scholarly journals Oocyte cryopreservation review: outcomes of medical oocyte cryopreservation and planned oocyte cryopreservation

2022 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zachary Walker ◽  
Andrea Lanes ◽  
Elizabeth Ginsburg
Keyword(s):  
Fertility Preservation ◽  
Live Birth ◽  
Oocyte Retrieval ◽  
Oocyte Cryopreservation ◽  
Utilization Rate ◽  
Birth Rates ◽  
Aged Patients ◽  
Live Birth Rates ◽  
Oocyte Yield ◽  
Age Related

Abstract Background The utilization of oocyte cryopreservation (OC) has become popularized with increasing numbers of reproductive-aged patients desiring to maintain fertility for future family building. OC was initially used for fertility preservation in postmenarchal patients prior to gonadotoxic therapies; however, it is now available to patients to circumvent age-related infertility and other diagnoses associated with early loss of ovarian reserve. The primary aim of this paper is to provide a narrative review of the most recent and robust data on the utilization and outcomes of OC in both patient populations. Summary OC results in similar oocyte yield in patients facing gonadotoxic therapies and patients undergoing planned OC. Available data are insufficient to predict the live birth rates or the number of oocytes needed to result in live birth. However, oocyte yield and live birth rates are best among patients < 37.5 years old or with anti-mullerian hormone levels > 1.995 ng/dL, at the time of oocyte retrieval. There is a high ‘no use’ rate (58.9%) in patients using planned OC with 62.5% returning to use frozen oocytes with a spouse. The utilization rate in medical OC patients is < 10%. There is currently no data on the effects of BMI, smoking, or ethnicity on planned OC outcomes. Conclusion It is too early to draw any final conclusions on outcomes of OC in medical OC and planned OC; however, preliminary data supports that utilization of OC in both groups result in preservation of fertility and subsequent live births in patients who return to use their cryopreserved eggs. Higher oocyte yield, with fewer ovarian stimulation cycles, and higher live birth rates are seen in patients who seek OC at younger ages, reinforcing the importance of age on fertility preservation. More studies are needed in medical OC and planned OC to help guide counseling and decision-making in patients seeking these services.

scholarly journals The ovarian sensitivity index is predictive of live birth chances after IVF in infertile patients

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Weghofer ◽  
D H Barad ◽  
S K Darmon ◽  
V A Kushnir ◽  
D F Albertini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Live Birth ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Embryo Quality ◽  
Oocyte Retrieval ◽  
Sensitivity Index ◽  
Validation Group ◽  
Birth Rates ◽  
Live Birth Rates ◽  
Oocyte Yield ◽  
Ovarian Sensitivity Index

Abstract STUDY QUESTION Does the ovarian sensitivity index (OSI) predict embryo quality, pregnancy and live birth in patients undergoing FSH/hMG stimulation for IVF? SUMMARY ANSWER The OSI is predictive of pregnancy and live birth in older women with a more unfavorable prognosis undergoing FSH/hMG stimulation for IVF. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY The OSI was previously reported to reflect gonadotrophin requirements among high, normal and poor responders and to predict pregnancy potential in younger patients undergoing ovarian stimulation with FSH. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION A retrospective cohort study that included 1282 women undergoing IVF with FSH/hMG stimulation was carried out between January 2010 and December 2016. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS We evaluated 1282 women who underwent fertility treatment with FSH/hMG stimulation and oocyte retrieval at an academically affiliated private fertility center. OSI was calculated as (oocytes ×1000)/total gonadotrophin dose and grouped into two classes based on a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis of a randomly selected development sample comprising one-third of the cycles. The remaining cycles comprised the validation group. ROC curves were also used to compare the predictive value of OSI to that of baseline FSH and anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH). Logistic regression models evaluated the effect of high (OSI &gt;0.83) and low (OSI ≤0.83) on clinical pregnancy and live birth in the validation group. Models were adjusted for female age, baseline FSH, AMH and oocyte yield and gonadotrophin dose. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE Women presented with a mean ±SD age of 38.6 ± 5.4 years and showed median AMH levels of 0.65 (95% CI 0.61–0.74) ng/ml. They received 5145 ± 2477 IU of gonadotrophins and produced a median 5.2 (95% CI 5.0–5.5) oocytes. Pregnancy and live birth rates per oocyte retrieval for all women were 20.6% and 15.8%, respectively. Patients with higher OSI (less gonadotrophin required per oocyte retrieved) produced significantly more high-quality embryos than patients with low OSI (3.5 (95% CI 3.2–3.8) versus 0.6 (95% CI 0.5–0.7) (P = 0.0001)) and demonstrated higher pregnancy (23.2% versus 9.7%) and live birth rates (8.8% versus 5.3%) than their counterparts (P = 0.0001 and P = 0.0001, respectively). After adjustments for age, baseline AMH and FSH, total gonadotrophin dosage and oocyte yield, an OSI &gt;0.83 was associated with greater odds of pregnancy (odds ratio 2.12, 95% CI 1.30–3.45, P &lt; 0.003) and live birth (odds ratio 1.91, 95% CI 1.07–3.41, P &lt; 0.028). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION The results may not be applicable to women with excellent pregnancy potential or FSH-only stimulation. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS The predictive capacity of OSI for embryo quality, pregnancy and live birth, which is independent of AMH or FSH, may help in counseling patients about their pregnancy potential and live birth chances. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) Intramural funding from the Center for Human Reproduction and the Foundation for Reproductive Medicine. A.W., V.A.K., D.F.A., D.H.B. and N.G. have received research grant support, travel funds and speaker honoraria from various pharmaceutical and medical device companies: none, however, related to the topic presented here. D.H.B. and N.G. are listed as inventors on already awarded and still pending US patents, claiming beneficial effects on diminished ovarian reserve and embryo ploidy from dehydroepiandrosterone supplementation. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A.

O-014 How effective is oocyte cryopreservation?

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Cobo
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Live Birth ◽  
Ovarian Reserve ◽  
Oocyte Retrieval ◽  
Success Rates ◽  
Birth Rates ◽  
Oocyte Vitrification ◽  
Live Birth Rates ◽  
Cumulative Live Birth ◽  
Different Populations

Abstract text The challenge of cryopreserve, store for prolonged period, and successfully implant the female gamete is nowadays feasible thanks to vitrification. The technology that was initially validated in oocyte recipients is currently applied to a vast population, including women at risk of losing their ovarian function due either to iatrogenic causes as occurs in cancer patients, or due to the natural depletion of the ovarian reserve as a result of age related fertility decline. That is the case of a growing population of women who wish to postpone childbearing and decide on oocyte vitrification as a means of fertility preservation (FP). At present, there is a growing body of evidence regarding the use of vitrified oocytes by many women under different indications, which makes it possible to evaluate the approach from different scenarios. So that vitrification can be evaluated in terms on survival rates, embryo development and the rate at which vitrified oocytes develop into live-born children in IVF cycles using vitrified oocytes which were initially stored due to different reasons. The effects of vitrification at the subcellular level and its impact on oocyte competence is of interest in the evaluation of the efficacy of the technology. Some studies have indicated that vitrification may affect ultrastructure, reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation, gene expression, and epigenetic status. However, it is still controversial whether oocyte vitrification could induce DNA damage in the oocytes and the resulting early embryos. Recent studies show that oocytes survival and clinical outcome after vitrification can be impaired by patients’ age and the clinical indication or the reason for vitrification. These studies show that age at oocyte retrieval strongly affects the survival and reproductive prognosis. In our experience, oocyte survival, pregnancy and cumulative live birth rates are significantly higher when patients are aged 35 years or younger versus patients older than 35 years at oocyte retrieval. Therefore, elective-FP patients should be encouraged to decide at young ages to significantly increase their chances of success. There is also evidence that the reason for vitrification is associated to the success rates. Poorer reproductive outcome was reported in cancer patients, low responders and endometriosis patients when compared to healthy women in age matching groups. Moreover, there are certain individualities linked to specific populations, as occurs when endometriosis patients had cystectomy earlier than the oocyte retrieval for FP. These women achieved lower success rates as compared to non-operated age matching counterparts. In this case, the lower cumulative live birth rates observed in operated women are, most probably, due to the smaller number of oocytes available, as a consequence of the detrimental effect of the surgery on the ovarian reserve. In this regard, several reports show that the number of oocytes available per patient is another variable closely related to the outcome in all populations using vitrified oocytes after FP. Thus, a significant improvement in the cumulative live birth rates can be achieved by adding a few oocytes, especially in healthy young patients. Different populations using vitrified oocytes under several indications achieve differential results in terms of pregnancy rates, when calculated in overall. Nonetheless, when the calculations for the cumulative probability of achieving a baby are made according the number of oocytes used per patient belonging to the same group of age, the results become comparable between different populations, as shown by the comparison between elective freezers versus endometriosis patients. Undoubtedly, vitrification can be recognized as one of the latest brakethrough in the ART field, but certainly the next step forward would be the successfull automatization of the vitrification and warming processes to achieve fully consistency among different laboratories.

scholarly journals Applying growth hormone as an adjuvant to correct poor prognosis outcomes in IVF: Study 2 compares dehydroepiandrosterone

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 164-190
Author(s):  
John Lui Yovich ◽  
Shanthi Srinivasan ◽  
Mark Sillender ◽  
Shipra Gaur ◽  
Philip Rowlands ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Live Birth ◽  
Ovarian Reserve ◽  
Poor Prognosis ◽  
Birth Rate ◽  
Live Birth Rate ◽  
Utilization Rate ◽  
Recurrent Implantation Failure ◽  
Birth Rates ◽  
Live Births ◽  
Live Birth Rates

This retrospective study examines the influence of recombinant growth hormone (rGH) and dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) adjuvants on oocyte numbers, embryo utilization and live births arising from 3637 autologous IVF±ICSI treatment cycles undertaken on 2376 women across ten years (2011-2020) within a pioneer Australian facility. Despite using an FSH-dosing algorithm enabling maximal doses up to 450 IU for women with reduced ovarian reserve, younger women had significantly higher mean numbers of oocytes recovered than older women ranging from 11.1 for women <35 years to 9.4 for women aged 35-39 years reducing to 6.5 for women aged 40-44 years and 4.1 for those aged ≥45 years (p<0.0001). Overall, the embryo utilization rate was 48.5% and live birth productivity rate was 35.4 % across all ages and neither rGH nor DHEA showed any benefit on these rates, in fact, those women with nil adjuvants showed the highest live birth rate per initiated cycle (44.94% overall: p<0.0001, and 55.2% for the youngest group: p<0.001). Embryo utilization was increased by rGH in those women aged 40-44 years who had low ovarian reserve (p<0.0001), but this benefit did not translate into any improvement in the live birth rate, in fact those women who did not use adjuvants had the highest overall birth rate (p<0.0001). Similarly, other factors known to cause a poor prognosis, including low IGF-1 profile, recurrent implantation failure, and low oocyte numbers at OPU, showed no improvement in embryo utilization nor in live births from the adjuvants. The relevance of embryo quality was examined on 1135 women whose residual embryos after a single fresh-embryo transfer failed to develop to a suitable grade for cryopreservation. From 1727 cycles such women often displayed an improved embryo utilization rate with both rGH, and with DHEA or combined rGH+DHEA. Even so, live birth rates were not improved by either of the adjuvants excepting young women <35 years using rGH without DHEA (p<0.05). Examining poor prognosis sub-groups, indicated both rGH and DHEA or combined rGH+DHEA consistently improved embryo utilization in those women with low ovarian reserve (p<0.0001), or those with low IGF-1 levels (p<0.0001) or with recurrent implantation failure (p<0.02). All the poor-prognosis sub-groups showed low live birth rates and, notwithstanding the improvements in embryo utilization, the live birth rates were not significantly improved by the adjuvants, albeit the rates were closer to the nil adjuvant groups (not significantly different).

scholarly journals Fertility Preservation: How to Preserve Ovarian Function in Children, Adolescents and Adults

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (22) ◽  
pp. 5247
Author(s):  
Marie-Madeleine Dolmans ◽  
Camille Hossay ◽  
Thu Yen Thi Nguyen ◽  
Catherine Poirot
Keyword(s):  
Fertility Preservation ◽  
Live Birth ◽  
Ovarian Reserve ◽  
Ovarian Function ◽  
Ovarian Tissue Cryopreservation ◽  
High Fertility ◽  
Birth Rates ◽  
Endocrine Activity ◽  
Live Birth Rates ◽  
Future Fertility

Chemotherapy, pelvic radiotherapy and ovarian surgery have known gonadotoxic effects that can lead to endocrine dysfunction, cessation of ovarian endocrine activity and early depletion of the ovarian reserve, causing a risk for future fertility problems, even in children. Important determinants of this risk are the patient’s age and ovarian reserve, type of treatment and dose. When the risk of premature ovarian insufficiency is high, fertility preservation strategies must be offered to the patient. Furthermore, fertility preservation may sometimes be needed in conditions other than cancer, such as in non-malignant diseases or in patients seeking fertility preservation for personal reasons. Oocyte and/or embryo vitrification and ovarian tissue cryopreservation are the two methods currently endorsed by the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, yielding encouraging results in terms of pregnancy and live birth rates. The choice of one technique above the other depends mostly on the age and pubertal status of the patient, and personal and medical circumstances. This review focuses on the available fertility preservation techniques, their appropriateness according to patient age and their efficacy in terms of pregnancy and live birth rates.

P–660 Impact of elevated late-follicular phase serum estrogen and progesterone levels on blastocyst utilization and cumulative live birth rates in freeze-all cycles

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
K Yakin ◽  
S Ertas ◽  
C Alatas ◽  
O Oktem ◽  
B Urman
Keyword(s):  
Live Birth ◽  
Birth Rate ◽  
Live Birth Rate ◽  
Follicular Phase ◽  
Utilization Rate ◽  
Cumulative Live Birth Rate ◽  
Birth Rates ◽  
Live Birth Rates ◽  
Cumulative Live Birth ◽  
Late Follicular Phase

Abstract Study question Does elevated late-follicular phase estrogen and progesterone levels have an impact on blastocyst utilization and/or cumulative live birth rates in freeze-all cycles? Summary answer High estrogen or progesterone on the day of ovulation trigger is associated with poor blastocyst utilization but comparable cumulative live birth rates in freeze-all cycles. What is known already Several studies suggest impaired clinical outcome in cycles with high estrogen (&gt;3500 pg/ml) or progesterone (&gt;1.5 ng/ml) levels. However, these data were derived from cycles where top-quality embryo(s) were transferred in the fresh cycle and surplus embryos were frozen. These findings might be confounded by alterations in endometrial receptivity. Freeze-all cycles might provide a better model to assess the impact of high late-follicular estrogen or progesterone levels on laboratory and clinical outcome. Study design, size, duration We performed a retrospective cohort study of all IVF cycles (n = 712) between 2016 and 2018 where the entire cohort of embryos was cryopreserved at the blastocyst stage. After excluding cases with &lt;4 oocytes or preimplantation genetic test, the study group comprised 459 women who had 699 frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles. Participants/materials, setting, methods Women were classified into four groups by the indication for freeze-all strategy as elevated progesterone (high P, n = 61), high estrogen (high E, n = 224), elective freezing (elective, n = 114) and tubal-endometrial pathologies (TEP, n = 60). The primary outcome was the cumulative live birth rate in subsequent thaw-transfer cycles and the secondary outcome was the blastocyst utilization rate. Groups were compared using ANOVA and Cox regression analyses to adjust for confounding variables. Main results and the role of chance The mean age of the study group was 32.8 ± 5.3 years, total number of oocytes and cryopreserved blastocysts were 15.0±7.6 and 4.2±3.0, respectively. The high-E group was younger (31.5 ± 5.2 years) and had higher peak E2 levels (4078.9 ± 588.4 pg/ml), number of oocytes (19.7 ± 7.0), cryopreserved embryos (5.3 ± 3.3) and transfer cycles (2.3 ± 1.4) than the other groups. Blastocyst utilization rate was significantly lower (40.4%) compared to elective freezing (53.6%) and TEP groups (55.7%) (both p = 0.001). The high-P group had higher peak progesterone levels (2.1 ± 0.5 ng/ml, p = 0.001), number of oocytes (14.0 ± 5.2) and frozen embryos (4.1 ± 3.5) compared to elective and TEP groups (both p = 0.04). Blastocyst utilization rate was lower (45.7%) than elective freezing and TEP groups but the difference lacked statistical significance (p = 0.33 and p = 0.21, respectively). Cumulative live birth rates were 42.6% in high-P, 59.8% in high-E, 44.7% in elective freezing and 46.7% in TEP groups. Significant predictors of cumulative live birth were female age (aHR: 0.97, 95%CI:0.95–0.99, p = 0.02) and number of frozen blastocysts (aHR:1.05, 95%CI:1.01–1.10), p = 0.02). When adjusted for these confounders, the cumulative live birth rate was not associated with high-E (aHR: 0.86, 95%CI:0.56–1.31) or high-P (aHR: 0.76,95%CI:0.44–1.32). Limitations, reasons for caution This was a retrospective study with small sample size performed at a single fertility center, which may limit the generalizability of our findings. Wider implications of the findings: While lower blastocyst utilization rates are observed in women high late-follicular estradiol or progesterone levels, cumulative live birth rates in subsequent thaw-transfer cycles were not impaired. However, unfavorable outcome parameters observed in women with elevated progesterone deserve further research. Trial registration number Not applicable

P–225 The effect of rapid and delayed insemination on reproductive outcome in conventional insemination and intracytoplasmic sperm injection invitro-fertilization cycles

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
F Esiso ◽  
F Lai ◽  
D Cunningham ◽  
D Garcia ◽  
B Barrett ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Live Birth ◽  
Birth Rate ◽  
Detrimental Effect ◽  
Live Birth Rate ◽  
Oocyte Retrieval ◽  
Fertilization Rate ◽  
Time Intervals ◽  
Birth Rates ◽  
Live Birth Rates ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Study question Does rapid or delayed insemination after egg retrieval affect fertilization, blastocyst development and live birth rates in CI and ICSI cycles? Summary answer When performing CI or ICSI &lt;1.5h and &gt;6.5h after retrieval, detrimental effects are moderate on fertilization but do not impact blastocyst usage and birth rates. What is known already Several studies have shown that CIor ICSI performed between 3 to 5 h after oocyte retrieval has improved laboratory outcomes. However, some studies indicate that insemination of oocytes, by either CI or ICSI, within 2 hours or more than 8 hours after oocyte retrieval has a detrimental effect on the reproductive outcome. With some ART centres experiencing an increase in workload, respecting these exact time intervals is frequently challenging. Study design, size, duration A single-center retrospective cohort analysis was performed on 6559 patients (9575 retrievals and insemination cycles) between January 1st2017 to July 31st2019. The main outcome measures were live-birth rates. Secondary outcomes included analysis of fertilization per all oocytes retrieved, blastocyst utilization, clinical pregnancy, and miscarriage rates. All analyses used time of insemination categorized in both CI and ICSI cycles. Fertilization rates across categories was analyzed by ANOVA and pregnancy outcomes compared using Chi-square tests. Participants/materials, setting, methods As part of laboratory protocol, oocyte retrieval was performed 36 h post-trigger. Cycles involving injection with testicular/epidydimal sperm, donor or frozen oocytes were excluded. The time interval between oocyte retrieval and insemination was analyzed in eight categories: 0 (0- &lt;0.5h), 1 (0.5-&lt;1.5h), 2 (1.5-&lt;2.5h), 3 (2.5-&lt;3.5h), 4 (3.5-&lt;4.5), 5 (4.5-&lt;5.5), 6 (5.5-&lt;6.5) and 7 (6.5-&lt;8h). The number of retrievals in each group (0–7) was 586, 1594, 1644, 1796, 1836, 1351, 641 and 127 respectively. Main results and the role of chance This study had a mean patient age of 36.0 years and mean of 12.2 oocytes per retrieval in each category. There were 4,955 CI and 4,620 ICSI retrievals. The smallest groups were time category 7 and 0 for CI and ICSI respectively. The results showed that the mean fertilization rate per egg retrieved for CI ranged from 54.1 to 64.9% with a significant difference between time category 0 and 5 (p &lt; 0.001) and category 1 and 5 (p &lt; 0.0.001). Mean fertilization rate for ICSI per egg retrieved ranged from 52.8 to 67.3% with no significant difference between time categories compared to category 5. Blastocyst utilization rate for CI and ICSI were not significantly different for all time categories. In the CI and ICSI groups there were 6,540 and 6,178 total fresh and frozen transfers. The miscarriage and clinical pregnancy rate in CI and ICSI were not significantly different across time categories. The overall mean live birth rate for CI was 32.4% (range: 23.1 to 35.5%). Live-birth rates differed significantly (p = 0.04) in CI with time categories 0 and 7 the lowest. In the ICSI group, the overall mean live birth rate was 30.8% (range: 29.1 to 35.7%),with no significant differences between time categories. Limitations, reasons for caution As this is a retrospective study, the influence of uncontrolled variables cannot be excluded. The group spread was uneven with the early and late time categories having the lowest number of representative retrievals and this could have affected the results obtained. Wider implications of the findings: Our results indicate that both CI and ICSI are optimal when performed between 1.5–6.5 hours after oocyte retrieval. Further prospective studies on reproductive outcomes related to time of insemination are warranted. This data indicates a minimal detrimental effect when it is untenable to follow strict insemination time intervals. Trial registration number 2015P000122

scholarly journals Efficiency of Autologous Egg Cryopreservation: Eight Years’ Experiences and Clinical Outcomes

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cassie T. Wang ◽  
Xiangli Niu ◽  
Qiuyan Ruan ◽  
Weihua Wang
Keyword(s):  
Live Birth ◽  
Sperm Quality ◽  
Embryo Implantation ◽  
Oocyte Cryopreservation ◽  
Blastocyst Development ◽  
Fresh Embryo Transfer ◽  
Birth Rates ◽  
Patients Âgés ◽  
Live Birth Rates ◽  
Human Reproductive

Oocyte cryopreservation is one of the state-of-art technologies in human reproductive medicine, which brings opportunities for women to preserve their fertility. In the present study, we analyzed the efficiency and outcomes of 8 years’ autologous egg cryopreservation: Frozen oocytes were warmed from 120 cycles and oocyte survival, fertilization, blastocyst development, clinical pregnancy, embryo implantation, live birth rates and birth weights were collected based on the patients’ ages of <35, 35–37 and > 37 years old. The details of oocyte cryopreservation and the efficiency were further analyzed based on different patient categories. During the study period, 849 oocytes from 120 cycles were warmed. Oocyte survival, fertilization, and blastocyst development were not affected by women’s ages at the time of cryopreservation. However, number of patients without blastocyst formation was significantly (P < 0.05) higher in patients >37 years old (31.2%) than that in patients <35 years old (13.1%). Higher live birth rates were observed in patients <35 (51.1%) and 35–37 (46.7%) years old than in patients >37 years old (28.6%) after fresh embryo transfer. Some patients did not have blastocysts mainly due to low fertilization by poor sperm or small number of oocytes warmed. These results indicate that the efficiency of oocyte cryopreservation, evaluated by live birth and embryo implantation rates is affected by women’s age, number of oocytes warmed and sperm quality.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document