Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in patients (pts) with advanced gastric cancer/gastroesophageal junction cancer (GC/GEJC) or esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC): Results of nivolumab plus chemotherapy (NIVO+chemo) versus chemo from CheckMate 649.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (28_suppl) ◽  
pp. 167-167
Author(s):  
Elena Elimova ◽  
Lucjan Wyrwicz ◽  
Steven I. Blum ◽  
Hong Xiao ◽  
Mingshun Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Primary Analysis ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Cox Models ◽  
Study Objective ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Mean Differences

167 Background: CheckMate 649 (NCT02872116) is a randomized, open label phase 3 study in first line (1L) treatment of pts with advanced GC/GEJC/EAC. Primary analysis results showed statistically significant improvement in overall survival (OS) for NIVO+chemo vs. chemo in all randomized pts. We present HRQOL results for these pts, included as an exploratory study objective. Methods: HRQOL was assessed using EQ-5D-3L (EQ-5D) and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Gastric Cancer (FACT-Ga). Assessments were performed at baseline (BL), every 6 weeks during treatment and during follow-up. Change from BL EQ-5D Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Utility Index (UI) and FACT-Ga scores were analyzed using mixed models. Time to first symptom deterioration (TTSD), time until definitive deterioration (TuDD), and time to improvement (TTI) were estimated with Kaplan-Meier estimators and stratified Cox models; deterioration/improvement was based on prespecified meaningful change thresholds. Results: 1581 pts were randomized to NIVO+chemo (n = 789) or chemo (n = 792). Among 1359 pts with BL and post-BL patient-reported outcomes (NIVO+chemo, n = 693; chemo, n = 666), BL scores for FACT-Ga total were similar between treatment groups. Least squares mean differences from BL favored NIVO+chemo at most visits for EQ-5D, FACT-Ga total, and Gastric Cancer Subscale (GaCS), and were comparable for other subscales (not shown). TTI generally favored NIVO+chemo (most HR > 1) but was not significantly different between arms. TTSD was longer in NIVO+chemo arm compared with chemo alone (all HRs < 1), except for Emotional Well-Being (WB); only GaCS and FACT-Ga total were significantly different between arms. TuDD showed statistically significant delays in deterioration (HR with CI < 1) for all scores expect Social WB. Conclusions: Compared with chemo alone, the addition of NIVO to chemo maintained HRQoL with a decreased risk of symptom deterioration in patients with previously untreated advanced or metastatic GC/GEJC/EAC. Together with improved OS, these data support NIVO+chemo as a new 1L standard treatment for GC/GEJC/EAC. Clinical trial information: NCT02872116. [Table: see text]

Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in patients (pts) with advanced gastric cancer/gastroesophageal junction cancer (GC/GEJC) or esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC): Interim results of nivolumab plus chemotherapy (N+C) versus (C) from CheckMate 649.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4066-4066
Author(s):  
Lucjan Wyrwicz ◽  
Elena Elimova ◽  
Steven I. Blum ◽  
Hong Xiao ◽  
Eric Davenport ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Cox Models ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer ◽  
Utility Index ◽  
Open Label Phase ◽  
Related Quality ◽  
Mean Differences

4066 Background: CheckMate 649 (NCT02872116) is a randomized, open label phase 3 study in first line (1L) GC/GEJC/EAC. Prespecified interim results showed statistically significant improvement in overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) for N+C vs C in all randomized pts and pts whose tumors expressed programmed death-ligand 1 combined positive score (CPS) ≥ 5. We present interim HRQOL results for CPS ≥ 5 pts, included as exploratory in the study. Methods: HRQOL was assessed using EQ-5D-3L (EQ-5D) and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Gastric Cancer (FACT-Ga). Assessments were performed at baseline (BL), every 6 weeks during treatment, and during follow-up. Change from BL EQ-5D Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Utility Index (UI) and FACT-Ga scores were analyzed using mixed models. Time to first symptom deterioration (TTSD), time until definitive deterioration (TuDD), and time to improvement (TTI) were estimated with Kaplan-Meier estimators and stratified Cox models; deterioration/improvement was based on prespecified meaningful change thresholds. Results: 1,581 pts were randomized to N+C (n = 789) and C (n = 792); of those, 955 pts had CPS ≥ 5 (N+C [n = 473] and C [n = 482]). Among 821 pts with BL and post BL PROs (N+C [n = 421] and C [n = 400]), BL scores for FACT-Ga total were similar for N+C and C. Least-squares mean differences from BL favored N+C at most visits for EQ-5D and FACT-Ga total and GaCS, and were comparable for other FACT subscales (data not shown). TTI largely favored N+C (most hazard ratios (HR) > 1) but was not significantly different between treatments. For TTSD, pts treated with N+C had decreased risk of deterioration (HR < 1) in EQ-5D UI, FACT-Ga total, and GaCS. TuDD showed statistically significant delays in deterioration (HR with confidence intervals [CI] < 1) for all scores. Conclusions: Pts with 1L GC/GEJC/EAC experienced better HRQOL with N+C compared with C alone. Change from BL in EQ-5D and FACT-Ga total and GaCS favored N+C at most visits. N+C decreased deterioration risk compared to C with OS and PFS improvement, suggesting favorable benefits in 1L GC/GEJC/EAC pts with CPS ≥ 5. Clinical trial information: NCT02872116. [Table: see text]

Symptomatic Treatment With Lanreotide Microparticles in Inoperable Bowel Obstruction Resulting From Peritoneal Carcinomatosis: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase III Study

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (35) ◽  
pp. 4337-4343 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pascale Mariani ◽  
Joëlle Blumberg ◽  
Alain Landau ◽  
Daniela Lebrun-Jezekova ◽  
Estelle Botton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Peritoneal Carcinomatosis ◽  
Bowel Obstruction ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Symptomatic Treatment ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Primary Analysis ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Parallel Group ◽  
Intent To Treat

Purpose To investigate the somatostatin analog lanreotide as symptomatic treatment for inoperable bowel obstruction due to peritoneal carcinomatosis. Patients and Methods In all, 80 patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis, inoperable malignant digestive obstruction, and two or more vomiting episodes per day or nasogastric tube (NGT) who were previously treated with intravenous corticosteroids and proton pump inhibitors were randomly assigned to one 30-mg injection of lanreotide microparticles (n = 43) or placebo (n = 37) in a 10-day, double-blind, parallel-group phase. The primary end point was the proportion of patients responding on day 7 (one or fewer episodes of vomiting per day or no vomiting recurrence after NGT removal [for ≥ 3 consecutive days in both cases]). Vomiting frequency/NGT secretion volumes, nausea, abdominal pain, well-being, and safety were also assessed. Patients could then enter an open-label lanreotide-only phase. The study was conducted at 22 European hospitals. Results More patients receiving lanreotide than placebo were responders; this difference was not statistically significant for the intent-to-treat (ITT) population on the basis of diary cards (primary analysis; 41.9% [18 of 43] v 29.7% [11 of 37], respectively; odds ratio, 1.75; 95% CI, 0.68 to 4.49; P = .24) but was statistically significant for the corresponding supportive per protocol analysis (57.7% [15 of 26] v 30.4% [seven of 23]; P < .05) and ITT analysis, on the basis of investigators' assessments (50.0% [19 of 38] v 28.6% [10 of 35]; P < .05). Improvements in well-being were significantly greater with lanreotide on days 3, 6, and 7. No significant differences were observed for other secondary end points. Only two (mild/moderate) treatment-emergent adverse events were considered related to lanreotide. Conclusion These results show that lanreotide has some efficacy and is safe in the symptomatic treatment of patients with inoperable bowel obstruction due to peritoneal carcinomatosis.

scholarly journals Perceived functioning, well-being and psychiatric symptoms in patients with stable schizophrenia treated with long-acting risperidone for 1 year

2005 ◽  
Vol 187 (2) ◽  
pp. 131-136 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Wolfgang Fleischhacker ◽  
Jonathan Rabinowitz ◽  
Georg Kemmler ◽  
Mariëlle Eerdekens ◽  
Angelika Mehnert
Keyword(s):  
Mental Component Summary ◽  
Psychiatric Symptoms ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Mental Component Summary Score ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Psychotic Symptoms ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Sf 36 ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Long Acting

BackgroundThe extent to which antipsychotics improve patients' well-being is uncertain.AimsTo examine psychopathology and patient-rated functioning and well-being in patients treated with risperidone.MethodIn a 1-year, open-label, international multicentre trial of long-acting risperidone in 615 stable adult patients with schizophrenia, self-rated functioning and well-being were measured every 3 months using the Short Form 36-item questionnaire (SF–36). Psychopathology was quantified using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS).ResultsSignificant improvements were found on the SF–36 mental component summary score and vitality and social functioning scales. PANSS and mental component summary scores were moderately correlated.ConclusionsPatient-reported functioning and well-being appear to differ from investigator-rated psychotic symptoms. Patient-rated well-being should be assessed with symptoms to help measure treatment outcomes.

A phase Ib/II, multicenter, open-label, dose-escalation, and dose-expansion study evaluating trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd, DS-8201) monotherapy and combinations in patients with HER2-overexpressing gastric cancer (DESTINY-Gastric03).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS261-TPS261
Author(s):  
Yelena Y. Janjigian ◽  
Natasha Viglianti ◽  
Feng Liu ◽  
Ariadna Mendoza-Naranjo ◽  
Liz Croydon
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Topoisomerase I ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Metastatic Gastric Cancer ◽  
Her2 Status ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase 1B

TPS261 Background: For patients (pts) with HER2-overexpressing metastatic gastric cancer, trastuzumab + chemotherapy is a standard first-line option but provides only a modest overall survival (OS) benefit vs chemotherapy. T-DXd is an antibody-drug conjugate consisting of an anti-HER2 antibody, cleavable tetrapeptide-based linker, and a membrane-permeable topoisomerase I inhibitor payload. Results from a phase 1 trial showed promising antitumor activity (confirmed objective response rate [ORR], 43.2%) in pts with heavily pretreated HER2+ metastatic gastric cancer who received T-DXd (5.4 or 6.4 mg/kg; Shitara K, et al. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20:827-836). Here we describe the phase 1b/2 DESTINY-Gastric03 trial (NCT04379596) evaluating T-DXd monotherapy and combinations in pts with HER2-overexpressing gastric cancer. Methods: This is an open-label, multicenter, 2-part, phase 1b/2 study in pts with HER2-overexpressing (immunohistochemistry [IHC] 3+ or IHC 2+/in situ hybridization positive) locally advanced, unresectable or metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer. In part 1 (dose escalation), pts who had received prior trastuzumab-containing therapy will be assigned to 1 of 5 arms: (1) T-DXd + 5-fluorouracil (5-FU); (2) T-DXd + capecitabine (C); (3) T-DXd + durvalumab; (4) T-DXd + 5-FU or C + oxaliplatin (Ox); or (5) T-DXd + 5-FU or C + durvalumab. In part 2 (dose expansion), pts with no prior treatment for metastatic disease will be randomized across 4 arms: (1) T-DXd; (2) trastuzumab + 5-FU or C + Ox or cisplatin; (3) T-DXd + 5-FU or C ± Ox; or (4) T-DXd + 5-FU or C + durvalumab. In part 2, pts will be stratified by HER2 status. Primary endpoints are safety, determination of recommended phase 2 doses (part 1), and investigator-assessed confirmed ORR per RECIST v1.1 (part 2). Secondary endpoints include confirmed ORR (part 1), disease control rate, duration of response, progression-free survival (all per investigator), OS, safety (part 2), pharmacokinetics, and immunogenicity. Clinical trial information: NCT04379596.

scholarly journals Correction to: Developing real-world comparators for clinical trials in chemotherapy-refractory patients with gastric cancer or gastroesophageal junction cancer

2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 142-142
Author(s):  
Ian Chau ◽  
Dung T. Le ◽  
Patrick A. Ott ◽  
Beata Korytowsky ◽  
Hannah Le ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Real World ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer

ping real-world comparators for

Significance of accurate HER2 testing as a new biomarker in advanced gastric cancer.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 106-106
Author(s):  
Tetsuya Kusumoto ◽  
Hajime Ohtsu ◽  
Hiroyuki Kawano ◽  
Koji Ando ◽  
Satoshi Ida ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Tumor Biology ◽  
Japanese Patients ◽  
Her2 Expression ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Her2 Testing ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer ◽  
Her2 Heterogeneity

106 Background: The Trastuzumab for Gastric Cancer (ToGA) study is the first international trial to include Japanese patients with human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2)-positive advanced or recurrent gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer, which demonstrated that trastuzumab plus chemotherapy improved overall survival in the overall population (hazard ratio 0.74). HER2 testing in gastric cancer differs from testing in breast cancer due to inherent differences in tumor biology; gastric cancer more frequently shows HER2 heterogeneity and incomplete membrane staining. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the frequency of HER2-positive cases by application of the standard criteria in Japanese patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC) and to investigate the relationships between HER2 expression and therapeutic responses. Methods: A total of 199 tumor samples were assessed for HER2 expression both by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and HER2 amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). HER2-positive status was defined as IHC2+ and FISH-positive or IHC3+. Objective responses were evaluated in the patients with AGC who were treated with chemotherapy plus trastuzumab or chemotherapy alone based on the HER2 expression status. Results: HER2-positive tumors were identified in 12 patients (5.5%), less than 28.1% in the Japanese subgroup analyses of ToGA study. The positive rates varied with histological type; 14%, 5.3% and 0.95% in the well, moderately and poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma, respectively. Although high concordance between the results of IHC and FISH in all samples was found, IHC2+ samples retested here showed FISH-negative. Of all 10 patients with AGC, 3 patients with HER2-positive tumor were treated with capecitabine/cisplatin plus trastuzumab, and partial response was found in 2 cases; response rates were 67%. Conclusions: Specific consideration and scoring modification are required before embarking on HER2 testing in gastric cancer. Accurate and reliable HER2 testing and scoring will allow appropriate selection of patients eligible for treatment with trastuzumab.

Preclinical activity of MM-111, a bispecific ErbB2/ErbB3 antibody in previously treated ErbB2-positive gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 48-48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johanna Lahdenranta ◽  
Violette Paragas ◽  
Arthur J. Kudla ◽  
Ryan Overland ◽  
Victor M. Moyo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Resistance Mechanism ◽  
Predictive Biomarkers ◽  
Her2 Overexpression ◽  
Multiple Time ◽  
Gastric Cancers ◽  
Treatment Regimens ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer ◽  
Erbb3 Signaling

48 Background: ErbB2 (HER2) overexpression has been reported in 7-34% of gastric cancers. ErbB3 (HER3) is the preferred dimerization partner of ErbB2, and ErbB2/ErbB3 heterodimer activation is implicated in the progression and metastasis of ErbB2+ tumors. Activation of ErbB3 signaling is a postulated resistance mechanism to current ErbB2-directed therapies and select chemotherapies. In line with this research, ErbB3 levels are associated with poor prognosis in gastric cancers. MM-111 is a bi-specific antibody that docks to ErbB2 and inhibits ErbB3 signaling in cells that overexpress ErbB2. In this study, MM-111 was evaluated in ErbB2+ gastric cancer by testing the activity of MM-111 in ErbB2+ pre-clinical models of gastric cancer, and by assessing the prevalence of potentially predictive biomarkers in a panel of archived gastric and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) tumors. Methods: MM-111 was tested in ErbB2+ gastric cancer xenografts that were either untreated or after tumors ceased to respond to trastuzumab/5-FU. Xenografts were analyzed at multiple time points for the expression of ErbB-receptor family members and their downstream signaling by Luminex -assays. Preclinical data indicate that ErbB2, ErbB3, and heregulin are predictive biomarkers for MM-111. In order to determine the prevalence of our potentially predictive biomarkers in gastric and GEJ cancers, we obtained commercially archived tumor tissue and assayed the tissue for ErbB2 and ErbB3 expression levels using quantitative IHC, and measured heregulin transcript levels by RT-PCR. Results: MM-111 synergizes with various treatment regimens in the 2nd line treatment setting in ErbB2+ gastric cancer xenografts. In our models, the combination of MM-111, trastuzumab, and paclitaxel is particularly effective after tumors progressed on trastuzumab/5-FU. MM-111 inhibits the activity of the ErbB –signaling axis in these models. In addition, 23% of GEJ tumor samples and 20% of gastric samples were positive for potentially predictive biomarkers. Conclusions: ErbB2+xenograft tumors that stop responding to trastuzumab-based therapies benefit from MM-111–based regimens.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document