scholarly journals Reflection on the Past, Present, and Future of Thrombolytic Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke

Neurology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 97 (20 Supplement 2) ◽  
pp. S170-S177
Author(s):  
Stacie L. Demel ◽  
Robert Stanton ◽  
Yasmin N. Aziz ◽  
Opeolu Adeoye ◽  
Pooja Khatri

More than 25 years have passed since the US Food and Drug Administration approved IV recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (alteplase) for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke. This landmark decision brought a previously untreatable disease into a new therapeutic landscape, providing inspiration for clinicians and hope to patients. Since that time, the use of alteplase in the clinical setting has become standard of care, continually improving with quality measures such as door-to-needle times and other metrics of specialized stroke unit care. The past decade has seen more widespread use of alteplase in the prehospital setting with mobile stroke units and telestroke and beyond initial time windows via the use of CT perfusion or MRI. Simultaneously, the position of alteplase is being challenged by new lytics and by the concept of its bypass altogether in the era of endovascular therapy. We provide an overview of alteplase, including its earliest trials and how they have shaped the current therapeutic landscape of ischemic stroke treatment, and touch on new frontiers for thrombolytic therapy. We highlight the critical role of thrombolytic therapy in the past, present, and future of ischemic stroke care.

Author(s):  
Carole J Decker ◽  
Emily Chhatriwalla ◽  
Brian Garavalia ◽  
John A Spertus ◽  
Er Chen ◽  
...  

Background: Explaining the risks and benefits of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) occurs in a hurried conversation in the emergency department and may not be fully grasped by patients and their caregivers. Risk models describing the heterogeneity of benefits from rt-PA in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) have been created, but are not used in routine clinical practice. To develop a tool (RESOLVE) for modeling each patient’s benefits and risks for rt-PA, we conducted qualitative interviews with survivors, their caregivers and emergency physicians to inform the design and improve usability. Methods: A multidisciplinary research team conducted qualitative research through 10 focus groups of survivors and caregivers. We obtained feedback on their preferred role, desired information and their impressions of alternative formats for presenting risk and benefits. Three emergency physicians from 2 sites have been interviewed (with >15 additional physician interviews being currently conducted, the results of which will supplement these preliminary data at the time of presentation). Results: Survivors and caregivers (63 participants: 39 stroke survivors; 43% male) express a need for more information, including specific risks and benefits to treatment. In general, both groups desired an active role in the acute stroke treatment decision. In contrast, the initial physician interviews indicated a hesitancy to provide NINDS data to patients and caregivers, skepticism of the existing data and cultural barriers to the use of rt-PA in AIS, the latter acquired through residency training or the opinions of their clinical colleagues. The interviewed clinicians, however, felt more positive about using rt-PA when a neurologist was readily available to support the decision. Conclusions: Preliminary findings suggest reluctance by emergency physicians to share data about the benefits of rt-PA to stroke patients and their caregivers, despite the desire of the latter for such information. While the additional planned interviews will be needed to confirm these findings, preliminary insights suggest a compelling need to overcome the reticence of emergency physicians to use clinical data to better engage patients in making a shared decision about rt-PA in AIS.


CJEM ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 3 (03) ◽  
pp. 180-182
Author(s):  
Michael D. Hill ◽  
Gordon J. Gubitz ◽  
Stephen J. Phillips ◽  
Alastair M. Buchan

The cautiously-worded Position Statement recently issued by the Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians (see Appendix 1) regarding the use of intravenous recombinant tissue-plasminogen activator (tPA, alteplase) for acute ischemic stroke underscores the reality that many physicians in Canada have been reluctant to embrace this therapy. Much of the caution expressed in the CAEP document is related to 2 major areas of concern: evidence of efficacy (i.e., did tPA really “prove” itself in randomized trials?) and effectiveness (i.e., are the trial results generalizable to everyday practice?). While we support the development of documents that help to clarify controversial treatments, and agree with much of what is presented in the CAEP Position Statement, we offer the following comments.


2021 ◽  
Vol 41 (01) ◽  
pp. 028-038
Author(s):  
Alison E. Baird ◽  
Richard Jackson ◽  
Weijun Jin

AbstractThe introduction of thrombolytic therapy in the 1990s has transformed acute ischemic stroke treatment. Thus far, intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) also known as alteplase is the only thrombolytic proven to be efficacious and approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration. But the thrombolytic agent tenecteplase (TNK) is emerging as a potential replacement for rt-PA. TNK has greater fibrin specificity, slower clearance, and higher resistance to plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 than rt-PA. Hence, TNK has the potential to provide superior lysis with fewer hemorrhagic complications. Also, easier bolus-only administration makes TNK a very practical rt-PA alternative. In several clinical trials, TNK has shown similar efficacy and safety to rt-PA, and the potential to be at least noninferior to rt-PA in some settings. TNK may be superior to rt-PA for reperfusing large vessel occlusions in patients with salvageable penumbra, although this has not yet translated to improved clinical outcomes. Further phase 3 studies are in progress comparing rt-PA with TNK for acute ischemic stroke during the first 4.5 hours. Studies are also in progress to evaluate the use of TNK for extended applications, such as wake-up stroke.


2017 ◽  
pp. 64-67
Author(s):  
Dinh Thuyen Nguyen ◽  
Duy Ton Mai ◽  
Viet Phuong Dao ◽  
Anh Tuan Nguyen

Objective: to evaluate predictors the risk of symptomatic intracerebral heamorrhage after thrombolytic therapy with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator in acute ischemic stroke. Methods: observative study on 54 patients with acute ischemic stroke at Emergency Department, Bach Mai hospital from 01/2010 to 10/2016. Results: Predictors the risk of symptomatic intracerebral heamorrhage were: age above 70 (OR 2,76; 95% CI 0,73 – 10,52; p = 0,12), time from onset to treatment (OR 1,03; 95% CI 0,34 – 3,13; p = 0,95), systolic blood pressure ≥ 140 mmHg (OR 2,0; 95% CI 0,61 – 6,51; p = 0,24), NIHSS score above 12 (OR 3,13; 95% CI 0,63 – 15,51; p = 0,138), glycemia above 10 mmol/l (OR 8,94; 95% CI 1,51 – 51,73; p = 0,003), fibrillation atrial (OR 1,49; 95% 0,49 – 4,56; p = 0,33), history of diebete (OR 6,4; 95% CI 0,67 – 61,03; p = 0,06), history of anticoagulation (OR 1,07; 95% CI 0,22 – 5,11; p = 0,63), history of cerebral infarction (OR 1,49; 95% CI 0,183 – 12,184; p = 0,707), sign of early brain CT (OR 6,14; 95% CI 1,01 – 39,93; p = 0,048). Conclusion: glucose above 10 mmol/l and sign of early brain CT were predictors the risk of symptomatic intracerebral heamorrhage after thrombolytic therapy with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator in acute ischemic stroke. Key words: stroke, thrombolysis, predictor, heamorrhage conversion


1996 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 196-200
Author(s):  
Roger L White

The current status of thrombolytic therapy for acute ischemic stroke is reviewed in relation to early work and to the use of thrombolytic agents in acute myocardial infarction. The case of a patient treated with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke is described to illustrate the improvement in outcome that can be achieved with this therapy in selected patients. A number of recommendations are included for cardiologists on the use of plasminogen activator in acute ischemic stroke regarding the timing, dosage, selection, and monitoring of patients.


2011 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 6-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Niko Sillanpaa ◽  
Jukka T. Saarinen ◽  
Harri Rusanen ◽  
Jari Hakomaki ◽  
Arto Lahteela ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document