scholarly journals Exploring the facilitators, barriers, and strategies for self-management in adults living with severe mental illness, with and without long-term conditions: A qualitative evidence synthesis

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (10) ◽  
pp. e0258937
Author(s):  
Abisola Balogun-Katung ◽  
Claire Carswell ◽  
Jennifer V. E. Brown ◽  
Peter Coventry ◽  
Ramzi Ajjan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Illness ◽  
Physical Health ◽  
Severe Mental Illness ◽  
Evidence Synthesis ◽  
Barriers And Facilitators ◽  
Self Management ◽  
Qualitative Evidence Synthesis ◽  
Long Term Conditions ◽  
Qualitative Evidence

Background People living with severe mental illness (SMI) have a reduced life expectancy by around 15–20 years, in part due to higher rates of long-term conditions (LTCs) such as diabetes and heart disease. Evidence suggests that people with SMI experience difficulties managing their physical health. Little is known, however, about the barriers, facilitators and strategies for self-management of LTCs for people with SMI. Aim To systematically review and synthesise the qualitative evidence exploring facilitators, barriers and strategies for self-management of physical health in adults with SMI, both with and without long-term conditions. Methods CINAHL, Conference Proceedings Citation Index- Science, HMIC, Medline, NICE Evidence and PsycInfo were searched to identify qualitative studies that explored barriers, facilitators and strategies for self-management in adults with SMI (with or without co-morbid LTCs). Articles were screened independently by two independent reviewers. Eligible studies were purposively sampled for synthesis according to the richness and relevance of data, and thematically synthesised. Results Seventy-four articles met the inclusion criteria for the review; 25 articles, reporting findings from 21 studies, were included in the synthesis. Seven studies focused on co-morbid LTC self-management for people with SMI, with the remaining articles exploring self-management in general. Six analytic themes and 28 sub-themes were identified from the synthesis. The themes included: the burden of SMI; living with co-morbidities; beliefs and attitudes about self-management; support from others for self-management; social and environmental factors; and routine, structure and planning. Conclusions The synthesis identified a range of barriers and facilitators to self-management, including the burden of living with SMI, social support, attitudes towards self-management and access to resources. To adequately support people with SMI with co-morbid LTCs, healthcare professionals need to account for how barriers and facilitators to self-management are influenced by SMI, and meet the unique needs of this population.

scholarly journals Exploring determinants of self-management in adults with severe mental illness: a qualitative evidence synthesis

BJPsych Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (S1) ◽  
pp. S13-S13
Author(s):  
Claire Carswell ◽  
Jennifer Brown ◽  
Abisola Balogun ◽  
Jo Taylor ◽  
Peter Coventry ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Illness ◽  
Environmental Factors ◽  
Self Management ◽  
Qualitative Evidence Synthesis ◽  
Management Support ◽  
Long Term Conditions ◽  
Qualitative Evidence ◽  
Beliefs And Attitudes ◽  
People’S Perceptions

AimsTo systematically review and synthesise qualitative evidence about determinants of self-management in adults with SMI. The goal is to use findings from this review to inform the design of effective self-management strategies for people with SMI and LTCs.BackgroundPeople living with serious mental illness (SMI) have a reduced life expectancy by around 15–20 years, mainly due to the high prevalence of long-term physical conditions such as diabetes and heart disease. People with SMI face many challenges when trying to manage their physical health. Little is known about the determinants of self-management – managing the emotional and practical issues – of long-term conditions (LTCs) for people with SMI.MethodSix databases, including CINAHL and MEDLINE, were searched to identify qualitative studies that explored people's perceptions about determinants of self-management in adults with SMI (with or without comorbid LTCs). Self-management was defined according to the American Association of Diabetes Educator's self-care behaviours (AADE7). Determinants were defined according to the Capabilities, Opportunity, Motivations and Behaviours (COM-B) framework. Eligible studies were purposively sampled for synthesis according to the richness of the data (assessed using Ames et al (2017)'s data richness scale), and thematically synthesised.ResultTwenty-six articles were included in the synthesis. Seven studies focused on self-management of LTCs, with the remaining articles exploring self-management of SMI. Six analytic themes and 28 sub-themes were identified from the synthesis. The themes included: the additional burden of SMI; living with comorbidities; beliefs and attitudes about self-management; support from others for self-management; social and environmental factors; routine, structure and planning. Capabilities for self-management were linked to people's perceptions about the support they received for their SMI and LTC from healthcare professionals, family and friends. Opportunities for self-management were more commonly expressed in the context of social and environmental factors. Motivation for self-management was influenced by beliefs and attitudes, whilst being closely related to the burden of SMI.ConclusionThe themes identified from the synthesis suggest that capabilities, opportunities and motivations for self-management can be negatively influenced by the experience of SMI, whilst social and professional support, improved access to resources, and increased involvement in care, could promote self-management. Support programmes for people with SMI and LTCs need to account for these experiences and adapt to meet the unique needs of this population.

Small steps: barriers and facilitators to physical health self-management by people living with mental illness

2014 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 216-230 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vivien Kemp ◽  
Colleen Fisher ◽  
Sharon Lawn ◽  
Malcolm Battersby ◽  
Mohan K. Isaac
Keyword(s):  
Mental Illness ◽  
Physical Health ◽  
Barriers And Facilitators ◽  
Self Management

scholarly journals The barriers and facilitators to screening in emergency departments: a qualitative evidence synthesis (QES) protocol

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 50
Author(s):  
Louise Barry ◽  
Rose Galvin ◽  
Sylvia Murphy Tighe ◽  
Margaret O'Connor ◽  
Damian Ryan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Conceptual Model ◽  
Evidence Synthesis ◽  
Grey Literature ◽  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
Barriers And Facilitators ◽  
Screening Tools ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Qualitative Evidence Synthesis ◽  
Clinical Workflow ◽  
Qualitative Evidence

Background: Early detection of adults at risk of adverse outcomes through systematic screening in the emergency department (ED) can serve to identify high risk groups in need of targeted assessment and early intervention in the hospital or community setting. However, issues such as time pressures, inadequate resources, poor integration of tools into clinical workflow and lack of staff training are cited among the barriers to successfully implementing screening tools in the ED. The aim of this qualitative evidence synthesis (QES) is to synthesize evidence pertaining to the barriers and facilitators to implementing screening tools in the ED. Methods: A comprehensive literature search will be completed in the following databases Scopus, CINAHL, Medline, Embase, Pubmed and Cochrane library. Grey literature sources will also be searched. Qualitative or mixed methods studies that include qualitative data on the perspectives and experiences of stakeholders on the implementation of screening tools in the ED will be included. “Best fit” framework synthesis will be utilised to produce a context specific conceptual model to describe and explain how these barriers and facilitators may impact on implementation. An a priori framework of themes, formed from the existing evidence base, will inform the ultimate thematic analysis and assist in the organisation and interpretation of search results, ensuring the QES is built upon current findings. CASP will be utilised to quality appraise articles and GRADE CERQual will assess confidence in the QES findings. Conclusions: This synthesis will offer a new conceptual model for describing the perspectives, perceptions and experiences of barriers and facilitators experienced by patients and key stakeholders involved in the implementation of screening tools in the ED. The results of this review will inform practice and aid the development and implementation of change strategies to support the implementation of screening tools in the ED. Registration: PROSPERO CRD42020188712 05/07/20

scholarly journals Why do healthcare professionals fail to escalate as per the Early Warning System (EWS) protocol? A qualitative evidence synthesis of the barriers and facilitators of escalation

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sinead M O Neill ◽  
Barbara Clyne ◽  
Miriam Bell ◽  
Avilene Casey ◽  
Brendan Leen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Early Warning ◽  
Clinical Judgment ◽  
Healthcare Professionals ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Evidence Synthesis ◽  
Warning System ◽  
Barriers And Facilitators ◽  
Qualitative Evidence Synthesis ◽  
Quality Appraisal ◽  
Qualitative Evidence

Abstract Background: Early warning systems (EWSs) are used to assist clinical judgment in the detection of acute deterioration to avoid or reduce adverse events including unanticipated cardiopulmonary arrest, admission to the intensive care unit and death. Sometimes healthcare professionals (HCPs) do not trigger the alarm and escalate for help according to the EWS protocol and it is unclear why this is the case. The aim of this qualitative evidence synthesis was to answer the question ‘why do HCPs fail to escalate care according to EWS protocols?’ The findings will inform the update of the National Clinical Effectiveness Committee (NCEC) National Clinical Guideline No. 1 Irish National Early Warning System (INEWS). Methods: A systematic search of the published and grey literature was conducted (until February 2018). Data extraction and quality appraisal were conducted by two reviewers independently using standardised data extraction forms and quality appraisal tools. A thematic synthesis was conducted by two reviewers of the qualitative studies included and categorized into the barriers and facilitators of escalation. GRADE CERQual was used to assess the certainty of the evidence.Results: Eighteen studies incorporating a variety of HCPs across seven countries were included. The barriers and facilitators to the escalation of care according to EWS protocols were developed into five overarching themes: Governance, Rapid Response Team (RRT) Response, Professional Boundaries, Clinical Experience, and EWS parameters. Barriers to escalation included: Lack of Standardisation, Resources, Lack of accountability, RRT behaviours, Fear, Hierarchy, Increased Conflict, Over confidence, Lack of confidence, and Patient variability. Facilitators included: Accountability, Standardisation, Resources, RRT behaviours, Expertise, Additional support, License to escalate, Bridge across boundaries, Clinical confidence, Empowerement, Clinical judgment, and a tool for detecting deterioration. These are all individual yet inter-related barriers and facilitators to escalation. Conclusions: The findings of this qualitative evidence synthesis provide insight into the real world experience of HCPs when using EWSs. This in turn has the potential to inform policy-makers and HCPs as well as hospital management about emergency response system-related issues in practice and the changes needed to address barriers and facilitators and improve patient safety and quality of care.

A qualitative evidence synthesis of users’ experience of mobile health applications in the self-management of type 2 diabetes

2021 ◽  
pp. 174239532098387
Author(s):  
Margaret O’Neill ◽  
Catherine Houghton ◽  
Geraldine Crilly ◽  
Maura Dowling
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Health Information ◽  
Mobile Health ◽  
Evidence Synthesis ◽  
Self Management ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Qualitative Evidence Synthesis ◽  
Qualitative Evidence ◽  
Mhealth Apps

Aim The aim of this qualitative evidence synthesis was to identify and synthesise qualitative research relating to experiences of using mobile health (mHealth) applications to aid self-management of Type 2 Diabetes. Methods Using a systematic search strategy, 11 databases were searched (Medline, CINAHL, PsychInfo, PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, ProQuest A&1, ProQuest UK & Ireland, Mednar). “Best fit” framework synthesis was used guided by the Health Information Technology Acceptance Model (HITAM). Assessment of methodological limitations was conducted using Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) and confidence in the review findings were guided by GRADE-CERQual. Results Fourteen eligible studies were included in the synthesis (7 qualitative and 5 mixed methods). Key themes identified under the health, information and technology zones of the HITAM revealed the benefits of mHealth apps, barriers to their use, their perceived usefulness and ease of use. Discussion Most people used the apps for feedback on their self-management and found them helpful in their communication with health care providers. Some embraced the technology and found it easy to use while others found mHealth apps to be counterintuitive.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document