scholarly journals Avelumab as neoadjuvant therapy in patients with urothelial non-metastatic muscle invasive bladder cancer: a multicenter, randomized, non-comparative, phase II study (Oncodistinct 004 - AURA trial)

BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nieves Martinez Chanza ◽  
Louisa Soukane ◽  
Philippe Barthelemy ◽  
Aurélien Carnot ◽  
Thierry Gil ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bladder Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Predictive Biomarkers ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Invasive Bladder Cancer ◽  
Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer ◽  
Muscle Invasive ◽  
To Receive

Abstract Introduction Cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by surgery is the standard treatment for patients with non-metastatic muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). Unfortunately, many patients are not candidates to receive cisplatin due to renal impairment. Additionally, no predictive biomarkers for pathological complete response (pCR) are currently validated in clinical practice. Studies evaluating immune checkpoint inhibitors in the peri-operative setting are emerging with promising results. Clinical trials are clearly required in the neoadjuvant setting in order to improve therapeutic strategies. Methods and analysis Oncodistinct 004 – AURA is an ongoing multicenter phase II randomized trial assessing the efficacy and safety of avelumab single-agent or combined to different NAC regimens in patients with non-metastatic MIBC. Patients are enrolled in two distinct cohorts according to their eligibility to receive cisplatin-based NAC. In the cisplatin eligible cohort, patients are randomized in a 1:1 fashion to receive avelumab combined with cisplatin-gemcitabine or with dose-dense methotrexate-vinblastine-doxorubicin-cisplatin. In the cisplatin ineligible cohort, patients are randomized at a 1:1 ratio to paclitaxel-gemcitabine associated to avelumab or avelumab alone. Primary endpoint is pCR. Secondary endpoints are pathological response and safety. Ethics and dissemination The study is approved by ethics committee from all participating centers. All participants provide informed consent prior inclusion to the study. Once completed, results will be published in peer-reviewed journals. Trial registration number ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03674424).

Phase II trial of atezolizumab in BCG-unresponsive non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: SWOG S1605 (NCT #02844816).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5022-5022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter C. Black ◽  
Catherine Tangen ◽  
Parminder Singh ◽  
David James McConkey ◽  
Scott Lucia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bladder Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Invasive Bladder Cancer ◽  
Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer ◽  
Bladder Preservation ◽  
Bcg Therapy ◽  
Muscle Invasive

5022 Background: Radical cystectomy (RC) is the standard of care for patients with BCG-unresponsive high risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), but many patients are unfit for surgery or elect bladder preservation. Based on the reported efficacy of atezolizumab in metastatic urothelial carcinoma and the known expression of PD-L1 in NMIBC after BCG therapy, this trial was designed to evaluate the activity of atezolizumab in BCG-unresponsive high risk NMIBC. Methods: This single arm phase II registration trial testing systemic atezolizumab (1200 mg IV) every 3 weeks for one year aimed to enroll 135 (70 CIS and 65 non-CIS) eligible patients with histologically proven BCG-unresponsive high risk NMIBC who were unfit for or declined RC. Here we report on the subset with CIS (with or without concomitant Ta/T1) among patients who received at least one protocol treatment. The primary endpoint was pathological complete response (CR) rate at 6 months as defined by mandatory biopsy with a null hypothesis of 30% and alternative of 50% with a 1-sided alpha = 0.05 and 96% power. The 3 month CR rate, defined by cytology, cystoscopy and for-cause biopsy, is reported here as a secondary endpoint, in addition to safety. Results: Seventy-five eligible CIS patients were enrolled. Two received no treatment and are not evaluable. Of 73, median patient age was 73.4 years and median number of prior BCG doses was 12. Concomitant Ta/T1 tumor was found in 30 (41.1%) patients, including T1 disease in 16 (21.9%). A CR was observed in 30 (41.1%; 95% CI 29.7%, 53.2%) patients at 3 months and 19 (26.0%; 95% CI 16.5%, 37.6%) at 6 months. Any possibly or probably treatment-related adverse event (AE) was observed in 61 (83.6%) patients. The most frequent AEs were fatigue 36 (49.3%), pruritis 8 (11.0%), hypothyroidism 8 (11.0%), and nausea 8 (11.0%). Grade 3-5 AEs occurred in 9 (12.3%) patients and there was one treatment-related death (myasthenia gravis with respiratory failure and sepsis). Conclusion: The observed response to atezolizumab at 3 and 6 months in patients with BCG-unresponsive CIS was similar to that reported in recent similar trials and meets the benchmark for initial CR defined by the FDA guidance. This trial provided no new safety concerns. The duration of response will determine if this is a suitable treatment option for patients with BCG-unresponsive high risk CIS. Clinical trial information: 02844816 .

scholarly journals Perioperative Systemic Treatment for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (13) ◽  
pp. 7201
Author(s):  
In-Ho Kim ◽  
Hyo-Jin Lee
Keyword(s):  
Bladder Cancer ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Systemic Treatment ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Invasive Bladder Cancer ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Future Perspectives ◽  
Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer ◽  
Muscle Invasive

Radical cystectomy is the primary treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer; however, approximately 50% of patients develop metastatic disease within 2 years of diagnosis, which results in dismal prognosis. Therefore, systemic treatment is important to improve the prognosis of muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Currently, several guidelines recommend cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy before radical cystectomy, and adjuvant chemotherapy is recommended in patients who have not received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have recently become the standard treatment option for metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Owing to their clinical benefits, several immune checkpoint inhibitors, with or without other agents (including other immunotherapy, cytotoxic chemotherapy, and emerging agents such as antibody drug conjugates), are being extensively investigated in perioperative settings. Several studies for perioperative immunotherapy have shown that immune checkpoint inhibitors have promising efficacy with relatively low toxicity, and have explored the predictive molecular biomarkers. Herein, we review the current evidence and discuss the future perspectives of perioperative systemic treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

scholarly journals Management of Localized Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer from a Multidisciplinary Perspective: Current Position of the Spanish Oncology Genitourinary (SOGUG) Working Group

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 5084-5100
Author(s):  
Antonio Gómez Caamaño ◽  
Ana M. García Vicente ◽  
Pablo Maroto ◽  
Alfredo Rodríguez Antolín ◽  
Julián Sanz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bladder Cancer ◽  
Working Group ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Imaging Techniques ◽  
Clinical Staging ◽  
Invasive Bladder Cancer ◽  
Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer ◽  
Muscle Invasive ◽  
Selection Of Patients ◽  
Selection Of

This review presents challenges and recommendations on different aspects related to the management of patients with localized muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), which were discussed by a group of experts of a Spanish Oncology Genitourinary (SOGUG) Working Group within the framework of the Genitourinary Alliance project (12GU). It is necessary to clearly define which patients are candidates for radical cystectomy and which are candidates for undergoing bladder-sparing procedures. In older patients, it is necessary to include a geriatric assessment and evaluation of comorbidities. The pathological report should include a classification of the histopathological variant of MIBC, particularly the identification of subtypes with prognostic, molecular and therapeutic implications. Improvement of clinical staging, better definition of prognostic groups based on molecular subtypes, and identification of biomarkers potentially associated with maximum benefit from neoadjuvant chemotherapy are areas for further research. A current challenge in the management of MIBC is improving the selection of patients likely to be candidates for immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors in the neoadjuvant setting. Optimization of FDG-PET/CT reliability in staging of MIBC and the selection of patients is necessary, as well as the design of prospective studies aimed to compare the value of different imaging techniques in parallel.

Neoadjuvant or adjuvant immunotherapy in bladder cancer: biological opportunity or clinical utility?

2021 ◽  
pp. 030089162110616
Author(s):  
Fausto Petrelli ◽  
Gianluca Perego ◽  
Ivano Vavassori ◽  
Andrea Luciani
Keyword(s):  
Bladder Cancer ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Urothelial Cancer ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Invasive Bladder Cancer ◽  
Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer ◽  
Cancer Of The Bladder ◽  
Muscle Invasive

In urothelial cancer of the bladder, the introduction of immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors represents progress in the management of the disease’s early and advanced stages. In particular, recent studies have implemented these drugs in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant phases to treat muscle-invasive bladder cancer. In some studies, patients received neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors alone (PURE and ABACUS) to treat muscle invasive bladder cancer, whereas other studies provided this therapy to cisplatin-ineligible patients. Furthermore, a large Phase III study (CheckMate 247) compared placebo with adjuvant nivolumab therapy in patients with high-risk urothelial cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery or surgery alone. Despite some uncertain niches (nonbladder, PD-L1-negative tumors, and node-negative resected cancers), certain biological opportunities (exploring new targets, evaluating in vivo pathologic response, focusing on biomarkers for response) and clinical uses (avoiding chemotherapy at all or in frail patients, attaining similar pathologic complete response rates as in cisplatin-based chemotherapy) are valid reasons for incorporating these agents into the therapeutic armamentarium of medical uro-oncologists.

scholarly journals Multicenter Prospective Phase II Trial of Neoadjuvant Dose-Dense Gemcitabine Plus Cisplatin in Patients With Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (19) ◽  
pp. 1949-1956 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gopa Iyer ◽  
Arjun V. Balar ◽  
Matthew I. Milowsky ◽  
Bernard H. Bochner ◽  
Guido Dalbagni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bladder Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Invasive Bladder Cancer ◽  
Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer ◽  
Durable Response ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Gene Alteration ◽  
End Point ◽  
Muscle Invasive ◽  
Dose Dense

Purpose Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical cystectomy (RC) is a standard of care for the management of muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). Dose-dense cisplatin-based regimens have yielded favorable outcomes compared with standard-dose chemotherapy, yet the optimal neoadjuvant regimen remains undefined. We assessed the efficacy and tolerability of six cycles of neoadjuvant dose-dense gemcitabine and cisplatin (ddGC) in patients with MIBC. Patients and Methods In this prospective, multicenter phase II study, patients received ddGC (gemcitabine 2,500 mg/m2 on day 1 and cisplatin 35 mg/m2 on days 1 and 2) every 2 weeks for 6 cycles followed by RC. The primary end point was pathologic downstaging to non–muscle-invasive disease (< pT2N0). Patients who did not undergo RC were deemed nonresponders. Pretreatment tumors underwent next-generation sequencing to identify predictors of chemosensitivity. Results Forty-nine patients were enrolled from three institutions. The primary end point was met, with 57% of 46 evaluable patients downstaged to < pT2N0. Pathologic response correlated with improved recurrence-free survival and overall survival. Nineteen patients (39%) required toxicity-related dose modifications. Sixty-seven percent of patients completed all six planned cycles. No patient failed to undergo RC as a result of chemotherapy-associated toxicities. The most frequent treatment-related toxicity was anemia (12%; grade 3). The presence of a presumed deleterious DNA damage response (DDR) gene alteration was associated with chemosensitivity (positive predictive value for < pT2N0 [89%]). No patient with a deleterious DDR gene alteration has experienced recurrence at a median follow-up of 2 years. Conclusion Six cycles of ddGC is an active, well-tolerated neoadjuvant regimen for the treatment of patients with MIBC. The presence of a putative deleterious DDR gene alteration in pretreatment tumor tissue strongly predicted for chemosensitivity, durable response, and superior long-term survival.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document