scholarly journals Cheating in chess: a call for an integrated disciplinary regulation

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 57-83
Author(s):  
Salomėja Zaksaitė

This article examines recent regulation in the sport of chess with a focus on cheating. On the one hand, disciplinary law in chess could be considered relatively underdeveloped compared with other sports. On the other hand, however, this kind of ‘underdevelopment’ might be appropriate since chess governing bodies have not yet introduced interventionist rules. These two interacting perspectives shape the aim and the objectives of legal research designed to protect the chess community from cheating by suggesting adequate disciplinary measures. The analysis focuses mainly on two forms of cheating: computer-assisted cheating and match-fixing. The broad concept of cheating and relatively young legal regulation in an under-researched sport call for interdisciplinary analysis, therefore, knowledge of sports law, human rights as well as criminology is applied.

2020 ◽  
Vol 66 (4/2019) ◽  
pp. 193-206
Author(s):  
Darko Simović

The adoption of the Act on Prevention of Domestic Violence was driven by the creation of a more effective legal framework for the protection of victims of domestic violence, and, therefore, also by the alignment of the legal system of the Republic of Serbia with international obligations. The main novelties include multi-sectoral cooperation and primarily preventive nature of the law. However, from its very adoption, it has been pointed to its noticeably repressive character, as well as to provisions with potentially harmful impacts. Hence, this paper represents a contribution to the discussion on the importance and scope of the solutions provided for in the Act on Prevention of Domestic Violence. On the one hand, it points to major novelties intended to contribute to a more effective prevention of domestic violence. On the other hand, it questions the constitutionality and appropriateness of some of the legal solutions, arguing that, in particular respects, the lawmaker had to use a wiser and more subtle approach to conceptualising the provisions of this law.


2018 ◽  
Vol 65 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Silvio Ferrari

The conflicts between rights of God and human rights are on the rise. On the one hand, there are some rights that are qualified as human rights in the most important international conventions and in many national constitutions. As such, they are to be respected always and everywhere. On the other hand, there are rights that are directly or indirectly attributed to the will of God. Their respect is regarded as a religious obligation to be upheld even when it implies the violation of human rights. These are the terms of the conflict and the fact that they sink their roots in non-negotiable beliefs – rights related to the very nature of man vs. rights dependent on the will of God–makes this conflict particularly serious and complex. This article discusses the structural and historical causes of this conflict and proposes a few strategies to reduce the tensions between these two sets of rights.


This article discusses the features of legal support for the functioning of the digital economy. Some reasons for the need for modernization of legislation in the context of the development of the digital economy are highlighted. Based on international experience, approaches to legal regulation in the field of the digital economy are proposed, by ensuring such a legal regime in which innovations, on the one hand, will develop freely, and, on the other hand, will be protected from possible risks.


Author(s):  
Erasmus Mayr

This comment examines the impact of Buchanan’s and Sreenivasan’s critique of the mirroring view on some established theories of human rights, in particular on ‘political’ accounts like Joseph Raz’s, which consider human rights to be a subclass of moral rights. It is argued that, on the one hand, such theories are not best understood as relying on the mirroring view, and, on the other hand, that they have resources to defend the mirroring view against Buchanan’s and Sreenivasan’s criticisms.


Author(s):  
Хусейн Вахаевич Идрисов

Статья посвящена характеристике криптовалюты в финансово-экономических и нормативно-правовых отношениях, складывающихся вокруг данного явления. Перечислены основные недостатки и преимущества применения криптовалюты в гражданском обороте, а также отношение к ней ряда государств в плане ее государственно-правового регулирования. В заключении статьи сделан вывод о том, что криптовалюты в современном мире имеют довольно противоречивый эффект: С одной стороны, это привлекательный финансовый инструмент для субъектов финансово-экономических отношений, но, с другой - это еще пока малоизученный и не апробированный массово на практике объект отношений, элемент гражданского оборота, связанный с большими рисками ее обращения. The article is devoted to the characteristics of the cryptocurrency in the financial, economic and regulatory relations that develop around this phenomenon. The main disadvantages and advantages of using cryptocurrency in civil circulation are listed, as well as the attitude of a number of states to it in terms of its state-legal regulation. In conclusion, the article concludes that cryptocurrencies in the modern world have a rather contradictory effect: On the one hand, it is an attractive financial instrument for the subjects of financial and economic relations, but, on the other hand, it is still a little-studied and not widely tested in practice object of relations, an element of civil turnover associated with high risks of its circulation.


2017 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 257-284
Author(s):  
Marian Burchardt

AbstractLegal anthropologists and sociologists of religion increasingly recognize the importance of law in current controversies over religious diversity. Drawing on the case of South Africa, this article explores how such controversies are shaped by contestations over what counts as ‘religion’. Analyzing the historical context and emergent forms of institutional secularity from which contemporary contestations over religious diversity draw, the article explores debates and practices of classification around religion, tradition, and culture, and the ways in which these domains are co-constituted through their claims on the law: on the one hand through an analysis of religion-related jurisprudence; on the other hand through an examination of the debates on witchcraft, law, and religion. I argue that the production of judicial knowledge of ‘religion’, ‘culture’, and ‘tradition’ is tied up with contestations over the power to define the meaning of the domains. In fact, contrary to notions of constitutionality in which rights seem to exist prior to the claims made on their basis, in a fundamental sense rights struggles help to constitute the contemporary human rights dispensation. Against the Comaroffs’ claim that judicialization depoliticizes power struggles, I show that legal claims making remains vibrantly political.


Probacja ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. 65-115
Author(s):  
Jarosław Tekliński

One of the few exceptions to the principle of the immediate execution of a penalty, expressed in Article 9 § 1 of the Executive Penal Code, is the institution of its deferral. The conditions of its application are specifi ed in the provisions of Article 150 and Article 151 of the Executive Penal Code. Postponement of a custodial sentence is not absolute, because the occurrence of certain factual or legal conditions during its duration may result in its termination. The subject of the article is to analyse the grounds for ending the postponement of a custodial sentence, with particular emphasis on the institution of appealing the postponement, and modifi cation of the decision pursuant to Article 24 of the Executive Penal Code. The study uses the method of dogmatic analysis, emphasizing, albeit with diff erent intensity, elements such as: description and systematization of legal norms, their interpretation as well as establishing and defi ning concepts. In the opinion of the author, the issue of the grounds for ending a postponement of a custodial sentence is, on the one hand, an attractive area of scientifi c research from a theoretical perspective. On the other hand, it is an important problem faced in the practice of judicial authorities. It is also a subject to which science seems to devote too little attention. Such a state of aff airs undoubtedly determines the need for scientific of the subject under consideration. Its results allow for the conclusion that the current legal regulation requires correction, the direction of which, by indicating the proposed changes to the applicable regulations, is presented by the author in this study.


2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-62
Author(s):  
E. S. Kryukova ◽  
V. D. Ruzanova

In the article on the basis of a critical analysis of the existing positions in the doctrine the concept of a biobank as an object of rights was formulated. At the same time, it is proposed to distinguish between the organizations in charge of biobanks and the collections themselves. It was concluded that biobank is a complex object, which is differentiated unity, since its elements, on the one hand, are autonomous, but on the other hand, are interconnected and interdependent. It is emphasized that the formation of a single legal regime of biobanks is complicated by the substantive heterogeneity of this object and the diversity of its elements. Taking into account the experience of European States in this field of legal regulation and scientific views, the idea of publishing as a basic special law on biobanks, which should establish their legal regime as an object of rights and rules for organizations under the jurisdiction of biobanks, was supported. The need for organizations working with biobanks to provide unprecedented protection is proven. The structure of the legal regime of biobank has been determined and as its most important component a group of rules on obtaining the consent of the holder for the further use of biobanks and data derived from them has been identified. The feasibility of introducing more diverse forms of consent to the circulation of the contents of biobanks is justified.


2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 268-279
Author(s):  
Nabitatus Sa'adah

AbstractThis study aims to determine the review of tax dispute resolution through objection agencies. The method used in this study is normative legal research. The results of the study point out that First, the position of the tax objection institution, including one form of administrative effort, is recognized as being in the positive law of Indonesia, specifically to resolve an administrative dispute. Second, the position of the objection institution, on the one hand, is intended to accelerate the settlement of tax disputes, but on the other hand, has a weakness related to the objectivity of the decision considering the breaker is one of the parties that issued the decision. The suggestion of this research is that if the objection institution is seen as very important in its existence, especially in an effort to accelerate the settlement of tax disputes, the institution must be truly able to demonstrate its existence as an institution capable of providing objective dispute resolution. Breakers must uphold moral integrity so that they can produce fair decisions.Keywords: Tax Disputes, Objection Institutions, Legal SettlementAbstrakPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui tinjauan terhadap penyelesaian sengketa pajak  melalui  lembaga keberatan. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum normatif. Hasil penelitian menujukan bahwa Pertama, Kedudukan lembaga keberatan pajak termasuk salah satu bentuk upaya administrasi  diakui keberadaannya dalam hukum positif  Indonesia khususnya untuk menyelesaikan suatu sengketa administrasi. Kedua, Kedudukan lembaga keberatan disatu sisi dimaksudkan untuk mempercepat penyelesaian sengketa pajak, tetapi disisi lain mempunyai kelemahan terkait keobyektifan putusan mengingat pemutus adalah salah satu pihak yang mengeluarkan putusan. Saran dari penelitian ini adalah apabila lembaga keberatan dipandang sangat penting keberadaannya khususnya dalam upaya mempercepat penyelesaian sengketa pajak maka lembaga tersebut harus betul-betul mampu menunjukkan eksistensinya sebagai lembaga yang mampu memberi penyelesaian sengketa yang obyektif. Pemutus harus menjunjung tinggi integritas moral sehingga mampu menghasilkan keputusan yang adil.Kata Kunci: Sengketa Pajak, Lembaga Keberatan, Penyelesaian Hukum


1980 ◽  
Vol 20 (217) ◽  
pp. 171-183 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacques Moreillon

The theme of this paper is not an easy one. The difficulty of our subject is twofold: on the one hand, two of its three facets (peace and human rights) raise conceptual and interpretative problems; on the other hand, to deal with them together would involve finding a common factor, something which is not obvious even—perhaps especially—within the limited framework of the Red Cross movement.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document