Preliminary efficacy from an ongoing phase 1 dose escalation study of seclidemstat (SP-2577) in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors (AST).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3073-3073
Author(s):  
Sant P. Chawla ◽  
Victoria S. Chua-Alcala ◽  
Jasgit C. Sachdev ◽  
David S. Wages ◽  
David D. Stenehjem ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Dose Escalation Study ◽  
Phase 1 Trial ◽  
Ongoing Phase

3073 Background: Lysine-specific demethylase 1 (LSD1) is an epigenetic enzyme that is aberrantly expressed in many solid tumors. High levels of LSD1 expression are often correlated with poor patient prognosis due to LSD1’s role in cancer cell proliferation, metastasis, and chemoresistance. Seclidemstat is a novel, selective, reversible and oral LSD1 inhibitor capable of inhibiting both LSD1’s catalytic and scaffolding functions. We report preliminary efficacy in AST from an ongoing phase 1 trial. Methods: SALA-003-AC19 (NCT03895684) is a phase 1 trial of single agent SP-2577 in pts with AST. All pts had progressive disease (PD) at time of study entry. Pts received oral SP-2577 twice a day under fasting condition, in 28-day cycles (C). The primary objective is safety and tolerability. Secondary objectives are to determine maximum-tolerated dose, preliminary efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics. Results: As of December 30, 2020, 19 pts with AST (10 sarcoma, 2 prostate, 2 ovarian, 2 pancreatic, 1 renal, 1 cervical, 1 breast) were enrolled. Pts received escalating doses of SP-2577 from 150 to 600 mg BID and the dose escalation is ongoing. The median age was 63 years (range, 21–79). 42% were male, and pts had received a median of 4 (range, 1–8) prior systemic therapies. The most common (>5%) grade 3 treatment-related adverse events were GI related including diarrhea (5.3%) and abdominal pain (5.3%). No grade 4 events were reported and there were no treatment-related deaths. Safety data will be presented after completion of phase 1. Three pts had at least one dose reduction. Among the 13 pts who were evaluable for response at end of C2, 7 pts (54%) had best response of stable disease (SD) with median time to progression (TTP) of 4.3 months (range, 2.1–11.5). Four of the 7 pts had genetic abnormalities that may demonstrate increased sensitization to SP-2577 according to preclinical studies. Characteristics of 7 pts with SD at C2 and beyond are shown in the table. Conclusions: Seclidemstat has shown activity among advanced sarcoma pts with a manageable safety profile. The dose escalation is ongoing and preliminary clinical data supports further exploration in FET-translocated sarcoma as single agent and in combination therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT03895684. [Table: see text]

A phase I, first-in-human, open-label, dose-escalation, safety, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic study of oral TP-1287 administered daily to patients with advanced solid tumors.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3611-3611
Author(s):  
Ben George ◽  
Donald A. Richards ◽  
William Jeffery Edenfield ◽  
Steven L Warner ◽  
Lars Mouritsen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Dose Escalation Study ◽  
Grade 3

3611 Background: TP-1287 is a an orally bioavailable phosphate prodrug of alvocidib, a cyclin dependent kinase 9 (CDK9) inhibitor. TP-1287 exhibits potent inhibition of intracellular kinases including CDK9. Inhibition of CDK9 leads to downregulation of the BCL-2 family member, MCL-1, which in turn inhibits tumor growth in preclinical animal models of prostate, breast, and lung carcinomas. Methods: This is a multicenter, Phase 1, dose escalation study using a standard 3+3 design with a modified Fibonacci scheme to examine the safety and clinical activity of TP-1287 in patients with advanced solid tumors. Patients will be added at the maximum tolerated dose (i.e. expansion cohort) to test TP-1287 as a single agent in patients with castrate resistant prostate cancer. Results: Twenty-two patients who were enrolled between December 2018 and January 2020 received a range of doses from 1 mg QD to 11 mg BID over 7 cohorts. Data are available for 20 patients as of the data cutoff date. TP-1287 plasma PK Cmax and AUC increased in near linear fashion over cohorts 1 thru 6, reaching 80 ng/mL and 499.3 ng*h/mL in cohort 6 for Cmax and AUC, respectively. TP-1287 treatment resulted in dose-dependent reductions of phospho-RNA Pol II, consistent with CDK9 inhibition, as measured by a flow cytometric assay assessing pharmacodynamic changes in phosphorylation state in PBMCs. The most frequently observed Grade 3 AE was unrelated anemia in 2 patients. All other events of Grade 3 (9 events/7 patients) and Grade 4 (1 event/seizure with new CNS mets) were unlikely related or unrelated. Clinical benefit was seen in one sarcoma patient with PR (15+cycles), one RCC patient with SD (7+cycles) and 2 bladder cancer patients with SD (6 and 8 cycles). Conclusions: These findings suggest that TP-1287 is tolerated as a monotherapy in patients with heavily pretreated, relapsed, refractory solid tumors and further clinical development in selected indications is warranted. Clinical trial information: NCT03298984 .

scholarly journals A first-in-human, phase 1 study of the NEDD8 activating enzyme E1 inhibitor TAS4464 in patients with advanced solid tumors

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noboru Yamamoto ◽  
Toshio Shimizu ◽  
Kan Yonemori ◽  
Shigehisa Kitano ◽  
Shunsuke Kondo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Liver Function ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Enzyme Inhibitor ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase 1 Study ◽  
Open Label Phase

SummaryBackground This open-label, phase 1 study investigated TAS4464, a potent NEDD8-activating enzyme inhibitor, in patients with advanced/metastatic solid tumors (JapicCTI-173,488; registered 13/01/2017). The primary objective was dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). Maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) was investigated using an accelerated titration design. Methods The starting 10-mg/m2 dose was followed by an initial accelerated stage (weekly dosing; n = 11). Based on liver function test (LFT) results, a 14-day, 20-mg/m2 dose lead-in period was implemented (weekly dosing with lead-in; n = 6). Results Abnormal LFT changes and gastrointestinal effects were the most common treatment-related adverse events (AEs). DLTs with 56-mg/m2 weekly dosing occurred in 1/5 patients; five patients had grade ≥ 2 abnormal LFT changes at 40- and 56-mg/m2 weekly doses. Further dose escalation ceased because of the possibility of severe abnormal LFT changes occurring. DLTs with weekly dosing with lead-in occurred in 1/5 patients at a 56-mg/m2 dose; MTD could not be determined because discontinuation criteria for additional enrollment at that particular dose level were met. As no further enrollment at lower doses occurred, dose escalation assessment was discontinued. Serious treatment-related AEs, AEs leading to treatment discontinuation, and DLTs were all related to abnormal LFT changes, suggesting that TAS4464 administration could affect liver function. This effect was dose-dependent but considered reversible. Complete or partial responses to TAS4464 were not observed; one patient achieved prolonged stable disease. Conclusions MTD could not be determined due to TAS4464 effects on liver function. Further evaluation of the mechanism of NEDD8-activating enzyme inhibitor-induced abnormal liver function is required. Trial registration number JapicCTI-173,488 (registered with Japan Pharmaceutical Information Center). Registration date 13 January 2017

Tolerability of split-dose oprozomib (ONX 0912) in patients with advanced refractory or recurrent solid tumors.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e13077-e13077
Author(s):  
Kyriakos P. Papadopoulos ◽  
David S. Mendelson ◽  
Anthony W. Tolcher ◽  
Howard A. Burris ◽  
Michael S. Gordon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dose Reduction ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Dose Schedule ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Status Change ◽  
Dose Escalation Study ◽  
Split Dose ◽  
Grade 3

e13077 Background: Oprozomib (ONX0912), a structural analog of carfilzomib, is an orally bioavailable proteasome inhibitor that irreversibly binds to its target and is being evaluated in hematologic malignancies and solid tumors (ST). In a dose-escalation study of once-daily (qd) ONX0912, the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was 150 mg/d. The protocol was subsequently amended to investigate the effects of a split-dose schedule. Presented here are the interim results from this patient (pt) group. Methods: This is an ongoing, phase 1 study in pts with advanced refractory or recurrent ST. The primary objective is to evaluate the safety and tolerability of ONX0912 and determine the MTD. ONX0912 is administered for 5 consecutive days in 14-day cycles. For pts under the amended regimen, treatment is initiated at 60 mg BID, with 4–6 h between doses. Daily doses are escalated in 30 mg increments in successive groups of 3 pts. Groups are expanded to include 6 pts in the event of a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) or if the MTD is reached. All AEs, including serious AEs (SAEs), are defined per protocol and collected from screening to 30 days after the last dose. Results: 13 pts received a split dose of ONX0912 (4 pts: 60 mg BID; 3 pts: 90/60 mg; 6 pts: 90 mg BID). At least 1 dose reduction was required by 1 pt in the 90/60 mg group and 2 pts in the 90 mg BID group. 9 pts reported treatment-related GI AEs (vomiting, n=9; nausea, n=8; diarrhea, n=5). 2 SAEs, arthralgia and mental status change, were reported at 60 mg BID. 2 SAEs resulting in a dose delay were reported at 90/60 mg (Grade 3/4 anemia [ongoing, also required a dose reduction] and reversible fatigue). There was 1 DLT at 90 mg BID (Grade 3 reversible hypophosphatemia), and this cohort was therefore expanded. Treatment-related vomiting led to discontinuation for 1 patient at 60 mg BID. No AEs led to early withdrawal, and no deaths have been reported in the study. Conclusions: With qd administration, the MTD of ONX0912 was established at 150 mg/d. However, the MTD has not been reached on the split-dose regimen at cumulative doses up to 180 mg/d (90 mg BID). GI AEs were the most common treatment-related AEs. Based on these preliminary observations, split-dose ONX0912 may improve tolerability over qd dosing.

A phase I dose-escalation of trifluridine/tipiracil in combination with oxaliplatin in metastatic colorectal cancer.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS3626-TPS3626 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antoine Hollebecque ◽  
Guillem Argiles ◽  
Thierry Andre ◽  
Andres Cervantes ◽  
Catherine Leger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Dose Escalation Study ◽  
Nude Mouse Model

TPS3626 Background: Trifluridine/tipiracil, also known as TAS‐102, is a combination of an antineoplastic thymidine‐based nucleoside analogue (trifluridine) and a thymidine phosphorylase inhibitor (tipiracil hydrochloride). The antitumor activity of combined trifluridine/tipiracil and oxaliplatin has been studied in gastrointestinal tumor xenografts, including a 5‐FU resistant subline, using a nude mouse model. This study demonstrated increased antitumor activity for the combination compared to trifluridine/tipiracil or oxaliplatin alone (p < 0.001) (Nukatsuka et al., Anticancer Res 2015). These data support the rationale for clinical use of the combination. We describe a phase 1, international, dose-escalation study of the combination in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Methods: This trial includes mCRC patients pretreated with at least one line of standard chemotherapy. The 14‐day administration schedule of trifluridine/tipiracil differs from current clinical practice to avoid overlapping toxicity, notably decreased neutrophils due to oxaliplatin or trifluridine/tipiracil. Trifluridine/tipiracil is administered orally (cohort 1: 25 mg/m² bid; cohort 2: 30 mg/m² bid; cohort 3: 35 mg/m² bid) from day 1 to 5; and oxaliplatin at 85 mg/m² (with a possibility to reduce to 65 mg/m²) on day 1. The primary objective is to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) through a 3+3 design. Secondary objectives include safety, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary efficacy (overall survival, progression‐free survival, overall response rate and biomarkers). As of December 2016, no dose‐limiting toxicities had been reported in cohorts 1 or 2. The MTD has not yet been reached and dose‐escalation continues with enrollment in cohort 3 at full dose for both drugs (trifluridine/tipiracil 35 mg/m² bid and oxaliplatin 85 mg/m²). Once established, the MTD will be confirmed in 6 additional patients to define the recommended dose to be used in the expansion part of the study planned in the same patient population. The results of the dose‐escalation part are expected in 2017. (NCT02848443). Clinical trial information: NCT02848443.

A first-in-human phase dose-escalation study of YH002, a recombinant humanized agonistic anti-OX40 IgG1 monoclonal antibody, in patients with advanced solid tumors.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14501-e14501
Author(s):  
Vinod Ganju ◽  
Adam Cooper ◽  
Kate Wilkinson ◽  
John J. Park
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation Study ◽  
Cancer Breast ◽  
Dose Levels

e14501 Background: YH002 is a recombinant humanized IgG1 antibody that targets the human OX40 receptor. Preclinical studies have demonstrated the specificity, potency, and anti-cancer efficacy of YH002 in a comprehensive panel. The totality of nonclinical data supports progression of YH002 into clinical studies in adult patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors. Methods: This is an ongoing phase 1 dose-escalation study. Patients with advanced or metastatic refractory solid tumors received YH002 as single agent by IV administration at 0.01 to12.0 mg/kg dose levels every 21 days (Q3W), to evaluate the safety, tolerability and preliminary efficacy. An accelerated titration dose escalation design followed by a traditional 3+3 dose algorithm were utilized to assess dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and identify MTD and/or RP2D. Tumor assessments were performed per RECIST v1.1 every 9 weeks. Results: By December 31 2020, six patients were enrolled and treated at escalating dose levels of 0.01 (n=1), 0.03 (n=1), 0.1 (n=1) and 0.3mg/kg (n=3), with tumor types including colon cancer, thymic cancer, prostate cancer, colorectal cancer, breast cancer and bladder cancer. Median treatment duration was 10.2 weeks (range 2 – 18). The median age of patients was 67 years old (range 47-78). These patients had progressed after a median of 2 prior lines of available standard therapy. As of data cutoff, no dose limiting toxicities (DLTs), no Grade (G) 3 or above adverse events (AE) or AEs leading to treatment discontinuation were reported. Drug-related adverse events (AEs) were all G1/2 events and occurred in 4 patients, including 8 G1 AEs (pneumonitis, rash, pruritus, arthralgia, myalgia, fatigue, lethargy, rash pruritic) and 3 G2 AEs (1 pneumonitis and 2 fatigue). Out of 5 patients having tumor assessment by RECIST, one pt with Thymic SCC at 0.3 mg/kg had best response of stable disease at week 9, one pt with prostate cancer at 0.1 mg/kg experienced Non-CR/Non-PD, and rest of 3 pts experienced progressive disease. Conclusions: These preliminary results demonstrate that YH002 was safe and tolerable up to 0.3mg/kg. Updated safety and antitumor activity will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT04353102.

A Sequential Two-Stage Dose Escalation Study Evaluating The Safety and Efficacy Of Eltrombopag In Thrombocytopenic Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) Resistant To Hypomethylating Agents (HMA)

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 2760-2760 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rami S Komrokji ◽  
Vu H. Duong ◽  
Ling Zhang ◽  
Ji-Hyun Lee ◽  
Eric Padron ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Median Duration ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Duration Of Treatment ◽  
Dose Escalation Study ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Introduction Thrombocytopenia remains a critical management challenge for MDS pts. The outcome of MDS Pts after HMA failure is poor. Eltrombopag is an oral, small non-peptide thormbopoeitin (TPO) receptor agonist. It has biologically distinct effects in part to its binding site on the TPO receptor that is distinct from that for native TPO and other synthetic agonists. We conducted an investigator initiated study with eltrombopag in MDS pts with thrombocytopenia after HMA failure. Methods The study is a phase 1, dose escalation design. Pts are allocated to dose cohorts of 50, 100, 150, 200, 250 and 300mg/day. Each dose cohort includes 6 pts. Key eligibility criteria include confirmed diagnosis of MDS or acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with 20-30% myeloblasts. Pts must have at least one prior HMA treatment. The mean platelet count within a month of enrollment must be ≤ 50 X 109 /L. Key exclusions include splenic enlargement > 8 cm, bone marrow fibrosis ≥ grade 3, and prior TPO agonist use. The primary objective of the study is to determine the MTD. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) is defined as treatment related non-hematological grade 3-4 toxicity. If no DLTs were observed during the first 2 cycles of therapy, the next cohort of patients receives a higher dose of eltrombopag. Pts who did not receive treatment for 8 weeks were replaced for DLT assessment. The secondary endpoints include response, overall survival (OS) and leukemia free survival (LFS). Results Thirty-one pts were enrolled. Table-1 summarizes baseline characteristics. Most pts had higher risk MDS who were heavily pretreated. The median interval from MDS diagnosis was 28 months. Six pts were enrolled in cohort 1 (50 mg), 10 pts in cohort 2 (100 mg) (4 pts replaced (2 deaths unrelated to treatment, 1 infection, 1 progressive disease (PD)), 12 pts were enrolled in cohort 3 (150 mg) where 6 pts were replaced (5 PD and 1 infection), and to date, 3 pts are enrolled in cohort 4 (200 mg). No protocol defined DLT have been encountered to date. No grade 3 or 4 treatment related adverse events have been reported. The most common adverse events that were deemed possibly, or probably related to study drug included fatigue (n=9), diarrhea (n=6), night sweats (n=3), headache (n=3), numbness (n=3). There were 2 pts with grade 2 pneumonia and grade 3 fatigue, and 2 grade 2 diarrhea events. Seven pts (23%) developed leukocytosis on treatment and 13 pts (42%) experienced an increase in circulating myeloblasts at some point during study treatment. Three of 27 pts developed higher grade bone marrow myelofibrosis (change from grade 0-1 to grade 2-3), one of whom received the 50 mg dose and 2 pts on the150 mg dose. Eleven pts (35%) progressed to AML, 9 out of 11 patients who progressed had RAEB-2 or RAEB-t and 5 had poor risk cytogenetics. The median follow up duration is 23 months. The best response on study per IWG 2006 criteria include marrow CR (mCR) + Hematological improvement (HI) (6%, n=2), mCR (3%, n=1), HI (13%, n=4), stable disease (SD) (29%, n=9), PD (36%, n=11) and not evaluable for response (13%, n=4). The overall response rate (HI+) was 22% (7 out 31 pts) and 26% among pts evaluable for response (7 out of 27 pts). HI included 6 platelet responses and 1 erythroid response. Among 20 pts who were platelet transfusion dependent, 6 became transfusion independent (30%). The median duration of response was 3.3 months. The median duration of treatment is 2 months. The most common reasons for eltrombopag discontinuation were PD (48%) and infection (10%). Median OS was 5 months whereas median OS was 8 months among HI+ responders. The median LFS was 3.5 months. Conclusions Eltrombopag yielded modest responses in heavily treated higher risk MDS pts after HMA failure. Leukocytosis, increased circulating myeloblasts and myelofibrosis were observed in subsets of pts. Future development of eltrombopag as a single agent in MDS should be in lower risk MDS or in combination with HMA in higher risk MDS. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Use of eltrombopag in MDS.

scholarly journals Phase 1 dose‐escalation study of single‐agent veliparib in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors

2017 ◽  
Vol 108 (9) ◽  
pp. 1834-1842 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tadaaki Nishikawa ◽  
Koji Matsumoto ◽  
Kenji Tamura ◽  
Hiroyuki Yoshida ◽  
Yuichi Imai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Japanese Patients ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation Study

Phase 1 and phase 2a, first-in-human (FIH) study, of DRP-104, a broad glutamine antagonist, in adult patients with advanced solid tumors.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS3149-TPS3149
Author(s):  
Melissa Lynne Johnson ◽  
Deborah Blythe Doroshow ◽  
Tanguy Y. Seiwert ◽  
Michael K. Gibson ◽  
Vamsidhar Velcheti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Adult Patients ◽  
Glutamine Metabolism ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors

TPS3149 Background: Dependence of cancer cells on glutamine has made glutaminolysis an attractive therapeutic target in cancer. Prior clinical trials evaluating glutamine analogues for the treatment of cancer were abandoned due to lack of efficacy and/or tolerability. DON (6-Diazo-5-oxo-L-norleucine) is an irreversible inhibitor of several enzymes that utilize glutamine as a metabolic substrate. In addition to direct anti-tumor efficacy, inhibition of glutamine metabolism in the tumor microenvironment has been shown to improve T-cell activation and tumor infiltration, increasing anti-tumor immune responses. As such, combining DON with an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI), has strong preclinical rationale. The investigational product DRP-104 (sirpiglenastat) is an inactive prodrug of DON designed to limit systemic DON exposure while targeting glutamine dependence in tumor cells. Methods: A phase 1/2a, FIH, multi-center, non-randomized, multi-cohort, open-label study of DRP-104 is currently open to accrual for patients with advanced solid tumors. This study will be conducted in 4 parts: A) Dose Escalation of IV and subQ DRP-104 (Run-In phase followed by modified Continual Reassessment Method) to define MTD/RP2D. Primary objective of dose escalation is to assess the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and preliminary antitumor activity of DRP-104 as a single agent; B) Dose Expansion of IV and subQ DRP-104 for safety assessment while primary objective is to select and recommend phase 2 DRP-104 route of administration; C) Phase 2a at recommended MTD/RP2D of selected route of DRP-104 in 2 patient cohorts: patients with locally advanced/metastatic NSCLC with KEAP1, NFE2L2 and/or STK11 mutation and patients with unresectable or metastatic SCCHN, in order to assess the safety, tolerability and preliminary antitumor activity of DRP-104 as a single agent; D) Phase 2a at recommended MTD/RP2D of selected route of DRP-104 in combination with atezolizumab in adult patients with advanced solid tumors previously treated with an ICI, in order to assess the safety, tolerability and preliminary antitumor activity of DRP-104 in combination with atezolizumab; DRP-104 IV is infused TIW over 1 hour infusion for 2 consecutive weeks followed by 1 week off. DRP-104 subQ is administered BIW weekly. Study is currently open with 6 IV patients (Run-In Phase completed and at Dose Level 4) and 3 subQ patients at Dose Level 1 at time of submission. Clinical trial information: NCT04471415.

A first-in-human phase Ib study to evaluate the MEK inhibitor GDC-0973, combined with the pan-PI3K inhibitor GDC-0941, in patients with advanced solid tumors.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2566-2566 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia LoRusso ◽  
Geoffrey Shapiro ◽  
Shuchi Sumant Pandya ◽  
Eunice Lee Kwak ◽  
Cheryl Jones ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Fdg Pet ◽  
Metabolic Response ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Pi3k Inhibitor ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation Study ◽  
Phase Ib

2566 Background: Both RAS/RAF/MEK and PI3K/Akt signaling pathways are deregulated in many tumor types. Targeting both pathways may be more efficacious than targeting either pathway alone. In preclinical models, concurrent administration of GDC‑0973, a potent, selective, MEK1/2 inhibitor and GDC-0941, a potent class I PI3K inhibitor, shows improved efficacy compared to either agent alone dosed continuously or intermittently. Methods: A phase Ib dose-escalation study with 3+3 design was initiated in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors to evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetics (PK) of oral dosing of GDC-0973 and GDC-0941. Pts received: concurrent GDC-0973 + GDC-0941 once daily (qd) on a 21 day on/7 day off (21/7) schedule; intermittent GDC-0973 on Days 1, 4, 8, 11, 15, 18 of a 28 day cycle + GDC-0941 qd on a 21/7 schedule (MEK int); or GDC-0973 + GDC-0941 qd on a 7 day on /7 day off schedule (7/7). Starting doses were 20 mg GDC-0973 + 80 mg GDC-0941 (21/7), 100 mg GDC-0973 + 130 mg GDC-0941 (MEK int); 40 mg GDC-0973 + 130 mg GDC-0941 (7/7). Serial plasma PK samples, FDG-PET, and CT scans were obtained. Results: 78 pts have enrolled. DLTs were G3 lipase (n=1), G4 CPK elevation (n=1). Compared to the 21/7 MTD of 40 mg GDC-0973 + 100 mg GDC-0941, higher doses of GDC-0973 + GDC-0941 were tolerated on the MEK int schedule. Overall, adverse events related to the study drug combination in ≥ 20% pts were diarrhea, rash, nausea, fatigue, vomiting, decreased appetite, dysgeusia, and elevated CPK. Preliminary analysis indicated PK of GDC-0973 and GDC-0941 are not altered when dosed in combination. Of 46 evaluable pts, 26 had an FDG-PET partial metabolic response (≥ 20% decrease in mean SUVmax from baseline) at ≥1 time points. Partial responses were observed in 3 pts (mBRAF melanoma, mBRAF pancreatic ca, mKRAS endometrioid ca); 5 pts had stable disease ≥ 5 months. Conclusions: Combination dosing of GDC‑0973 and GDC-0941 is generally well tolerated, with toxicities similar to those observed in single agent GDC-0973 and GDC-0941 phase 1 trials. There are early signs of anti-tumor activity. Dose escalation on MEK int and 7/7 schedules continues and updated data will be presented.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document