Recurrent or metastatic salivary gland tumor (MSGT) patients treated with selinexor, a first in class selective exportin-1 (XPO1) inhibitor.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6586-6586
Author(s):  
Eoghan Ruadh Malone ◽  
Anna Spreafico ◽  
Ilan Weinreb ◽  
Sarah Jennings ◽  
Lindsay Carlsson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Single Agent ◽  
Salivary Gland Tumor ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Duration Of Treatment ◽  
Genomic Aberration ◽  
Targeted Next Generation Sequencing ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Systemic Treatments ◽  
Treatment Naïve ◽  
Early Phase Clinical Trials

6586 Background: MSGT are rare with limited systemic treatments. This single institution, prospective study in recurrent or metastatic (RM) MSGT involved 2 phases: genomic profiling followed by treatment with either genomically-matched or unmatched therapy. Here we present the results of the unmatched arm for patients (pts) treated with S an oral selective inhibitor of XPO1 that leads to activation of tumor suppressor proteins and retention of oncoprotein mRNAs in the cell nucleus, inducing cancer cell apoptosis. Methods: Patients (pts) with RM-MSGT had archived paraffin embedded tumor samples profiled with targeted next generation sequencing, immunohistochemistry for androgen receptor (AR) and fluorescent in-situ hybridization for HER-2 and ALK. If no actionable mutations were identified or if no matched agents were available, pts with progressive disease could receive S (60mg given twice weekly Q28 days). The study had a simon-2 stage design; 1 partial response in the first 18 pts treated with S, would trigger an additional 7pts to receive S in stage 2. Results: Between July 2014 and April 2019 85 pts were enrolled on study: 73 had sequencing which identified 41 with no actionable mutations and 32 with actionable mutations. 18 pts (10F/8M, median age 61 years [40-79]) were treated with S and included adenoid cystic (n = 8), salivary duct (n = 4), acinic cell (n = 2) and other subtypes (n = 4). Of these 18, 4 pts had actionable aberrations: AR amplification (n = 2), mutations in SMARCB1 (n = 1) and CDKN2A (n = 1). 13pts were treatment naïve, 3pts and 2pts received 1 and 2 or more lines of treatment respectively prior to enrollment: androgen deprivation therapy (n = 2), chemotherapy (n = 3), early phase clinical trials (n = 3). The median number of cycles of S received were 3 (range: 1-19). The best response by RECIST was SD in 13pts (72%) (SD > 6 months (range: 6-18 months) in 5pts (28%); tumor reduction measured in 7pts (39%)), no PRs, PD in 3pts (17%), and 2pts (11%) were not evaluable for response due to insufficient duration of treatment coming off early due to toxicity. The median PFS (95% CI) was 7.6 (3.5-NA) months and the median OS (95% CI) was 15.4 (7.3-NA) months. The most common drug-related toxicities were grade 1-2 fatigue 14pts (78%), nausea 13pts (72%) and dysguesia 10pts (56%). 5 (28%) pts had a dose reduction and 6 (33%) in total had a dose interruption due to toxicity. Conclusions: Single agent antitumor activity was limited and the side effect profile was tolerable. No specific genomic aberration was associated with response to S. Clinical trial information: NCT02069730 .

Phase 1/2 study of cirmtuzumab and ibrutinib in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) or chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7556-7556
Author(s):  
Hun Ju Lee ◽  
Michael Y. Choi ◽  
Tanya Siddiqi ◽  
Jacqueline Claudia Barrientos ◽  
William G. Wierda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase 1 ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Synergistic Activity ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Car T ◽  
Treatment Naïve

7556 Background: Cirmtuzumab (Cirm) is a humanized monoclonal antibody that inhibits the tumor promoting activity of ROR1 and had demonstrated additive/synergistic activity with many anti-cancer agents including ibrutinib (Ibr). Methods: Patients (Pts) with relapsed or refractory (RR) MCL or treatment naïve (TN) or RR CLL were enrolled. In Part 1 (Dose Escalation), doses of Cirm IV q2wks x5 then q4wks of 2-16 mg/kg and 300 or 600 mg were examined. Safety of Cirm alone was assessed during the first 28 days, then Ibr was started at approved doses for each indication. Cirm 600 mg IV q2wks x3 then q4wks in combination with Ibr starting day 0 was chosen as the recommended dosing regimen for use in Part 2 (Expansion) and Part 3 (CLL only, Cirm/Ibr vs. Ibr alone). Results: Twelve evaluable MCL pts were enrolled into Part 1, and 5 into Part 2. Median number of prior regimens was 2 (1-5), including pts relapsing after Ibr (4), auto-SCT (3), auto-SCT/ allo-SCT (1), auto-SCT/CAR-T (1). In CLL, 34 evaluable pts (12 TN and 22 RR) enrolled into Part 1 (18) or Part 2 (16). At least 74% of CLL pts in Parts 1 and 2 were high risk as determined by unmutated IGHV, del17p, and/or del11q. In Part 3, 22 evaluable pts received Cirm/Ibr (15) or Ibr (7). As of the 30OCT2020 safety cut-off for MCL and CLL, common TEAEs (all grades) included diarrhea (41%), contusion (39%), fatigue (39%), URI (31%), hypertension (25%) arthralgia (23%). Grade ≥3 neutropenia was 13% and thrombocytopenia 1%. There were no Cirm dose reductions or discontinuations for toxicity. Overall, Cirm did not appear to negatively impact the safety of Ibr. Efficacy (MCL): As of the 02FEB2021 efficacy cutoff, the best response of 17 evaluable pts in Parts 1 and 2 included an objective response rate (ORR) of 82%, 41% CR/CMR, 41% PR, 12% SD, and 6% PD. CR/CMR remain durable from 8-28+ mos. Most responses occurred rapidly after ̃3 mos of Cirm/Ibr. Notably, responses were achieved in all pts who received prior SCT+/- CAR-T (4CR, 1PR) or prior Ibr (2CR, 2PR). At a median follow-up of 14.6 mos, the median PFS (mPFS) had not been reached (NR) (95% CI: 17.5, NA). Efficacy (CLL): The best response of 34 evaluable pts in Parts 1 and 2 included 91% ORR, 3% CR, 88% PR/PR-L, 9% SD, 0% PD. In Part 3, both arms achieved 100% ORR (all PRs). At a median follow-up of 20.2 mos, the mPFS was NR (95% CI: NA, NA), and the PFS estimate at 24 months was 95% for R/R, and 87% for TN, respectively, for evaluable CLL pts receiving Cirm/Ibr. Conclusions: Cirm/Ibr is a well-tolerated, active regimen in both MCL and CLL. For MCL, the mPFS of NR (95% CI: 17.5, NA) and CRR (41%), with all CRs remaining without PD, compare favorably to mPFS of 12.8 mos (95% CI 8.5-16.6) and CRR (20%) reported for single agent Ibr (Rule 2017). For CLL, the high ORR and PFS are encouraging, particularly for RR CLL. The study is ongoing, with MCL enrollment expanded to study Cirm + Ibr in pts who have had a suboptimal response to an Ibr regimen, or who have failed other approved BTKi agents. Clinical trial information: NCT03088878.

LR-CD: Lenalidomide combination therapy for untreated low-grade B-cell NHL.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8053-8053
Author(s):  
Craig B. Reeder ◽  
Rodger Edwin Tiedemann ◽  
Katherine Gano ◽  
Amylou C. Dueck ◽  
Christoher R Conley ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Response Data ◽  
Non Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Treatment Naïve ◽  
Reported Data

8053 Background: Lenalidomide (LEN) is an immunomodulatory agent that has shown significant single-agent anti-lymphoma activity in patients with relapsed disease and in combination may enhance the efficacy of rituximab by various mechanisms. There is limited data on the role of LEN in combination regimens for treatment-naïve patients. This phase II single arm trial was designed to evaluate tumor response, toxicity (AE) and survival with a combination of LEN, rituximab, cyclophosphamide (CTX) and dexamethasone (DEX) (LR-CD) in symptomatic untreated patients with low grade B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Methods: Eligibility required age ≥18, ECOG PS ≤2, confirmed diagnosis of low-grade B-cell lymphoma (FL1-2, SLL, MZL or LPL/WM), measurable nodes ≥2cm or IgM ≥400mg/dL(LPL/WM), ANC ≥1400/mm3, platelets ≥100,000/mm3, creatinine ≤2mg/dL, signed informed consent and in need of therapy. Treatment consisted of IV rituximab 375mg/m2 D1, oral LEN 20mg D1-21, CTX 250mg/m2 D1, 8, 15, DEX 40mg D1, 8, 15, 22 and ASA 325 mg daily in a 28 day cycle. Treatment continued 2 cycles beyond best response (max 12). Toxicity was assessed by NCI CTCAE v3.0. Results: 28 patients have enrolled at Mayo Clinic with 25 evaluable for toxicity and 21 for response: Median age 65(43-83), 72% male, FL 24%, MZL 28%, LPL/WM 38%, and SLL 4%. Median number of cycles given was 5. Overall response in 21 patients with response data is 95% (95% CI 76-100%) with 19% CR (95% CI 5-42%), and 76% PR (confirmed and unconfirmed, 95% CI 53-92%). The ORR in 8 patients with LPL/WM with response data was 88%, all PR (95% CI 47-100%). At a median f/u of 14.7 months 96% are alive without progression. 1 death (unrelated) occurred 7.7 months after completing 12 cycles of treatment. The most common grade ≥3 AEs were neutropenia (37.5%), leukopenia (16.7%), anemia (12.5%) and fatigue (12.5%). Conclusions: The combination LR-CD with the novel agent LEN is feasible, well tolerated and produces high response rates in symptomatic patients with low grade B-cell NHL. Toxicities are manageable and similar to reported data of single agent LEN.

scholarly journals RARE-04. TARGETED TREATMENT OF PAPILLARY CRANIOPHARYNGIOMAS HARBORING BRAFV600E MUTATIONS

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi222-vi222
Author(s):  
Tareq Juratli ◽  
Pamela Jones ◽  
Nancy Wang ◽  
Megha Subramanian ◽  
Simon Aylwin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Case Reports ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Targeted Treatment ◽  
Patient Treatment ◽  
Additional Patient ◽  
Optimal Timing ◽  
Duration Of Treatment ◽  
Tumor Biopsy ◽  
Mek Inhibitors ◽  
Systemic Treatments

Abstract Craniopharyngiomas are surgically challenging brain tumors. Postoperatively, quality of life is often significantly impaired due to neurological and endocrinological complications. Currently, FDA approved systemic treatments are not available for patients in whom craniopharyngiomas recur after surgery and radiation. Papillary craniopharyngiomas are characterized by the presence of BRAFV600E mutations. To date, five case reports have been published on the treatment of BRAFV600E mutant papillary craniopharyngiomas with BRAF and/or MEK inhibitors. In this presentation, authors from all five previously published reports share their collective experience and provide updated follow-up on their patients, thus generating an overview of all currently available information on targeted therapy in patients with BRAFV600E mutant papillary craniopharyngiomas. We have also included information on an additional patient with a papillary craniopharyngioma recently treated with BRAF and MEK inhibitors after tumor biopsy alone, in the absence of recurrence, highlighting the potential for a neo-adjuvant therapeutic approach. All six cases in our series showed dramatic responses to targeted treatment with BRAF (and MEK) inhibitors. Collectively, our cases are highly promising and informative for patient treatment, although uncertainty remains with regards to the optimal timing, the specific agents (single agent or dual therapy) to be used and the duration of treatment. The ongoing multicenter phase II Alliance A071601 trial (NCT03224767) of vemurafenib and cobimetinib for patients with biopsy-proven residual or recurrent papillary craniopharyngiomas should provide additional information to help guide patient management.

Irinotecan monotherapy as second-line treatment in advanced pancreatic cancer

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 15111-15111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Park ◽  
S. Yi ◽  
H. Kim ◽  
S. Lee ◽  
I. Hwang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Stable Disease ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Number Of Cycles

15111 Background: The aim of this phase II study was to determine whether second line therapy with single agent irinotecan could provide any clinical benefit in patients with gemcitabine- pretreated advanced pancreatic cancer. Methods: From January 2004 to October 2006, patients with advanced pancreatic cancer previously treated with gemcitabine alone or combination were treated with single agent irinotecan(150 mg/m2, biweekly), until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression. Primary endpoint was response rate with single stage design. Results: Twenty-eight patients were enrolled(22 male, 6 female, median age : 54.5 years (39–76)). Nine patients are still alive and 3 remain on therapy with stable disease. The median number of cycles was 3.5(1–12). Twenty-four patients were assessable for toxicity and 21 for response. The most common toxicities was diarrhea (grade 3, 12.5%). Grade 3 neutropenia in 1 patient was observed. Other hematological and non-hematological toxicities were mild and manageable. Partial responses were observed in 3 patients (3/21, 14%). An additional 9 patients (9/21, 43%) had stable disease as their best response. 12 patients have progressed with a median time-to-progression of 4.0 months. Conclusions: Single-agent irinotecan was tolerated with manageable toxicity, offering encouraging activity as second-line treatment of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer, refractory to gemcitabine. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Phase I trial of sunitinib (S) and temsirolimus (T) in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC).

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 433-433
Author(s):  
Matthew T. Campbell ◽  
Randall E. Millikan ◽  
Emre Altinmakas ◽  
Lianchun Xiao ◽  
Nizar M. Tannir
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Phase I Trial ◽  
Mtor Inhibitors ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Treatment Naïve ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Number Of Cycles ◽  
Mean Time

433 Background: Anti-VEGF agents and mTOR inhibitors are mainstay therapies in mRCC. Pre-clinical data suggests synergistic anti-tumor effect when combining these 2 classes. A previous phase I trial using sunitinib (S) 25 mg/d 4 wks on, 2 wks off, and temsirolimus (T) 15 mg/wk was stopped after 2 of the first 3 pts developed dose limiting toxicity (DLT). Methods: Pts with any subtype mRCC (PS 0-1) were eligible. Each cycle consisted of daily S for 14 days on, 7 days off, and weekly T. The continuous reassessment method (CRM) was used. The primary objective was to find the maximum tolerated doses (MTD) of S and T. The total planned accrual was 60 pts. Results: Accrual was stopped after 20 pts received study drugs. Median age was 63.5 years; 13 pts received prior targeted therapy, 7 pts were treatment naïve; median number of prior treatments 1 (range 0-6). Treatment cohorts (#pts, S, T, dose in mg): 2 (S12.5,T6), 1 (S25,T12.5), 1 (S12.5,T8), 8 (S12.5alt25,T9), 2 (S25,T6), 2 (S25alt37.5,T6), 2 (S37.5,T6), 2 (S37.5,T8). Dose reduction was required in 6 of 20 pts; the most common DLT was mucositis in 3 of 20 pts, followed by thrombocytopenia in 2 of 20 pts. The mean number of cycles for all pts was 6.6±5.36, with mean time on study 159±120 days. One pt experienced DLT in cycle 1 and received no study related imaging, 1 had a partial response, 16 pts had stable disease, and 2 pts had progressive disease (PD) as best response. A total of 21 grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) attributed to drug occurred in 11 of 20 pts. Reasons for study discontinuation were PD in 12 pts, toxicity in 6 pts, and pt preference in 2 pts. There were no treatment related deaths. Conclusions: The MTD of S and T using the CRM were not reached due to premature trial closure. However, we believe S 37.5 mg/d, 2 wks on, 1 wk off, and T 8-10 mg weekly may well be close to MTD. Clinical trial information: NCT01122615.

c-Met abnormatities in patients with genitourinary (GU) malignancies and outcomes with c-MET inhibitors.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 407-407
Author(s):  
Denis Leonardo Fontes Jardim ◽  
Debora De Melo Gagliato ◽  
Gerald Steven Falchook ◽  
Jennifer J. Wheler ◽  
Ralph Zinner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Cell Cancer ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Tyrosine Kinase Receptor ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Met Amplification ◽  
Genetic Abnormalities ◽  
Met Inhibitor ◽  
Metastatic Sites

407 Background: c-MET is a tyrosine kinase receptor involved in cancer growth, migration, development of metastasis and angiogenesis. Deregulation of this gene has been associated with poor prognosis and resistance to treatment in prostate, bladder and renal cell cancer (RCC). Methods: Patients with GU malignancies referred to the phase I clinic were evaluated for the presence of c-MET mutation and amplification. Their outcomes on protocols containing c-METinhibitors were also analyzed. Results: c-MET amplification was detected in 7 out of 97 (7.2%) patients (4/27 renal, 1/18 urothelial and 2/12 adrenocortical carcinoma), while c-MET mutation/variant in 3 out of 53 (5.7%) patients (2/20 renal and 1/15 prostate cancer). No demographic characteristics were associated with either c-MET abnormalities, but patients tested positive for either mutation or amplification had a higher number of metastatic sites (median number of sites of 4 versus 3 for wild type patients). Median overall survival from phase I consult was 4.4 and 10.6 months for patients with and without a c-MET alteration, respectively. Twenty-nine (25%) patients were treated under a protocol containing a c-MET inhibitor. Overall 6 (21%) patients had a partial response (all prostate and RCC) and 10 (34%) had stable disease as best response. Median time to tumor progression was 2.3 months (0.4-19.7) for all treated patients. No responses were detected in patients with a c-MET genetic abnormality or treated with a specific c-MET inhibitor as a single agent. Conclusions: c-MET mutation and amplification are present in different GU malignancies conferring a worse prognosis for patients referred to the phase I program. We observed activity of c-MET inhibitors for patients without c-MET genetic abnormalities and when c-MET inhibition was combined with other targets/drugs.

3-weekly daratumumab-IMiD-dexamethasone is highly efficacious and cost-effective in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e19521-e19521
Author(s):  
James Chim ◽  
Vincent Wong ◽  
Elaine AU ◽  
Yok-Lam Kwong
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Infusion Reaction ◽  
Immunomodulatory Agents ◽  
Asian Patients ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Rapid Responses ◽  
Grade 3

e19521 Background: Daratumumab (dara) with immunomodulatory agents (IMiD) and dexamethasone (dex) is highly effective in relapsed multiple myeloma (MM). The recommended schedule of dara is weekly for 8 doses, followed by 2-weekly for 8 doses, and then every 4-weekly thereafter. Given the high cost and the long half-life as an antibody, a 3-weekly dosing of dara was used together with IMiD/dexamethasone. Methods: Dara at 16mg/kg was used every 3-weekly with lenalidomide or pomalidomide. Patient achieving best response received single agent IMiD maintenance until disease progression. Results: Fourteen relapsed MM patients were enrolled. One had received weekly dara from a private oncologist, hence was excluded from analysis. Thirteen patients at a median age of 63 years (range: 50-84 years) were studied. The median number of previous therapies was 2 (range: 1-5), with nine patients (69.2%) having undergone autologous stem cell transplantation. Three patients (23.1%) were refractory to bortezomib, seven patients (53.8%) to lenalidomide, and eight patients (61.5%) to last treatment. At relapse, two (15.4%) had high LDH, eight (61.5%) impaired renal function, and three (23.1%) extramedullary disease. Treatment was dara-lenalidomide-dex in six (46.2%), and dara-pomalidomide-dex in seven (53.8%). Responses after four cycles included CR in 5 patients (38.5%), VGPR in five patients (38.5%), and PR in three patients (23.1%). After a median of four dara infusions (range: 3-10), the best responses included CR in seven patients (53.8%), nCR in two patients (15.4%), VGPR in two patients (15.4%), and PR in two patients (15.4%). Median time to VGPR was one month. At 10 months, the OS was 90%, and PFS 54.7%. Three patients progressed, one of whom died of ruptured hepatic plasmacytoma. The most frequent toxicity was haematological especially neutropenia (all grades: 92.3%, Grade ¾: 76.9%), infusion reaction (38.5%, all grade ½), neuropathy (38.5%, all grade ½), gastrointestinal (all grades: 38.5%, grade ¾: 7.7%), and sepsis (all grades: 30.8%; grade ¾: 23.1%). Neutropenia was effectively prevented with prophylactic G-CSF. Conclusions: In conclusion , a 3-weekly dara-IMiD-dex regimen is highly efficacious, inducing deep and rapid responses, hence cost-effective for less affluent countries. In view of prevalent grade 3/4 neutropenia despite less frequent dara, 3-weekly dara might be more suitable for Asian patients.

Safety and efficacy of retreatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in patients with metastatic RCC (mRCC) who have previously received an ICI.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 698-698
Author(s):  
Praful Ravi ◽  
Ziad Bakouny ◽  
Ronan Flippot ◽  
David A. Braun ◽  
Sarah Abou Alaiwi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Investigational Agent ◽  
Prior Therapy ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Metastatic Rcc

698 Background: Several ICIs are approved for use in first and subsequent lines of therapy in mRCC, either alone or in combination with another ICI or targeted therapy. There is limited data on whether patients who receive an ICI derive benefit from a subsequent line of ICI-based therapy. Methods: We reviewed mRCC patients at our institution who were treated with an ICI between 2009 and 2018 having previously received ICI-based therapy. The primary outcomes of interest were radiologic response and time to treatment failure (TTF) on ICI retreatment. Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) were graded using CTCAE v5.0. Results: A total of 31 patients were retreated with an ICI, either alone (n=15) or in combination with another ICI (n=8), tyrosine kinase inhibitor (n=2) or investigational agent (n=6); reasons for discontinuation of prior ICI were disease progression (n=23), toxicity (n=7) and study completion (n=1). Median age at the start of first-line therapy was 62 years and the majority of patients (n=30, 90%) had International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium intermediate- or poor-risk disease; median follow-up was 3.4 years (95% CI 2.5-4.6). The median number of lines of therapy received prior to ICI retreatment was 3 (range 1-7). Of 27 evaluable patients, 3 (11%) had a partial response (PR) to ICI retreatment (2 with ICI-ICI combination therapy and 1 with single-agent ICI), 13 (48%) had stable disease, and 11 (41%) had progressive disease (PD) as their best response; of the 3 with a PR, 2 had a PR and 1 had SD to prior ICI therapy. In comparison, 13 of 31 patients (42%) had a PR or better to first ICI-based therapy, with 4 (13%) having PD. Median TTF on ICI retreatment was 3.2 months (95% CI 1.8-5.2), compared to 8.2 months (3.3-10.0) on prior ICI. 19 patients experienced an irAE with ICI retreatment, with 8 (26%) suffering a grade 3 or higher irAE. Conclusions: Retreatment with ICIs after prior therapy with an ICI was relatively safe but demonstrated limited efficacy. Additional data, ideally from prospective studies, assessing outcomes of retreating patients with ICIs are needed to determine whether using different ICIs in sequence has a role in treatment of mRCC.

Subcutaneous alemtuzumab in patients with refractory/relapsed B-CLL after a fludarabine-based regimen

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6600-6600
Author(s):  
R. Bezares ◽  
G. Stemmelin ◽  
D. Argentieri ◽  
E. Lanari ◽  
E. Guy-Garay ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Interim Analysis ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Duration Of Treatment ◽  
Barr Virus ◽  
Epstein Barr ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Cmv Disease

6600 Background: Alemtuzumab is the only immunotherapy that is effective as a single agent in patients with B-CLL who are refractory to, or who have relapsed after, fludarabine therapy. The optimized schedule for alemtuzumab that achieves maximal efficacy with manageable toxicity is still being explored. We report the first interim analysis of a new, less intensive schedule of alemtuzumab SC to patients with refractory/relapsed B-CLL. Methods: Alemtuzumab was dose escalated from 10 to 20 mg during the first week, 30 mg bid during the second and third weeks, and 30 mg once weekly during weeks 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 34, and 40. Antiviral prophylaxis included TMP/SMX bid 3 times a week and acyclovir 200 mg tid. Results: Patients (N = 36) with refractory (19%) or relapsed (81%) B-CLL had a median age of 67 years (range, 43–86 years), 28 were male, 61%/39% had Binet stage B/C disease, and 2 had B-cell prolymphocytic transformation. The median number of prior therapies was 1 (range, 1–4). The median duration of treatment was 7 weeks (range, 2–24 weeks), with a median cumulative alemtuzumab dose of 412 mg (range, 150–1,080 mg). Thirty-two patients were evaluable for response. The overall response rate of 93%: complete response (CR), 34%; unconfirmed CR, 6%; partial response (PR), 53%. Two patients (7%) did not respond to therapy. Of the 7 refractory patients, 5 had a PR, 1 did not respond, and 1 was not yet evaluable. Median overall survival was 10 months, which correlated with response and pretreatment status. Minimal residual disease (MRD) was measured by flow cytometry in 5 patients who achieved a CR: 3 patients had <0.5% of CD5/CD19/CD23+ cells, 1 patient had <5% of CLL cells, and 1 patient had <10% CLL cells. According to WHO toxicity criteria, 5 patients experienced grade 3/4 infection; 2 patients had grade 3 granulocytopenia/thrombocytopenia; 1 patient had cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation without CMV disease; and 1 patient developed Epstein-Barr Virus with prolonged bone marrow hypoplasia. Conclusions: Results of this interim analysis suggest that a less intense regimen of alemtuzumab is feasible, effective, and safe for patients with refractory/relapse B-CLL after fludarabine therapy. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

A phase II study of gefitinib in patients with metastatic melanoma

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9057-9057
Author(s):  
S. Patel ◽  
A. Bedikian ◽  
K. Kim ◽  
N. Papadopoulos ◽  
P. Hwu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Metastatic Melanoma ◽  
Clinical Efficacy ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Choroidal Melanoma ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Blood Collection ◽  
Systemic Treatments

9057 Background: Gefitinib is an inhibitor of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), which is frequently expressed on both choroidal and non-choroidal melanoma cells. We evaluated the clinical efficacy of gefitinib in patients (pts) with metastatic melanoma. Methods: Pts with stage IV or unresectable or recurrent stage III melanoma and Zubrod performance status of 0 to 2 were eligible. For non-choroidal melanoma, pts must have received systemic cytotoxic therapy, but no more than 2 regimens; for choroidal melanoma, pts could be either chemo-naïve or have received up to 2 systemic cytotoxic therapies. The dose of oral gefitinib was 250 mg daily, and tumor response was evaluated every 6 weeks per RECIST. Ten patients with cutaneous disease were also consented for paired biopsies and blood collection for correlative studies at baseline and after 3 weeks of treatment. Results: Fifty-two pts (46 non-choroidal; 6 choroidal primay) were treated and evaluated for toxicity, and 50 pts were evaluable for response. Median age of pts was 62.5 years, with median Zubrod PS Score of 1. The median number of prior systemic treatments was 1. Forty-one pts (79%) had stage M1c disease. There were no drug-related grade 4 or 5 adverse events (AEs), and fatigue was the only grade 3 AEs in >5% of the patients. There were 2 (4%) partial responses, including a pt with metastatic choroidal melanoma, and 13 pts (26%) had disease stabilization. A median duration of response was 9.5 months among the responders. Median time to progression was 6 weeks, and median overall survival was 4.6 months. Among 7 pts with sufficient tissue on paired biopsies, there were no notable trends in the changes of the expression of pERK1/2, pAKT, or pPAK1 with treatment. Additionally, no trends were identified in serum VEGF or IL-8 levels after treatment. Conclusions: Gefitinib was well tolerated, but had minimal clinical efficacy as a single-agent therapy for metastatic melanoma of cutaneous origin. There were no consistent changes in the expressions of downstream kinase proteins with gefitinib treatment. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document