scholarly journals Impact of Young Age on Treatment Efficacy and Safety in Advanced Colorectal Cancer: A Pooled Analysis of Patients From Nine First-Line Phase III Chemotherapy Trials

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (20) ◽  
pp. 2781-2786 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles D. Blanke ◽  
Brian M. Bot ◽  
David M. Thomas ◽  
Archie Bleyer ◽  
Claus-Henning Kohne ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Combination Chemotherapy ◽  
Older Patients ◽  
Advanced Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Young Patients ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Young Age ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Grade 3

Purpose Colorectal cancer predominantly occurs in the elderly, but approximately 5% of patients are 50 years old or younger. We sought to determine whether young age is prognostic, or whether it influences efficacy/toxicity of chemotherapy, in patients with advanced disease. Methods We analyzed individual data on 6,284 patients from nine phase III trials of advanced colorectal cancer (aCRC) that used fluorouracil-based single-agent and combination chemotherapy. End points included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), response rate (RR), and grade 3 or worse adverse events. Stratified Cox and adjusted logistic-regression models were used to test for age effects and age-treatment interactions. Results A total of 793 patients (13%) were younger than 50 years old; 188 of these patients (3% of total patients) were younger than 40 years old. Grade 3 or worse nausea (10% v 7%; P = .01) was more common, and severe diarrhea (11% v 14%; P = .001) and neutropenia (23% v 26%; P < .001) were less common in young (younger than 50 years) than in older (older than 50 years) patients. Age was prognostic for PFS, with poorer outcomes occurring in those younger than 50 years (median, 6.0 v 7.5 months; hazard ratio, 1.10; P = .02), but it did not affect RR or OS. In the subset of monotherapy versus combination chemotherapy trials, the relative benefits of multiagent chemotherapy were similar for young and older patients. Results were comparable when utilizing an age cut point of 40 years. Conclusion Young age is modestly associated with poorer PFS but not OS or RR in treated patients with aCRC, and young patients have more nausea but less diarrhea and neutropenia with chemotherapy in general. Young versus older patients derive the same benefits from combination chemotherapy. Absent results of a clinical trial, standard combination chemotherapy approaches are appropriate for young patients with aCRC.

Leucovorin and Fluorouracil With or Without Oxaliplatin as First-Line Treatment in Advanced Colorectal Cancer

2000 ◽  
Vol 18 (16) ◽  
pp. 2938-2947 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. de Gramont ◽  
A. Figer ◽  
M. Seymour ◽  
M. Homerin ◽  
A. Hmissi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Advanced Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Oxaliplatin Treatment ◽  
Phase Iii Study ◽  
Grade 3

PURPOSE: In a previous study of treatment for advanced colorectal cancer, the LV5FU2 regimen, comprising leucovorin (LV) plus bolus and infusional fluorouracil (5FU) every 2 weeks, was superior to the standard North Central Cancer Treatment Group/Mayo Clinic 5-day bolus 5FU/LV regimen. This phase III study investigated the effect of combining oxaliplatin with LV5FU2, with progression-free survival as the primary end point. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four hundred twenty previously untreated patients with measurable disease were randomized to receive a 2-hour infusion of LV (200 mg/m2/d) followed by a 5FU bolus (400 mg/m2/d) and 22-hour infusion (600 mg/m2/d) for 2 consecutive days every 2 weeks, either alone or together with oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 as a 2-hour infusion on day 1. RESULTS: Patients allocated to oxaliplatin plus LV5FU2 had significantly longer progression-free survival (median, 9.0 v 6.2 months; P = .0003) and better response rate (50.7% v 22.3%; P = .0001) when compared with the control arm. The improvement in overall survival did not reach significance (median, 16.2 v 14.7 months; P = .12). LV5FU2 plus oxaliplatin gave higher frequencies of National Cancer Institute common toxicity criteria grade 3/4 neutropenia (41.7% v 5.3% of patients), grade 3/4 diarrhea (11.9% v 5.3%), and grade 3 neurosensory toxicity (18.2% v 0%), but this did not result in impairment of quality of life (QoL). Survival without disease progression or deterioration in global health status was longer in patients allocated to oxaliplatin treatment (P = .004). CONCLUSION: The LV5FU2-oxaliplatin combination seems beneficial as first-line therapy in advanced colorectal cancer, demonstrating a prolonged progression-free survival with acceptable tolerability and maintenance of QoL.

Capecitabine As First-Line Treatment for Patients Older Than 70 Years With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: An Oncopaz Cooperative Group Study

2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (13) ◽  
pp. 3104-3111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaime Feliu ◽  
Pilar Escudero ◽  
Ferrán Llosa ◽  
Matilde Bolaños ◽  
Jose-Manuel Vicent ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Combination Chemotherapy ◽  
Clinical Benefit ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Advanced Colorectal Cancer ◽  
First Line ◽  
Hand Foot Syndrome ◽  
Clinical Benefit Response ◽  
Grade 3

Purpose To determine the tolerability of capecitabine in elderly patients with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC). Patients and Methods Fifty-one patients with advanced CRC who were ≥ 70 years and considered ineligible for combination chemotherapy received oral capecitabine 1,250 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1 to 14 every 3 weeks. Patients with a creatinine clearance of 30 to 50 mL/min received a dose of 950 mg/m2 twice daily. Results A total of 248 cycles of capecitabine were administered (median, five cycles; range, one to eight cycles). The overall response rate was 24% (95% CI, 15% to 41%), including two complete responses (CR; 4%) and 10 partial responses (PR; 20%). Disease control (CR + PR + stable disease) was achieved in 67% of patients. The median times to disease progression and overall survival were 7 months (95% CI, 6.4 to 9.5 months) and 11 months (95% CI, 8.6 to 13.3 months), respectively. Of the 35 patients evaluated for clinical benefit response, 14 (40%; 95% CI, 24% to 58%) showed clinical benefit. Capecitabine was well tolerated. Treatment-related grade 3 and 4 adverse events were observed in only six patients (12%), and the most common events were diarrhea, hand-foot syndrome, and thrombocytopenia. One patient (2%) had an episode of angina, but no treatment-related deaths were reported. Conclusion Our findings suggest that capecitabine is effective and well tolerated in elderly patients with advanced CRC who are considered ineligible for combination chemotherapy.

Capecitabine, an Oral Fluoropyrimidine Carbamate With Substantial Activity in Advanced Colorectal Cancer: Results of a Randomized Phase II Study

2000 ◽  
Vol 18 (6) ◽  
pp. 1337-1345 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric Van Cutsem ◽  
Michael Findlay ◽  
Bruno Osterwalder ◽  
Walter Kocha ◽  
David Dalley ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Advanced Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Effective Treatment Option ◽  
Randomized Phase Ii

PURPOSE: To evaluate in patients with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) three treatment regimens of oral capecitabine in order to select the most appropriate regimen for testing in phase III. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three capecitabine schedules were evaluated in a randomized phase II design: arm A, 1,331 mg/m2/d bid continuously; arm B, 2,510 mg/m2/d bid intermittently (2 weeks on/1 week off); and arm C, 1,657 mg/m2/d plus oral leucovorin 60 mg/d bid intermittently (2 weeks on/1 week off). RESULTS: One hundred nine patients were randomized; 39 patients were assessable for efficacy in arm A, 34 in arm B, and 35 in arm C. Patient characteristics were balanced in the arms. Confirmed tumor responses (partial response [PR] + complete response [CR]) were reported for eight patients with two CRs (21%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 9% to 36%) in arm A, eight patients with one CR (24%; 95% CI, 11% to 41%) in arm B, and eight patients with two CRs (23%; 95% CI, 10% to 40%) in arm C. Median times to progression (TTP) in arms A, B, and C were 127, 230, and 165 days, respectively. Overall, more toxicity was seen with capecitabine plus leucovorin, particularly diarrhea and hand-foot syndrome. There was no grade 3 or 4 marrow toxicity. CONCLUSION: Capecitabine offers a new, effective treatment option as an oral single agent in advanced CRC. Promising overall response rates were reported for all three regimens. The addition of leucovorin to the intermittent regimen had no marked effect on tumor response or median TTP. The intermittent single-agent capecitabine schedule is proposed for phase III evaluation, based on considerations of toxicity, dose-intensity, response rate, and TTP.

Phase III Trial of Infusional Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, Oxaliplatin, and Irinotecan (FOLFOXIRI) Compared With Infusional Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, and Irinotecan (FOLFIRI) As First-Line Treatment for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: The Gruppo Oncologico Nord Ovest

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (13) ◽  
pp. 1670-1676 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alfredo Falcone ◽  
Sergio Ricci ◽  
Isa Brunetti ◽  
Elisabetta Pfanner ◽  
Giacomo Allegrini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Peripheral Neurotoxicity ◽  
Phase Iii Trial ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Secondary Resection ◽  
Phase Iii Study ◽  
Grade 3

Purpose The Gruppo Oncologico Nord Ovest (GONO) conducted a phase III study comparing fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan (FOLFOXIRI [irinotecan 165 mg/m2 day 1, oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 day 1, leucovorin 200 mg/m2 day 1, fluorouracil 3,200 mg/m2 48-hour continuous infusion starting on day 1, every 2 weeks]) with infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI). Methods Selection criteria included unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer, age 18 to 75 years, and no prior chemotherapy for advanced disease. The primary end point was response rate (RR). Results A total of 244 patients were randomly assigned. An increase of grade 2 to 3 peripheral neurotoxicity (0% v 19%; P < .001), and grade 3 to 4 neutropenia (28% v 50%; P < .001) were observed in the FOLFOXIRI arm. The incidence of febrile neutropenia (3% v 5%) and grade 3 to 4 diarrhea (12% v 20%) were not significantly different. Responses, as assessed by investigators, were, for FOLFIRI and FOLFOXIRI, respectively, complete, 6% and 8%; and partial, 35% and 58%, (RR, 41% v 66%; P = .0002). RR confirmed by an external panel was 34% versus 60% (P < .0001). The R0 secondary resection rate of metastases was greater in the FOLFOXIRI arm (6% v 15%; P = .033, among all 244 patients; and 12% v 36%; P = .017 among patients with liver metastases only). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were both significantly improved in the FOLFOXIRI arm (median PFS, 6.9 v 9.8 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.63; P = .0006; median OS, 16.7 v 22.6 months; HR, 0.70; P = .032). Conclusion The FOLFOXIRI regimen improves RR, PFS, and OS compared with FOLFIRI, with an increased, but manageable, toxicity in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer with favorable prognostic characteristics. Further studies of FOLFOXIRI in combination with targeted agents and in the neoadjuvant setting are warranted.

A Randomized Trial Comparing Defined-Duration With Continuous Irinotecan Until Disease Progression in Fluoropyrimidine and Thymidylate Synthase Inhibitor—Resistant Advanced Colorectal Cancer

2004 ◽  
Vol 22 (15) ◽  
pp. 3023-3031 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rohit Lal ◽  
James Dickson ◽  
David Cunningham ◽  
Ian Chau ◽  
Andrew R. Norman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Advanced Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Random Assignment ◽  
Duration Of Disease ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Synthase Inhibitor

Purpose Irinotecan given until disease progression is an accepted standard treatment for advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) resistant to fluoropyrimidines. It is not known whether a predefined period of irinotecan treatment would result in similar duration of disease control. We performed a multicenter phase III trial to compare the two policies of defined-duration versus continuous irinotecan treatment. Patients and Methods Three hundred thirty-three eligible patients with advanced CRC progressing on or within 24 weeks of completing fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy were prospectively registered. After receiving eight cycles of irinotecan given at 350 mg/m2 once every 3 weeks, 55 patients with responding or stable disease were randomly assigned to stop irinotecan (n = 30) or continue until disease progression (n = 25). Registered patients were not randomly assigned predominantly due to disease progression (n = 236) and intolerable toxicity (n = 38). Results From the time of random assignment, there were no differences in failure-free survival (P = .999) or overall survival (P = .11) between the two arms. No difference was seen in mean global health status quality-of-life score between the two arms at 12 weeks after random assignment. No grade 3 diarrhea and febrile neutropenia was seen in the continue-irinotecan arm after random assignment. Conclusion For most patients, the decision to continue on irinotecan beyond 24 weeks is influenced by disease progression or treatment-related toxicity. However, for 17% of patients in whom this decision is clinically relevant, there seems to be little benefit from continuing irinotecan, though the drug was well tolerated without any deterioration in quality of life.

FOLFOX-4 + cetuximab in untreated patients with advanced colorectal cancer. A phase II study of the Gruppo Oncologico dell’Italia Meridionale (prot. GOIM 2402)

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3559-3559 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Colucci ◽  
F. Giuliani ◽  
R. Mattioli ◽  
C. Garufi ◽  
R. Mallamaci ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Advanced Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Disease Status ◽  
First Line ◽  
Preliminary Results ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Line Setting ◽  
Ecog Ps

3559 Background: Cetuximab is an IgG monoclonal antibody targeting the EGFR showing to be effective both as single agent or in combination with Irinotecan (CPT-11) or Irinotecan/FU/FA in patients (pts) with EGFR-expressing metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) in the first and second/subsequent-line setting. The current trial was designed to evaluate the efficacy and the safety of Cetuximab plus Folfox-4 as first -line treatment. The main objective was the percentage of confirmed objective response rate. Methods: Chemonaivepts with non-resectable metastatic CRC and expressing EGFR were treated with Cetuximab (400 mg/m2 week 1 and 250 mg/m2 weekly thereafter) plus Folfox-4 (every 2 weeks: Oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2, day 1; FA 100 mg/m2 2h, simultaneously with OH-P, and FU 400 mg/m2 iv bolus followed by 600 mg/m2 iv for 22h on days 1 and 2). The first evaluation of disease status (Recist criteria) was performed after the first 4 cycles and confirmed after one month. The treatment was continued until a maximum of 12 cycles of chemotherapy; the maintenaice with Cetuximab was permitted. Preliminary results: On the 65 screened pts, 47 (72%) had EGFR-expressing metastatic disease and were enrolled. Their main characteristics were: median Ecog PS 0; median age 66 yrs (range 43–74); main sites of disease: liver 31, lung 12, lymph-nodes 3, others 8. To date twenty-two pts are evaluable for activity and 27 for toxicity; 2 pts are not evaluable and 25 are too early. We observed 16 PR (72.7%), 5 NC (22.7%) and 1 PD (4.6%) for an ORR of 72.7% and a TGCR of 95.4%; the confirmed PR were 15 (68%). To date 2 pts undergone surgery of their metastases both for lung. The main adverse events grade 3/4 (NCI criteria) were: acne-like rush 18.5%, diarrea 7%, nausea/vomiting 4% and anemia 4%. Conclusions: Our preliminary results confirm that the combination of Cetuximab plus Folfox-4 has an high activity and a good safety profile in advanced CRC pts. The study is ongoing. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

First-line single-agent cetuximab in patients with advanced colorectal cancer

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3553-3553 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Pessino ◽  
S. Artale ◽  
A. Guglielmi ◽  
S. Sciallero ◽  
G. Fornarini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Advanced Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Great Majority ◽  
Skin Toxicity ◽  
Common Adverse Event ◽  
Time To Progression ◽  
Grade 3

3553 Background: The most relevant recent advance in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer is the fact that cure is still possible under very selected conditions. However the goal of chemotherapy remains palliative in the great majority of patients, justifying less toxic innovative approaches in so- called “window of opportunity trials”. We have pursued this idea in a phase II study of cetuximab monotherapy in chemo-naive patients with advanced colorectal cancer beyond any possibility of curative resection. Methods: Patients with non-resectable metastatic colorectal cancer (at least two metastatic sites and/or otherwise inoperable metastatic disease) were treated with cetuximab (400 mg/m2 week 1 and 250 mg/m2 weekly thereafter) until progressive disease (PD) or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end-point was objective response; secondary end-points were: stable disease, time to treatment failure and time to progression. According to Simon’s two-stage design, the number of responses/patients to stop the trial was 0/10 for stage 1 and 3/29 for stage 2. Results: Of the 44 patients screened, 42 (97%) had EGFR-expressing tumors. Thirty-nine patients (median age: 69) initiated the treatment. Two had grade 3 allergic reactions to cetuximab at the first administration leading to treatment discontinuation. The most common adverse event was skin toxicity, which occurred in 90% of the patients ( 31% grade 2, 10 % grade 3). We observed 1 complete response, 3 partial responses, 13 stable diseases (5 of which were minor responses), and 22 PD. The duration of the 4 responses were 12, 9, 9 and 6 months. Median time to progression was 2.0 months. Conclusions: The study is negative because the response rate is low. However, the duration of benefit in the few responding patients is such that it is imperative to find the molecular determinants of cetuximab activity in these cases. [Table: see text]

A phase II study of picoplatin (pico) as second-line therapy for patients (pts) with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) who have resistant or refractory disease or have relapsed within 180 days of completing first-line, platinum (plat)-containing chemotherapy

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7722-7722 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Bentzion ◽  
O. Lipatov ◽  
I. Polyakov ◽  
R. MacKintosh ◽  
J. Eckardt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Median Survival ◽  
Stable Disease ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Refractory Disease ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
First Line ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Grade 3

7722 Background: Pico is a sterically hindered plat analogue designed to overcome plat resistance with improved safety and efficacy. In >600 pts pico had single-agent activity in lung, prostate, ovarian and other malignancies with rare significant nephro-, oto-, or neurotoxicity (∼2% grade 3 and 0% grade 4). In a previous phase 2 study of single agent pico as 2nd line therapy in SCLC, 4 of 48 pts (8%) had a partial response and 21 (44%) stable disease. Median survival was 27.0 (95% CI = 16–35) wks. This multi-center phase 2 trial was designed to confirm the activity of pico as 2nd line monotherapy for plat-resistant SCLC. Methods: Pts with SCLC who either 1) failed or progressed through 1st line plat-containing chemo (refractory disease), or 2) initially responded to 1st line plat-containing chemo and then relapsed/ progressed within 3 months (resistant disease), or 3) initially responded and then relapsed/progressed between 90 to 180 days (sensitive, relapsed 90 to 180 days), had measurable disease and ECOG PS 0–2 were treated with pico, 150 mg/m2 iv over1–2 hrs, q 21 days. Tumor response was assessed q 6 wks. Adverse events (AEs) were graded using the NCI CTCAE. Results: 77 pts received pico (45 refractory, 27 resistant, 5 sensitive). The median number of cycles received was 2 (mean = 2.9). The most frequently reported AEs of any severity were thrombocytopenia (39% of pts), anemia (35%), neutropenia (22%), nausea (20%), emesis (14%) and dyspnea (25%). Neutropenic fever occurred in 1 pt; there were no treatment related deaths. One pt had grade 3 neuropathy; there was no grade 3 or 4 ototoxicity or nephrotoxicity. Median overall survival is 28.1 (95% CI = 26–37) wks. Median progression free survival is 9.3 (95% CI = 7–12) wks. Of 63 pts with at least 1 post-treatment assessment of disease status, 33 (52%) had stable disease. Conclusion: Median survival compares favorably with other therapeutic options and toxicity is reduced in pico treated SCLC pts who have failed prior plat-containing first-line chemo or who have progressed within 180 days of first-line chemo. A phase III trial to confirm these results has been initiated. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Bevacizumab (BEV) plus capecitabine as maintenance therapy after initial treatment with BEV plus XELOX in previously untreated patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): Mature data from STOP and GO, a phase III, randomized, multicenter study.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3565-3565 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suayib Yalcin ◽  
Ruchan Uslu ◽  
Faysal Dane ◽  
Ugur Yilmaz ◽  
Nurullah Zengin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Drop Out ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Significance Level ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Grade 3

3565 Background: Colorectal cancer is one of the most frequent malignancies, second after breast cancer in women and third after lung cancer and prostate cancer in men. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the progression-free survival (PFS) between two arms: Arm A is a combination of BEV + XELOX; Arm B is a combination of BEV + XELOX for 6 cycles followed by maintenance BEV + capecitabine as first-line therapy in mCRC. Methods: BEV (7.5 mg/kg) + XELOX (capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 bid d1–14 + oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 d1 q3w) were administered until progression (Arm A) or 6 cycles of BEV + XELOX followed by BEV + capecitabine were administered until progression (Arm B). PFS was the primary endpoint; secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety. A sample size of 118 pts was required to detect with 80% power an increase of 1.5 months in median PFS between two arms with a standard deviation of 3.9 months and significance level of 0.05 (10% drop-out rate). Results: A total of 123 pts were randomized. Demographic characteristics were balanced between the arms. Median treatment period was 7.5 (range 0.5–13.9) and 8.1 (range 0.1–20.7) months in Arms A and B, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference in median PFS between arms, although there was no significant difference in ORR and OS (see table). Tolerability was acceptable in both arms with the following grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs): Arm A 48.4%; Arm B 34.4% (p=0.116). Grade 3/4 diarrhoea occurred in 9.7% vs. 3.3%, weakness in 8.1% vs. 8.2%, hand-foot syndrome in 3.2% vs. 1.6%, and neuropathy in 4.8% vs. 3.3% of pts in Arms A and B, respectively. Conclusions: These findings suggest that maintenance therapy with BEV + capecitabine following induction with 6 cycles of BEV + XELOX may be superior to continuous BEV + XELOX until progression inpts with previously untreated mCRC. [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document