenia (15%), and febrile neutropenia (10%); the most frequent grade 3-4 gastrointestinal TEAEs were diarrhea and vomiting (10% each). Conclusions: Among pts who were relapsed or refractory to prior HMA Tx, 35% had a hematologic response to CC-486, suggesting that prior HMA failure does not preclude future response to CC-486. Notably, the majority of pts had received >4 prior HMA Tx cycles; thus, prior failures to injectable HMAs were not likely due to inadequate duration of Tx. The ORR with CC-486 in pts who had received ≥6 cycles of the prior injectable HMA was the same as the ORR with CC-486 in all pts. Hypomethylating effects of HMAs are transient; unlike injectable HMAs, oral CC-486 can be administered over extended dosing periods (>7d) of the Tx cycle to produce sustained hypomethylating activity. There was no statistical difference in ORR between CC-486 7d and extended dosing in this small pt group. Nevertheless, given the short half-life and S-phase-restricted DNA incorporation of AZA (Li, Cancer Res, 1970), extending AZA exposure to >7d/cycle with CC-486 could increase the opportunity for cycling cells to incorporate AZA and expose more malignant progenitor cells to AZA, which may optimize therapeutic effects. Extended hypomethylation due to longer exposure to CC-486 may induce pts to respond to CC-486 who had failed prior injectable HMA Tx. Disclosures Savona: TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Sunesis: Research Funding; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Ariad: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Gore:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Scott:Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Alexion: Speakers Bureau; Agios: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Cogle:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Conkling:USOncology Research: Research Funding; Amgen Inc.: Research Funding. Hetzer:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Dong:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kumar:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Ukrainskyj:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Skikne:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership.

scholarly journals Phase 2 Study of Zanubrutinib (BGB-3111) in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Marginal Zone Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 5256-5256 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen Opat ◽  
Robert Marcus ◽  
Craig A. Portell ◽  
William Reed ◽  
Chris Tankersley ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Marginal Zone ◽  
Marginal Zone Lymphoma ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Grade 3

Background: Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) plays a critical role in B-cell receptor signaling, which mediates B-cell proliferation, migration, and adhesion. Inhibition of BTK has emerged as a strategy for targeting B-cell malignancies including marginal zone lymphoma (MZL). Zanubrutinib (BGB-3111) is an investigational, next-generation BTK inhibitor that was designed to maximize BTK occupancy and minimize off-target inhibition of TEC- and EGFR-family kinases. Increased specificity may minimize toxicities reported with ibrutinib potentially due to off-target inhibition such as diarrhea, thrombocytopenia, bleeding, atrial fibrillation, rash, and fatigue (Coutre et al. Blood Advances 2019). In non-clinical studies, zanubrutinib has been shown to be highly potent, selective, bioavailable, and irreversible, with potentially advantageous pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties. Complete and sustained BTK occupancy has been observed with zanubrutinib treatment in both peripheral blood mononuclear cells and in lymph nodes (Tam et al. Blood 2019). Based on drug-drug interaction studies and population PK analyses (internal data), zanubrutinib may be co-administered with strong or moderate CYP3A4 inhibitors at a reduced dose, proton pump inhibitors, vitamin K antagonists, as well as direct oral anticoagulants. Zanubrutinib does not prolong the QT interval. Pooled clinical data from 6 zanubrutinib monotherapy trials including 682 patients with either non-Hodgkin lymphoma, Waldenström macroglobulinemia, or chronic lymphocytic leukemia suggests that zanubrutinib has been generally well tolerated amongst patients with B-cell malignancies (Tam et al. EHA 2019). This data further showed that some toxicities often associated with BTK inhibitors were infrequent with zanubrutinib, including 1.9% atrial fibrillation/flutter (0.6% grade ≥3), 2.5% major hemorrhage (2.1% grade ≥3), 10.9% fatigue (0.7% grade ≥3), 18.0% rash (0.1% grade ≥3), 18.3% thrombocytopenia (6.6% grade ≥3), and 19.4% diarrhea (0.9% grade ≥3). Early clinical data from a phase 1 study demonstrated responses in 7 of 9 patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) MZL treated with zanubrutinib (Tam et al. ASH 2017); the remaining 2 patients had stable disease indicating an encouraging rate of overall disease control. Study Design and Methods: This ongoing global phase 2, single-arm, open-label study (MAGNOLIA; NCT03846427) is examining zanubrutinib monotherapy in patients with R/R MZL who have received 1 or more prior lines of systemic therapy (Figure). Eligible patients must have histologically confirmed diagnosis of MZL including splenic, nodal, and extranodal subtypes, have received prior anti-CD20 antibody therapy, and have measurable disease. Patients must have documented clinical need for therapy as well as adequate marrow and organ function. Patients are treated with oral zanubrutinib at 160 mg twice daily until progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. The primary efficacy endpoint is ORR according to the Lugano Classification (Cheson et al. J Clin Oncol. 2014) measured by computed tomography and bone marrow assessment data as determined by an independent review committee (IRC). A 2-sided Clopper-Pearson 95% CI for ORR will be calculated. Key secondary endpoints include ORR by investigator assessment, time to and duration of response, time to treatment discontinuation, progression-free survival (all determined by IRC and investigator assessments), overall survival, safety, and patient-reported outcomes. All patients are tested for the MYD88 mutation at study entry. Recruitment is ongoing. Disclosures Opat: Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Mundipharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Beigene: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Epizyme: Research Funding; CSL: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy. Marcus:Gilead: Consultancy; Roche: Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses; Roche-Genentech: Honoraria. Portell:Xencor: Research Funding; Roche/Genentech: Research Funding; Infinity: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Acerta/AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Kite: Consultancy, Research Funding; BeiGene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; AbbVie: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy. Reed:BeiGene: Employment, Equity Ownership, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses. Tankersley:BeiGene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Huang:BeiGene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Trotman:Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; BeiGene: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: Zanubrutinib is an investigational agent and has not yet been approved in the US

scholarly journals Current Results of Lentiglobin Gene Therapy in Patients with Severe Sickle Cell Disease Treated Under a Refined Protocol in the Phase 1 Hgb-206 Study

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1026-1026 ◽  
Author(s):  
John F. Tisdale ◽  
Julie Kanter ◽  
Markus Y. Mapara ◽  
Janet L. Kwiatkowski ◽  
Lakshmanan Krishnamurti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Therapy ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Cd34 Cells ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background β-globin gene transfer has the potential for substantial clinical benefit in patients with sickle cell disease (SCD). LentiGlobin Drug Product (DP) contains autologous CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) transduced with the BB305 lentiviral vector (LVV), encoding β-globin with an anti-sickling substitution (T87Q). The safety and efficacy of LentiGlobin gene therapy is being evaluated in the ongoing Phase 1 HGB-206 study (NCT02140554). Results in the initial 7 patients treated with LentiGlobin DP from steady state bone marrow harvested (BMH) HSCs using original DP manufacturing process (Group A) demonstrated stable HbAT87Q production in all patients, but at levels below the anticipated target. The protocol was thus amended to include pre-harvest RBC transfusions, optimize myeloablation by targeting higher busulfan levels, and use a refined DP manufacturing process (Group B); additionally, HSC collection by plerixafor mobilization/apheresis was instituted (Group C). Data from patients in Group C, treated under the modified protocol with DPs manufactured from plerixafor-mobilized HSCs using the refined process, are reported here. Results in patients in Groups A and B are reported separately. Methods Patients with severe SCD (history of recurrent vaso-occlusive crisis, acute chest syndrome, stroke, or tricuspid regurgitant jet velocity of >2.5 m/s) were enrolled. Patients in Group C received ≥2 months of transfusions to reach Hb of 10 - 12 g/dL and <30% HbS before HSC collection. Patients received 240 μg/kg of plerixafor 4 - 6 hours before HSCs were collected by apheresis and CD34+ cells were transduced with the BB305 LVV at a central facility. Following myeloablative conditioning with busulfan, the DP was infused, and patients were monitored for adverse events (AEs), engraftment, peripheral blood (PB) vector copy number (VCN), HbAT87Q expression, and HbS levels. Summary statistics are presented as median (min - max). Results As of 15 May 2018, 11 Group C patients (age 25 [18 - 35] years) had undergone mobilization/apheresis, 9 patients had DP manufactured (median 1 cycle of mobilization [1 - 3]) and 6 patients had been treated. Cell dose, DP VCN and % transduced cells in the 6 treated patients were: 7.1 (3 - 8) x 106 CD34+ cells/kg, 4.0 (2.8 - 5.6) copies/diploid genome (c/dg) and 81 (78 - 88) % transduced cells. The median follow-up was 3.0 (1.2 - 6.0) months. Patients achieved neutrophil engraftment at a median of 19 (18 - 20) days. Platelet engraftment was achieved at a median of 28 (12 - 64) days in 4 patients; platelet engraftment was pending in 2 patients. Two of 11 patients experienced 4 grade ≥3 AEs associated with plerixafor mobilization/HSC collection: 1 had vaso-occlusive pain and hypomagnesaemia, and the other had vaso-occlusive pain and non-cardiac chest pain. The toxicity profile from DP infusion to last follow-up in the 6 treated patients was consistent with myeloablative conditioning. Febrile neutropenia (n=5) and stomatitis (n=4) were the most common non-hematologic grade ≥3 AEs. Serious AEs were reported in 3 patients post-DP infusion: splenic hematoma, non-cardiac chest pain and mucosal inflammation. To date, there have been no DP-related AEs, graft failure, vector-mediated replication competent lentivirus, or clonal dominance. In the 6 treated patients, PB VCN at last visit ranged from 1.4 - 2.9 c/dg. In the 3 patients with 3 months follow-up, total Hb levels were 11.7 g/dL, 9.8 g/dL and 9.2 g/dL, and HbAT87Q levels were 4.7 g/dL, 3.2 g/dL and 3.5 g/dL. One additional patient with 6 months follow-up was off transfusions and had total Hb of 14.2 g/dL, of which 62% (8.8 g/dL) was vector-derived HbAT87Q and 36% (5.1 g/dL) was HbS. All 4 patients had HbAT87Q (median 39%) levels higher than or equal to HbS (median 31%) at the 3-month visit. Summary HGB-206 protocol changes and refined DP manufacturing have improved the LentiGlobin DP characteristics resulting in significantly improved outcomes. In addition, the HbAT87Q expression is comparable to, or exceeds, HbS levels as early as 3 months post DP infusion. These data support the feasibility of plerixafor-mediated CD34+ cell collection in patients with severe SCD and the efficacy of gene therapy. The safety profile of LentiGlobin gene therapy remains consistent with single-agent busulfan conditioning. Additional data and longer follow-up will determine the clinical effect of increased HbAT87Q/HbS ratios. Disclosures Kanter: Global Blood Therapeutics: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; bluebird bio: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Sancilio: Research Funding; NHLBI: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Apopharma: Research Funding; ASH: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Mapara:Incyte: Consultancy. Kwiatkowski:Novartis: Research Funding; bluebird bio: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Apopharma: Research Funding; Terumo: Research Funding; Agios Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding. Schmidt:GeneWerk GmbH: Employment; German Cancer Research Center: Employment; bluebird bio: Consultancy. Miller:bluebird bio: Employment, Equity Ownership. Pierciey:bluebird bio: Employment, Equity Ownership. Shi:bluebird bio: Employment, Equity Ownership. Ribeil:bluebird bio: Employment, Equity Ownership. Asmal:bluebird bio: Employment, Equity Ownership. Thompson:Amgen: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Baxalta/Shire: Research Funding; bluebird bio: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Biomarin: Research Funding; La Jolla Pharmaceutical: Research Funding. Walters:Sangamo Therapeutics: Consultancy; bluebird bio: Research Funding; ViaCord Processing Lab: Other: Medical Director; AllCells Inc.: Other: Medical Director.

An Open-Label, Phase I Study of R-CVP in Combination with Inotuzumab Ozogamicin in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory CD22-Positive B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma,

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 3715-3715 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michinori Ogura ◽  
Toshiki Uchida ◽  
David A MacDonald ◽  
Kiyohiko Hatake ◽  
Andrew Davies ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Efficacy Data ◽  
Inotuzumab Ozogamicin ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Expansion Cohort

Abstract Abstract 3715 Background: Inotuzumab ozogamicin (INO) is a humanized anti-CD22 antibody conjugated to calicheamicin, a potent antitumor antibiotic. CD22 is expressed on the majority of B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL). Although safety and preliminary efficacy data of INO as monotherapy and in combination with rituximab have previously been reported, there is no report of combination use of INO with chemotherapy. This phase I study evaluated the safety of INO in combination with chemotherapy (R-CVP regimen) in patients with relapsed or refractory CD22+ B-cell NHL. Preliminary efficacy data were also collected. Patients and Methods: Patients with either relapsed or refractory CD22+ B-cell NHL and at least 1 prior treatment regimen, including rituximab and chemotherapy, were enrolled in a phase I dose-finding study (part 1), with a planned expansion cohort (n = 10) to confirm the safety and tolerability of the maximum tolerated dose (MTD; part 2), and a further expansion cohort (n = 20) to estimate antitumor activity (part 3). In the dose-escalation study, INO (0.8 mg/m2) was given on Day 2 with R-CVP (rituximab 375 mg/m2, vincristine 1.4 mg/m2, and escalating doses of cyclophosphamide 375, 550, and 750 mg/m2 all on Day 1; prednisone 40 mg/m2 on Days 1–5) q3wks. After the highest dose of cyclophosphamide was evaluated for safety, INO was escalated to 1.3 mg/m2. Dose reductions and/or dose delays were performed, as needed, based on toxicities. The current analysis presents the completed dose-escalation phase, with preliminary safety and efficacy data. Results: 23 patients with follicular (FL; n = 15), mantle cell (n = 3), diffuse large B-cell (n = 3), or small lymphocytic (n = 1) lymphomas (missing diagnosis, n = 1) have been enrolled so far: 65% of patients were male, and the median age was 62 years (range, 42–74 years). In part 1 of the study, approximately 50% of patients had received 2 or more prior chemotherapy regimens, and all had received prior rituximab. As of the time of this analysis, 11 patients had completed at least 5 treatment cycles (ie, ≥105 days on study drug). No dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were reported with INO 0.8 mg/m2 plus R-CVP at the lower doses of cyclophosphamide (375 and 550 mg/m2). At a dose level of INO 0.8 mg/m2 plus full-dose R-CVP (cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2), 1 out of 6 patients had a DLT of grade 4 neutropenia requiring treatment with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). At a dose level of INO 1.3 mg/m2 plus R-CVP, 2 out of 3 patients had a total of 3 DLTs (acute hepatitis, thrombocytopenia, and neutropenia requiring G-CSF). Therefore, the MTD was determined to be rituximab 375 mg/m2, vincristine 1.4 mg/m2, and cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2 all given on Day 1, INO 0.8 mg/m2 given on Day 2, and prednisone 40 mg/m2 given on Days 1 through 5 of each 3-week cycle. Treatment-emergent grade ≥3 adverse events included neutropenia (57%), lymphopenia (52%), leukopenia (35%), thrombocytopenia (30%), increased alanine aminotransferase (9%), increased aspartate aminotransferase (4%), decreased blood sodium (4%), fatigue (4%), febrile neutropenia (4%), hyperbilirubinemia (4%), hypoxia (4%), lethargy (4%), pleural effusion (4%), and pollakiuria (4%). Enrollment is continuing in parts 2 and 3 of the study. Preliminary efficacy data from the escalation portion of the study (n = 15 evaluable patients) is notable for an overall response rate (ORR) of 87% (33% with complete response; 53% with partial response). In patients with FL, the ORR was 100% (45% with complete response). Conclusions: INO 0.8 mg/m2 appears to be tolerable when given in combination with full dose R-CVP chemotherapy. DLTs were hematologic and hepatic, and encouraging signs of antitumor activity have been reported. Disclosures: MacDonald: Roche Canada: Honoraria, Research Funding. Davies:Pfizer Inc: Research Funding. Sangha:Roche: Honoraria; Boehringer Ingelheim: Honoraria. Crump:Millenium: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Roche Canada: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer Inc: Consultancy, Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen-Ortho: Consultancy, Honoraria. Thieblemont:Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris: Employment; Institut National du Cancer - INCa [French National Cancer Institute]: Research Funding. Ishibashi:Pfizer Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Hua:Pfizer Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Paccagnella:Pfizer Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties. Vandendries:Pfizer Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kobayashi:Ohtsuka Pharmaceutical: Research Funding; Nippon Shiyaku: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria. Tobinai:Bayer: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Chugai: Research Funding; Eli Lilly: Research Funding; Genzyme: Research Funding; GSK: Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; MSD: Research Funding; Mundipharma: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Pfizer Inc: Research Funding; Symbio: Research Funding; Zenyaku: Research Funding.

CC-122 Dosing on a Novel Intermittent Schedule Mitigates Neutropenia and Maintains Clinical Activity in Subjects with Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 1494-1494 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cecilia Carpio ◽  
Loïc Ysebaert ◽  
Raúl Cordoba ◽  
Armando Santoro ◽  
José Antonio López-Martín ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background: CC-122, a first in class PPM™ pleiotropic pathway modifier, has anti-tumor activity against B cell lymphomas. The molecular target of CC-122 is cereblon (CRBN) and CC-122 promotes ubiquitination of lymphoid transcription factor Aiolos in a CRBN-dependent manner, leading to its degradation in Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) tumor tissue and immune cells. CC-122 also depletes Ikaros, which is expressed in immature stages of myeloid differentiation and regulates early neutrophil differentiation (Blood 101:2219 2003). Following establishment of CC-122 3mg daily (QD) as the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) on a continuous schedule (Blood 122:2905 2013), subjects with advanced lymphoma, myeloma, and select solid tumors were enrolled in parallel expansion. In DLBCL subjects, CC-122 treatment demonstrated promising clinical efficacy, however, dose reductions due to neutropenia were frequent with the QD schedule (Blood 124:3500 2014). Therefore, a second cohort of DLBCL subjects was enrolled to evaluate the tolerability and clinical activity of intermittent schedules. Methods: Subjects with relapsed/refractory DLBCL were enrolled in parallel dose escalation of CC-122 given orally at 4mg or 5mg on two intermittent schedules. CC-122 given 21/28 days was tested based on lenalidomide experience. In order to model a second schedule, human bone marrow CD34+ cells were cultured for two weeks in SCF, Flt3L and G-CSF for expansion towards granulocytic lineage followed by 6 days with media plus G-CSF for neutrophil maturation.CC-122 0.5 uM was added continuously or on a 5 out of 7 day (5/7d) schedule. Myeloid maturation stages were measured 14 days later by CD34, CD33 and CD11b flow cytometry. Continuous exposure to CC-122 led to reversible myeloid maturation arrest and 90% decreased mature neutrophils compared to vehicle, whereas, CC-122 exposure for 5/7d resulted in only 50% decreased mature neutrophils. Based on this rationale, CC-122 given 5/7d was selected as the second intermittent schedule tested in DLBCL. Results: As of June 25, 2015, 22 subjects with relapsed/refractory DLBCL were enrolled in the 2nd cohort; all were evaluable for safety, 16 were efficacy evaluable (EE) as of the cutoff date. The median age was 60 years and 54% were male. The median time since diagnosis was 14 months and all subjects were ECOG 0-1. For subjects treated with CC-122 4mg 21/28 days (N=3), there were no dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) in cycle 1, however, all subjects required dose reduction due to neutropenia and therefore this dose level was considered a non-tolerated dose (NTD). For subjects treated with CC-122 on a 5/7 days schedule, the NTD was at 5mg due to 2 DLTs in 2 of 5 subjects (grade 3 febrile neutropenia and grade 3 pneumonitis). CC-122 4mg was the MTD on 5/7d and was selected for ongoing expansion in up to 50 subjects (N=14 as of cutoff date). There were no DLTs in 12 DLT-evaluable subjects. Median relative dose intensity achieved for 4mg 5/7d vs 3mg QD was 99% vs 79%. The most common (≥ 10%) related adverse events (AEs) were neutropenia (36%), constipation (29%), asthenia (21%) and grade 3/4 related AEs were neutropenia (36%) and lipase elevation (14%). In addition, drug-related serious AEs included pneumonia, neck pain, and respiratory failure. AEs were an uncommon cause of discontinuation (7%, n=14). Response rates for the EE DLBCL subjects treated at 5mg 5/7d (N=3), 4mg 5/7d (N=10), and 3mg QD (N=22) was 67% (2 PR), 30% (1CR, 2 PR) and 23% (1CR, 4PR), respectively. Aiolos protein levels in peripheral T cells was measured by flow cytometry pre (baseline) and 5 hours post dosing on C1D1, C1D10 and C1D22. The median % change Aiolos levels at each of these visits were -47, -28 and -52%, respectively, indicating that Aiolos degradation occurs throughout the cycle. In addition, the median increase from baseline in cytotoxic memory T cells and helper memory T cells at cycle 1 day 22 in peripheral blood samples was 580% and 76%, respectively. Conclusion: In an in vitro myeloid differentiation assay, myeloid maturation arrest by CC-122, possibly due to Ikaros degradation, can be partially bypassed with a 2 day drug holiday. From a clinical standpoint, exploration of intermittent dosing confirmed that 5/7d schedule mitigates neutropenia-related dose reductions and improves CC-122 clinical activity in relapse/refractory DLBCL patients. Of note, the immunomodulatory effects of CC-122 are maintained on the 5/7d schedule. Disclosures Carpio: Celgene: Research Funding. Off Label Use: CC-122 is a first in class PPM(TM) pleiotropic pathway modifier with anti-tumor activity against B cell lymphomas.. Ysebaert:Celgene: Research Funding. Cordoba:Celgene: Research Funding. Santoro:Celgene: Research Funding. López-Martín:Celgene: Research Funding. Sancho:Celgene: Research Funding. Panizo:Celgene: Research Funding; Roche: Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Speakers Bureau. Gharibo:Celgene: Research Funding. Rasco:Asana BioSciences, LLC: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Stoppa:Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Damian:Celgene: Research Funding. Wei:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Hagner:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Hege:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Carrancio:Celgene: Research Funding. Gandhi:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Pourdehnad:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Ribrag:Esai: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pharmamar: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Research Funding; Servier: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

A Phase 1 Study of Denintuzumab Mafodotin (SGN-CD19A) in Relapsed/Refactory B-Lineage Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 182-182 ◽  
Author(s):  
Craig H Moskowitz ◽  
Michelle A Fanale ◽  
Bijal D Shah ◽  
Ranjana H Advani ◽  
Robert Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Prior Therapy ◽  
Non Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract Background Denintuzumab mafodotin (SGN-CD19A) is a novel antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) composed of a humanized anti-CD19 monoclonal antibody conjugated to the microtubule-disrupting agent monomethyl auristatin F (MMAF) via a maleimidocaproyl linker. CD19 is a B-cell-specific marker expressed in the vast majority of patients (pts) with B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Methods An ongoing phase 1, dose-escalation study is investigating the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and antitumor activity of denintuzumab mafodotin in pts with relapsed or refractory (R/R) B-cell NHL (NCT 01786135). Eligible pts were ≥12 yrs of age and were R/R to ≥1 prior systemic regimens; pts with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) or follicular lymphoma grade 3 (FL3) also received intensive salvage therapy ± autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT), unless they refused or were ineligible. Denintuzumab mafodotin was administered IV every 3 weeks (q3wk; 0.5-6 mg/kg) for dose escalation and every 6 weeks (q6wk; 3 mg/kg) in a subsequent expansion cohort. A modified continual reassessment method was used for dose allocation and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) estimation in the q3wk dosing schedule. Archived tissue was collected to assess potential biomarkers of response. Results To date, 62 pts have been treated, including 53 pts (85%) with DLBCL (of whom 16 had transformed DLBCL), 5 (8%) with mantle cell lymphoma, and 3 (5%) with FL3. Median age was 65 yrs (range, 28-81). Pts had received a median of 2 prior systemic therapies (range, 1-6); 15 pts (24%) had prior ASCT. Thirty-seven pts (60%) were refractory to the most recent prior therapy. Fifty-two pts were treated in the q3wk schedule (0.5-6 mg/kg), and 10 pts were treated with 3 mg/kg q6wk. Five pts remain on treatment (2 q3wk pts, 3 q6wk pts). Overall, 20 (33%) of 60 efficacy-evaluable pts achieved objective responses, including 13 (22%) with CRs. Eighteen of the 20 objective responses were achieved by the end of Cycle 2 (15 q3wk pts, 3 q6wk pts). Table.Q3wk Dosing (N=51)Q6wk Dosing (N=9)RelapsedaN=22RefractorybN=29RelapsedaN=3RefractorybN=6Best clinical response, n (%)Complete remission (CR)7 (32)3 (10)3 (100)-Partial remission (PR)4 (18)3 (10)--Stable disease (SD)6 (27)7 (24)-3 (50)Progression5 (23)16 (55)-3 (50)ORR (CR+PR), % (95% CI)50 (28, 72)21 (8, 40)100 (29, 100)-CR rate, % (95% CI)32 (14,55)10 (2, 27)100 (29, 100)-ORR=objective response rateaBest response of CR/PR with most recent prior therapybBest response of SD/PD with most recent prior therapy Median duration of objective response in the q3wk schedule was 39 wks for relapsed pts (95% CI: 11.6, - [range, 0.1+ to 73+ wks]) and 41 wks for refractory pts (95% CI: 13.7, 67 [range, 13.7 to 67 wks]); this included 2 pts who maintained their responses for >15 mos. Data for the q6wk schedule are not yet mature. The MTD was not reached at 0.5-6 mg/kg q3wk, and only 1 DLT was observed (G3 keratopathy at 3 mg/kg). Toxicity profiles were similar across both dosing schedules; the most frequently reported adverse events (AEs) were blurry vision (65%), dry eye (52%), fatigue and keratopathy (35% each), constipation (29%), photophobia (27%), and nausea (26%). Ocular symptoms and corneal exam findings consistent with superficial microcystic keratopathy were observed in 52 pts (84%); symptoms were less severe than the associated corneal exam findings. Keratopathy was managed with topical steroids and dose modifications, and improved/resolved within a median of ~5 wks (range, 1-17) in pts for whom there was sufficient follow-up. ADC PK demonstrated a mean terminal half-life of ~2 wks, and accumulation was observed following multiple dose administrations in both schedules. Conclusions Denintuzumab mafodotin is generally well tolerated and demonstrates encouraging activity with durable responses in heavily pre-treated pts with B-cell NHL. In relapsed pts, 56% achieved objective responses with a CR rate of 40% across both the q3wk and q6wk schedules. The low rate of myelosuppression and neuropathy suggests that denintuzumab mafodotin could be incorporated into novel combination regimens in earlier lines of therapy. A randomized phase 2 trial is being initiated to evaluate RICE (rituximab, ifosfamide, carboplatin, etoposide) ± denintuzumab mafodotin pre-ASCT as second-line treatment for pts with DLBCL. Disclosures Moskowitz: Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Denintuzumab mafodotin (SGN-CD19A) is not approved for use.. Fanale:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel expenses, Research Funding. Shah:Janssen: Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; DeBartolo Institute for Personlaized Medicine: Research Funding; Rosetta Genomics: Research Funding; Acetylon Pharmaceuticals, INC: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Plexus Communications: Honoraria; Spectrum: Speakers Bureau; Pharmacyclics: Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; SWOG: Consultancy; NCCN: Consultancy. Chen:Genentech: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Consultancy, Other: Travel expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Kim:Bayer: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding; Eli Lilly: Consultancy. Kostic:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Liu:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership, Other: Travel expenses. Peng:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Forero-Torres:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document