scholarly journals Long-term outcomes of transvaginal mesh surgery for pelvic organ prolapse: a retrospective cohort study

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaojuan Wang ◽  
Yisong Chen ◽  
Changdong Hu ◽  
Keqin Hua

Abstract Background The objective of this study was to evaluate the overall outcomes and complications of transvaginal mesh (TVM) placement for the management of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) with different meshes with a greater than 10-years of follow-up. Methods We performed a retrospective review of patients with POP who underwent prolapse repair surgery with placement of transvaginal mesh (Prolift kit or self-cut Gynemesh) between January 2005 and December 2010. Baseline of patient characteristics were collected from the patients’ medical records. During follow-up, the anatomical outcomes were evaluated using the POP Quantification system, and the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) was used to assess the response of a condition to therapy. Overall postoperative satisfaction was assessed by the following question: “What is your overall postoperative satisfaction, on a scale from 0 to 10?”. Relapse-free survival was analyzed using Kaplan–Meier curves. Results In total, 134 patients were included. With a median 12-year (range 10–15) follow-up, 52 patients (38.8%) underwent TVM surgery with Prolift, and Gynemesh was used 82 (61.2%). 91% patients felt that POP symptom improved based on the PGI-I scores, and most satisfied after operation. The recurrence rates of anterior, apical and posterior compartment prolapse were 5.2%, 5.2%, and 2.2%, respectively. No significant differences in POP recurrence, mesh-associated complications and urinary incontinence were noted between TVM surgery with Prolift versus Gynemesh. Conclusions Treatment of POP by TVM surgery exhibited long-term effectiveness with acceptable morbidity. The outcomes of the mesh kit were the same as those for self-cutmesh.

2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (9) ◽  
pp. e3177
Author(s):  
S. Serni ◽  
S. Morselli ◽  
P. Verrienti ◽  
M. Di Camillo ◽  
L. Gemma ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Simone Morselli ◽  
Vincenzo Li Marzi ◽  
Pierangelo Verrienti ◽  
Maurizio Serati ◽  
Matteo Di Camillo ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Junfang Yang ◽  
Kun Zhang ◽  
Jinsong Han ◽  
Yiting Wang ◽  
Ying Yao ◽  
...  

Objective: This study aims to evaluate the risk factors for subjective recurrence and complications of patients who underwent transvaginal synthetic mesh surgery. Design:This retrospective cohort study included patients who received transvaginal mesh (TVM) surgery between January 2005 and June 2019. Methods: The information of patients was collected, including basic characteristics, subjective recurrence, and mesh-related complications. The clinical characteristics of patients with and without subjective recurrence were compared. The sexual activities of patients before and after the operation were recorded. SPSS 20.0 was used for the statistical analysis. Results: A total of 257 patients were included. Among them, 62 (24.1%) patients were lost to follow-up. The median follow-up time was 80 months (12 months, 170 months). Finally, 195 patients were followed up, 11 (5.6%) patients had a subjective recurrence of pelvic organ prolapse, and 26 (13.3%) patients had mesh-related complications (11 patients with de novo pain and 15 patients with mesh exposure). We found significant differences in age (68.9±5.1 vs. 63.4±5.8 years old), years of post-menopause (17.5±6.3 vs. 13.3±6.9 years), previous hysterectomy (27.3% vs. 6.0%), and concomitant hysterectomy (45.5% vs. 81.0%) between patients with and without subjective recurrence (P<0.05). The mesh exposure proportion of patients with total vaginal mesh (47.6%) was significantly higher than that with anterior vaginal mesh (2.9%) (P<0.05). Furthermore, 6.7% of sexually active patients reported do novo dyspareunia. Limitation: The investigators could only record the subjective recurrence of patients, thus there is a lack of objective recurrence data. Conclusion: Age, years of post-menopause and previous hysterectomy are risk factors for subjective recurrence of transvaginal mesh surgery; however,concomitant hysterectomy is a protective factor. Mesh exposure is the most common complication, especially for total vaginal mesh repair surgery.


2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. e1383-e1385
Author(s):  
S. Morselli ◽  
V. Li Marzi ◽  
P. Spatafora ◽  
C. Zaccaro ◽  
M. Di Camillo ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Enrique P. Ubertazzi ◽  
Hector F.E. Soderini ◽  
Adrian J.M. Saavedra Sanchez ◽  
Camilo Fonseca Guzman ◽  
Lucila I. Paván

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 34-40
Author(s):  
I. A. Eizenach ◽  
V. V. Vlasova ◽  
V. G. Mozes

Aim. To determine whether the cervical elongation affects long-term outcomes of reconstructive surgery of pelvic organ prolapse.Materials and Methods. We consecutively enrolled 99 patients with grade 2-3 pelvic organ prolapse (Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System) who underwent vaginal mesh surgery. Volume and length of the cervix were measured using vaginal ultrasonography immediately before the surgery. Cervical elongation was defined as cervix > 6 cm in length (n = 55). Upon 1 year of follow-up, we evaluated the primary outcome (pelvic organ prolapse) and secondary outcomes (cervical length and volume).Results. After 1 year of follow-up, cervical elongation was still detected in 18.1% of patients with cervical elongation before the surgery but not in those without (p = 0.008). Dyspareunia was documented in 14.5% and 2.2% of women with and without cervical elongation, respectively (p = 0.034). In patients with cervical elongation, the length of the cervix before the surgery and after 1 year of follow-up was 7.6 (7; 7.9) cm and 8.4 (7.9; 8.9) cm, respectively (p = 0.001); the respective values of cervical volume were 23.7 (23.4; 24.4) cm3 and 26.9 (25.7; 31.9) cm3 , respectively (p = 0.001); however, these differences were insignificant in patients without cervical elongation.Conclusion. Cervical excision may be recommended for the patients with pelvic organ prolapse and concurrent cervical elongation (length of the cervix > 6 cm). Cervical preservation in such patients may lead to progression of the elongation even after the correction of pelvic organ prolapse. 


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document