Assessing unrealised potential for organ donation after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

Abstract Background Organ donation after brain death is the standard practice in many countries. Rates are low globally. This study explores the potential national number of candidates for uncontrolled donations after cardiac death (uDCD) amongst out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients and the influence of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) on the candidacy of these potential organ donors using Singapore as a case study. Methods Using Singapore data from the Pan-Asian Resuscitation Outcomes Study, we identified all non-traumatic OHCA cases from 2010 to 2016. Four established criteria for identifying uDCD candidates (Madrid, San Carlos Madrid, Maastricht and Paris) were retrospectively applied onto the population. Within these four groups, a condensed ECPR eligibility criteria was employed and thereafter, an estimated ECPR survival rate was applied, extrapolating for possible neurologically intact survivors had ECPR been administered. Results 12,546 OHCA cases (64.8% male, mean age 65.2 years old) qualified for analysis. The estimated number of OHCA patients who were eligible for uDCD ranged from 4.3 to 19.6%. The final projected percentage of potential uDCD donors readjusted for ECPR survivors was 4.2% (Paris criteria worst-case scenario, n = 532) to 19.4% of all OHCA cases (Maastricht criteria best-case scenario, n = 2428), for an estimated 14.3 to 65.4 uDCD donors per million population per year (pmp/year). Conclusions In Singapore case study, we demonstrated the potential numbers of candidates for uDCD among resuscitated OHCA cases. This sizeable pool of potential donors demonstrates the potential for an uDCD program to expand the organ donor pool. A small proportion of these patients might however survive had they been administered ECPR. Further research into the factors influencing local organ and patient outcomes following uDCD and ECPR is indicated.

Download Full-text

Out of hospital cardiac arrest in Western Sydney - an analysis of outcomes and estimation of future eCPR eligibility

10.21203/rs.3.rs-1083706/v1 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Pramod Chandru ◽

Tatum Priyambada Mitra ◽

Nitesh Dutt Dhanekula ◽

Mark Dennis ◽

Adam Eslick ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cardiac Arrest ◽

Life Support ◽

Rescue Therapy ◽

A Priori ◽

Advanced Life Support ◽

Spontaneous Circulation ◽

Eligibility Criteria ◽

Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽

Poor Outcomes ◽

Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Abstract Background Refractory out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is associated with extremely poor outcomes. However, in selected patients extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (eCPR) may be an effective rescue therapy, allowing time treat reversible causes. The primary goal was to estimate the potential future caseload of eCPR at historically 'low-volume' extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) centres. Methods A 3-year observational study of OHCA presenting to the Emergency Department (ED of an urban referral centre without historical protocolised use of eCPR. Demographics and standard Utstein outcomes are reported. Further, an a priori analysis of each case for potential eCPR eligibility was conducted. A current eCPR selection criteria (from the 2-CHEER study) was used to determine eligibly. Results In the study window 248 eligible cardiac arrest cases were included in the OHCA registry. 30-day survival was 23.4% (n=58). The mean age of survivors was 55.4 years. 17 (6.8%) cases were deemed true refractory arrests and fulfilled the 2-CHEER eligibility criteria. The majority of these cases presented within “office hours” and no case obtained a return of spontaneous circulation standard advanced life support. Conclusions In this contemporary OHCA registry a significant number of refractory cases were deemed potential eCPR candidates reflecting a need for future interdisciplinary work to support delivery of this therapy.

Download Full-text

Abstract 309: Prediction Chart for Neurological Outcomes of Elderly Patients with Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest and the Corresponding Time to Termination of Resuscitation: Evidence from a Japanese Nationwide Population-based Cohort Study

Circulation ◽

10.1161/circ.142.suppl_4.309 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 142 (Suppl_4) ◽

Author(s):

Akira Funada ◽

Yoshikazu Goto ◽

Masayuki Takamura

Keyword(s):

Emergency Department ◽

Cardiac Arrest ◽

Elderly Patients ◽

Service Providers ◽

Patient Characteristics ◽

Case Scenario ◽

Worst Case ◽

Neurological Outcomes ◽

Shockable Rhythm ◽

Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Introduction: Neurological outcomes and the appropriate duration from call receipt to termination of resuscitation (TOR) in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) could differ according to patient characteristics. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that a prediction chart comprising prehospital variables, including age, could be useful for predicting neurological outcomes and determining the time to TOR in the field or at the emergency department. Methods: We evaluated 19,829 elderly patients with OHCA (age ≥65 years) of cardiac origin who achieved prehospital return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). Data were obtained from the prospectively recorded All-Japan Utstein Registry between 2011 and 2016. Patients with OHCA witnessed by emergency medical service providers were excluded. The primary outcome was 1-month neurologically intact survival, defined as a cerebral performance category (CPC) score of 1-2. Patients with OHCA were divided into 12 groups according to shockable rhythm (YES/NO), witness status (YES/NO), and age (65-74, 75-89, or ≥90 years). The time from call receipt to ROSC was calculated and categorized by 5-min intervals. The time from call receipt to ROSC at which the probability of 1-month CPC 1-2 decreased to <1% was defined as the call to TOR duration. Results: The overall 1-month CPC 1-2 rate was 18.9% (n = 3,756). When stratified by patient characteristics, the 1-month CPC 1-2 rates ranged from 52.3% in patients aged 65-74 years with shockable rhythm and witnessed OHCA (best-case scenario) to 1.6% in patients aged ≥90 years with non-shockable rhythm and un-witnessed OHCA (worst-case scenario). The corresponding call to TOR duration ranged from 35 to 10 min (Table). Conclusions: Neurological outcomes and the appropriate call to TOR duration differed according to patient characteristics, including age. Our prediction chart for elderly patients with OHCA could be useful for determining TOR in the field or at the emergency department.

Download Full-text

Beyond the limits - ECPR in putative fatal circumstances

CJEM ◽

10.1017/cem.2018.32 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 20 (S2) ◽

pp. S70-S73

Author(s):

Ingo Graeff ◽

Sylvia Schacher ◽

Stefan Lenkeit ◽

Catherine N. Widmann ◽

Jens-Christian Schewe

Keyword(s):

Cardiac Arrest ◽

Water Immersion ◽

Heart Association ◽

Prognostic Indicators ◽

European Resuscitation Council ◽

Eligibility Criteria ◽

Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽

Arterial Blood Gas ◽

Arterial Blood ◽

Hospital Cardiac Arrest

AbstractThe eligibility criteria for applying extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) in patients with cardiac arrest are currently unclear. For those patients with hypothermic cardiac arrest, the European Resuscitation Council (ERC) Guidelines recommend considering ECPR only for patients with potassium <8 mmol/L and a body temperature below 32°C, whereas the American Heart Association Guidelines (AHA) do not express this in a specific manner.We report the case of an urban unwitnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patient found with her head immersed in water at a temperature of 23°C. The patient presented an unclear history and a dire combination of clinical and laboratory parameters (asystole, arterial blood gas: pH 6.8, potassium 8.3 mmol/L, lactate 16.0 mmol/L). Despite these poor prognostic indicators, ECPR was initiated after 95 minutes of CPR and the patient survived with a good neurological outcome.This case highlights the uncertainty in ECPR eligibility and prognostication, especially in those with hypothermia and water immersion for whom aggressive therapies may be warranted. Further data and improved strategies are required to delineate candidacy for this resource-intensive procedure better.

Download Full-text

Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in relation to organ donation

European Heart Journal ◽

10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa628 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 41 (37) ◽

pp. 3587-3587 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Stefan Roest ◽

Jeroen J H Bunge ◽

Olivier C Manintveld

Keyword(s):

Cardiac Arrest ◽

Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽

Organ Donation ◽

Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽

Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Download Full-text

Evaluation of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation eligibility criteria for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients

10.21203/rs.3.rs-286117/v1 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Brendan Lee ◽

Adam Clay ◽

Eric Sy

Keyword(s):

Cardiac Arrest ◽

Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽

University Of Michigan ◽

Eligibility Criteria ◽

Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽

Clinical Criteria ◽

Neurological Outcomes ◽

University Of British Columbia ◽

The University ◽

Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Abstract Objectives To evaluate the number of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients eligible for extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) in Saskatchewan and their clinical outcomes, including survival and neurological outcomes at discharge. ECPR eligibility was assessed, using clinical criteria from the University of British Columbia (UBC), University of Michigan (UM), University of California (UC) and a restrictive ECPR criteria. Results We performed a retrospective cohort study of 200 OHCA patients (August 1, 2017-May 31, 2019) in Regina, Saskatchewan. Sixty-one (30%) were female, the median age was 64 years (interquartile range [IQR], 52–78), the median CPR duration was 30 minutes (IQR 12–47), and 20% survived to discharge. Two (1%) patients received ECPR but did not meet any ECPR criteria. Nineteen (10%), thirty (15%), twenty-two (11%), and seven (4%) patients were ECPR-eligible, using the UBC, UM, UC, and restrictive criteria. However, none of these patients had received ECPR. Only two (11%), two (7%), two (9%), and one (14%) of these patient(s) survived to discharge, respectively. Neurological outcomes were unfavourable among all ECPR-eligible patients. Future study at our centre will be necessary on how to implement ECPR program to further improve these outcomes.

Download Full-text

Evaluation of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation eligibility criteria for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients

BMC Research Notes ◽

10.1186/s13104-021-05564-1 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 14 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Brendan Lee ◽

Adam Clay ◽

Eric Sy

Keyword(s):

United States ◽

Cardiac Arrest ◽

Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽

Eligibility Criteria ◽

Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽

Clinical Criteria ◽

Neurological Outcomes ◽

University Of British Columbia ◽

The University ◽

Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Abstract Objectives To evaluate the number of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients eligible for extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) in Saskatchewan and their clinical outcomes, including survival and neurological outcomes at discharge. ECPR eligibility was assessed, using clinical criteria from the University of British Columbia (UBC, Canada), University of Michigan (UM, United States), University of California (UC, United States) and a restrictive ECPR criteria. Results We performed a retrospective cohort study of 200 OHCA patients (August 1, 2017-May 31, 2019) in Regina, Saskatchewan. Sixty-one (30%) were female, the median age was 64 years (interquartile range [IQR], 52–78), the median CPR duration was 30 min (IQR 12–47), and 20% survived to discharge. Two (1%) patients received ECPR but did not meet any ECPR criteria. Nineteen (10%), thirty (15%), twenty-two (11%), and seven (4%) patients were ECPR-eligible, using the UBC, UM, UC, and restrictive criteria. However, none of these patients had received ECPR. Only two (11%), two (7%), two (9%), and one (14%) of these patient(s) survived to discharge, respectively. Neurological outcomes were unfavourable among all ECPR-eligible patients. Future study at our centre will be necessary on how to implement ECPR program to further improve these outcomes.

Download Full-text