scholarly journals Effect of oseltamivir phosphate versus placebo on platelet recovery and plasma leakage in adults with dengue and thrombocytopenia; a phase 2, multicenter, double-blind, randomized trial

2022 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. e0010051
Author(s):  
Rahajeng N. Tunjungputri ◽  
Silvita Fitri Riswari ◽  
Setyo G. Pramudo ◽  
Lydia Kuntjoro ◽  
Bachti Alisjahbana ◽  
...  

Background Thrombocytopenia, bleeding and plasma leakage are major complications of dengue. Activation of endogenous sialidases with desialylation of platelets and endothelial cells may underlie these complications. We aimed to assess the effects of the neuraminidase inhibitor oseltamivir on platelet recovery and plasma leakage in dengue. Methods We performed a phase 2, double-blind, multicenter, randomized trial in adult dengue patients with thrombocytopenia (<70,000/μl) and a duration of illness ≤ 6 days. Oseltamivir phosphate 75mg BID or placebo were given for a maximum of five days. Primary outcomes were the time to platelet recovery (≥ 100,000/μl) or discharge from hospital and the course of measures of plasma leakage. Results A total of 70 patients were enrolled; the primary outcome could be assessed in 64 patients (31 oseltamivir; 33 placebo). Time to platelet count ≥100,000/μl (n = 55) or discharge (n = 9) were similar in the oseltamivir and placebo group (3.0 days [95% confidence interval, 2.7 to 3.3] vs. 2.9 days [2.5 to 3.3], P = 0.055). The kinetics of platelet count and parameters of plasma leakage (gall bladder thickness, hematocrit, plasma albumin, syndecan-1) were also similar between the groups. Discussion In this trial, adjunctive therapy with oseltamivir phosphate had no effect on platelet recovery or plasma leakage parameters. Trial registration ISRCTN35227717.

AIDS ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 25 (18) ◽  
pp. 2249-2258 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian Gazzard ◽  
Claudine Duvivier ◽  
Christian Zagler ◽  
Antonella Castagna ◽  
Andrew Hill ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 70-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
James B. Bussel ◽  
Gregory Cheng ◽  
Mansoor N. Saleh ◽  
Bhabita Mayer ◽  
Sandra Y. Vasey ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 70 Introduction: Chronic ITP is characterized by decreased platelet counts resulting from autoantibody-mediated peripheral platelet destruction and suboptimal platelet production. Eltrombopag is an oral, thrombopoietin receptor agonist approved for the treatment of ITP in the USA and elsewhere. Thromboembolic events (TEEs) can occur in patients with ITP; it has been speculated that ITP has prothrombotic characteristics and that low platelet counts may prevent a higher incidence of TEEs (Sarpatwari, 2010; Aledort, 2004; Zelcer, 2003). In the UK General Practice Research Database, incidence rates for TEEs were 1.35/100 patient years (PYs) (95% CI [0.99, 1.79]) for patients with ITP vs 1.16/100 PYs (95% CI [0.99, 1.35]) in patients without ITP (Sarpatwari, 2010). Similar results were found in a US claims database study (Bennett, 2008) and in romiplostim studies (Bussel, 2009). In this study we evaluated the incidence of TEEs in patients with chronic ITP treated with eltrombopag. Methods: Data from 446 patients with chronic ITP exposed to eltrombopag were analyzed from 5 eltrombopag clinical trials: two 6-week, randomized, double-blind, phase 2 and 3 studies, with patients on eltrombopag (n=164) or placebo (n=67) (Bussel, 2007; Bussel, 2009); RAISE, a 6-month, randomized, double-blind, phase 3 study, with 135 patients on eltrombopag and 62 on placebo (Cheng, 2010); REPEAT, a phase 2 study with 66 patients on eltrombopag for 3 cycles of 6 weeks on-therapy followed by up to 4 weeks off therapy (Psaila, 2008); and EXTEND, an ongoing extension study with 299 of the same patients on eltrombopag for at least 2 years (Cheng, 2008). The first occurrence of a TEE was used in the calculation of the incidence rates across the ITP program. Confirmed or suspected cases of TEEs were either reported by investigators or identified after sponsor evaluation based on symptoms reported as adverse events (AEs) that were potentially compatible with a TEE. In an additional analysis, the odds ratio for a TEE at different platelet thresholds was investigated to assess if a direct relationship could be established. Results: Across the ITP program, 20 patients (4.5%, 20/446) exposed to eltrombopag have experienced 27 TEEs. The TEEs were DVT (12), pulmonary embolism (6), MI (4), ischemic stroke (3), suspected prolonged reversible ischemic neurologic deficit (1), and transient ischemic attack (1). No placebo-treated patient experienced a TEE. The PYs of exposure to study medication was approximately 17 times greater than PYs of exposure to placebo (eltrombopag 584.4 PYs; placebo 35.4 PYs). Despite the increased exposure to eltrombopag in the EXTEND study, the incidence of TEEs (3.14/100 PYs, 95% CI [1.92, 4.85]) decreased compared to previously reported data (4.04/100 PYs, 95% CI [2.35, 6.46], Bussel, 2009). There was no clear pattern observed with regard to time to TEE onset; events were reported as early as day 1 and up to day 981 (median time to onset 229 days). The platelet counts most proximal to the events ranged between 14,000/μ L and 482,000/μ L (median 143,000/μ L). The majority of patients (55%, 11) had platelet counts below the normal range at the time of the TEE (<150,000/μ L). 4/20 patients experienced the TEE closest to their maximum platelet count achieved on study, whereas the majority (80%, 16/20) experienced the TEE at a lower platelet count than their maximum platelet count during treatment with eltrombopag. As seen in the Table, no changes in the odds ratio for a TEE at different platelet thresholds were observed. All patients experiencing a TEE had at least one risk factor for TEE; analysis did not reveal any one risk factor that was associated with the majority of cases. Two of 15 patients with TEEs tested had positive results for heterozygous Factor V Leiden mutation. Conclusions: There is no increase in the incidence rate of TEEs across the ITP program despite longer duration of eltrombopag treatment. The data presented here confirm previous observations that there is no evidence of a correlation between platelet count increases and the occurrence of TEEs in patients with chronic ITP on eltrombopag. Disclosures: Bussel: GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Cheng:GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Saleh:GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Imcoline, Celgene: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Mayer:GlaxoSmithKline: Employment, Equity Ownership. Vasey:GlaxoSmithKline: Employment. Brainsky:GlaxoSmithKline: Employment.


2016 ◽  
Vol 42 (5) ◽  
pp. 1012-1023 ◽  
Author(s):  
Megan L Ryan ◽  
◽  
Daniel E Falk ◽  
Joanne B Fertig ◽  
Beatrice Rendenbach-Mueller ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 2033-2033
Author(s):  
P. Ernst ◽  
A. Bacigalupo ◽  
O. Ringdén ◽  
T. Ruutu ◽  
A. Zander ◽  
...  

Abstract Background. Recombinant methionyl granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (methuG-CSF; Filgrastim) is commonly used to reduce the duration of neutropenia that follows allo BMT performed after high-dose chemo-/radiotherapy (HDT) in pts with HM. Recently, a retrospective chart review suggested that leukemic pts treated with G-CSF after allo BMT had faster neutrophil recovery, but slower platelet engraftment, increased risk of graft vs host disease (GvHD), and reduced survival relative to pts who did not receive G-CSF (Ringdén et al, 2004). The present double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter phase 3 study was designed to evaluate the effects of Filgrastim treatment on neutrophil recovery. Pts were to be followed for 2 years. Methods. Eligible pts were aged 12–55 and scheduled for allo BMT from a sibling donor preceded by high-dose chemotherapy +/− total body irradiation for treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) or lymphoblastic lymphoma (LBL), high-risk non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL), acute myeloid leukemia (AML), or chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Pts were randomized to receive either Filgrastim (5μg/kg/day) or placebo from transplant until recovery of an absolute neutrophil count (ANC) of ≥0.5x109/L or for a maximum of 42 days. Randomization was stratified by age (<18 and ≥18 years) and remission status (1st complete remission/subsequent remissions) within each center. The primary endpoint was the time to ANC of ≥0.5x109/L. Assuming a standard deviation of 3.8 days, the study was powered to have a probability of at least 80% of detecting a difference of at least 3.6 days between the groups for the endpoint of time to ANC ≥0.5x109/L using a two-tailed significance of 5%. Results. The first pt was enrolled in 1993; however, the planned sample size of 100 pts (50 per arm) was not reached due to slow enrollment and the study was terminated in 1996. A total of 66 pts were enrolled; of these, 51 were analysed (25 Filgrastim, 26 placebo). Filgrastim-treated pts achieved an ANC of ≥0.5x109/L at a median (quartiles) time of 15 (13, 16) days compared with 19 (17, 22) days for placebo; ANC ≥1.0x109/L was reached by 16 (15, 17) and 22 (21, 28) days, respectively. Median (quartiles) time to discharge from hospital was 30 (26, 43) days for Filgrastim vs 36 (28, 42) days for placebo. The number of pts with platelet count ≥25x109/L within 56 days was 16 for Filgrastim vs 23 for placebo, and 12 vs 18, respectively, for platelet count ≥50x109/L within 56 days. The incidence, maximum severity and number of days to onset of acute GvHD were similar across the groups. No difference in adverse events was reported; 4 Filgrastim pts died (0 of disease progression) and 8 placebo pts died (3 of disease progression). Conclusion. The results of this phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial in pts with HM receiving allo BMT may suggest that Filgrastim treatment enhances neutrophil engraftment with no negative impact on platelet recovery or GvHD.


Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 738-738 ◽  
Author(s):  
Uday R. Popat ◽  
Genevieve Ray ◽  
Roland L Bassett ◽  
Man-Yin C Poon ◽  
Benigno C. Valdez ◽  
...  

Background: Delayed platelet recovery and secondary thrombocytopenia, defined as a drop in platelet count not due to disease relapse after initial platelet recovery, occur in 5-25% of patients after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) and indicate adverse prognosis. Platelet transfusion to prevent bleeding remains a mainstay of therapy and role of thrombopoietic agents is not known. Eltrombopag, a non-peptide small molecule, thrombopoietin receptor agonist, is licensed for use in refractory ITP and aplastic anemia. In this phase II randomized double blind placebo controlled study, we investigated the safety and efficacy of eltrombopag for post HCT thrombocytopenia. Methods: Patients 35 days or more after HCT were eligible for the study if they had 1) platelet count ≤ 20 x 109/l sustained for 7 days or if they were platelet transfusion dependent, and 2) neutrophil count ≥ 1.5 x 109/l with or without G-CSF in the previous 7 days. Patients were excluded if they had abnormal liver function tests (ALT ≥ 2.5 ULN, or Bilirubin >2mg/dl) or had prior venous thrombosis. Patients were randomized to receive placebo or eltrombopag using a Bayesian adaptive algorithm in which the probability of randomization to each arm was based upon the ongoing response rate. Eltrombopag was started at a dose of 50mgs and escalated every 2 weeks to 75mgs, 125 mgs and 150mgs if platelet count was < 50 x 109/l. The primary endpoint was platelet count at end of the treatment (8 weeks). A patient was considered responsive if platelet count was ≥ 30 x 109/l. The primary endpoint was evaluated by calculating the Bayesian posterior probability in each arm that the response rate was higher than the other arm. A Beta (0.4, 1.6) prior distribution was assumed for each arm. Given the observed study data, the probability of response in each arm was calculated and the probability that Eltrombopag is superior was computed. Results: Sixty patients were randomized to eltrombopag (n=42) or placebo (n=18) and received at least one dose of drug. 7 patients had an autograft and 53 patients had an allograft. Donor was related for 22 and unrelated for 31 patients. Stem cell source was peripheral blood in 36 patients, bone marrow in 23 patients and cord blood in 1 patient. There were no significant differences in patient characteristics between the 2 treatment arms. The probability that the response rate in the Eltrombopag arm is superior to the response rate in the placebo arm was 0.75, given the observed data. The protocol required this probability to be > 0.975 to declare a winner; thus, the results are inconclusive. Fifteen (36%) of patients in eltrombopag arm responded compared to 5 (28%) of patients in placebo arm. A 95% credible interval for response in the Eltrombopag arm is 22% to 50%, and a 95% credible interval for response in the placebo arm is 11% to 48%. 37 patients completed all 8 weeks of therapy; however, all patients (n=60) who received at least one dose of study treatment were included in the intention to treat evaluation of this endpoint. A secondary objective was to compare proportion of patients achieving a platelet count ≥ 50 x 109/l. Response rate was higher in the eltrombopag arm for this endpoint as well: 9 (21.4%) patients achieved success compared with 0 (0%) patients in the placebo arm (p=0.0466; Fisher's exact test). OS, PFS, relapse rate, and non-relapse mortality were similar in two arms. Conclusion: Eltrombopag improves platelet count in patients with post-transplant thrombocytopenia. Disclosures Kim: Eli Lilly: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document