scholarly journals How do we use therapeutic drug monitoring to improve outcomes from severe infections in critically ill patients?

2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gloria Wong ◽  
Fekade Bruck Sime ◽  
Jeffrey Lipman ◽  
Jason A Roberts
Antibiotics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 667
Author(s):  
Ute Chiriac ◽  
Daniel C. Richter ◽  
Otto R. Frey ◽  
Anka C. Röhr ◽  
Sophia Helbig ◽  
...  

Optimization of antibiotic dosing is a treatment intervention that is likely to improve outcomes in severe infections. The aim of this retrospective study was to describe the therapeutic exposure of steady state piperacillin concentrations (cPIP) and clinical outcome in critically ill patients with sepsis or septic shock who received continuous infusion of piperacillin with dosing personalized through software-guided empiric dosing and therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). Therapeutic drug exposure was defined as cPIP of 32–64 mg/L (2–4× the ‘MIC breakpoint’ of Pseudomonas aeruginosa). Of the 1544 patients screened, we included 179 patients (335 serum concentrations), of whom 89% achieved the minimum therapeutic exposure of >32 mg/L and 12% achieved potentially harmful cPIP > 96 mg/L within the first 48 h. Therapeutic exposure was achieved in 40% of the patients. Subsequent TDM-guided dose adjustments significantly enhanced therapeutic exposure to 65%, and significantly reduced cPIP > 96 mg/L to 5%. Mortality in patients with cPIP > 96 mg/L (13/21; 62%) (OR 5.257, 95% CI 1.867–14.802, p = 0.001) or 64–96 mg/L (30/76; 45%) (OR 2.696, 95% CI 1.301–5.586, p = 0.007) was significantly higher compared to patients with therapeutic exposure (17/72; 24%). Given the observed variability in critically ill patients, combining the application of dosing software and consecutive TDM increases therapeutic drug exposure of piperacillin in patients with sepsis and septic shock.


2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan Abdulla ◽  
Puck van den Broek ◽  
Tim M.J. Ewoldt ◽  
Anouk E. Muller ◽  
Henrik Endeman ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. 166-174
Author(s):  
Nora J mabelis ◽  
Kimberly N. Shudofsky ◽  
Joost J. van Raaij ◽  
Sjoerd D. Meenks ◽  
Thomas Havenith ◽  
...  

Antibiotics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 1452
Author(s):  
Schrader Nikolas ◽  
Riese Thorsten ◽  
Kurlbaum Max ◽  
Meybohm Patrick ◽  
Kredel Markus ◽  
...  

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is increasingly relevant for an individualized antibiotic therapy and subsequently a necessary tool to reduce multidrug-resistant pathogens, especially in light of diminishing antimicrobial capabilities. Critical illness is associated with profound pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic alterations, which challenge dose finding and the application of particularly hydrophilic drugs such as β-lactam antibiotics. Methods: Implementation strategy, potential benefit, and practicability of the developed standard operating procedures were retrospectively analyzed from January to December 2020. Furthermore, the efficacy of the proposed dosing target of piperacillin in critically ill patients was evaluated. Results: In total, 160 patients received piperacillin/tazobactam therapy and were subsequently included in the study. Of them, 114 patients received piperacillin/tazobactam by continuous infusion and had at least one measurement of piperacillin serum level according to the standard operating procedure. In total, 271 measurements were performed with an average level of 79.0 ± 46.0 mg/L. Seventy-one piperacillin levels exceeded 100 mg/L and six levels were lower than 22.5 mg/L. The high-level and the low-level group differed significantly in infection laboratory parameters (CRP (mg/dL) 20.18 ± 11.71 vs. 5.75 ± 5.33) and renal function [glomerular filtration rate (mL/min/1.75 m2) 40.85 ± 26.74 vs. 120.50 ± 70.48]. Conclusions: Piperacillin levels are unpredictable in critically ill patients. TDM during piperacillin/tazobactam therapy is highly recommended for all patients. Although our implementation strategy was effective, further strategies implemented into the daily clinical workflow might support the health care staff and increase the clinicians’ alertness.


2019 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sophie Neugebauer ◽  
Christina Wichmann ◽  
Sibylle Bremer-Streck ◽  
Stefan Hagel ◽  
Michael Kiehntopf

2021 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 437-437
Author(s):  
Christina Rose ◽  
Michelle Miller ◽  
Kazumi Morita ◽  
Sheriff Gbadamosi ◽  
Kerry Mohrien

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document