scholarly journals The prognostic significance of the advanced lung cancer inflammation index in patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer: a retrospective study

BMC Cancer ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Masatsune Shibutani ◽  
Kiyoshi Maeda ◽  
Hisashi Nagahara ◽  
Tatsunari Fukuoka ◽  
Shinji Matsutani ◽  
...  
PeerJ ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. e10100
Author(s):  
Hailun Xie ◽  
Shizhen Huang ◽  
Guanghui Yuan ◽  
Jiaan Kuang ◽  
Ling Yan ◽  
...  

Background and Purpose Several studies have proposed that the advanced lung cancer inflammation index (ALI), a new inflammation-related index, can be used for the prognosis assessment of various malignancies. However, few studies have reported its prognostic value in colorectal cancer (CRC). Therefore, this study explored the relationship between ALI and outcomes in CRC patients. Methods A total of 662 CRC patients who underwent surgery between 2012 and 2014 were included. The ALI was defined as: body mass index × serum albumin/neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio. The X-tile program identified the optimal cut-off value of ALI. Logistic regression analyses determined factors affecting postoperative complications. The Kaplan–Meier method and Cox proportional hazards analyses evaluated potential prognostic factors. Results The optimal cut-off of ALI in males and females were 31.6 and 24.4, respectively. Low-ALI was an independent risk factor for postoperative complications in CRC patients (odds ratio: 1.933, 95% CI [1.283–2.911], p = 0.002). Low-ALI groups also had significantly lower progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), when compared with the high-ALI group, especially at advance tumor stages. Using multivariate analysis, ALI was determined as an independent prognostic factor for PFS (hazard ratio: 1.372, 95% CI [1.060–1.777], p = 0.016) and OS (hazard ratio: 1.453, 95% confidence interval: 1.113–1.898, p = 0.006). Conclusion ALI is an independent predictor of short and long-term outcomes in CRC patients, especially at advance tumor stages. The ALI-based nomograms can provide accurate and individualized prediction of postoperative complication risk and survival for CRC patients.


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e21624-e21624
Author(s):  
Konstantinos N. Syrigos ◽  
Stavroula Patsilinakou ◽  
Dimitra Grapsa ◽  
Evangelia Chrysanthopoulou ◽  
Ioannis Gkiozos ◽  
...  

e21624 Background: As shown in recent studies, inflammation plays a key role in lung cancer (LC) pathogenesis and evolution, while the potential prognostic and predictive value of various inflammation markers in different disease stages is being extensively studied. We herein aimed to further evaluate the potential prognostic value of a new inflammation marker (ALI, Advanced Lung Cancer Inflammation Index = BMI x Alb / NLR), which combines previous markers of systematic inflammation with markers of nutrition or cachexia at the time of LC diagnosis. Methods: The medical records of 67 patients, diagnosed with LC in Sismanoglio Athens General hospital, within a two-year period (January 2016-January 2017) were retrospectively studied. Demographic, clinicopathological and laboratory features of patients, including pre-treatment ALI, were recorded and correlated with prognosis (overall survival, OS). Results: A total of 67 patients were included with a mean age of 60 (± 8) years. The majority of cases were men (39/67,58.2 %), with positive smoking history (62/67, 92.5%), performance status (PS) 1-2 (43/67, 64.2%) and disease stage IV (54/67, 80.6%). Adenocarcinoma was the commonest histological type observed (19/67, 28.5%). Values of ALI ranged from 7.8 to 37.2 (mean: 21±6). The cut-off point of ALI was 19 (based on ROC curve analysis) and patients were divided into two groups: those with ALI < 19 and those with ALI ≥ 19. In univariate analysis, PS and the presence of metastatic disease, as well as ALI values < 19, were all correlated with reduced survival (p = 0.002, p = 0.028 and p = 0.018, respectively). In multivariate analysis, PS was the only parameter that retained its statistically significant correlation with an adverse prognosis (p = 0.048), although its prognostic significance was increased when combined with ALI. Conclusions: Although failing to confirm an independent prognostic value for ALI, the results of our study suggest that combination of ALI with standard prognostic predictors such as PS may improve prediction of patients’ survival. Additional prospective studies are warranted to validate the prognostic significance of this promising biomarker and expand its use in routine practice.


2020 ◽  
Vol 63 (9) ◽  
pp. 1242-1250
Author(s):  
Kurando Kusunoki ◽  
Yuji Toiyama ◽  
Yoshinaga Okugawa ◽  
Akira Yamamoto ◽  
Yusuke Omura ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. e0164056 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eun Young Kim ◽  
Nambeom Kim ◽  
Young Saing Kim ◽  
Ja-Young Seo ◽  
Inkeun Park ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 030089162098346
Author(s):  
Guangzhe Pian ◽  
Sung Yeon Hong ◽  
Seung Yeop Oh

Introduction: Recently, a new inflammatory marker, the advanced lung cancer inflammation index (ALI), was reported as a prognostic marker in patients with several cancers. We aimed to investigate the prognostic value of ALI in patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases (CLM) undergoing surgery. Methods: From June 2009 to June 2018, 141 patients underwent a surgery for CLM at Ajou University Hospital, of whom 132 without extrahepatic metastases, systemic inflammatory diseases, or immune system diseases were enrolled in this study. The ALI was calculated using the following formula: ALI = body mass index × serum albumin/neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio. The patients were divided into high (n = 32) and low (n = 100) ALI groups according to the preoperative optimal cutoff value of 70.40 that was determined by X-tile software. Results: Patients with low ALI had a significantly worse overall survival (OS) compared to the high ALI group ( p = 0.010). Multivariate analysis showed that ALI and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) were independently associated with OS ( p = 0.009 and p = 0.042, respectively). Among the patients with CEA >5 ng/mL, the low ALI group had a significantly worse OS compared to the high ALI group ( p = 0.013). Conclusion: Preoperative ALI was a prognostic factor in patients with CLM undergoing surgery. In particular, the prognostic impact of ALI was more prominent in the patients with CEA >5 ng/mL.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document