scholarly journals Criminal Law Study on Narcotics Abuse Rehabilitation

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-62
Author(s):  
Salma Widiasyam ◽  
Oheo Haris ◽  
Siti Aisah Abdullah

The purpose of this research is to determine whether the rehabilitation of the victims of narcotics abuse in the decree of the District Court of Kendari No. 236/Pid. Sus/2019/PN K has fulfilled the element of Article 54 Act number 35 year 2009. The type of research used in this study is normative research, using the Statute Approach, Case Approach, Conceptual Approach.Based on the results the authors conclude that narcotic addicts and narcotics abuse victims are obliged to undergo medical rehabilitation and social rehabilitation. The judge in the its verdict prosecute convicted because it has been proven legally and committed guilty of committing a criminal offence "narcotic abuse for himself", dropping a criminal against the defendant with imprisonment for 1 (one) year and 2 (two) months have in accordance with article 127 paragraph (1) of Law No. 35 Year 2009. However, in the ruling judge ignores article 127 paragraph (2) and paragraph (3) of Law No. 35 Year 2009 that the obligation of the judge in providing rehabilitation efforts against the defendant cases of drug abuse in line with the issuance of Circular Letter of Supreme Court No. 4 Year 2010.

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 365
Author(s):  
Fahmi Reza

Drug abuse crime is becoming increasingly widespread, especially among the younger generation where the younger generation is the main pillar of a nation that can endanger the survival of the nation in the future. There is a difference of perception between law enforcement regarding the criminalization of the offenses related to drug abuse convictions were deemed less appropriate prison committed against to drugs. Scriptwriting non study was conducted using literature study using laws in Act No. 35 of 2009 challenged the Narcotics and the Supreme Court Circular No. 4 of 2010placement of abuse, abusers and drug addicts into rehabilitation institute of medical and social rehabilitation. The conclusion of this script writing is that the administration of prison sentences against offenders in this respect addicts who are victims of drug abuse should not be done and prioritize rehabilitation verdict.Keywords: Verdict Prison; Drug Abuse; Rehabilitation.


2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 183-198
Author(s):  
Raharni Raharni ◽  
Sri Idaiani ◽  
Yuyun Yuniar

Abstract Narcotics, Psychotropic, and Addictive Substance Abuse (NAPZA) is a problem in Indonesia, one of the consequences is relapse. Relapse is a process where someone has been declared abstinence (recovered) and returns to using drugs. Relapse rates also still high in some countries. Drug users experience a relapse between one month to one year after leaving the treatment program. The aim of this research was to find out the policies and programs related to handling of NAPZA relapse in rehabilitation centers. The study design was cross sectional with qualitative study by conducting round table discussion (RTD) with stakeholders from the National Narcotics Agency (BNN), Drug and Food Control Agency (BPOM), Directorate for Prevention and Control of Mental Health and Drug Problems Ministry of Health, Drug Addiction Hospital, psychiatric practioners, volunteers, and confirmation to the rehabilitation center. The results of study showed that there was no national minimum standard for handling NAPZA relapse. The various relapse definition caused differences in relapse rates. Relapse rate according to Directorate Mental Health and NAPZA of the Ministry of Health in 2018 was 24.3% as rough figures (claim data). NAPZA relapse rates in the National Narcotics Agency, prior to the post rehabilitation program, was 90%, and decreasing to 30% after conducting post-rehabilitation program. While relapse rate in Rehabilitation and Therapy House, Lido Bogor was around 7%. There is no national standard for how many times a drug user is considered a victim or categorized as criminal action. In conclusion, there is Ministries/institutions of egocentrism in handling NAPZA relapse. Ministry of Health emphasizes medical rehabilitation, Ministry of Social emphasizes social rehabilitation, while BNN more comprehensively covering medical rehabilitation, social rehabilitation, and post rehabilitation. Narcotics, psychotropic, and comprehensive precursor control is carried out by the BPOM comprehensively, from imports, production, distribution, delivery and the use. The existence of E-NAPZA, administrative sanctions and criminal sanctions will reduce illicit trafficking and drug abuse. Indonesian Presidential Instruction No. 6 of 2018 concerning the National Action Plan for the Prevention of Eradication of drug abuse and Circulation (P4GN), in ministries/institutions is expected to decrease the number of NAPZA relapse. Abstrak Penyalahgunaan Narkotika, Psikotropika, dan Zat Adiktif (NAPZA) merupakan masalah di Indonesia yang salah satu akibatnya yaitu kekambuhan (relapse). Relapse merupakan suatu proses dimana seseorang telah dinyatakan abstinence (pulih) dan kembali menggunakan NAPZA. Angka relapse masih tinggi di beberapa negara. Pengguna NAPZA mengalami kekambuhan antara satu bulan sampai dengan satu tahun setelah keluar dari program pengobatan. Tujuan penelitian adalah untuk mengetahui kebijakan dan program yang terkait dengan penanggulangan relapse NAPZA di panti rehabilitasi. Desain penelitian berupa cross sectional dan studi kualitatif melalui round table discussion (RTD) dengan para pemangku kepentingan yaitu Badan Narkotika Nasional (BNN), Badan Pengawasan Obat dan Makanan (BPOM), Direktorat Pencegahan dan Pengendalian Masalah Kesehatan Jiwa dan NAPZA Kementerian Kesehatan, Rumah Sakit Ketergantungan Obat (RSKO), praktisi kejiwaan, dan relawan, serta konfirmasi ke panti rehabilitasi. Hasil penelitian yang diperoleh menunjukkan belum ada standar minimal nasional untuk penanganan relapse NAPZA. Definisi relapse yang beragam menyebabkan perbedaan angka relapse. Angka relapse di Direktorat Jiwa dan NAPZA Kementerian Kesehatan tahun 2018 yaitu 24,3% sebagai angka kasar (data klaim). Angka relapse NAPZA di BNN sebelum adanya program pasca rehabilitasi yaitu 90% dan setelah ada program pasca rehabilitasi menjadi 30%. Angka relapse di UPT Rumah Rehabilitasi dan Terapi NAPZA, Lido Bogor sekitar 7%. Belum ada standar secara nasional sampai berapa kali seorang penyalahguna NAPZA dianggap sebagai korban atau masuk kategori tindakan pidana. Kesimpulan penelitian menunjukkan adanya egosentrisme di masing-masing kementerian/lembaga dalam melakukan kebijakan penanganan penyalahgunaan NAPZA. Kebijakan Kementerian Kesehatan lebih menekankan pada rehabilitasi medis, Kementerian Sosial menekankan pada rehabilitasi sosial, sedangkan kebijakan BNN lebih komprehensif meliputi rehabilitasi medis, rehabilitasi sosial, dan pasca rehabilitasi. Pengawasan narkotika, psikotropika, dan prekusor komprehensif dilakukan oleh BPOM, mulai dari hulu sampai hilir yaitu dari impor, produksi, penyaluran, penyerahan, dan penggunaan. Aadanya aplikasi E-NAPZA serta sanksi administratif dan pidana dapat mengurangi peredaran gelap dan penyalahgunaan NAPZA. Melalui Instruksi Presiden Republik Indonesia No. 6 Tahun 2018 tentang Rencana Aksi Nasional Pencegahan Pemberantasan Penyalahgunaan dan Peredaran NAPZA dan Prekusor (P4GN) di kementerian/lembaga diharapkan membantu menurunkan angka relapse NAPZA.


2020 ◽  
pp. 69-75
Author(s):  
K.A. Bakishev

The Concept of the legal policy of the Republic of Kazakhstan for the period from 2010 to 2020emphasizes that the criminal law must meet the requirements of legal accuracy and predictability ofconsequences, that is, its norms must be formulated with a sufficient degree of clarity and based on clearcriteria that exclude the possibility of arbitrary interpretation provisions of the law. Meanwhile, an analysisof the Criminal Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan shows that some articles on liability for road transportoffences are designed poorly. For example, Art. 346 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan ischaracterized by a combination of formal and qualified corpus delicti, as well as two forms of guilt — intentand negligence; in Art. 351 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan, the circle of subjects of thecriminal offence was significantly reduced due to the unjustified exclusion of drivers of non-mechanicalvehicles. As a result, the Supreme Court of the Republic of Kazakhstan in the regulatory decree «On thepractice of the courts applying the criminal law in cases of crimes related to violation of the rules of theroad and the operation of vehicles’ of June 29, 2011 made a number of errors and contradictions that led todifficulties in qualifying the criminal offence and the appointment criminal punishment. Taking into accountthe law-enforcement and legislative experience of Kazakhstan and other countries in the field of ensuringtraffic safety, the author proposes amendments and additions to the named regulatory decision of theSupreme Court of the Republic of Kazakhstan to improve its quality and improve law enforcement practice.


2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 261
Author(s):  
Ratri Novita Erdianti

Narcotics crime in Indonesia becomes a problem that until now never ceased. One of the problems is the increasing number of narcotics abusers. In our country, narcotic users/narcotics addicts can already be said as a criminal offender. In the Narcotics Act no. 35 of 2009 explained that what are meant by Narcotics Abusers are people who use Narcotics without rights or against the law. Persons who use narcotics unlawfully and unlawfully herein may be classified as addicts and distributors who use and conduct circulation. In the narcotics law, a drug addict victim of narcotics must undergo medical rehabilitation and social rehabilitation. But in reality, the article for narcotics abusers is more directed at other positions in the positions of dealers whose criminal consequences become imprisonment. This is for the author less appropriate. So that efforts made in solving cases of perpetrators of criminal acts become part of criminal policy in the context of the prevention of narcotics crime. The problem that the writer raised is about the relevance of criminal prison for narcotics abusers with the purpose of punishment and how the application of alternative punishment against narcotics abusers from the perspective of criminal policy. This study was conducted using normative juridical, which examines Law no. 35 of 2009 which regulates the form of punishment for the perpetrators of narcotics abuse is associated with the theories in criminal law


2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 119-134
Author(s):  
Al Furqon

This research was carried out at the Makassar District Court in Makassar, with research methods using data collection techniques by means of research library and field research. The results of this research indicate that all the elements of a criminal offence committed by the pengancaman the second defendant had sesuasi with the elements contained in article 335 of the PENAL CODE with Article 55 paragraph (1) of the CRIMINAL CODE. This is apparent from satisfy all the elements in accordance with the article didakwakan on the defendant. Article didakwakan, namely Article 335 paragraph (1) of the CRIMINAL CODE. With satisfy the elements and look at the application of the criminal law against the crime pengancaman, then the defendant must account for his actions in accordance with the ruling of the District Court Judges deposed by the Makassar imprisonment of three (3) months and pay the fees. In deciding the matter State Court judge Makassar has pretty much consideration, starting from the demands of the public prosecutor, the accused, description of witnesses, as well as satisfy the elements pursuant to article didakwakan, as well as the things that are incriminating and relieve. So defendants are convicted with imprisonment for 3 (three) months and pay the fees, not fully contain the benefit law. Considering the act committed by the two defendants, then according to the author, the criminal who dropped by the Tribunal of judges rated very lightly.  


1972 ◽  
Vol 7 (02) ◽  
pp. 186-194 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meir Dan Cohen

1. Foreword: The following judgment of the Supreme Court deals with an affair which lies on the periphary of criminal law, but nevertheless may serve as a means of raising a few problems which are of crucial importance in the sphere of penal law. These problems are all attached to one of the two central pillars of every crime, namely: the actus reus. We shall try to prove that even though this concept is well-known and hackneyed, it still contains many deficiencies and is a source of misunderstandings. First, we shall try to expose the deficiency in the judgment itself, and then we shall proceed to a broader consideration of the perversions in the definitions of the actus reus of certain crimes in the legislation. 2. The Judgment: The matter under trial was as follows: The official receiver (the respondent) applied to the District Court for an order according to sees. 130 and 131 of the Bankruptcy Ordinance to bring the appellant, who is a bankrupt, to trial for offences under these sections. The appellant was invited to the proceedings on that application, gave evidence at the hearing, and after the respective arguments of the parties had been heard, an order was granted by the Court as required by the applicant.


2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Aldita Putra Bayu Pratama

AbstractThis study aims to determine the implementation of rehabilitation decisions for narcotics users in Surabaya District Court. And to find out the obstacles in implementing rehabilitation. This research uses an empirical juridical method that is research in the form of empirical studies to find theories about the process of occurrence and about the process of working and the effectiveness of law in society. Data sources were obtained from literature, applicable laws and interviews with Judges of the Surabaya District Court. The analysis used uses the recapitulation of decision data from the Surabaya District Court regarding drug decisions. Article 54 of Law No. 35/2009 concerning Narcotics states that: Narcotics addicts and victims of narcotics abusers must undergo medical rehabilitation or social rehabilitation. The results of the study can be concluded that the factors used by the judges in providing rehabilitation decisions are not necessarily only according to the law but with demands. Regarding the implementation of rehabilitation, it is also not free from the obstacles faced by the parties who proposed in particular. These constraints lie in the supporting and inhibiting factors of rehabilitation, the lack of socialization regarding the requirements in proposing rehabilitation. With the obstacles already made various efforts that can overcome these obstacles. Therefore there is a need for socialization - socialization and motivation as well as counseling to the next generation of the nation about the effects and dangers of narcotics so as not to be misused in the future.Keywords: narcotics; rehabilitationAbstrakPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui implementasi putusan rehabilitasi bagi pengguna narkotika di pengadilan negeri surabaya. Dan untuk mengetahui kendala dalam pelaksanaan rehabilitasi. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis empiris yaitu penilitian yang berupa studi - studi empiris untuk menemukan teori-teori mengenai proses terjadinya dan mengenai proses bekerjanya dan efektifitas hukum di dalam masyarakat. Sumber data diperoleh dari literatur, perundang-undangan yang berlaku dan wawancara kepada Hakim Pengadilan Negeri Surabaya. Analisis yang digunakan menggunakan data rekapitulasi putusan dari Pengadilan Negeri Surabaya mengenai putusan narkoba. Pasal 54 Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 Tentang Narkotika menyatakan bahwa pecandu narkotika dan korban penyalahguna narkotika wajib menjalani rehabilitasi medis atau rehabilitasi sosial. Hasil penelitian dapat disimpulkan bahwa faktor-faktor yang digunakan hakim dalam memberikan putusan rehabilitasi tidak serta merta hanya dengan menurut undang-undang saja melainkan dengan tuntutan. Tentang pelaksanaan rehabilitasi juga tidak lepas dari kendala yang dihadapi oleh para pihak yang mengajukan khususnya. Kendala-kendala tersebut terdapat pada faktor pendukung serta faktor penghambat rehabilitasi, kurangnya sosialisasi mengenai syarat-syarat dalam mengajukan rehabilitasi. Dengan adanya kendala sudah dilakukan berbagai upaya yang dapat mengatasi kendala tersebut. Oleh karena itu perlu adanya sosialisasi-sosialisasi dan motivasi dan juga konseling kepada generasi penerus bangsa tentang dampak serta bahaya narkotika agar tidak disalahgunakan dikemudian hari.Kata kunci: narkotika; rehabilitasi


2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 35
Author(s):  
Ning Adiasih

The living law is a refl  ection of the community values as accommodated in Article 5(1) of Law No. 48 of 2009 concerning Judiciary Power, which encourages judges to fi  nd and apprehend the values of law and justice of the societies. Inheritance dispute settlement in Indonesia may give the judges some options to implement certain law because of the pluralistic pattern of Indonesian inheritance law. On the other hand, the judges may have function to complement statutory laws and may create new law through forming law or fi  nding law to be implemented on certain pending case. The judges must have a thorough knowledge and interpret the law applied on certain case. For instance when the deceased was a Moslem, while one of the heirs is a non-Muslim, the judges of religious court may decide that non-Muslim heir entitled to the bequest as wasiat wajibah. Likewise, the judges of district court may implement inheritance law of adat law or Civil Code. The pluralism of the sources of law in inheritance cases is quite a problem for the judges, therefore the Supreme Court has enacted a guidelines in Circular Letter No. MA/Kumdil/171/VK/1991, dated on 8 May 1991. This article will question the implementation of the guidelines.


Author(s):  
Aleksey Tarbagaev ◽  
Ludmila Maiorova ◽  
Yana Ploshkina

The second attempt of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation to introduce the concept of a criminal offence into Russian criminal and criminal procedure legislation widens the non-rehabilitating grounds for the termination of a criminal case or prosecution with the imposition of other criminal law measures: it is suggested that, in addition to a court fine, community work and partially paid work should also be introduced. This leads to certain problems, including problems with the presumption of innocence and the observance of the principle of justice. The authors turn to the German experience for a better understanding of the situation. Germany faced similar problems much earlier, when § 153а was introduced in the Criminal Procedure Code of the Federal Republic of Germany (CPC of the FRG); it provided for an opportunity to terminate criminal prosecution for criminal offences on the grounds of expediency with the imposition of duties and regulations on the accused, which are akin to criminal law measures under draft law № 1112019-7. Taking into consideration the theoretical approaches developed in Germany, the practice of the Constitutional Court of the FRG and the Supreme Court of the FRG, the authors examine the goals of introducing § 153а in the CPC of the FRG, the practice of its implementation, as well as the problem of terminating criminal prosecution on the grounds of expediency with the imposition of duties and regulations on the accused connected with the observance of the Constitution of the FRG, the presumption of innocence, the principles of justice, certainty, equality before law; they analyze the controversial legal nature of duties and regulations under § 153а in the CPC of the FRG. According to German criminal procedure law, the termination of criminal prosecution on the grounds of expediency with the imposition of duties and regulations on the accused is a right, and not a duty of the corresponding officers and agencies as it is, in fact, an alternative to criminal prosecution which makes it possible to terminate it at a certain stage when there are all the necessary legal grounds for criminal prosecution.


2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-70
Author(s):  
Hajairin Hajairin

In this research, the author saw in two court judgments which taken out by the District Court (PN) of Raba Bima, number 341/Pid.B/2014/PN.R.bi and the High Court of Mataram (PT), number 20/Pid/2015/PT.Mtr. Both of judgments are strengthen each other, it defendant is in the period of detention during 19 years in prison. However, the  verdict/judgment of Supreme Court Number 815K/Pid/2015 cancelled of two court judgment which it underneath. In this case, the Judge has different view of law as the main point to be consideration to make decision for Abdul Khalik. The construction of law in this case has to be seen and translated by the concept of judgment and legal certainty, because of different decision making by District Court (PN) of Raba Bima, the High Court of Mataram and Supreme Court which is freeing Abdul Khalik from all lawsuits. Based on these situation, it need to deep analysis and critically to get the best judgment as the goal of criminal law which is born by the criminal justice system.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document