scholarly journals Descriptive study of chest x-ray examination in mandatory annual health examinations at the workplace in Japan

PLoS ONE ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. e0262404
Author(s):  
Yuya Watanabe ◽  
Toru Nakagawa ◽  
Kota Fukai ◽  
Toru Honda ◽  
Hiroyuki Furuya ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Detection Rate ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Care Center ◽  
Stage I ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Health Care Center ◽  
Chest X Ray

The utility of chest x-ray examination (CXR) in mandatory annual health examinations for occupational health is debatable in Japan. This study aimed to provide basic data to consider future policies for mandatory annual health examinations in the workplace. A nationwide descriptive survey was performed to determine the rate of detection of tuberculosis, lung cancer, and other diseases through CXR in organizations associated with National Federation of Industrial Health Association. The rate of finding on CXR conducted during annual health examinations in FY2016 was evaluated. Data regarding diagnosis based on follow-up examination findings were obtained and compared with the national statistics. In addition, CXR findings were compared with the results of low-dose lung computed tomography performed at the Hitachi Health Care Center. From 121 surveyed institutions, 88 institutions with 8,669,403 workers were included. For all ages, 1.0% of examinees required follow-up examination. Among 4,764,985 workers with diagnosis data, the tuberculosis detection rate was 1.8–5.3 per 100,000 persons. For Lung cancer, 3,688,396 workers were surveyed, and 334 positive cases were detected. The lung cancer detection rate using CXR was 9.1–24.4 per 100,000 persons. From 164 cases with information regarding the clinical stage, 72 (43.9%) had Stage I lung cancer. From 40,045 workers who underwent low-dose computed tomography multiple times, 31 lung cancer cases, all with Stage I disease, were detected (detection rate: 77.4 per 100,000 persons). Our findings suggest that CXR plays a little role in the detection of active tuberculosis. With regard to LC screening, the detection rate of LC by CXR was lower, approximately 50%, than the expected rate (41.0 per 100,000 persons) of LC morbidity based on the age–sex distribution of this study population. However, the role of CXR for LC screening cannot be mentioned based on this result, because assessment of mortality reduction is essential to evaluate the role.

Health and quality of life (QOL) issues in four groups of lung cancer patients: Low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screened, chest x-ray detected, incidentally found, and routinely diagnosed.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1610-1610
Author(s):  
Ping Yang ◽  
Kathleen J. Yost ◽  
Matthew M. Clark ◽  
Mariza de Andrade ◽  
Katherine M. Piderman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Incidental Finding ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Lung Cancer Patients ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Chest X Ray ◽  
Low Dose Computed Tomography

1610 Background: Low dose computed tomography (LDCT) scans have reduced lung cancer deaths by 20.3% in high risk populations, although there is an unknown balance between the benefits and harms of LDCT scans as a screening tool. Our purpose was to compare health-related QOL issues among lung cancer patients who were initially detected by LDCT scans; 4 comparison groups included: lung cancer diagnosed by a screening chest X-ray, as an incidental finding from procedures taken for other medical reasons, or based on symptoms indicative for lung cancer and routinely diagnosed, and individuals who were LDCT screened but found no lung cancer (controls who participated in Mayo’s lung cancer CT screening trial). Methods: A total of 1,658 lung cancer patients (cared at Mayo Clinic) in the 4 groups (37, 151, 389, and 1081 respectively) and 488 controls were compared on following patient-reported outcomes (collected via validated tools): overall QOL, four symptoms (cough, pain, dyspnea, fatigue), mental/ physical/ emotional/ social/ spiritual QOL, and other concerns (e.g., family/ friends/ financial/ legal). A clinically significant deficit was defined as at least 10-points in difference (or <50 points) on a 0-100 scale. The rates of deficits were compared via Fisher’s exact tests and average QOL values via Kruskal-Wallis tests. Results: Overall QOL and individual symptoms were significantly worse (p<0.05) in all lung cancer groups than in controls, except for pain. LDCT-screened patients reported the greatest deficit among the 4 lung cancer groups in physical (41%), emotional (24%), social (38%), and spiritual QOL (24%); whereas chest X-ray detected patients had the least deficit in overall QOL (22%) and pain (32%). All 4 lung cancer groups experienced much worse fatigue (52-64%) than the controls (32%). Conclusions: Our preliminary results suggest that LDCT-screening detected lung cancer patients reported a different QOL profile from other lung cancer patients and non-lung cancer controls. The clinical course, smoking behavior, and QOL related health issues associated with LDCT screening for lung cancer warrant thorough investigation.

Cost-Effectiveness of Chest X-Ray Follow-Up of Patients Treated for Seminoma of the Testis

1986 ◽  
Vol 72 (4) ◽  
pp. 405-408 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefano Ciatto ◽  
Luca Cionini ◽  
Paolo Pacini
Keyword(s):  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Detection Rate ◽  
Primary Treatment ◽  
Stage I ◽  
First Year ◽  
Consecutive Series ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Chest X Ray ◽  
One Year

The authors report on a consecutive series of 253 cases of seminoma of the testis followed with periodic chest X-ray examinations from a minimum of three to a maximum of 27 years. The detection rate of asymptomatic intrathoracic metastases (ITM) was considered together with the costs of the follow-up procedure. Chest X-ray follow-up is not advisable beyond one year from primary treatment, since most (14 of 18) ITM occur in the first year, the detection rate of ITM beyond this date is too low (0.11% patients/year), and the related costs are too high (over $ 130,000 per ITM detected). Chest X-ray follow-up is questionable even in the first year after primary treatment for Stage I cases because of the low detection rate (1.38% patients/year) and the high costs (over $ 14,000 per ITM detected), whereas it appears to be opportune in Stages IIA and IIB.

scholarly journals Computed tomography follow-up identifies radically treatable new primaries after resection for lung cancer

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jenny Mitchell ◽  
Rachel Benamore ◽  
Fergus Gleeson ◽  
Elizabeth Belcher
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Primary Lung Cancer ◽  
Negative Likelihood Ratio ◽  
University Hospitals ◽  
Early Stage Lung Cancer ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Chest X Ray

Abstract OBJECTIVES The optimal imaging programme for the follow-up of patients who have undergone resection of primary lung cancer is yet to be determined. We investigated the incidence and patterns of new and recurrent malignancy after resection for early-stage lung cancer in patients enrolled into a computed tomography (CT) follow-up programme. METHODS We reviewed the outcomes of consecutive patients who underwent CT follow-up after resection of early-stage primary lung cancer at the Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, between 2013 and 2017. RESULTS Four hundred and sixty-six consecutive patients underwent resection of primary lung cancer between 1 January 2013 and 31 March 2017. Three hundred and thirty-one patients (71.0%) were enrolled in CT follow-up. The median follow-up was 98 weeks (range 26–262). Sixty patients (18.2%) were diagnosed with programme-detected malignancy. Recurrence was diagnosed in 36 patients (10.9%), new primary lung cancer in 16 patients (4.8%) and non-lung primary tumours in 8 patients (2.4%). A routine CT scan identified the majority of new primary lung cancers (84.2%) and those with disease recurrence (85.7%). The majority of programme-detected malignancies were radically treatable (55%). The median survival of programme-detected cancers was 92.4 versus 23.0 weeks for patients with clinically detected tumours (P < 0.0001). Utilizing the CT scout image as a surrogate for chest X-ray, the sensitivity of this modality was 16.95% (8.44–28.97%) and specificity was 89.83% (79.17–96.18%). Negative likelihood ratio was 0.92 (0.8–1.07). CONCLUSIONS CT follow-up of surgically treated primary lung cancer patients identifies malignancy at a stage where radical treatment is possible in the majority of patients. Chest X-ray follow-up may not be of benefit following lung cancer resection.

Screening for Lung Cancer With Low-Dose Helical Computed Tomography: Anti-Lung Cancer Association Project

2002 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 911-920 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomotaka Sobue ◽  
Noriyuki Moriyama ◽  
Masahiro Kaneko ◽  
Masahiko Kusumoto ◽  
Toshiaki Kobayashi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Helical Ct ◽  
Helical Computed Tomography ◽  
Tumor Diameter ◽  
Sputum Cytology ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Chest X Ray ◽  
Stage Ia

PURPOSE: Because efficacy of lung cancer screening using chest x-ray is controversial and insufficient, other screening modalities need to be developed. To provide data on screening performance of low-dose helical computed tomography (CT) scanning and its efficacy in terms of survival, a one-arm longitudinal screening project was conducted. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 1,611 asymptomatic patients aged 40 to 79 years, 86% with smoking history, were screened by low-dose helical CT scan, chest x-ray, and 3-day pooled sputum cytology with a 6-month interval. RESULTS: At initial screening, the proportions of positive tests were 11.5%, 3.4%, and 0.8% with low-dose helical CT scan, chest x-ray, and sputum cytology, respectively. In 1,611 participants, 14 (0.87%) cases of lung cancer were detected, with 71% being stage IA disease and a mean tumor diameter of 19.8 mm. At repeated screening, the proportions of positive tests were 9.1%, 2.6%, and 0.7% with low-dose helical CT, chest x-ray, and sputum cytology, respectively. In 7,891 examinations, 22 (0.28%) cases of lung cancer were detected, with 82% being stage IA disease and a mean tumor diameter of 14.6 mm. The 5-year survival rate for screen-detected lung cancer was 76.2% and 64.9% for initial and repeated screening, respectively. CONCLUSION: Screening with low-dose helical CT has potential to improve screening efficacy in terms of reducing lung cancer mortality. An evaluation of efficacy using appropriate methods is urgently required.

scholarly journals Minimal-dose computed tomography is superior to chest x-ray for the follow-up and treatment of patients with resected lung cancer

2014 ◽  
Vol 147 (1) ◽  
pp. 30-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Waël C. Hanna ◽  
Narinder S. Paul ◽  
Gail E. Darling ◽  
Hadas Moshonov ◽  
Frances Allison ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Lung Cancer ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Minimal Dose ◽  
Chest X Ray

LOW-DOSE COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY IN MOSCOW FOR LUNG CANCER SCREENING (LDCT-MLCS): BASELINE RESULTS

2019 ◽  
Vol 65 (2) ◽  
pp. 224-233
Author(s):  
Sergey Morozov ◽  
Viktor Gombolevskiy ◽  
Anton Vladzimirskiy ◽  
Albina Laypan ◽  
Pavel Kononets ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Lung Cancer Screening ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Malignant Neoplasms ◽  
Number Needed To Screen ◽  
Low Dose Computed Tomography

Study aim. To justify selective lung cancer screening via low-dose computed tomography and evaluate its effectiveness. Materials and methods. In 2017 we have concluded the baseline stage of “Lowdose computed tomography in Moscow for lung cancer screening (LDCT-MLCS)” trial. The trial included 10 outpatient clinics with 64-detector CT units (Toshiba Aquilion 64 and Toshiba CLX). Special low-dose protocols have been developed for each unit with maximum effective dose of 1 mSv (in accordance with the requirements of paragraph 2.2.1, Sanitary Regulations 2.6.1.1192-03). The study involved 5,310 patients (53% men, 47% women) aged 18-92 years (mean age 62 years). Diagnosis verification was carried out in the specialized medical organizations via consultations, additional instrumental, laboratory as well as pathohistological studies. The results were then entered into the “National Cancer Registry”. Results. 5310 patients (53% men, 47% women) aged 18 to 92 years (an average of 62 years) participated in the LDCT-MLCS. The final cohort was comprised of 4762 (89.6%) patients. We have detected 291 (6.1%) Lung-RADS 3 lesions, 228 (4.8%) Lung- RADS 4A lesions and 196 (4.1%) Lung-RADS 4B/4X lesions. All 4B and 4X lesions were routed in accordance with the project's methodology and legislative documents. Malignant neoplasms were verified in 84 cases (1.76% of the cohort). Stage I-II lung cancer was actively detected in 40.3% of these individuals. For the first time in the Russian Federation we have calculated the number needed to screen (NNS) to identify one lung cancer (NNS=57) and to detect one Stage I lung cancer (NNS=207). Conclusions. Based on the global experience and our own practices, we argue that selective LDCT is the most systematic solution to the problem of early-stage lung cancer screening.

scholarly journals Efficacy of chest X-ray in the diagnosis of COVID-19 pneumonia: comparison with computed tomography through a simplified scoring system designed for triage

2021 ◽  
Vol 52 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Akın Çinkooğlu ◽  
Selen Bayraktaroğlu ◽  
Naim Ceylan ◽  
Recep Savaş
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Intensive Care Units ◽  
Scoring System ◽  
Imaging Modality ◽  
Ground Glass Opacity ◽  
Initial Presentation ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Chest X Ray

Abstract Background There is no consensus on the imaging modality to be used in the diagnosis and management of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia. The purpose of this study was to make a comparison between computed tomography (CT) and chest X-ray (CXR) through a scoring system that can be beneficial to the clinicians in making the triage of patients diagnosed with COVID-19 pneumonia at their initial presentation to the hospital. Results Patients with a negative CXR (30.1%) had significantly lower computed tomography score (CTS) (p < 0.001). Among the lung zones where the only infiltration pattern was ground glass opacity (GGO) on CT images, the ratio of abnormality seen on CXRs was 21.6%. The cut-off value of X-ray score (XRS) to distinguish the patients who needed intensive care at follow-up (n = 12) was 6 (AUC = 0.933, 95% CI = 0.886–0.979, 100% sensitivity, 81% specificity). Conclusions Computed tomography is more effective in the diagnosis of COVID-19 pneumonia at the initial presentation due to the ease detection of GGOs. However, a baseline CXR taken after admission to the hospital can be valuable in predicting patients to be monitored in the intensive care units.

scholarly journals Incidental renal tumours on low-dose CT lung cancer screening exams

2016 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 104-109 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul F Pinsky ◽  
Barbara Dunn ◽  
David Gierada ◽  
P Hrudaya Nath ◽  
Reginald Munden ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Renal Cancer ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Lung Cancer Screening ◽  
National Lung Screening Trial ◽  
Renal Tumours ◽  
Chest X Ray ◽  
Low Dose Computed Tomography ◽  
Lung Screening

Introduction Renal cancer incidence has increased markedly in the United States in recent decades, largely due to incidentally detected tumours from computed tomography imaging. Here, we analyze the potential for low-dose computed tomography lung cancer screening to detect renal cancer. Methods The National Lung Screening Trial randomized subjects to three annual screens with either low-dose computed tomography or chest X-ray. Eligibility criteria included 30 + pack-years, current smoking or quit within 15 years, and age 55–74. Subjects were followed for seven years. Low-dose computed tomography screening forms collected information on lung cancer and non-lung cancer abnormalities, including abnormalities below the diaphragm. A reader study was performed on a sample of National Lung Screening Trial low-dose computed tomography images assessing presence of abnormalities below the diaphragms and abnormalities suspicious for renal cancer. Results There were 26,722 and 26,732 subjects enrolled in the low-dose computed tomography and chest X-ray arms, respectively, and there were 104 and 85 renal cancer cases diagnosed, respectively (relative risk = 1.22, 95% CI: 0.9–1.5). From 75,126 low-dose computed tomography screens, there were 46 renal cancer diagnoses within one year. Abnormalities below the diaphragm rates were 39.1% in screens with renal cancer versus 4.1% in screens without (P < 0.001). Cases with abnormalities below the diaphragms had shorter median time to diagnosis than those without (71 vs. 160 days, P = 0.004). In the reader study, 64% of renal cancer cases versus 13% of non-cases had abnormalities below the diaphragms; 55% of cases and 0.8% of non-cases had a finding suspicious for renal cancer (P < 0.001). Conclusion Low-dose computed tomography screens can potentially detect renal cancers. The benefits to harms tradeoff of incidental detection of renal tumours on low-dose computed tomography is unknown.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document