Increasing cervical cancer screening uptake in Yorkshire

Introduction. Cancer of the cervix is the leading cause of cancer deaths among women in developing countries. Screening is one of the most cost effective control strategies for the disease. This study assessed the determinants of cervical cancer screening uptake among Nigerian women.Methodology. This cross-sectional study was conducted using multistage sampling technique among 338 participants in Ilorin, North Central Nigeria. A pretested questionnaire was used for data collection and data analysis was done using SPSS version 21. Chi-square test was used for bivariate analysis while binary logistic regression was used for multivariate analysis. Statistical significance was set atp<0.05.Results. Only 8.0% of the respondents had ever been screened for cancer of the cervix. The proportion of women who had ever been screened was significantly higher among those who demonstrated positive attitude to screening (81.5%,p=0.001), respondents who were aware of the disease (100.0%,p=0.001), and those who were aware of cervical cancer screening (88.9%,p=0.001). Respondents who had negative attitude had 63% lesser odds of being screened compared to those who had positive attitudes towards screening (AOR; 0.37, 95% CI; 0.01–0.28).Conclusion. There is urgent need to improve the knowledge base and attitude of Nigerian women to enhance cervical cancer screening uptake among them.

Download Full-text

Cervical cancer screening uptake in Sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis

10.1101/2020.12.26.20248864 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Nigus Bililign Yimer ◽

Mohammed Akibu Mohammed ◽

Kalkidan Solomon ◽

Mesfin Tadese ◽

Stephanie Grutzmacher ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cervical Cancer ◽

Cancer Screening ◽

Cervical Cancer Screening ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Cervical Screening ◽

Sub Saharan Africa ◽

African Countries ◽

Screening Uptake ◽

Analytic Review ◽

Sub Saharan

AbstractBackgroundCervical cancer screening and prevention programs have been given considerable attention in high-income countries, while only receiving minimal effort in many African countries. This meta-analytic review aimed to estimate the pooled uptake of cervical cancer screening uptake and identify its predictors in Sub-Saharan Africa.MethodsPubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, African Journals Online, Web of Science and SCOPUS electronic databases were searched. All observational studies conducted in Sub-Saharan Africa and published in English language from January 2000 to 2019 were included. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was applied to examine methodological quality of the studies. Inverse variance-weighted random-effects model meta-analysis was done to estimate the pooled uptake and odds ratio of predictors with 95% confidence interval. I2 test statistic was used to check between-study heterogeneity, and funnel plot and Egger’s regression statistical test were used to check publication bias. To examine the source of heterogeneity, subgroup analysis based on sample size, publication year and geographic distribution of the studies was carried out.ResultsOf 3,537 studies identified, 29 studies were included with 36,374 women. The uptake of cervical cancer screening in Sub-Saharan Africa was 12.87% (95% CI: 10.20, 15.54; I2= 98.5%). Meta-analysis of seven studies showed that knowledge about cervical cancer increased screening uptake by nearly 5-folds (OR: 4.81; 95% CI: 3.06, 7.54). Other predictors include educational status, age, HIV status, contraceptive use, perceived susceptibility, and awareness about screening locations.ConclusionCervical screening uptake is low in Sub-Saharan Africa and influenced by several factors. Health outreach and promotion targeting identified predictors are needed to increase uptake of screening service in the region.sProtocol registrationCRD42017079375

Download Full-text

Factors Affecting Cervical Cancer Screening Uptake by Hmong Hilltribe Women in Thailand

Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention ◽

10.7314/apjcp.2014.15.8.3753 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 15 (8) ◽

pp. 3753-3756 ◽

Cited By ~ 16

Author(s):

Laead Wongwatcharanukul ◽

Supannee Promthet ◽

Peter Bradshaw ◽

Chananya Jirapornkul ◽

Naowarat Tungsrithong

Keyword(s):

Cervical Cancer ◽

Cancer Screening ◽

Cervical Cancer Screening ◽

Factors Affecting ◽

Screening Uptake

Download Full-text

Impact of per capita income on the effectiveness of school-based health education programs to promote cervical cancer screening uptake in southern mozambique

Journal of Global Infectious Diseases ◽

10.4103/jgid.jgid_165_17 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 10 (3) ◽

pp. 152

Author(s):

Floriano Amimo ◽

TroyD Moon ◽

Anthony Magit ◽

Jahit Sacarlal

Keyword(s):

Cervical Cancer ◽

Cancer Screening ◽

Health Education ◽

Cervical Cancer Screening ◽

Capita Income ◽

Per Capita Income ◽

Education Programs ◽

Screening Uptake ◽

School Based ◽

Per Capita

Download Full-text

Temporal trend in socioeconomic inequalities in the uptake of cancer screening programmes in France between 2005 and 2010: results from the Cancer Barometer surveys

BMJ Open ◽

10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016941 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 7 (12) ◽

pp. e016941 ◽

Cited By ~ 12

Author(s):

David Mark Kelly ◽

Carla Estaquio ◽

Christophe Léon ◽

Pierre Arwidson ◽

Hermann Nabi

Keyword(s):

Colorectal Cancer ◽

Cervical Cancer ◽

Cancer Screening ◽

Cervical Cancer Screening ◽

Colorectal Cancer Screening ◽

Socioeconomic Inequalities ◽

Secondary Outcome ◽

Participation Rates ◽

Cervical Smear ◽

Screening Uptake

ObjectivesCancer screening is a form of secondary prevention for a disease which is now the leading cause of death in France. Various socioeconomic indicators have been identified as potential factors for disparities in breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screening uptake. We aimed to identify the socioeconomic inequalities, which persisted in screening uptake for these cancers, and to quantify these disparities over a 5-year period.SettingThe Cancer Barometer was a population-based-survey carried out in 2005 and 2010 in France.ParticipantsA randomly selected sample of participants aged 15–85 years (n=3820 in 2005 and n=3727 in 2010) were interviewed on their participation in breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screening-programmes and their socioeconomic profile.Primary and secondary outcome measuresFor each type of screening programme, we calculated participation rates, OR and relative inequality indices (RII) for participation, derived from logistic regression of the following socioeconomic variables: income, education, occupation, employment and health insurance. Changes in participation between 2005 and 2010 were then analysed.ResultsParticipation rates for breast and colorectal screening increased significantly among the majority of socioeconomic categories, whereas for cervical cancer screening there were no significant changes between 2005 and 2010. RIIs for income remained significant for cervical smear in 2005 (RII=0.25, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.48) and in 2010 (RII=0.31, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.64). RIIs for education in mammography (RII=0.43, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.98) and cervical smear (RII=0.36, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.64) were significant in 2005 and remained significant for cervical smear (RII=0.40, 95% CI 0.22 to 0.74) in 2010.ConclusionsThere was a persistence of socioeconomic inequalities in the uptake of opportunistic cervical cancer screening. Conversely, organised screening programmes for breast and colorectal cancer saw a reduction in relative socioeconomic inequalities, even though the results were not statistically significant. The findings suggest that organised cancer screening programmes may have the potential to reduce socioeconomic disparities in participation.

Download Full-text

Self-sampling for human papillomavirus (HPV) testing: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BMJ Global Health ◽

10.1136/bmjgh-2018-001351 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 4 (3) ◽

pp. e001351 ◽

Cited By ~ 16

Author(s):

Ping Teresa Yeh ◽

Caitlin E Kennedy ◽

Hugo de Vuyst ◽

Manjulaa Narasimhan

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Cervical Cancer ◽

Cancer Screening ◽

Cervical Cancer Screening ◽

Clinical Assessment ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Standard Of Care ◽

Hpv Testing ◽

Screening Uptake ◽

Screening Frequency

IntroductionHuman papillomavirus (HPV) self-sampling test kits may increase screening for and early detection of cervical cancer and reduce its burden globally. To inform WHO self-care guidelines, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of HPV self-sampling among adult women on cervical (pre-)cancer screening uptake, screening frequency, social harms/adverse events and linkage to clinical assessment/treatment.MethodsThe included studies compared women using cervical cancer screening services with HPV self-sampling with women using standard of care, measured at least one outcome, and were published in a peer-reviewed journal. We searched PubMed, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CNIAHL), Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (LILACS) and Embase through October 2018. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane tool for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and the Evidence Project tool for non-randomised studies. Meta-analysis was conducted using random-effects models to generate pooled estimates of relative risk (RR).Results33 studies in 34 articles with 369 017 total participants met the inclusion criteria: 29 RCTs and 4 observational studies. All studies examined HPV self-sampling; comparison groups were standard of care (eg, Pap smear, visual inspection with acetic acid, clinician-collected HPV testing). 93% of participants were from high-income countries. All 33 studies measured cervical cancer screening uptake. Meta-analysis found greater screening uptake among HPV self-sampling participants compared with control (RR: 2.13, 95% CI 1.89 to 2.40). Effect size varied by HPV test kit dissemination method, whether mailed directly to home (RR: 2.27, 95% CI 1.89 to 2.71), offered door-to-door (RR: 2.37, 95% CI 1.12 to 5.03) or requested on demand (RR: 1.28, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.82). Meta-analysis showed no statistically significant difference in linkage to clinical assessment/treatment between arms (RR: 1.12, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.57). No studies measured screening frequency or social harms/adverse events.ConclusionA growing evidence base, mainly from high-income countries and with significant heterogeneity, suggests HPV self-sampling can increase cervical cancer screening uptake compared with standard of care, with a marginal effect on linkage to clinical assessment/treatment.Systematic review registration numberPROSPERO CRD42018114871.

Download Full-text