scholarly journals Insulin receptor autoantibody-mediated hypoglycemia in a woman with mixed connective tissue disease

Author(s):  
Max C Petersen ◽  
Jonah M Graves ◽  
Tony Yao ◽  
Lutz Schomburg ◽  
Waldemar B Minich ◽  
...  

Abstract Autoantibodies to the insulin receptor are rare and typically cause severe insulin resistance and hyperglycemia, a condition termed type B insulin resistance. Uncommonly, antibodies to the insulin receptor can cause hypoglycemia. We present the case of a woman who developed recurrent severe hypoglycemia and myopathy, was found to have insulin receptor autoantibodies and mixed connective tissue disease, and had resolution of hypoglycemia with immunosuppression. A 55-year-old woman with a history of obesity, hypertension, and prior hemorrhagic stroke presented with recurrent severe hypoglycemia. A diagnostic fast resulted in hypoinsulinemic hypoketotic hypoglycemia. Adrenal function was intact. Progressive myopathy had developed simultaneously with her hypoglycemia, and rheumatologic evaluation revealed mixed connective tissue disease. The plasma acylcarnitine profile was normal, extensive oncologic evaluation including IGF-2 measurement was unrevealing, and anti-insulin antibody testing was negative. Ultimately, anti-insulin receptor antibodies were found to be present. The patient was treated with glucocorticoids and rituximab. Eight weeks after initiation of immunosuppression, the insulin receptor antibody titer had decreased and hypoglycemia had resolved. Eight months after diagnosis, the patient remained free of severe hypoglycemia despite tapering of glucocorticoids to a near-physiologic dose. Though antibodies to the insulin receptor typically cause severe insulin resistance, this patient had no evidence of insulin resistance and instead presented with recurrent severe hypoglycemia, which responded to glucocorticoids and rituximab. The diagnosis of insulin receptor antibody-mediated hypoglycemia is rare but should be considered in patients with systemic autoimmune disease, including mixed connective tissue disease, in the appropriate clinical context.

Author(s):  
Agnieszka Łebkowska ◽  
Anna Krentowska ◽  
Agnieszka Adamska ◽  
Danuta Lipińska ◽  
Beata Piasecka ◽  
...  

Summary Type B insulin resistance syndrome (TBIR) is characterised by the rapid onset of severe insulin resistance due to circulating anti-insulin receptor antibodies (AIRAs). Widespread acanthosis nigricans is normally seen, and co-occurrence with other autoimmune diseases is common. We report a 27-year-old Caucasian man with psoriasis and connective tissue disease who presented with unexplained rapid weight loss, severe acanthosis nigricans, and hyperglycaemia punctuated by fasting hypoglycaemia. Severe insulin resistance was confirmed by hyperinsulinaemic euglycaemic clamping, and immunoprecipitation assay demonstrated AIRAs, confirming TBIR. Treatment with corticosteroids, metformin and hydroxychloroquine allowed withdrawal of insulin therapy, with stabilisation of glycaemia and diminished signs of insulin resistance; however, morning fasting hypoglycaemic episodes persisted. Over three years of follow-up, metabolic control remained satisfactory on a regimen of metformin, hydroxychloroquine and methotrexate; however, psoriatic arthritis developed. This case illustrates TBIR as a rare but severe form of acquired insulin resistance and describes an effective multidisciplinary approach to treatment. Learning points: We describe an unusual case of type B insulin resistance syndrome (TBIR) in association with mixed connective tissue disease and psoriasis. Clinical evidence of severe insulin resistance was corroborated by euglycaemic hyperinsulinaemic clamp, and anti-insulin receptor autoantibodies were confirmed by immunoprecipitation assay. Treatment with metformin, hydroxychloroquine and methotrexate ameliorated extreme insulin resistance.


2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1593.1-1593
Author(s):  
L. Montolio-Chiva ◽  
J. Narváez ◽  
M. Pascual ◽  
H. S. Park ◽  
A. V. Orenes Vera ◽  
...  

Background:Currently, most authors accept that mixed connective tissue disease (MCTD) is an independent entity, although there are those who argue that it is actually an overlap syndrome or an undifferentiated early phase of another systemic autoimmune disease (SAD).Objectives:To analyze the long term evolution of a serie of patients with MCTD.Methods:Observational, retrospective and multicenter study in patients with MCTD (diagnostic criteria of Alarcón-Segovia et al),followed for a minimun of 2 years.Results:Fifty-five patients (49 women) with a median age at diagnosis of 38±14 years and with a follow up time (median) of 101 months (range, 24-237 months with a total of 501.2 pacients-year) were identified.At the end of the follow-up period, only 27% (15/55) of the patients kept on fulfilling MCTD criteria. In the remaining 73% (40), 40% (22) had been differentiated to systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), 13% (7) to systemic sclerosis (SSc) and 20% (11) developed an overlap syndrome [SSc+SLE in 8 cases and SSc+rheumatoid arthritis (AR) in 3]. In 8% of these patients, a secondary Sjögren’s syndrome was diagnosed during the follow-up period. The average score in patients who met the EULAR/ACR 2013 criteria for SSc was 11 (minimum 9 - maximum 16) and the average time elapsed from the diagnosis of MCTD to meet SSc criteria was 64.4 months (interquartile range [IQR] 25-75%: 10-127 months).Applying the 2012 SLICC criteria, only 24 patients of those initially diagnosed as MCTD ended up meeting SLE criteria. The average score in these patients was 5.6 (4-9) and the average time elapsed from the diagnosis of MCTD unltil fulfilling the SLICC criteria was 39 months (IQR 25-75%: 6-28). When we apply the new ACR/EULAR 2019 criteria, the percentage of patients who meet SLE criteria increased to 30%, with an average score of 17.3 (10-38). The average time elapsed since the diagnosis of MCTD until meeting the new SLE criteria was reduced to 17 months (IQR 25-75: 0-10).In the multivariate study, the presence of sclerodactyly (OR: 2.91; IC 95% 1.90 - 4.1, p= 0.001) and esophageal involvement (OR: 2.05; IC 95% 1.14–3.66, p=0.016) were associated with the evolution to SSc. Any predictor of evolution to SLE was identified.Conclusion:Only slightly more than a quarter of patients initially diagnosed as MCTD maintain this diagnosis during the follow-up. The majority, ended up evolving towards to another SAD, fundamentally SLE and SSc. The new ACR/EULAR 2019 criteria seems to be more sensitive than the SLICC 2012 criteria for diagnose SLE in these patients.Disclosure of Interests:L Montolio-Chiva: None declared, J. Narváez: None declared, Maria Pascual: None declared, Hye Sang Park: None declared, Ana V Orenes Vera: None declared, Eduardo Flores: None declared, Juanjo J Alegre-Sancho Consultant of: UCB, Roche, Sanofi, Boehringer, Celltrion, Paid instructor for: GSK, Speakers bureau: MSD, GSK, Lilly, Sanofi, Roche, UCB, Actelion, Pfizer, Abbvie, Novartis, Iván Castellví: None declared, Joan Miquel Nolla: None declared


Author(s):  
E. Grau Garcia ◽  
P. Jover Carbonell ◽  
I. Martinez Cordellat ◽  
R. Negueroles Albuixech ◽  
J.E. Oller Rodriguez ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document