Variations in Seizure Frequency During Pregnancy and Postpartum by Epilepsy Type

Neurology ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000013056
Author(s):  
P. Emanuela Voinescu ◽  
Alexa N Ehlert ◽  
Camden P Bay ◽  
Stephanie Allien ◽  
Page B Pennell

Objective:To assess whether increased seizure frequency during pregnancy and post-partum is influenced by epilepsy type, seizure location, and antiseizure medications.Methods:Clinical data was collected in a longitudinal prospective database of pregnant women with epilepsy at Brigham and Women’s Hospital. Within each individual participant, baseline seizure frequency was calculated for the 9 months preconception, and it was determined if seizure frequency increased during pregnancy or the postpartum period. Seizure frequency was calculated for each 4-week interval during pregnancy. Generalized estimating equations for logistic regression were applied.Results:Ninety-nine patients contributing 114 pregnancies were included from 2013-2018. Increased seizure frequency occurred more often during pregnancies of women with focal versus generalized epilepsy (21.1% vs 5.3%, OR 4.70; 95% CI (1.00, 22.00); p = 0.0497). Among women with focal epilepsy, increased seizure frequency occurred more often in those with frontal lobe epilepsy (OR 8.00; 95 % CI (2.19, 29.21); p = 0.0017). There was no difference in seizure worsening in the postpartum period between focal and generalized (11.1% vs 9.1%, p=0.4478), or frontal and other focal (18.8% vs 6.0%; p=0.1478) epilepsy groups. Pregnancies on polytherapy had higher odds of seizure worsening compared to monotherapy (OR = 8.36, 95% CI = (2.07, 33.84), p = 0.0029), regardless of the medication or epilepsy type. A lack of preconception seizure freedom was also associated with increased seizure frequency during pregnancy (OR = 6.418; p = 0.0076).Conclusion:Women with focal epilepsy have higher likelihood of seizure worsening during pregnancy compared to women with generalized epilepsy; frontal lobe epilepsy poses an especially elevated risk. Polytherapy and lack of preconception seizure freedom are additional predictors for an increased likelihood of seizure worsening.

2012 ◽  
Vol 116 (5) ◽  
pp. 1042-1048 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dario J. Englot ◽  
Doris D. Wang ◽  
John D. Rolston ◽  
Tina T. Shih ◽  
Edward F. Chang

Object Frontal lobe epilepsy (FLE) is the second-most common focal epilepsy syndrome, and seizures are medically refractory in many patients. Although various studies have examined rates and predictors of seizure freedom after resection for FLE, there is significant variability in their results due to patient diversity, and inadequate follow-up may lead to an overestimation of long-term seizure freedom. Methods In this paper the authors report a systematic review and meta-analysis of long-term seizure outcomes and predictors of response after resection for intractable FLE. Only studies of at least 10 patients examining seizure freedom after FLE surgery with postoperative follow-up duration of at least 48 months were included. Results Across 1199 patients in 21 studies, the overall rate of postoperative seizure freedom (Engel Class I outcome) was 45.1%. No trend in seizure outcomes across all studies was observed over time. Significant predictors of long-term seizure freedom included lesional epilepsy origin (relative risk [RR] 1.67, 95% CI 1.36–28.6), abnormal preoperative MRI (RR 1.64, 95% CI 1.32–2.08), and localized frontal resection versus more extensive lobectomy with or without an extrafrontal component (RR 1.71, 95% CI 1.26–2.43). Within lesional FLE cases, gross-total resection led to significantly improved outcome versus subtotal lesionectomy (RR 1.99, 95% CI 1.47–2.84). Conclusions These findings suggest that FLE patients with a focal and identifiable lesion are more likely to achieve seizure freedom than those with a more poorly defined epileptic focus. While seizure freedom can be achieved in the surgical treatment of medically refractory FLE, these findings illustrate the compelling need for improved noninvasive and invasive localization techniques in FLE.


Neurology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 95 (9) ◽  
pp. e1244-e1256 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dileep R. Nair ◽  
Kenneth D. Laxer ◽  
Peter B. Weber ◽  
Anthony M. Murro ◽  
Yong D. Park ◽  
...  

ObjectiveTo prospectively evaluate safety and efficacy of brain-responsive neurostimulation in adults with medically intractable focal onset seizures (FOS) over 9 years.MethodsAdults treated with brain-responsive neurostimulation in 2-year feasibility or randomized controlled trials were enrolled in a long-term prospective open label trial (LTT) to assess safety, efficacy, and quality of life (QOL) over an additional 7 years. Safety was assessed as adverse events (AEs), efficacy as median percent change in seizure frequency and responder rate, and QOL with the Quality of Life in Epilepsy (QOLIE-89) inventory.ResultsOf 256 patients treated in the initial trials, 230 participated in the LTT. At 9 years, the median percent reduction in seizure frequency was 75% (p < 0.0001, Wilcoxon signed rank), responder rate was 73%, and 35% had a ≥90% reduction in seizure frequency. We found that 18.4% (47 of 256) experienced ≥1 year of seizure freedom, with 62% (29 of 47) seizure-free at the last follow-up and an average seizure-free period of 3.2 years (range 1.04–9.6 years). Overall QOL and epilepsy-targeted and cognitive domains of QOLIE-89 remained significantly improved (p < 0.05). There were no serious AEs related to stimulation, and the sudden unexplained death in epilepsy (SUDEP) rate was significantly lower than predefined comparators (p < 0.05, 1-tailed χ2).ConclusionsAdjunctive brain-responsive neurostimulation provides significant and sustained reductions in the frequency of FOS with improved QOL. Stimulation was well tolerated; implantation-related AEs were typical of other neurostimulation devices; and SUDEP rates were low.ClinicalTrials.gov identifierNCT00572195.Classification of evidenceThis study provides Class IV evidence that brain-responsive neurostimulation significantly reduces focal seizures with acceptable safety over 9 years.


Author(s):  
Mazen Basheikh ◽  
R. Mark Sadler

ABSTRACT: Rationale: The manufacturer of perampanel (PER) suggests an initial adult dose of 2–4 mg/day and an upward dose titration of 2 mg at no more frequently than 1- or 2-week intervals when used with enzyme-enhancing antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) or nonenzyme-enhancing AEDs, respectively. The general practice in our clinic is an initial dose of PER 2 mg/day and titrated by 2 mg/4 weeks to an initial target of 6 mg/day. Methods: Retrospective chart audit of patients starting PER in an adult epilepsy clinic between September 2013 and November 2016 with at least one 6-month follow-up visit was reviewed. Data collection included patient demographics, seizure characteristics, past and concurrent therapy, monthly seizure frequency before PER and at 6-month visit, and characteristics of PER discontinuation. Efficacy of treatment was assessed with the Engel classification and 50% responder rate. Results: N = 102 patients; mean age = 40 years and 54% females. Focal onset seizures 85%, generalized 13%, and unknown 2%. Median prior AED exposure = 6 (range 3–20); median concomitant AED use = 2 (range 1–5). Follow-up range was 6–37 months. The median seizure frequency/month prePER treatment was 6 (range 0–30) for focal onset seizures and 1 (range 0–6) for generalized seizures. The retention rate amongst all patients at 6 months was 78.4%. At 6-month follow-up, 36% of all patients achieved Engel class I (seizure freedom) (30.7% of patients with focal onset seizures and 63.6% with generalized epilepsy). The 50% responder rate was 52% and 82% for focal and generalized epilepsy, respectively. Conclusion: PER has a good retention rate when titrated slowly and thus encouraging seizure freedom results in an otherwise medically refractory epilepsy population.


2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (10) ◽  
pp. 582-585 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazuo Kodama ◽  
Taku Omata ◽  
Yoshimi Watanabe ◽  
Hiromi Aoyama ◽  
Yuzo Tanabe

Objective: We evaluated potassium bromide’s (KBr’s) efficacy and tolerability for pediatric refractory epilepsy. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 42 patients treated with KBr in our hospital between 2008 and 2016 (age: 4 months to 19 years; mean: 6.2 years). Thirteen of them had 2 seizure types. The treatment durations ranged from 1 month to 6 years (mean: 15.0 months). Results: KBr had an excellent effect (seizure-free status) in 3 patients (7.1%), a moderate effect (>50% reduction in seizure frequency from the pretreatment baseline) in 21 patients (50.0%), and no effect (<50% reduction in seizure frequency from the pretreatment baseline) in 18 patients (42.9%). The effective daily doses ranged from 20 to 80 mg/kg (mean: 50.0 mg/kg). KBr was effective in 59.1% patients with generalized epilepsy (n = 22), 55.6% patients with focal epilepsy (n = 18), and both patients with Dravet syndrome. An excellent or moderate effect was found in 72.2% patients with tonic seizures (n = 18), 66.6% patients with generalized tonic-clonic seizures (n = 6), 75.0% patients with secondary generalized seizures (n = 4), 46.2% patients with focal seizures (n = 13), and 20% patients with infantile spasms (n = 10) but no patients with myoclonic seizures (n = 2). Adverse effects including drowsiness, excitement, and rashes were reported in 13 patients (31.0%). Conclusions: These findings suggest that KBr is particularly effective for tonic seizures, generalized tonic-clonic seizures, and secondary generalized seizures. Although the adverse effects need further attention, KBr should be considered for pediatric refractory epilepsy.


2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suresh Gurbani ◽  
Sirichai Chayasirisobhon ◽  
Leslie Cahan ◽  
SooHo Choi ◽  
Bruce Enos ◽  
...  

To study the efficacy of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) therapy as an adjunctive treatment for intractable epilepsy in patients under 12 years of age, we analyzed 2-year postimplant data of 35 consecutive patients. Of the 35 patients, 18 (51.4%) at 6 months, 18 (51.4%) at 12 months, and 21 (60.1%) at 24 months showed ≥50% reduction in seizure frequency (responders). Although incremental seizure freedom was noted, no patient remained seizure-free throughout the 3 study periods. Partial response (≥50% seizure reduction in 2 or less study periods) was seen in 8 (22.9%) patients. Twelve patients (34.3%) were nonresponders. Out of 29 patients with primary generalized epilepsy, 20 (68.9%) and, out of 6 patients with focal epilepsy, 3 (50%) had ≥50% seizure control in at least one study period. No major complications or side effects requiring discontinuation of VNS therapy were encountered. We conclude that (1) patients with intractable primary generalized epilepsy respond better to VNS therapy, (2) cumulative effect of neuromodulation with improving responder rate to seizure freedom with continuation of VNS therapy is noted, and (3) VNS therapy is safe and is well tolerated in children receiving implant under 12 years of age.


Neurosurgery ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 83 (2) ◽  
pp. 217-225 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesca Bonini ◽  
Aileen McGonigal ◽  
Didier Scavarda ◽  
Romain Carron ◽  
Jean Régis ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUND Resective surgery established treatment for pharmacoresistant frontal lobe epilepsy (FLE), but seizure outcome and prognostic indicators are poorly characterized and vary between studies. OBJECTIVE To study long-term seizure outcome and identify prognostic factors. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed 42 FLE patients having undergone surgical resection, mostly preceded by invasive recordings with stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG). Postsurgical outcome up to 10-yr follow-up and prognostic indicators were analyzed using Kaplan–Meier analysis and multivariate and conditional inference procedures. RESULTS At the time of last follow-up, 57.1% of patients were seizure-free. The estimated chance of seizure freedom was 67% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 54-83) at 6 mo, 59% (95% CI: 46-76) at 1 yr, 53% (95% CI: 40-71) at 2 yr, and 46% (95% CI: 32-66) at 5 yr. Most relapses (83%) occurred within the first 12 mo. Multivariate analysis showed that completeness of resection of the epileptogenic zone (EZ) as defined by SEEG was the main predictor of seizure outcome. According to conditional inference trees, in patients with complete resection of the EZ, focal cortical dysplasia as etiology and focal EZ were positive prognostic indicators. No difference in outcome was found in patients with positive vs negative magnetic resonance imaging. CONCLUSION Surgical resection in drug-resistant FLE can be a successful therapeutic approach, even in the absence of neuroradiologically visible lesions. SEEG may be highly useful in both nonlesional and lesional FLE cases, because complete resection of the EZ as defined by SEEG is associated with better prognosis.


2007 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 98-99 ◽  
Author(s):  
John W. Miller

Surgical Outcome and Prognostic Factors of Frontal Lobe Epilepsy Surgery. Jeha LE, Najm I, Bingaman W, Dinner D, Widdess-Walsh P, Luders H. Brain 2007;130(Pt 2):574–584. Epub 2007 Jan 5. Frontal lobe epilepsy (FLE) surgery is the second most common surgery performed to treat pharmacoresistant epilepsy. Yet, little is known about long-term seizure outcome following frontal lobectomy. The aim of this study is to investigate the trends in longitudinal outcome and identify potential prognostic indicators in a cohort of FLE patients investigated using modern diagnostic techniques. We reviewed 70 patients who underwent a frontal lobectomy between 1995 and 2003 (mean follow-up 4.1 ± 3 years). Data were analysed using survival analysis and multivariate regression with Cox proportional hazard models. A favourable outcome was defined as complete seizure-freedom, allowing for auras and seizures restricted to the first post-operative week. The estimated probability of complete seizure-freedom was 55.7% [95% confidence interval (CI) = 50–62] at 1 post-operative year, 45.1% (95% CI = 39–51) at 3 years, and 30.1% (95% CI = 21–39) at 5 years. Eighty per cent of seizure recurrences occurred within the first 6 post-operative months. Late remissions and relapses occurred, but were rare. After multivariate analysis, the following variables retained their significance as independent predictors of seizure recurrence: MRI-negative malformation of cortical development as disease aetiology [risk ratio (RR) = 2.22, 95% CI = 1.40–3.47], any extrafrontal MRI abnormality (RR = 1.75, 95% CI = 1.12–2.69), generalized/non-localized ictal EEG patterns (RR = 1.83, 95% CI = 1.15–2.87), occurrence of acute post-operative seizures (RR = 2.17, 95% CI = 1.50–3.14) and incomplete surgical resection (RR = 2.56, 95% CI = 1.66–4.05) (log likelihood-ratio test P-value < 0.0001). More than half of patients in favourable prognostic categories were seizure-free at 3 years, and up to 40% were seizure-free at 5 years, compared to <15% in those with unfavourable outcome predictors. These data underscore the importance of appropriate selection of potential surgical candidates.


2020 ◽  
pp. 106002802094111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher T. Buckley ◽  
Olivia R. Waters ◽  
George DeMaagd

Objective: To review the pharmacology, efficacy, and safety of oral cenobamate in the treatment of uncontrolled focal epilepsy. Data Sources: The PubMed database and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched using the following terms: cenobamate, Xcopri, and YKP3089. Study Selection and Data Extraction: Articles published in English between January 2000 and April 2020 related to pharmacology, safety, and clinical trials were assessed. Data Synthesis: In a phase 2 trial, cenobamate reduced the median percentage change in seizure frequency from baseline by 56% compared with 22% for placebo ( P < 0.0001). In another phase 2 trial of multiple cenobamate doses, cenobamate reduced seizure frequency by 36% ( P = 0.0071) in the 100-mg group and 55% ( P < 0.0001) in both the 200- and 400-mg groups, compared to 24% with placebo. Adverse effects of cenobamate appear to be similar to those of other antiseizure medications and primarily affect the neurological system. Relevance to Patient Care and Clinical Practice: In patients taking antiseizure medications who continue to have focal seizures, cenobamate has efficacy at multiple doses and is generally well tolerated. Cenobamate may be distinguished from other antiseizure medications by high rates of seizure freedom not seen in previous placebo-controlled trials, which has the potential to significantly improve quality of life. However, despite this efficacy, Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms may remain a significant concern with cenobamate. Conclusion: As seen in clinical trials, cenobamate as an adjunctive, once-daily treatment represents an efficacious and generally well-tolerated therapy for patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
A. Verentzioti ◽  
I. Blumcke ◽  
A. Alexoudi ◽  
P. Patrikelis ◽  
A. Siatouni ◽  
...  

Introduction. There is an emerging interest in the literature about MOGHE (Mild Malformation of Cortical Development with Oligodendroglial Hyperplasia and Epilepsy). We report the case of an epileptic patient with MOGHE. Case Report. A 33-year-old male patient was suffering from refractory focal epilepsy since adolescence. MRI demonstrated increased T2/FLAIR signal intensity of right frontal lobe. Presurgical evaluation led to definition of epileptogenic network in a specific area of right frontal lobe. The resected specimen revealed MOGHE. Discussion. MOGHE appears to be a brain entity which shares some unique histopathological features. Review of the literature is in accordance with our patient’s findings. The major neuropathological finding consists of areas with blurred gray-white matter boundaries due to heterotopic neurons in white matter and increased numbers of subcortical oligodendroglial cells with increased proliferation. MR abnormalities are present in T2/FLAIR sequences. It concerns patients with refractory frontal lobe epilepsy and appears to associate with unfavourable postsurgical outcome in seizure control. Conclusion. More cases are needed in order to establish more data about this distinct entity in frontal lobe epilepsy. This could be valuable knowledge to patients and doctors concerning expectations or management of undesirable outcome in frontal lobe epilepsy surgery.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document