Theophrastus’De sensibus in A-fragments of Diels-Kranz. Revisiting the Testimonia and their Value

Rhizomata ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 120-145
Author(s):  
Han Baltussen
Keyword(s):  
Sense Perception ◽  
Quality Of Reporting ◽  
Accurate Evaluation ◽  
Sharp Distinction

AbstractAs a crucial source for Presocratic theories of sense perception, Theophrastus’ De sensibus deserves a closer scrutiny than the placement among A-fragments, as often suggested or instigated. This paper proposes to refine our terminology for labelling the varying quality of reporting within the A-fragments has. It supplements the existing criticism of Diels’ division by analysing neglected features. A reassessment of the assumptions underlying the terms ‘fragment’ and ‘paraphrase’ can contribute to dissolving the sharp distinction between A- and B-fragments in DK. It advocates, not equality for A-fragments, but a more inclusive and accurate evaluation of the passages.

scholarly journals The quality of intervention reporting in trials of therapeutic exercise for hip osteoarthritis: a secondary analysis of a systematic review

Trials ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Louise C. Burgess ◽  
Thomas W. Wainwright ◽  
Khara A. James ◽  
Johan von Heideken ◽  
Maura D. Iversen
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Secondary Analysis ◽  
Internal Validity ◽  
Hip Osteoarthritis ◽  
Therapeutic Exercise ◽  
Quality Of Reporting ◽  
Effective Interventions ◽  
Randomised Controlled ◽  
Intervention Reporting

Abstract Background Therapeutic exercise is recommended as a core treatment for hip osteoarthritis (HOA). Whilst it is widely accepted that exercise can improve pain and disability, optimal type and dose of exercise are yet to be agreed upon. This may, in part, be attributed to the wide variation and inadequate reporting of interventions within the literature. This study evaluates the quality of intervention reporting among trials of therapeutic exercise in HOA. Methods Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were sourced in a systematic review, completed in August 2020. Two raters independently used the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) and Consensus on Exercise Reporting Template (CERT) to evaluate intervention reporting. Correlations between quality assessment scores and CERT and TIDieR scores evaluated the relationship between internal validity and external applicability. The year of publication was compared to the quality of reporting scores. Results Fourteen RCTs were included in the analysis. On average, studies were awarded 9.43 ± 1.95 out of 12 points for the TIDieR checklist (range 4–12) and 13.57 ± 4.01 out of 19 points for the CERT (range 5–19). Pearson’s correlation coefficient suggested that the quality of reporting had improved over time and that there was a fair, positive relationship between internal validity and external applicability. Discussion Whilst the quality of intervention reporting is improving, many RCTs of therapeutic exercise in HOA lack the detail necessary to allow accurate evaluation and replication. Researchers are encouraged to utilise the standardised reporting guidelines to increase the translation of effective interventions into clinical practice.

Appraising the Quality of Reporting of American College of Surgeons NSQIP Emergency General Surgery Studies

2021 ◽  
Vol 232 (5) ◽  
pp. 671-680 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamad El Moheb ◽  
Hadi Sabbagh ◽  
Daniel Badin ◽  
Tala Mahmoud ◽  
Basil Karam ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
General Surgery ◽  
Emergency General Surgery ◽  
Quality Of Reporting ◽  
American College Of Surgeons

Quality of reporting of dental survival analyses

2014 ◽  
Vol 41 (12) ◽  
pp. 928-940 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. M. Layton ◽  
M. Clarke
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Reporting ◽  
Survival Analyses

Reporting Quality in Math Meta-Analyses for Students with or at Risk of Disabilities

2021 ◽  
pp. 001440292110508
Author(s):  
Gena Nelson ◽  
Soyoung Park ◽  
Tasia Brafford ◽  
Nicole A. Heller ◽  
Angela R. Crawford ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
At Risk ◽  
Students With Disabilities ◽  
Reporting Quality ◽  
Quality Of Reporting ◽  
Mathematics Interventions ◽  
Screening Process ◽  
Mathematics Intervention ◽  
Meta Analyses ◽  
Abstract Screening

Researchers and practitioners alike often look to meta-analyses to identify effective practices to use with students with disabilities. The number of meta-analyses in special education has also expanded in recent years. The purpose of this systematic review is to evaluate the quality of reporting in meta-analyses focused on mathematics interventions for students with or at risk of disabilities. We applied 53 quality indicators (QIs) across eight categories based on recommendations from Talbott et al. to 22 mathematics intervention meta-analyses published between 2000 and 2020. Overall, the meta-analyses met 61% of QIs and results indicated that meta-analyses most frequently met QIs related to providing a clear purpose (95%) and data analysis plan (77%), whereas meta-analyses typically met fewer QIs related to describing participants (39%) and explaining the abstract screening process (48%). We discuss the variation in quality indicator scores within and across the quality categories and provide recommendations for future researchers.

Improved quality of reporting safety data of medication in paediatric randomised controlled trials

2021 ◽  
pp. archdischild-2020-321197
Author(s):  
Taco Jan Prins ◽  
Corine Rollema ◽  
Eric van Roon ◽  
Tjalling de Vries
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Randomised Controlled Trials ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Drug Event ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Quality Of Reporting ◽  
Event Reporting ◽  
The Past ◽  
Randomised Controlled

ObjectiveEvaluating the reporting of safety data of medication in paediatric randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in 2017–2018 compared with our earlier study.DesignLiterature search with a systemic appraisal of adverse drug event reporting.Main outcome measuresQuality of reporting of safety data using Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) and Ioannidis scores in paediatric drug RCTs. The CONSORT score consists of nine recommendations of the CONSORT Group issued to improve the quality of reporting adverse events. The Ioannidis score is based on these advices. We considered a CONSORT score of at least 6 and an Ioannidis score of at least 3 as sufficient.ResultsWe reviewed 100 RCTs published in 2017 and 2018. Ninety-four (94%) articles mentioned adverse events compared with 78% in the earlier study. Fifty-seven per cent used a standardised method for reporting adverse events compared with 34% in our earlier study. In 26 of the articles, the expected adverse events were defined, and 27 articles had a preset standardised scale for adverse events. Of these, 62 articles (62%) had a CONSORT score of 6 or higher compared with 18% in 2010. In the present study, 67% had an Ioannidis score of 3 or higher, whereas in the earlier study this was 29%. Both differences are statistically significant (p<0.05).ConclusionsReporting safety data in paediatric RCTs has improved over the past 10 years. However, there is still room for improvement and for further improvement. Authors and editors should give more attention to methods for collecting, reporting and presenting safety data of RCTs in studies and manuscripts.

Quality of reporting in randomized controlled trials of therapeutic cardiovascular medical devices

Surgery ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 165 (5) ◽  
pp. 965-969 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wenwen Chen ◽  
Jiajie Yu ◽  
Longhao Zhang ◽  
Guanyue Su ◽  
Wen Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Medical Devices ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Quality Of Reporting ◽  
Randomized Controlled

scholarly journals Improving the quality of reporting of research studies

2009 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 137-142 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelvin P. Jordan ◽  
Martyn Lewis
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Reporting ◽  
Research Studies
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document