scholarly journals Phase I and Pharmacokinetic Study of Cetuximab and Irinotecan in Children With Refractory Solid Tumors: A Study of the Pediatric Oncology Experimental Therapeutic Investigators' Consortium

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (30) ◽  
pp. 5102-5108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tanya M. Trippett ◽  
Cynthia Herzog ◽  
James A. Whitlock ◽  
Johannes Wolff ◽  
John Kuttesch ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Children And Adolescents ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Cns Tumors ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Patients Âgés ◽  
Open Label Phase ◽  
Recommended Phase Ii Dose

Purpose To determine the dose of cetuximab that can be safely combined with irinotecan for treatment of pediatric and adolescent patients with refractory solid tumors. Patients and Methods This open-label, phase I study enrolled patients ages 1 to 18 years with advanced refractory solid tumors, including tumors of the CNS. Patient cohorts by age group (children, ages 1 to 12 years; adolescents, ages 13 to 18 years) received escalating weekly doses of cetuximab (75, 150, 250 mg/m2) in a 3 + 3 design, plus irinotecan (16 or 20 mg/m2/d) for 5 days for 2 consecutive weeks every 21 days. The primary end points were establishing the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), recommended phase II dose (RPIID), and pharmacokinetics of the combination. Preliminary safety and efficacy data were also collected. Results Twenty-seven children and 19 adolescents received a median of 7.1 and 6.0 weeks of cetuximab therapy, respectively. Cetuximab 250 mg/m2 weekly plus irinotecan 16 mg/m2/d (pediatric) or 20 mg/m2/d (adolescent) have been established as the MTD/RPIID. Dose-limiting toxicities included diarrhea and neutropenia. Mild to moderate (grade 1 to 2) acneiform rash occurred in a majority of patients; no grade 3 to 4 rashes were observed. Cetuximab demonstrated dose-dependent clearance in both children and adolescents, similar to that in adults. There were two confirmed partial responses, both in patients with CNS tumors. Stable disease was achieved in 18 patients overall, including 10 patients with CNS tumors (38.5%). Conclusion The cetuximab/irinotecan combination can be given safely to children and adolescents with cancer. Promising activity, particularly in CNS tumors, warrants phase II evaluation of this regimen.

Open-label, multicenter, phase I study to assess safety and tolerability of adavosertib plus durvalumab in patients with advanced solid tumors.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2562-2562 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manish R. Patel ◽  
Gerald Steven Falchook ◽  
Judy Sing-Zan Wang ◽  
Esteban Rodrigo Imedio ◽  
Sanjeev Kumar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Human Monoclonal Antibody ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Preliminary Evidence ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Drug Induced ◽  
Recommended Phase Ii Dose

2562 Background: Adavosertib (AZD1775; A) is a highly selective inhibitor of WEE1. This Phase I study (NCT02617277) investigated a range of doses and schedules for oral A plus IV durvalumab (DV), a human monoclonal antibody targeting PD-L1, to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended Phase II dose (RP2D) in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors. Methods: Four 28-day schedules (Sch) were evaluated with pts receiving DV 1500 mg on day (d) 1 of each schedule (Table). Patients continued treatment if they showed clinical benefit in the absence of any discontinuation criteria. Pts received A monotherapy for PK analysis prior to the start of combination therapy in Sch B, C (d –7 to –5) and D (d –9 to –5). MTD was determined using a 3+3 dose-escalation cohort design. Predefined dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were evaluated during the first cycle of study treatment. Results: 54 pts received A (most common primary tumor sites: colon, 19%; lung, 13%; breast, 11%). The most common grade ≥3 AEs were fatigue (15%), diarrhea (11%) and nausea (9%). DLTs were nausea (n = 2) and diarrhea (n = 1). 7 pts (13%) had A-related SAEs, including reversible and confounded drug-induced liver injury (Sch B 125 mg and Sch C; 1 each). Disease control rate (DCR) for the total cohort was 36%. Preliminary PK at 150 mg BID suggests adequate coverage for cell kill activity and no drug–drug interaction. Conclusions: The MTD/RP2D was A 150 mg BID (3 d on, 4 d off; treatment d 15–17, 22–24) with DV 1500 mg (d 1 Q4W); safety profile was considered acceptable. Preliminary evidence of antitumor activity was observed. Clinical trial information: NCT02617277. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Epacadostat Plus Pembrolizumab in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors: Phase I Results From a Multicenter, Open-Label Phase I/II Trial (ECHO-202/KEYNOTE-037)

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (32) ◽  
pp. 3223-3230 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tara C. Mitchell ◽  
Omid Hamid ◽  
David C. Smith ◽  
Todd M. Bauer ◽  
Jeffrey S. Wasser ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Enzyme Inhibitor ◽  
Endometrial Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Open Label Phase

Purpose Tumors may evade immunosurveillance through upregulation of the indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 (IDO1) enzyme. Epacadostat is a potent and highly selective IDO1 enzyme inhibitor. The open-label phase I/II ECHO-202/KEYNOTE-037 trial evaluated epacadostat plus pembrolizumab, a programmed death protein 1 inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid tumors. Phase I results on maximum tolerated dose, safety, tolerability, preliminary antitumor activity, and pharmacokinetics are reported. Patients and Methods Patients received escalating doses of oral epacadostat (25, 50, 100, or 300 mg) twice per day plus intravenous pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg or 200 mg every 3 weeks. During the safety expansion, patients received epacadostat (50, 100, or 300 mg) twice per day plus pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks. Results Sixty-two patients were enrolled and received one or more doses of study treatment. The maximum tolerated dose of epacadostat in combination with pembrolizumab was not reached. Fifty-two patients (84%) experienced treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), with fatigue (36%), rash (36%), arthralgia (24%), pruritus (23%), and nausea (21%) occurring in ≥ 20%. Grade 3/4 TRAEs were reported in 24% of patients. Seven patients (11%) discontinued study treatment because of TRAEs. No TRAEs led to death. Epacadostat 100 mg twice per day plus pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks was recommended for phase II evaluation. Objective responses (per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors [RECIST] version 1.1) occurred in 12 (55%) of 22 patients with melanoma and in patients with non–small-cell lung cancer, renal cell carcinoma, endometrial adenocarcinoma, urothelial carcinoma, and squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. The pharmacokinetics of epacadostat and pembrolizumab and antidrug antibody rate were comparable to historical controls for monotherapies. Conclusion Epacadostat in combination with pembrolizumab generally was well tolerated and had encouraging antitumor activity in multiple advanced solid tumors.

scholarly journals A Phase I Study of Sunitinib Plus Capecitabine in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (29) ◽  
pp. 4513-4520 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher J. Sweeney ◽  
E. Gabriela Chiorean ◽  
Claire F. Verschraegen ◽  
Fa Chyi Lee ◽  
Suzanne Jones ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Mucosal Inflammation ◽  
Treatment Schedule ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Dose Escalation Study ◽  
Open Label Phase ◽  
Hand Foot Syndrome

Purpose This open-label, phase I, dose-escalation study assessed the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), safety, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity of sunitinib in combination with capecitabine in patients with advanced solid tumors. Patients and Methods Sunitinib (25, 37.5, or 50 mg) was administered orally once daily on three dosing schedules: 4 weeks on treatment, 2 weeks off treatment (Schedule 4/2); 2 weeks on treatment, 1 week off treatment (Schedule 2/1); and continuous daily dosing (CDD schedule). Capecitabine (825, 1,000, or 1,250 mg/m2) was administered orally twice daily on days 1 to 14 every 3 weeks for all patients. Sunitinib and capecitabine doses were escalated in serial patient cohorts. Results Seventy-three patients were treated. Grade 3 adverse events included abdominal pain, mucosal inflammation, fatigue, neutropenia, and hand-foot syndrome. The MTD for Schedule 4/2 and the CDD schedule was sunitinib 37.5 mg/d plus capecitabine 1,000 mg/m2 twice per day; the MTD for Schedule 2/1 was sunitinib 50 mg/d plus capecitabine 1,000 mg/m2 twice per day. There were no clinically significant pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions. Nine partial responses were confirmed in patients with pancreatic cancer (n = 3) and breast, thyroid, neuroendocrine, bladder, and colorectal cancer, and cholangiocarcinoma (each n = 1). Conclusion The combination of sunitinib and capecitabine resulted in an acceptable safety profile in patients with advanced solid tumors. Further evaluation of sunitinib in combination with capecitabine may be undertaken using the MTD for any of the three treatment schedules.

scholarly journals A first-in-human, phase 1 study of the NEDD8 activating enzyme E1 inhibitor TAS4464 in patients with advanced solid tumors

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noboru Yamamoto ◽  
Toshio Shimizu ◽  
Kan Yonemori ◽  
Shigehisa Kitano ◽  
Shunsuke Kondo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Liver Function ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Enzyme Inhibitor ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase 1 Study ◽  
Open Label Phase

SummaryBackground This open-label, phase 1 study investigated TAS4464, a potent NEDD8-activating enzyme inhibitor, in patients with advanced/metastatic solid tumors (JapicCTI-173,488; registered 13/01/2017). The primary objective was dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). Maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) was investigated using an accelerated titration design. Methods The starting 10-mg/m2 dose was followed by an initial accelerated stage (weekly dosing; n = 11). Based on liver function test (LFT) results, a 14-day, 20-mg/m2 dose lead-in period was implemented (weekly dosing with lead-in; n = 6). Results Abnormal LFT changes and gastrointestinal effects were the most common treatment-related adverse events (AEs). DLTs with 56-mg/m2 weekly dosing occurred in 1/5 patients; five patients had grade ≥ 2 abnormal LFT changes at 40- and 56-mg/m2 weekly doses. Further dose escalation ceased because of the possibility of severe abnormal LFT changes occurring. DLTs with weekly dosing with lead-in occurred in 1/5 patients at a 56-mg/m2 dose; MTD could not be determined because discontinuation criteria for additional enrollment at that particular dose level were met. As no further enrollment at lower doses occurred, dose escalation assessment was discontinued. Serious treatment-related AEs, AEs leading to treatment discontinuation, and DLTs were all related to abnormal LFT changes, suggesting that TAS4464 administration could affect liver function. This effect was dose-dependent but considered reversible. Complete or partial responses to TAS4464 were not observed; one patient achieved prolonged stable disease. Conclusions MTD could not be determined due to TAS4464 effects on liver function. Further evaluation of the mechanism of NEDD8-activating enzyme inhibitor-induced abnormal liver function is required. Trial registration number JapicCTI-173,488 (registered with Japan Pharmaceutical Information Center). Registration date 13 January 2017

A phase I study of an IDO inhibitor (SHR9146) plus camrelizumab and in combination with/without apatinib in patients with advanced solid tumors: Safety and efficacy analysis.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3101-3101
Author(s):  
Ying Cheng ◽  
Ying Liu ◽  
Jinhua Xu ◽  
Jing Zhu ◽  
Ying Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Partial Response ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Renal Cancer ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Angiogenesis Inhibitor ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Safety And Efficacy

3101 Background: IDO is an enzyme of interest in immuno-oncology because of the immunosuppressive effects that result from its role in tryptophan catabolism. Clinical trials of IDO inhibitors with immunotherapy are under active investigation. The addition of angiogenesis inhibitor may further enhance the anti-tumor immune responses. Here we report the safety and efficacy results of SHR9146 (IDO inhibitor) plus camrelizumab (PD-1 antibody) with/without apatinib (VEGFR-2 inhibitor) in patients (pts) with advanced solid cancers who failed standard antitumor therapies. Methods: This was an open-label, phase I study. Eligible puts would receive SHR9146 (escalated dose) plus camrelizumab (200 mg IV, q2w) alone (Cohort A) or in combination with apatinib (250 mg p.o. qd) (Cohort B). Each cohort was conducted according to a 3+3 dose escalation design. The starting dose of SHR9146 was 100mg bid, followed by 200, 400, 600 mg bid. The two primary endpoints were Dose-limiting Toxicity (DLT) and Maximum Tolerated Dose (MDT). The secondary objective was to analysis the incidence of Adverse Events (AEs) and efficacy. Results: As of Oct 31, 2020, 23 pts have been enrolled (Cohort A:14, Cohort B: 9; median age: 54 years; median prior therapies: 2 lines;). Cohort A was escalating at 600mg, and Cohort B was escalating at 400mg. Two pts experienced DLTs: one DLT (G4 hypercalcemia) was observed at 600mg in Cohort A; the other DLT (G3 rash) was observed at 400mg in Cohort B. MDT was not reached and the study was still ongoing. In Cohort A, ORR and DCR in evaluable pts were 21.4% (3/14, all confirmed) and 42.9% (6/14). Partial response was observed in 3 pts with liver cancer (1/3), renal cancer (1/3), and cervix cancer (1/3). In Cohort B, ORR and DCR in evaluable pts were 33.3%(3/9, all confirmed) and 77.8%(7/9). Partial response was observed in 3 pts with SCLC (1/3), prostate cancer (1/3) and renal cancer (1/3). The incidence of pts with TRAEs and grade>=3 TRAEs were 91.3% (21/23) and 39.1% (9/23) respectively. The most common grade>=3 TRAEs were hypercalcemia (26.1%, 6/23), fatigue (17.4%, 4/23) and nausea (13.0%, 3/23). No fatal AEs were observed. G3 nausea, G3 lipase increased and G2 GGT increased resulted in SHR9146 dose reduction in 3 pts (Cohort A). Conclusions: SHR9146 plus camrelizumab in combination with/without apatinib demonstrated promising anti-tumor activity with acceptable safety in pts with advanced solid tumors. Further study is needed to validate the efficacy and safety. Clinical trial information: NCT03491631.

Phase I trial of 9-aminocamptothecin in children with refractory solid tumors: a Pediatric Oncology Group study.

1998 ◽  
Vol 16 (7) ◽  
pp. 2494-2499 ◽  
Author(s):  
A M Langevin ◽  
D T Casto ◽  
P J Thomas ◽  
S D Weitman ◽  
C Kretschmar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Steady State ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase I Trial ◽  
Malignant Tumors ◽  
Hepatic Metabolism ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Profile ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Volume Of Distribution ◽  
Recommended Phase Ii Dose

PURPOSE A phase I trial of 9-aminocamptothecin (9-AC) was performed in children with solid tumors to establish the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), and the pharmacokinetic profile in children and to document any evidence of activity. PATIENTS AND METHODS A 72-hour infusion of 9-AC dimethylacetamide formulation was administered every 21 days to 23 patients younger than 21 years of age with malignant tumors refractory to conventional therapy. Doses ranged from 36 to 62 microg/m2 per hour. Pharmacokinetics were to be performed in at least three patients per dose level. The first course was used to determine the DLT and MTD. RESULTS Nineteen patients on four dose levels were assessable for toxicities. At 62 microg/m2 per hour, three patients experienced dose-limiting neutropenia and one patient experienced dose-limiting thrombocytopenia. Pharmacokinetics were performed on 15 patients (nine patients had complete sets of plasma sampling performed). The pharmacokinetics of both lactone and total 9-AC were highly variable. The percentage of 9-AC lactone at steady-state was 10.8% +/- 3.6%. Total 9-AC and its lactone form had a terminal half-life of 8.1 +/- 3.8 and 7.1 +/- 3.9 hours, respectively, and a volume of distribution at steady-state (Vdss) of 21.2 +/- 13.3 L/m2 and 135.3 +/- 52.5 L/m2, respectively. Hepatic metabolism and biliary transport had an important role in 9-AC disposition. CONCLUSION The recommended phase II dose of 9-AC administered as a 72-hour infusion every 21 days to children with solid tumors is 52 microg/m2 per hour. Neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were dose limiting.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document