scholarly journals Effects of high-fidelity simulation education on medical students’ anxiety and confidence

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. e0251078
Author(s):  
Ji Hye Yu ◽  
Hye Jin Chang ◽  
Soon Sun Kim ◽  
Ji Eun Park ◽  
Wou Young Chung ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Medical Students ◽  
Patient Care ◽  
Clinical Setting ◽  
Clinical Performance ◽  
High Fidelity ◽  
High Fidelity Simulation ◽  
Simulation Education ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Care Situation

Introduction Psychological factors such as anxiety and confidence that students have in the patient care situation are important in that this affects the actual clinical performance. Students who are just starting clinical practice have a lack of clinical knowledge, skill proficiency, and patient communication skills, so they experience anxiety and lack of confidence in clinical setting. Practice in a safe environment, such as simulation education, can help students perform more settled and competently in patient care. The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of high-fidelity simulation experience on anxiety and confidence in medical students. Materials and methods This study enrolled 37 5th-year students at Ajou University School of Medicine in 2020. Two simulation trainings were implemented, and a survey was conducted to measure students’ level of anxiety and confidence before and after each simulation. Based on the research data, a paired t-test was conducted to compare these variables before and after the simulation, and whether this was their first or second simulation experience. Results Students had a significantly lower level of anxiety and a significantly higher level of confidence after the simulation than before. In addition, after one simulation experience, students had less anxiety and more confidence before the second simulation compared to those without simulation experience. Conclusions We confirmed that medical students need to be repeatedly exposed to simulation education experiences in order to have a sense of psychological stability and to competently deliver medical treatment in a clinical setting. There is a practical limitation in that medical students do not have enough opportunities to meet the patients during clinical practice in hospitals. Therefore, in order to produce excellent doctors, students should have the expanded opportunities to experience simulation education so they can experience real-world medical conditions.

Effect of In Situ High-Fidelity Simulation Training on the Emergency management of Pneumonia (INSTEP): a mixed-methods study

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 190-195 ◽  
Author(s):  
Owain Michael Leng ◽  
Charlotte Rothwell ◽  
Annamarie Buckton ◽  
Catherine Elmer ◽  
Jan Illing ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Patient Outcomes ◽  
High Fidelity ◽  
High Fidelity Simulation ◽  
Simulation Education ◽  
Audit Data ◽  
Semistructured Interviews ◽  
The Impact

BackgroundThe patient safety agenda has propelled the rise of simulation education, but relatively few evaluations of simulation-based educational interventions have focused on patient outcomes.ObjectiveTo evaluate the impact of an in situ, high-fidelity simulation teaching intervention on the management of community-acquired pneumonia in the ambulatory care unit of a district general hospital.MethodsThis study used a mixed-methods approach to evaluate the impact of a programme of 10 in situ high-fidelity simulation education sessions delivered to a total of 10 junior doctors, nine nurses and seven healthcare assistants. Participants were tasked with managing a manikin simulating a patient with pneumonia in real time in a working clinical area. Subsequent structured debrief emphasised key themes from the national guidelines on pneumonia management. The intervention was evaluated through an immediate feedback form, follow-up semistructured interviews by independent qualitative researchers that underwent content analysis and triangulation with audit data on compliance with national pneumonia guidelines before and after the simulation intervention.ResultsThe in situ simulation intervention was valued by participants both in immediate written feedback and in follow-up semistructured interviews. In these interviews, 17 of 18 participants were able to identify a self-reported change in practice following the simulation intervention. Furthermore, most participants reported observing a change in the clinical practice of their colleagues following the training. Collected audit data did not show a statistically significant change in compliance with the guidelines for the management of pneumonia.ConclusionThis study found evidence of a change in both self-reported and observed clinical practice following a simulation intervention, supporting expert opinion that simulation education can impact clinician behaviours and patient outcomes in complex clinical scenarios. Furthermore, this feasibility study provides a transferrable method to evaluate the real-world impact of simulation education that merits further investigation through an appropriately powered study.

scholarly journals SP2.2.9Using high fidelity simulation to improve hospital-based medical student education

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc Huttman ◽  
Hui Fen Koo ◽  
Charlotte Boardman ◽  
Michael Saunders
Keyword(s):  
Medical Students ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Medical Student Education ◽  
District General Hospital ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Free Text ◽  
High Fidelity ◽  
High Fidelity Simulation ◽  
Qualitative Feedback ◽  
Before And After

Abstract Introduction The evidence shows that experiential learning has multiple benefits in preparing medical students for foundation training. An immersive ‘on call simulation’ session was designed for final-year medical students at a district general hospital. The aim of this project was to assess how beneficial the sessions were and how they can be improved. Methods Pairs of students received 12 bleeps over 2 hours directing them to wards where mock patient folders were placed. Students prioritised bleeps involving deteriorating patients, chasing results and dealing with nursing queries. Simulated senior input was available from the session facilitator. A structured debrief session allowed discussion of each case. Quantitative feedback was gathered using a sliding scale (measured in percentage) for confidence before and after the session. Qualitative feedback was gathered using a free-text box. Results Four sessions were held between October 2020 and January 2021 for a total of 28 students, of which 26 provided feedback. Average confidence increased from 38% to 66%. 96% of students were ‘extremely satisfied’ with the session. Feedback included: “Incredibly immersive and fun” and “I was made to think through my priorities and decisions”. Improvements could be made by using actors/mannequins to simulate unwell patients and by use of skills models. Conclusion High fidelity simulation training is valuable and should be considered a standard part of the student curriculum. It is particularly suited to final year students who have the required clinical knowledge for foundation training but are still developing confidence in clinical decision making and prioritisation.

scholarly journals Assessment of medical students’ clinical performance using high-fidelity simulation: comparison of peer and instructor assessment

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ji Hye Yu ◽  
Mi Jin Lee ◽  
Soon Sun Kim ◽  
Min Jae Yang ◽  
Hyo Jung Cho ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Medical Students ◽  
Clinical Performance ◽  
Peer Assessment ◽  
Performance Assessments ◽  
High Fidelity ◽  
High Fidelity Simulation ◽  
Rater Reliability ◽  
Assessment Scores ◽  
Simulation Based ◽  
Primary Assessment

Abstract Background High-fidelity simulators are highly useful in assessing clinical competency; they enable reliable and valid evaluation. Recently, the importance of peer assessment has been highlighted in healthcare education, and studies using peer assessment in healthcare, such as medicine, nursing, dentistry, and pharmacy, have examined the value of peer assessment. This study aimed to analyze inter-rater reliability between peers and instructors and examine differences in scores between peers and instructors in the assessment of high-fidelity-simulation-based clinical performance by medical students. Methods This study analyzed the results of two clinical performance assessments of 34 groups of fifth-year students at Ajou University School of Medicine in 2020. This study utilized a modified Queen’s Simulation Assessment Tool to measure four categories: primary assessment, diagnostic actions, therapeutic actions, and communication. In order to estimate inter-rater reliability, this study calculated the intraclass correlation coefficient and used the Bland and Altman method to analyze agreement between raters. A t-test was conducted to analyze the differences in evaluation scores between colleagues and faculty members. Group differences in assessment scores between peers and instructors were analyzed using the independent t-test. Results Overall inter-rater reliability of clinical performance assessments was high. In addition, there were no significant differences in overall assessment scores between peers and instructors in the areas of primary assessment, diagnostic actions, therapeutic actions, and communication. Conclusions The results indicated that peer assessment can be used as a reliable assessment method compared to instructor assessment when evaluating clinical competency using high-fidelity simulators. Efforts should be made to enable medical students to actively participate in the evaluation process as fellow assessors in high-fidelity-simulation-based assessment of clinical performance in situations similar to real clinical settings.

scholarly journals The use of multiple-criteria decision-making theory to measure students’ perceptions of high-fidelity simulation

2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 88-93 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maureen Anne Jersby ◽  
Paul Van-Schaik ◽  
Stephen Green ◽  
Lili Nacheva-Skopalik
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Repeated Measures ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Learning Experience ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
High Fidelity ◽  
High Fidelity Simulation ◽  
Initial Exposure ◽  
Repeated Measures Design

BackgroundHigh-Fidelity Simulation (HFS) has great potential to improve decision-making in clinical practice. Previous studies have found HFS promotes self-confidence, but its effectiveness in clinical practice has not been established. The aim of this research is to establish if HFS facilitates learning that informs decision-making skills in clinical practice using MultipleCriteria DecisionMaking Theory (MCDMT).MethodsThe sample was 2nd year undergraduate pre-registration adult nursing students.MCDMT was used to measure the students’ experience of HFS and how it developed their clinical decision-making skills. MCDMT requires characteristic measurements which for the learning experience were based on five factors that underpin successful learning, and for clinical decision-making, an analytical framework was used. The study used a repeated-measures design to take two measurements: the first one after the first simulation experience and the second one after clinical placement. Baseline measurements were obtained from academics. Data were analysed using the MCDMT tool.ResultsAfter their initial exposure to simulation learning, students reported that HFS provides a high-quality learning experience (87%) and supports all aspects of clinical decision-making (85%). Following clinical practice, the level of support for clinical decision-making remained at 85%, suggesting that students believe HFS promotes transferability of knowledge to the practice setting.ConclusionOverall, students report a high level of support for learning and developing clinical decision-making skills from HFS. However, there are no comparative data available from classroom teaching of similar content so it cannot be established if these results are due to HFS alone.

scholarly journals High Fidelity Simulation Enhances Advanced Cardiac Life Support Training in Medical Students

2014 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 286-287 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Amin ◽  
C.L. Anderson ◽  
C. Canales ◽  
M. Langdorf ◽  
S. Lotfipour ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Medical Students ◽  
Life Support ◽  
Advanced Cardiac Life Support ◽  
High Fidelity ◽  
High Fidelity Simulation

Paramedic Student Clinical Performance During High-Fidelity Simulation After a Physically Demanding Occupational Task

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Alex (Sandy) MacQuarrie ◽  
Jayden R. Hunter ◽  
Samantha Sheridan ◽  
Amanda Hlushak ◽  
Clare Sutton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Performance ◽  
High Fidelity ◽  
High Fidelity Simulation ◽  
Occupational Task

scholarly journals A review of clinical reasoning in nursing education: based on high-fidelity simulation teaching method

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 175-183 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qiao-Qian Luo ◽  
Marcia A Petrini
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Education ◽  
Nursing Students ◽  
Patient Care ◽  
Clinical Reasoning ◽  
Teaching Method ◽  
Essential Feature ◽  
Care Practice ◽  
High Fidelity ◽  
High Fidelity Simulation ◽  
Reasoning Ability

AbstractObjectiveClinical reasoning is an essential feature of health care practice; it is also a crucial ability for providing patient care of high quality. It has been identified that graduate nurses may lack the clinical reasoning skills to deliver safe and effective patient care. It is therefore of paramount importance to enhance nursing students' clinical reasoning ability. High-fidelity simulation (HFS) is proved to be an effective teaching and learning method, which may also have some advantages over other teaching methods.MethodsThe authors retrospectively reviewed the related literature, illustrated the application of high-fidelity simulation teaching method in nursing education, putting the focus on the use of it in teaching with clinical reasoning.ResultsThe application of high-fidelity simulation to nursing education can simulate the clinical situation, thus to create a safe, continuous and efficient learning environment for students, and it can effectively improve students' clinical reasoning ability.Conclusionshigh-fidelity simulation is effective for clinical reasoning teaching in nursing education. The extension of its application in China should be of great value. The relevant further study is suggested focusing on how to overcome its own limitations and have it better applied in nursing education in China.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document