Efficacy of AI and palbociclib in ER+ HER2- advanced breast cancer patients relapsing during adjuvant tamoxifen: An exploratory analysis of the PADA-1 trial.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1070-1070
Author(s):  
François-Clément Bidard ◽  
Florence Dalenc ◽  
Thibault De La Motte Rouge ◽  
Barbara Pistilli ◽  
Caroline Cheneau ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endocrine Therapy ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy ◽  
Advanced Breast ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Adjuvant Tamoxifen ◽  
First Line ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Metastatic Relapse

1070 Background: In PADA-1 (NCT03079011), a phase III trial testing the clinical utility of ESR1mut detection, ER+ HER2- advanced breast patients (ABC pts) received Aromatase Inhibitor (AI) and Palbociclib (Pal) +/- LHRH agonist as first line therapy. PADA-1 was open to “AI-sensitive” pts, including those with de novo stage IV disease or metastatic relapse after adjuvant endocrine therapy but also pts with metastatic relapses during adjuvant tamoxifen (TAM). In this subsidiary analysis, we report the efficacy of AI+PAL as first line therapy in patients relapsing on adjuvant TAM. Methods: Main inclusion criteria in PADA-1 are: pre- or post-menopausal pts with ER+ HER2- ABC, who did not receive any prior therapy for ABC and who had no adjuvant AI or completed adjuvant AI for > 12 months or who had disease recurrence while on adjuvant TAM. Results: From 04/2017 to 01/2019, 1017 ABC pts have been included in PADA-1, of which 115 (11.3%) had a metastatic relapse while on adjuvant TAM (TAM only (N = 112) or TAM+GnRH agonist (N = 3)). Median age at inclusion was 46 years (range 25-81), and 58 (50.4%) patients had visceral disease. The median PFS under AI+PAL was 20.4 months (95%CI16.1;27.8) in patients relapsing during adjuvant TAM. In contrast, median PFS in patients with de novo metastatic disease and metastatic relapses after the completion of adjuvant endocrine therapy were 30.6 months (95%CI26.7;Not reached) and 27.8 months (95%CI24.1;30.)], respectively. A subgroup analysis among patients relapsing on adjuvant TAM showed that those relapsing during the first two years of adjuvant TAM had a shorter PFS (11.4 months 95%CI[8.7;20.7]) than those relapsing after 2 years of adjuvant TAM (23.8 months 95%CI[20.2;Not reached]). Conclusions: To our knowledge, these are the first data on first line AI+CDK4/6 inhibitor in patients relapsing on adjuvant TAM. While PFS on AI + PAL appears primarily driven by endocrine resistance status, our data show that AI+PAL is a valuable option also in patients relapsing during adjuvant TAM. Clinical trial information: NCT03079011 .

Phase III Study of Letrozole Versus Tamoxifen as First-Line Therapy of Advanced Breast Cancer in Postmenopausal Women: Analysis of Survival and Update of Efficacy From the International Letrozole Breast Cancer Group

2003 ◽  
Vol 21 (11) ◽  
pp. 2101-2109 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henning Mouridsen ◽  
Mikhail Gershanovich ◽  
Yan Sun ◽  
Ramón Pérez-Carrión ◽  
Corrado Boni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Advanced Breast Cancer ◽  
Postmenopausal Women ◽  
Endocrine Therapy ◽  
Advanced Breast ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Score ◽  
First Line ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy

Purpose: To analyze overall survival (OS) and update efficacy data for letrozole versus tamoxifen as first-line therapy in postmenopausal women with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer. Patients and Methods: This multicenter phase III trial randomly assigned 916 patients with hormone receptor–positive or unknown tumors letrozole 2.5 mg (n = 458) or tamoxifen 20 mg (n = 458) daily until disease progression. Optional cross-over was permitted at the treating physician’s discretion. This report updates efficacy at a median follow-up of 32 months. Results: The superiority of letrozole to tamoxifen was confirmed for time to progression (median, 9.4 v 6.0 months, respectively; P < .0001), time to treatment failure (median, 9 v 5.7 months, respectively; P < .0001), overall objective response rate (32% v 21%, respectively; P = .0002), and overall clinical benefit. Median OS was slightly prolonged for the randomized letrozole arm (34 v 30 months, respectively). Although this difference in OS is not significant, survival was improved in the randomized letrozole arm over the first 2 years of the study. Approximately one half of the patients in each arm crossed over. Total duration of endocrine therapy (“time to chemotherapy”) was significantly longer (P = .005) for patients initially on letrozole (median, 16 months) than for patients initially on tamoxifen (median, 9 months). Time to worsening of Karnofsky performance score was significantly delayed with letrozole compared with tamoxifen (P = .001). Conclusion: This study documents the superiority of letrozole over tamoxifen in first-line endocrine therapy in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer.

BOLERO-2: Efficacy and safety of first-line everolimus plus exemestane in advanced breast cancer.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (26_suppl) ◽  
pp. 152-152 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hope S. Rugo ◽  
Mario Campone ◽  
Michael Gnant ◽  
Patrick Neven ◽  
Barbara Pistilli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Therapy ◽  
Advanced Breast Cancer ◽  
Endocrine Therapy ◽  
Disease Recurrence ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Advanced Breast ◽  
First Line ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy

152 Background: In the BOLERO-2 study, progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly longer with the combination of everolimus and exemestane (EVE + EXE) compared with placebo and exemestane (PBO + EXE; hazard ratio = 0.45; p < .0001). Consistent efficacy results were observed in all subgroup analyses, such as in patients with visceral metastases and patients with disease recurrence during/after adjuvant therapy. This analysis of BOLERO-2 examines the efficacy of EVE + EXE in the subgroup of patients who received treatment immediately after recurrence during adjuvant therapy (i.e., as first-line therapy in the advanced setting). Methods: BOLERO-2 enrolled patients with hormone receptor–positive (HR+) advanced breast cancer with disease recurrence or progression after prior nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitors and compared EVE (10 mg/d) + EXE (25 mg/d) vs PBO + EXE. The primary end point was PFS by local investigator review. Results: A total of 137 patients received first-line EVE + EXE (n = 100) or PBO + EXE (n = 37) in the advanced setting. Of these patients, 74% of the EVE + EXE arm and 76% of the PBO + EXE arm had recurred after adjuvant endocrine therapy plus chemotherapy; 26% and 24%, respectively, had recurred after adjuvant endocrine therapy alone. Also, approximately 20% of patients entered the trial after recurring during or within 12 months of adjuvant therapy (21% EVE + EXE vs 16% PBO + EXE). The EVE + EXE group had significantly longer PFS compared with the PBO + EXE group (11.50 vs 4.07 months, respectively; hazard ratio = 0.39; 95% confidence interval, 0.25-0.62). Median PFS remained longer with EVE + EXE versus PBO + EXE, regardless of whether chemotherapy was included with the prior adjuvant hormonal therapy. Similar results were obtained from the analyses based on central review. The safety profile was consistent with the known profiles of each agent. Conclusions: EVE + EXE prolonged PFS in patients with HR+ advanced breast cancer who received treatment as first-line therapy. These results support the combination of EVE + EXE in patients with recurrence after adjuvant therapy. The recently initiated BOLERO-4 study is also evaluating the efficacy of EVE as a first-line therapy in patients with HR+ advanced breast cancer. Clinical trial information: NCT00863655.

scholarly journals Randomized Phase III Placebo-Controlled Trial of Letrozole Plus Oral Temsirolimus As First-Line Endocrine Therapy in Postmenopausal Women With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 195-202 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio C. Wolff ◽  
Ann A. Lazar ◽  
Igor Bondarenko ◽  
August M. Garin ◽  
Stephen Brincat ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Advanced Breast Cancer ◽  
Endocrine Therapy ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Exploratory Analysis ◽  
Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy ◽  
Advanced Breast ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
First Line

Purpose Recent data showed improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) when adding everolimus to exemestane in patients with advanced breast cancer experiencing recurrence/progression after nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor (AI) therapy. Here, we report clinical outcomes of combining the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor temsirolimus with letrozole in AI-naive patients. Patients and Methods This phase III randomized placebo-controlled study tested efficacy/safety of first-line oral letrozole 2.5 mg daily/temsirolimus 30 mg daily (5 days every 2 weeks) versus letrozole/placebo in 1,112 patients with AI-naive, hormone receptor–positive advanced disease. An independent data monitoring committee recommended study termination for futility at the second preplanned interim analysis (382 PFS events). Results Patients were balanced (median age, 63 years; 10% stage III, 40% had received adjuvant endocrine therapy). Those on letrozole/temsirolimus experienced more grade 3 to 4 events (37% v 24%). There was no overall improvement in primary end point PFS (median, 9 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.90; 95% CI, 0.76 to 1.07; P = .25) nor in the 40% patient subset with prior adjuvant endocrine therapy. An exploratory analysis showed improved PFS favoring letrozole/temsirolimus in patients ≤ age 65 years (9.0 v 5.6 months; HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.60 to 0.93; P = .009), which was separately examined by an exploratory analysis of 5-month PFS using subpopulation treatment effect pattern plot methodology (P = .003). Conclusion Adding temsirolimus to letrozole did not improve PFS as first-line therapy in patients with AI-naive advanced breast cancer. Exploratory analyses of benefit in younger postmenopausal patients require external confirmation.

Epirubicin or epirubicin and cisplatin as first-line therapy in advanced breast cancer. A phase III study

2000 ◽  
Vol 46 (6) ◽  
pp. 459-466 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dorte Nielsen ◽  
Per Dombernowsky ◽  
Susanne Kornum Larsen ◽  
Ole Paaske Hansen ◽  
Torben Skovsgaard
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Advanced Breast Cancer ◽  
Advanced Breast ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
First Line ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Phase Iii Study

Survival of Patients With Advanced Colorectal Cancer Improves With the Availability of Fluorouracil-Leucovorin, Irinotecan, and Oxaliplatin in the Course of Treatment

2004 ◽  
Vol 22 (7) ◽  
pp. 1209-1214 ◽  
Author(s):  
Axel Grothey ◽  
Daniel Sargent ◽  
Richard M. Goldberg ◽  
Hans-Joachim Schmoll
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Advanced Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Cytotoxic Agents ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Second Line Therapy ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Phase Iii Trials

Purpose Fluorouracil (FU)-leucovorin (LV), irinotecan, and oxaliplatin administered alone or in combination have proven effective in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer (CRC). Combination protocols using FU-LV with either irinotecan or oxaliplatin are currently regarded as standard first-line therapies in this disease. However, the importance of the availability of all three active cytotoxic agents, FU-LV, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin, on overall survival (OS) has not yet been evaluated. Materials and Methods We analyzed data from seven recently published phase III trials in advanced CRC to correlate the percentage of patients receiving second-line therapy and the percentage of patients receiving all three agents with the reported median OS, using a weighted analysis. Results The reported median OS is significantly correlated with the percentage of patients who received all three drugs in the course of their disease (P = .0008) but not with the percentage of patients who received any second-line therapy (P = .19). In addition, the use of combination protocols as first-line therapy was associated with a significant improvement in median survival of 3.5 months (95% CI, 1.27 to 5.73 months; P = .0083). Conclusion Our results support the strategy of making these three active drugs available to all patients with advanced CRC who are candidates for such therapy to maximize OS. In addition, our findings suggest that, with the availability of effective salvage options, OS should no longer be regarded as the most appropriate end point by which to assess the efficacy of a palliative first-line treatment in CRC.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document