scholarly journals Activist Learners’ Creative Thinking Processes in Posing and Solving Geometry Problem

2022 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 117-126
Author(s):  
Rosita Dwi ◽  
Manuharawati* Manuharawati* ◽  
Siti Khabibah
Keyword(s):  
Active Learning ◽  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Creative Thinking ◽  
Trial And Error ◽  
Research Subjects ◽  
Daily Experience ◽  
Geometry Problem ◽  
Thinking Process ◽  
Thinking Processes

<p style="text-align: justify;">This study aimed to describe the creative thinking process of students with active learning styles in proposing and solving problems on geometry material. The research instruments were Honey and Mumford's Learning Style Questionnaire (LSQ), problem-solving and submission test sheets, and interview guidelines. The LSQ questionnaire was distributed to students majoring in mathematics education at a university in Malang, Indonesia, with a total of 200 students. Students who have an active learning style and meet the specified criteria will be selected as research subjects. Based on research on creative thinking processes in proposing and solving problems in students with active learning styles, it was found that there were differences in behaviour between subject 1 and subject 2 at each stage of creative thinking. However, based on the researcher's observations of the behaviour of the two subjects at each stage of their thinking, there are similarities in behaviour, namely, they tend to be in a hurry to do something, prefer trial and error, and get ideas based on daily experience.</p>

scholarly journals PROSES BERPIKIR KREATIF PESERTA DIDIK DALAM MEMECAHKAN MASALAH SOAL PISA DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR GLOBAL-ANALITIK

MATHEdunesa ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-14
Author(s):  
Nailis Saida ◽  
Ismail Ismail
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Creative Thinking ◽  
Global Learning ◽  
Research Subjects ◽  
Incubation Stage ◽  
Analytic Learning ◽  
Thinking Processes ◽  
Analytic Learning Style

The process of creative thinking is a step that someone uses in produce new ideas and alternative ways/answers include the preparation, incubation, illumination and verification. The problem used is PISA problems with space and shape. Each individual has their own ways to absorbing information and solving a problem is learning style. Learning styles used are global and analytic learning style. The purpose of this research to describe students’ creative thinking processes in PISA roblem solving with global and analytic learning style. This research uses descriptive research with a qualitative approach. The research subjects were taken by two students each in global and analytic learning style in class X-IPA 1 of Senior High School 8 Kediri in the odd semester of the 2019/2020 school year. The result of this research showed that students’ creative thinking processess in PISA problem solving in PISA with global learning style can through preparation, incubation, illumination and verification. The student can do PISA problem in two different ways but the result are not coherent, do not write the basic formula and some write the final answer. In the incubation stage, student was saturation and difficulty on one of the ways which is found and the effect do silence for a moment. The next, student’ creative thinking processes in PISA problem solving with analytic learning style can also through preparation, incubation, illumination and verification. The student can do PISA problem in two different ways, the result are written coherently, step by step written clearly. In the incubation stage, student not have problem. Keywords:creative thinking process, PISA, learning style. 

scholarly journals PROSES BERPIKIR KRITIS SISWA DALAM MEMECAHKAN MASALAH MATEMATIKA REALISTIK MATERI GEOMETRI DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 51-60
Author(s):  
Finsensius Yesekiel Naja ◽  
Agustina Mei ◽  
Sofia Sa'o
Keyword(s):  
Critical Thinking ◽  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Research Subjects ◽  
Auditory Learning ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Mathematical Problems ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Thinking Processes

The purpose of this study is to describe the profile of students' critical thinking in solving realistic mathematical problems of geometry material in terms of learning styles. This research is a descriptive study with a qualitative approach. Critical thinking in this study refers to critical thinking with FRISCO criteria. In this study, subjects were taken from students of class VII SMP N 2 Ende Selatan. Each student's research subjects have visual, auditory, and kinesthetic learning styles. Data collection is done by providing a Problem Solving Test (TPM) and an interview. The results obtained, subjects who have a visual learning style, critical thinking processes in solving realistic mathematical problems, able to understand problems, the subject has not been able to determine ways to solve problems, the subject has not been able to carry out the settlement and the subject does not re-examine. Subjects who have auditory learning styles, critical thinking profiles in solving realistic mathematical problems are able to understand problems, but the subject does not re-examine. Subjects who have kinesthetic learning styles of critical thinking processes in solving realistic mathematical problems are able to understand problems, are able to plan problems, subjects can carry out well and check the results.

scholarly journals MATHEMATICAL THINKING PROCESS IN GRAPH THEORY MATERIAL IN TERMS OF STUDENT LEARNING STYLES

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. 1046
Author(s):  
Hetty Patmawati
Keyword(s):  
Graph Theory ◽  
Learning Styles ◽  
Student Learning ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Mathematical Thinking ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Conceptual Thinking ◽  
Thinking Process ◽  
Thinking Processes ◽  
Student Learning Styles

This research is motivated by the lack of understanding  students have in working on graph theory material problems due to differences in students' thinking processes, and  student learning styles when studying discrete mathematics, which requires different thinking with Boolean algebra material. Each student has a different way of thinking skills and learning style. This study uses descriptive qualitative methods so that this study has the objective to find out how the students' mathematical thinking processes in working on graph theory material problems and what obstacles are experienced by students in terms of their learning styles. The focus of research in this study, namely to analyze mathematical thinking processes on graph theory material in terms of student learning styles. The instruments in this study were researchers and also graph theory test questions that were used to view students' thought processes. The research subjects were 5 semester students, as many as 3 people with visual, auditory and kinesnetik learning styles. Then given the problem of graph theory as much as 2 questions, one question in the form of text and another in the form of images. The results show that students with visual learning styles tend to be included in students who have a conceptual thinking process, students with auditory learning styles tend to be included in students who have semi-conceptual thinking processes, while students with kinesthetic learning styles, including students who have computational thinking process . Barriers experienced by students include the lack of understanding of the basic concepts of graph theory and the trajectories and trajectories of Euler and Hamilton.

scholarly journals Proses berpikir siswa dalam menyelesaikan masalah geometri: Perbedaan siswa bertemperamen choleric dengan melancholic

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 134-152
Author(s):  
Miftah Syarifuddin
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Research Subjects ◽  
Ability Test ◽  
Conceptual Thinking ◽  
Descriptive Research ◽  
Geometry Problem ◽  
Thinking Process ◽  
Thinking Processes ◽  
Geometry Problem Solving ◽  
Selection Of

[Bahasa]: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan proses berpikir siswa bertemperamen choleric dan melancholic dalam menyelesaikan masalah geometri. Proses berpikir dalam penelitian ini adalah proses berpikir konseptual atau proses berpikir prosedural. Proses berpikir konseptual meliputi 5 (lima) kompetensi, yaitu menggunakan aturan dasar, melihat pola, menerapkan konsep, mengklarifikasi situasi, dan mengembangkan masalah. Proses berpikir prosedural adalah cara berpikir siswa yang terbiasa menghafal rumus dan menggunakan cara-cara rutin dalam menyelesaikan masalah. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian deskriptif dengan pendekatan kualitatif. Subjek penelitian terdiri dari 2 (dua) siswa perempuan dengan kemampuan matematika tinggi dan setara di kelas IX Salatiga, Indonesia, terdiri dari 1 (satu) siswa bertemperamen choleric dan 1 (satu) siswa bertemperamen melancholic. Pemilihan subjek penelitian berdasarkan hasil tes temperamen dan hasil tes kemampuan matematika. Data penelitian diperoleh dari pemberian tugas penyelesaian masalah geometri dan wawancara kepada para subjek penelitian sebanyak 2 (dua) kali. Pemberian tugas penyelesaian masalah kedua dan wawancara kedua merupakan triangulasi data. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa proses berpikir siswa terungkap melalui tugas penyelesaian masalah geometri yang diberikan. Siswa bertemperamen choleric menggunakan proses berpikir prosedural dalam menyelesaikan masalah geometri, sedangkan siswa bertemperamen melancholic menggunakan proses berpikir konseptual dalam menyelesaikan masalah geometri. Kata kunci: Proses Berpikir; Choleric; Melancholic; Masalah Geometri [English]: This study aims to describe the thinking process of students with choleric and melancholic temperament in solving geometry problems. The thinking process in this research is conceptual thinking process or procedural thinking process. The conceptual thinking process includes 5 (five) competencies, i.e. using basic rules, seing patterns, applying concepts, clarifying situations, and developing problems. The process of procedural thinking is a way of thinking of students who are used to memorizing formulas and using routine ways of solving problems. This research was a descriptive research with qualitative approach. The subjects consisted of 2 (two) female students with high and equivalent mathematics abilities in the ninth grade in Salatiga, Indonesia consisting of 1 (one) choleric student and 1 (one) melancholic student. The selection of research subjects is based on temperament test and mathematical ability test. Research data obtained from geometry problem solving task and interview to the research subjects twice. The second task of problem solving and interview is triangulation of data. The results reveal the thinking process of students through the task of solving the geometry problem given. Student with choleric temperament used procedural thinking processes in solving geometry problems, while student with melancholic temperament used conceptual thinking processes in solving geometry problems. Keywords: Thinking; Choleric; Melancholic; Geometry Problems

scholarly journals Analisis Analisis Berpikir Kritis Siswa SMP dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Pecahan ditinjau dari Gaya Belajar

KadikmA ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 50
Author(s):  
Ayu Imamatul Muslimah
Keyword(s):  
Critical Thinking ◽  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Junior High School ◽  
Basic Skills ◽  
Learning Abilities ◽  
Auditory Learning ◽  
Interview Method ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Thinking Processes

In learning activities, one of the efforts that can be done to improve students' learning abilities is to support learning styles that are following the objectives so that learning can be done effectively. This research was conducted at Junior High School 1 Kalisat, located at Jl. Diponegoro 52 Kalisat, Jember. This study aims to describe the students' critical thinking processes in solving fraction problems in terms of visual, auditory and kinesthetic learning styles. Data collection techniques used consisted of learning style questionnaires, critical thinking tests, and interview method. The subjects in this study were 6 students consisting of 2 students who represented visual, auditory, and kinesthetic learning styles. Based on data analysis, the results show that students with a visual and kinesthetic learning style meet five indicators of critical thinking, namely basic clarification, basic skills, concluding, further clarification, and strategies and tactics. Students with auditory learning styles meet the four indicators of critical thinking namely basic clarification, building basic skills, further clarification, and concluding. While students with auditory learning styles are less able to meet the indicators of strategies and tactics. Keywords: Critical Thinking, Learning Styles, Fraction Problems

scholarly journals PROFIL BERPIKIR KREATIF SISWA SMP KELAS VIII DALAM MENYELESAIKAN MASALAH SEGIEMPAT DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR

KadikmA ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 34
Author(s):  
Egha Fitriyah Ningsih
Keyword(s):  
High School Students ◽  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Junior High School ◽  
Creative Thinking ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Test Methods ◽  
School Students ◽  
Auditory Learning ◽  
Interview Methods

The purpose of this study was to describe the creative thinking profile of grade VIII junior high school students in terms of learning styles in solving quadrilateral problems. This research is a descriptive study using a qualitative approach. The subjects of this research were students VIII A at SMPN 1 Genteng, namely two students from each different type of learning style. Collecting data using questionnaires, test methods, and interview methods. Students' creative thinking is categorized into four indicators, namely fluency, flexibility, originality, and elaboration. The results showed that students in visual learning styles could fulfill all indicators of creative thinking, namely fluency, flexibility, originality, and elaboration. Auditory learning style students can fulfill three indicators of creative thinking, namely fluency, originality, and elaboration.

scholarly journals Gaya Belajar Interpersonal dan Pemahaman Konsep Peserta Didik terhadap Materi Pokok Statistika

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 87-98
Author(s):  
Sutini Sutini ◽  
Martina Yuliver Francisca ◽  
Siti Rokayah ◽  
Yusiana Rismatika Slawantya ◽  
Faqih Faqih
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Qualitative Data ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Research Subjects ◽  
High Level ◽  
Interpersonal Learning ◽  
Important Basis ◽  
Different Levels

Abstract:Understanding the concept for students becomes an important basis in thinking so as to solve the problems that exist in real life. This study aims to determine the level of interpersonal learning styles and students' understanding of the concepts of statistics. This research is qualitative in nature, with the research subjects being 6 students of class XII MIPA 1 in Madrasah Aliyah in Lamongan and 1 mathematics subject teacher. The object in this study is the ability to understand statistical concepts and interpersonal learning styles in students. The instruments used were observation, questionnaires, test questions, interviews, and documentation. Based on the analysis of qualitative data that has been done, the results obtained interpersonal learning styles in students are in the high and medium categories. with different levels of interpersonal learning styles. Even though they have a high level of interpersonal learning style, not all are able to understand statistical concepts well. Abstrak:Pemahaman konsep bagi peserta didik menjadi dasar penting dalam berpikir sehingga dapat menyelesaikan permasalahan-permasalahan yang ada dikehidupan nyata. Penelitian ini memiliki tujuan untuk mengetahui tingkat gaya belajar interpersonal dan pemahaman konsep peserta didik terhadap statistika. Penelitian ini bersifat kualitatif, dengan subjek penelitian adalah 6 peserta didik kelas XII MIPA 1 di salah satu Madrasah Aliyah di Lamongan dan 1 orang guru matapelajaran matematika. Objek dalam penelitian ini adalah kemampuan dalam pemahaman konsep statistika dan gaya belajar interpersonal pada peserta didik. Instrumen yang digunakan adalah observasi, angket, tes soal, wawancara, dan dokumentasi. Berdasarkan analisis data kualitatif yang telah dilakukan, diperoleh hasil gaya belajar interpersonal pada peserta didik berada dalam kategori tinggi dan sedang. dengan tingkat gaya belajar interpersonal yang berbeda. Meskipun memiliki tingkat gaya belajar interpesonal tinggi namun tidak semua mampu memahami konsep statistika dengan baik.

scholarly journals Analisis Gaya Belajar Siswa Berprestasi Studi Komparasi Siswa Berprestasi SMAN 1 dengan MAN 1 Yogyakarta Kelas XI

2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 295-308
Author(s):  
Ali Murfi ◽  
Noneng Siti Rosidah
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Research Subjects ◽  
Average Value ◽  
The Third ◽  
Learning Mathematics ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Individual ◽  
Mathematics And Science

This study was conducted, first, analyzed to determine the learning styles of students excel in Mathematics and Science subjects in class XI SMAN 1 and MAN 1 Yogyakarta by applying the theory of David Kolb's learning style. Second, to predict the differences and similarities of learning styles of students achievement in learning Mathematics Class XI SMAN 1 and MAN 1 Yogyakarta. 18 research subjects were drawn from students of class XI. Determining the subject of research is done by using purposive sampling technique that refers to the result of the average value of UTS Mathematics which is the third highest of any class. The results showed that: (1). Students' learning styles achievement in Mathematics and Science subjects in class XI SMA N 1 and MAN 1 Yogyakarta is varied. This is evidenced by the results if the data obtained show that the student has a unique learning style of each and likely to lead to the individual's personality. Based on the analysis of student learning styles achievement shows that students SMA N 1 Yogyakarta been the subject of much research as 4 students have a learning style Assimilator, 3 students have learning styles Konverger, one student has a learning style Akomodator and one student has a learning style Diverger again. While students perform at MAN 1 Yogyakarta who is the subject of research, as many as four people have Akomodator learning styles, each two students have learning styles Assimilator and Diverger, then one student again has a learning style Konverger. (2). Differences in learning styles that happens is the individual habits that become unique to them. Students perform at SMA N 1 Yogyakarta dominates the Assimilator learning styles, while students of MAN 1 Yogyakarta dominates the Akomodator learning styles.

scholarly journals Thinking Process of Concrete Student in Solving Two-Dimensional Problems

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 117-128
Author(s):  
Sri Adi Widodo ◽  
Ambar Dana Pangesti ◽  
Istiqomah Istiqomah ◽  
Krida Singgih Kuncoro ◽  
Tri Astuti Arigiyati
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Mathematical Problem ◽  
Two Dimensional ◽  
Research Subjects ◽  
Student Work ◽  
Logical Operations ◽  
Mathematical Problems ◽  
Thinking Process ◽  
Thinking Processes

The purpose of this research was to find out the thinking processes of a concrete student in solving two-dimensional problems. The research method used is descriptive qualitative. The research subjects were two students taken using purposive sampling. The instrument used was the Test of Logical Operations and problem-solving tests. Stages of data analysis used are researching all data, making a cognitive classification of students, choosing concrete students to be used as research subjects, reviewing the results of concrete student work in solving mathematical problems, verify data and data sources that have been classified and transcribed in the presentation or exposure of data. The results showed that at the stage of understanding the problem and re-checking the answers, concrete students use the assimilation at the stage of planning to solve the problem of doing the disequilibration. At the stage of carrying out a plan to solve a problem, concrete students carry out the accommodation. During this study, it was found that students 'habits in mathematical problem-solving did not plan to solve problems, did not re-examine answers, and there were students' habits by interpreting the final results of problems. It can be concluded that the students' concrete thinking processes in solving two-dimensional problems vary according to the stages of problem-solving.

scholarly journals Perceptions of Teaching Methods for Preclinical Oral Surgery: A Comparison with Learning Styles

2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 109-119 ◽  
Author(s):  
Esam Omar
Keyword(s):  
Active Learning ◽  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Oral Surgery ◽  
Personality Type ◽  
Dental Students ◽  
Myers Briggs Type Indicator ◽  
Clinical Exposure ◽  
Staff Members ◽  
Index Of Learning Styles

Purpose: Dental extraction is a routine part of clinical dental practice. For this reason, understanding the way how students’ extraction knowledge and skills development are important. Problem Statement and Objectives: To date, there is no accredited statement about the most effective method for the teaching of exodontia to dental students. Students have different abilities and preferences regarding how they learn and process information. This is defined as learning style. In this study, the effectiveness of active learning in the teaching of preclinical oral surgery was examined. The personality type of the groups involved in this study was determined, and the possible effect of personality type on learning style was investigated. Method: This study was undertaken over five years from 2011 to 2015. The sample consisted of 115 students and eight staff members. Questionnaires were submitted by 68 students and all eight staff members involved. Three measures were used in the study: The Index of Learning Styles (Felder and Soloman, 1991), the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI), and the styles of learning typology (Grasha and Hruska-Riechmann). Results and Discussion: Findings indicated that demonstration and minimal clinical exposure give students personal validation. Frequent feedback on their work is strongly indicated to build the cognitive, psychomotor, and interpersonal skills needed from preclinical oral surgery courses. Conclusion: Small group cooperative active learning in the form of demonstration and minimal clinical exposure that gives frequent feedback and students’ personal validation on their work is strongly indicated to build the skills needed for preclinical oral surgery courses.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document