Investigation of HBOC germline mutations in women diagnosed with breast cancer in Trinidad and Tobago.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6574-6574
Author(s):  
Gerneiva Parkinson ◽  
Anees B. Chagpar ◽  
Kellie Alleyne-Mike ◽  
Marcella Nunez-Smith ◽  
Alicia Zhou ◽  
...  

6574 Background: Trinidad and Tobago (T&T) is the southern-most Caribbean island, and according to the WHO/PAHO, it has the 2nd highest breast cancer mortality rate in the region. Notably, a large proportion of breast cancer cases in T&T occur at a young age; with nearly 36% of them being diagnosed under the age of 50. There is a known association between a younger age at diagnosis and Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer syndrome (HBOC). Yet, the prevalence of HBOC mutations remains unknown in T&T, as genetic counseling and testing services are extremely limited in the region. Therefore, we sought to determine the prevalence and spectrum of HBOC mutations in T&T. Methods: At the National Radiotherapy Center, T&T’s main oncology unit, female breast cancer patients, who met NCCN criteria for further genetic counseling and testing were recruited through chart reviews. After pre-test counseling, enrolled subjects had a detailed interview about their personal breast cancer diagnosis and family history. A saliva sample was collected using an Oragene kit, and analyzed by Color Genomics Inc. for 30 genes associated with hereditary cancers. Finalized results were returned to patients by genetic counselors from Color Genomics. Results: A total of 118 female patients who met NCCN guidelines for HBOC testing received genetic testing. A majority were 50 years of age or younger (69/118, 59%). The cohort was ethnically diverse: 34% African, 15% Asian, 48% multiple ethnicity, and 3% other/unknown. A pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant (positive result) was identified in 21.2% of the cohort (25/118) - most commonly identified in the BRCA1 gene (13/25, 52%), followed by BRCA2 (5/25, 20%), PTEN (2/25, 8%), BRIP1 (1/25, 4%), CHEK2 (1/25, 4%), MSH6 (1/25, 4%), PALB2 (1/25, 4%), and RAD51C (1/25, 4%). Conclusions: We found a strikingly high HBOC germline mutation prevalence rate of 21.2% among a cohort of female breast cancer patients meeting NCCN criteria for HBOC testing in T&T. Given the growing implications of germline HBOC mutations for breast cancer treatment and prevention, our results demonstrate an urgent need for funding, as well as the development of robust genetic counseling and testing services in T&T.

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher S. Bartlett ◽  
Tulay Koru-Sengul ◽  
Feng Miao ◽  
Stacey L. Tannenbaum ◽  
David J. Lee ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 107 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2-2
Author(s):  
H Gadelrab ◽  
M Mokhtar ◽  
H Morsy ◽  
M Elnaggar

Introduction: Breast cancer is the most frequently occurring cancer among females and the second most common cancer overall. Programmed Cell Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) plays an important role in blocking ‘cancer-immunity cycle’ and is considered as a major inhibitory pathway. The aim of the present study was to clarify the alterations of expression of PD-L1 in peripheral blood mononuclear cytes (PBMCs) of female breast cancer patients and analyze its association with clinico-pathological criteria as well as therapeutic response. Materials and Methods: The study was conducted on 45 female breast cancer patients and 45 female controls. Blood samples were collected followed by PBMCs isolation, total RNA extraction, reverse transcription and finally, quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) using SYBR Green DNA binding dye. Expression levels of PD-L1 were calculated and then compared with clinicopathological parameters of the patients in addition to initial therapeutic response. Results: A significant difference was detected for PD-L1 expression levels in breast cancer patients compared to controls. A significant association with age, metastatic breast cancer, estrogen receptor (ER) negative status as well as high concentrations of cancer antigen 15-3 (CA15-3) was detected. On the other hand, no significant association was recognized with tumor size, lymph nodal status, histopathological type, grade, progesterone receptor (PR) status, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2) status, triple negative, among de novo and recurrent metastatic patients and for the number of metastatic sites as well as the therapeutic response. Conclusions: This study paves the way of the use of PD-L1 as a noninvasive prognostic and diagnostic biomarker for poor prognosis of breast cancer.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gang Xu ◽  
Shanshan Bu ◽  
Xiushen Wang ◽  
Hong Ge

Abstract Purpose The application of postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) in T1–2 female breast cancer patients with 1–3 positive lymph nodes has been controversial. We sought to determine the survival benefits of PMRT in the patients with T1–2 and 1–3 positive nodes. Methods A retrospective study using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Regs Custom Data (with additional treatment fields) from 2001 to 2011 was performed. Patients who received PMRT were matched by the propensity score with patients who did not receive PMRT. The Overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) were analyzed. Results We identified 56,725 female breast cancer patients with T1–2 and 1–3 positive nodes, and 18,646 patients were included in the analysis. After propensity score matching (1:1), with a median follow-up of 116 months, PMRT showed an increase in the OS (P = 0.018) but had no effect on the BCSS. The 10-year OS rates were 76.8% and 74.4%, and the 10-year BCSS rates were 82.8% and 82.2% for the patients who received and who did not receive PMRT, respectively. Only patients with 3 positive nodes could gain the benefit of PMRT for BCSS. Conclusion PMRT for patients with T1–2 and 1–3 positive lymph nodes could increase the 10-year OS, and had no effect on the 10-year BCSS. Subgroup analysis indicated that only patients with 3 positive lymph nodes could benefit from PMRT for both the OS and BCSS.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (9) ◽  
pp. e0222860 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hsin-Hua Chen ◽  
Ching-Heng Lin ◽  
Der-Yuan Chen ◽  
Wen-Cheng Chao ◽  
Yi-Hsing Chen ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document