scholarly journals Objective Grading System Scores After the Use of a New Finishing Protocol

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-16
Author(s):  
Álvaro Carvajal Flórez ◽  
Óscar Zapata Noreña ◽  
Diana María Barbosa Liz ◽  
Patricia Plazas ◽  
Felipe Montoya Sepúlveda ◽  
...  

Objective: This non-randomized controlled clinical trial compared a new finishing protocol UDEA2 with the UDEA1 finishing protocol, according to the Objective Grading System (ogs).Methods: Forty-one patients treated in the postgraduate orthodontics clinic were included. Twenty patients served as intervention group (ig) with whom was used the UDEA2 protocol which includes dental positioners, and were compared to twenty-one patients that served as control group (cg) with whom was used the UDEA1 finishing protocol. An orthodontist (gold standard) determined the required movements with positioners used in the UDEA2 protocol. Eight ogs variables were measured by a calibrated clinician.Results: Both groups were comparable in gender, age and severity, but not in type of treatment applied. The total ogs for gc was 28.9±10.0, for ig at T1 (before the positioner) was 20.4±6.0 and the score for ig at T2 (after the positioner) was 19.2±6.0, with statistically significant differences (P≤0.05). The ogs score was principally increased for “alignment” in gc and ig-T1 groups. This variable decreased significantly in the ig-T2 group. There were no patients with more than 30 points in the ig-T2. The regression analysis showed an association (P=0.002) between the finishing protocol applied and the final ogs score. Possibility of belonging to the ig-T2 decreases as the ogs score increases (odds ratio [or] 0.83; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.738, 0.933).Conclusions: The implementation of the UDEA2 finishing protocol, which includes an orthodontics student’s constant training, a Finishing Protocol Guide application, and a dental positioner in the finishing phase, showed an improvement in quality of orthodontic treatments.

JMIR Nursing ◽  
10.2196/20747 ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. e20747
Author(s):  
Mahboube Davoudi ◽  
Tahereh Najafi Ghezeljeh ◽  
Farveh Vakilian Aghouee

Background Patients with heart failure have low quality of life because of physical impairments and advanced clinical symptoms. One of the main goals of caring for patients with heart failure is to improve their quality of life. Objective The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of the use of a smartphone-based app on the quality of life of patients with heart failure. Methods This randomized controlled clinical trial with a control group was conducted from June to October 2018 in an urban hospital. In this study, 120 patients with heart failure hospitalized in cardiac care units were randomly allocated to control and intervention groups. Besides routine care, patients in the intervention group received a smartphone-based app and used it every day for 3 months. Both the groups completed the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire before entering the study and at 3 months after entering the study. Data were analyzed using the SPSS software V.16. Results The groups showed statistically significant differences in the mean scores of quality of life and its dimensions after the intervention, thereby indicating a better quality of life in the intervention group (P<.001). The effect size of the intervention on the quality of life was 1.85 (95% CI 1.41-2.3). Moreover, the groups showed statistically significant differences in the changes in the quality of life scores and its dimensions (P<.001). Conclusions Use of a smartphone-based app can improve the quality of life in patients with heart failure. The results of our study recommend that digital apps be used for improving the management of patients with heart failure. Trial Registration Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials IRCT2017061934647N1; https://www.irct.ir/trial/26434


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
fahimeh sehhatie shafaei ◽  
mojgan mirghafourvand ◽  
shiva havizari

Abstract Background: Breastfeeding is one of the most important interfering factors in infants’ health. Monitoring mothers’ performance and providing them with the feedback helps to increase their self-efficacy, interest in learning, and level of performance. The present research evaluates the effect of prenatal counseling on the breastfeeding self-efficacy and frequency of breastfeeding problems in mothers with previous unsuccessful breastfeeding.Methods: This randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted on 108 pregnant women with unsuccessful breastfeeding in Tabriz health centers during 2017-2018. The participants were randomly assigned to intervention and control groups. The intervention group had four prenatal counseling sessions and the controls only received routine care. Then, the mothers who gave birth to their children received a counseling session up to 4 months after the delivery. The Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy (BSES) questionnaire and the frequency of breast feeding problems checklist on the 15th day, and 2nd and 4th month were completed both by the intervention and control groups.Results: The mean (SD) of breastfeeding self-efficacy was 119.3 (10.5), 128.3 (8.3) and 133.8 (10.3) in the intervention group and 105.3 (16.1), 105.7 (19.7) and 109.4 (24.7) in the control group on the 15th day, 2nd and 4th month after the delivery, respectively. There was a significant difference in terms of breastfeeding self-efficacy between intervention and control group on the 15th day (p<0.001), and 2nd (p<0.001) and 4th (p<0.001) month after the delivery. The frequency of breastfeeding problems on the 15th (p=0.008), 2nd (p<0.001) and 4th (p<0.001) after the delivery was significantly different in most cases of the intervention group when compared to the controls.Conclusion: The results indicated that prenatal counseling can increase mothers’ breastfeeding self-efficacy and solves most breastfeeding problems during postpartum period.Trial registration: IRCT20100109003027N19


Author(s):  
Leila Sayadi ◽  
Shokoh Varaei ◽  
Elham Faghihzadeh ◽  
Zahra Ahmadkhani

Background &Aim: Cerebral angiography is a diagnostic procedure for cerebral disorders, particularly the disorders of cerebral blood vessels. However, as an invasive procedure, it can cause patients anxiety and physiological instability. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of multimedia education on anxiety and physiological status among patients with cerebral angiography. Methods & Materials: This randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted from October 2017 to January 2018 in the angiography unit of a university hospital in Tehran, Iran. Participants were 88 candidates for cerebral angiography who were randomly allocated either to an intervention (n = 44) or a control (n= 44) group. Patients in the intervention group were provided with at least thirty-minute multimedia education consisted of video-based education, verbal education, written materials (an educational booklet), and question and answer. Data on participants’ personal characteristics were collected before the intervention, while their state anxiety was assessed before multimedia education and after cerebral angiography via Spielberger State Anxiety Inventory. Moreover, participants’ physiological parameters were measured and documented in a data sheet before and every two hours after angiography up to their discharge from the angiography unit. The independent-sample t, Chi-square, and McNemar’s tests and the Generalized Estimation Equation were used for data analysis. Results: After the intervention, 95.5% of patients in the intervention group and 86.4% in the control group had low level of anxiety; however, the between-group difference was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Moreover, anxiety level changed significantly neither in the intervention (P > 0.05) nor in the control (P > 0.05) group. In addition, after adjusting the effects of participants’ age, there were no significant between-group differences respecting the means of systolic blood pressure, the means of body temperature, peripheral oxygen saturation, and respiratory rate. However, the means of diastolic blood pressure and heart rate in the intervention group were significantly lower than the control group, irrespective of the effects of participants’ age. Conclusion: Multimedia education has no significant effects on state anxiety but has significant effects on diastolic blood pressure and heart rate among patients with cerebral angiography.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zeinab Nikniaz ◽  
Masood Shirmohammadi ◽  
Elham Masserat ◽  
Zahra Akbari Namvar

Abstract Background: We aimed to study the effectiveness of a “celiac” smartphone application on gastrointestinal symptoms in celiac patients. Methods: In the present randomized controlled clinical trial, 60 celiac patients were randomly assigned to receive education through a smartphone application (n=30) or conventional clinical education (n=30). We assessed the gastrointestinal symptoms using the gastrointestinal symptom rating scale (GSRS) questionnaire at baseline and three months after interventions. The GSRS total score, celiac disease GSRS (CD-GSRS) score, abdominal pain, reflux, diarrhea, constipation, and indigestion scores were calculated. Results: Out of 60 randomized patients, 58 patients completed the study. In comparison to baseline, the mean score of GSRS total score (p=0.04), CD-GSRS score (p=0.001), and indigestion subscore (p<0.001) were significantly decreased in the intervention group. In the control group, compared to baseline, the mean scores of CD-GSRS score (p=0.03) and abdominal pain subscore (p=0.04) were significantly reduced; and the mean score of reflux (p=0.01) subscore was significantly increased. The results of the between-group comparisons showed that although the mean GSRS and CD-GSRS total scores were lower in the intervention group compared with the control group, the differences were not statistically significant. In terms of GSRS subscores, there was a significant difference between the two groups only in the mean score of indigestion (P=0.01).Conclusion: According to the results, smartphone application had a significantly positive effect on indigestion symptoms compared with routine clinic education. However, more large studies with longer duration of the follow-up period are needed to assure this approach Trial registration: The protocol of the study was registered in the Iranian registry of clinical trials (IRCT code: IRCT20170117032004N2). trial registry webpage: : https://www.irct.ir/user/trial/40187/view. Trial registry date: 2019.6.26


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahboube Davoudi ◽  
Tahereh Najafi Ghezeljeh ◽  
Farveh Vakilian Aghouee

BACKGROUND Patients with heart failure have low quality of life because of physical impairments and advanced clinical symptoms. One of the main goals of caring for patients with heart failure is to improve their quality of life. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of the use of a smartphone-based app on the quality of life of patients with heart failure. METHODS This randomized controlled clinical trial with a control group was conducted from June to October 2018 in an urban hospital. In this study, 120 patients with heart failure hospitalized in cardiac care units were randomly allocated to control and intervention groups. Besides routine care, patients in the intervention group received a smartphone-based app and used it every day for 3 months. Both the groups completed the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire before entering the study and at 3 months after entering the study. Data were analyzed using the SPSS software V.16. RESULTS The groups showed statistically significant differences in the mean scores of quality of life and its dimensions after the intervention, thereby indicating a better quality of life in the intervention group (<i>P</i>&lt;.001). The effect size of the intervention on the quality of life was 1.85 (95% CI 1.41-2.3). Moreover, the groups showed statistically significant differences in the changes in the quality of life scores and its dimensions (<i>P</i>&lt;.001). CONCLUSIONS Use of a smartphone-based app can improve the quality of life in patients with heart failure. The results of our study recommend that digital apps be used for improving the management of patients with heart failure. CLINICALTRIAL Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials IRCT2017061934647N1; https://www.irct.ir/trial/26434


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiali Chen ◽  
Xinyu Zhang ◽  
Ning Ning ◽  
Peifang Li ◽  
Yueer Zhang

Abstract Background Few studies reported the impact of nutrition management based on Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) protocols in spinal surgery. The aim of this study was to examine the association of multidisciplinary nutrition management in percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy (PEID) with patients’ subjective feelings and postoperative recovery.Methods A randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted from August to November in 2017. A total of 101 patients undergoing PEID were randomized into two groups: a control group (50 patients experiencing traditional nutrition management) and an intervention group (51 patients experiencing multidisciplinary nutrition management). Fasting time, subjective feelings, satisfaction and postoperative recovery were evaluated in all patients.Results In all, 96 patients completed the study: 48 in each group. Our findings revealed that patients in intervention group had weaker preoperative hunger (p=0.036), preoperative thirst (p<0.001) and postoperative thirst (p=0.006), higher satisfaction about nutrition management (p=0.001), shorter pre and post-operative fasting liquids and solids time, and shorter first passage of flatus (p=0.005) than those of patients in control group.Conclusion Multidisciplinary nutrition management can promote patients’ subjective feelings and postoperative gastric recovery.Trial registration: Current Controlled Trials ChiCTR-IOQ-17011742, June/22/2017.


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Khatereh Rostami ◽  
Fariba Ghodsbin

Objective. The work, herein, sought to determine the effect of yoga on the quality of life of nurses working in intensive care units (ICU). Methods. This was a randomized controlled clinical trial of a preventive intervention of three weekly sessions of yoga exercises, which included aspects of meditation, breathing control, and slow body movements. The study selected 70 nurses working in ICU and assigned them to two groups: experimental (n = 35) and control (n = 35). The World Health Organization Quality of Life brief questionnaire (WHOQoL-Bref) was used to evaluate on four moments (baseline, one, two, six months after the start of the study); this scale has 26 items with Likert-type response options ranging from 1 to 5; higher total score indicates better quality of life. Results. The baseline score of quality of life in the experimental group was 62.3, which increased to 70.7 on the first month and continued improving in the evaluations on the second month (72.8) and sixth month (74.1), with this change being statistically significant. Instead, the control group showed no differences in scores of the different moments of evaluation (baseline = 62, first month = 61.9, second month = 62.4, and sixth month = 60.4). In the four domains of the WHOQoL-Bref (physical, psychological, social relationships, and environment), it was also noted that the experimental group obtained better scores over time compared with the control group. Conclusion. The intervention of yoga exercises was effective in improving the quality of life of nurses working in ICU.Descriptors: yoga; exercise; meditation; nurses; quality of life; intensive care units; randomized controlled trial; surveys and questionnaires; encuestas y cuestionarios.How to cite this article: Rostami K, Ghodsbin F. Effect of Yoga on the Quality of Life of Nurses Working in Intensive Care Units. Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Invest. Educ. Enferm. 2019; 37(3):e06.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
fahimeh sehhatie shafaei ◽  
mojgan mirghafourvand ◽  
shiva havizari

Abstract Background: Breastfeeding is one of the most important interfering factors in infants’ health. Monitoring mothers’ performance and providing them with the feedback helps to increase their self-efficacy, interest in learning, and level of performance. The present research evaluates the effect of prenatal counseling on the breastfeeding self-efficacy and frequency of breastfeeding problems in mothers with previous unsuccessful breastfeeding. Methods: This randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted on 108 pregnant women with unsuccessful breastfeeding in Tabriz health centers during 2017-2018. The participants were randomly assigned to intervention and control groups. The intervention group had four prenatal counseling sessions and the controls only received routine care. Then, the mothers who gave birth to their children received a counseling session up to 4 months after the delivery. The Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy (BSES) questionnaire and the frequency of breast feeding problems checklist on the 15 th day, and 2 nd and 4 th month were completed both by the intervention and control groups. Results: The mean (SD) of breastfeeding self-efficacy was 119.3 (10.5), 128.3 (8.3) and 133.8 (10.3) in the intervention group and 105.3 (16.1), 105.7 (19.7) and 109.4 (24.7) in the control group on the 15 th day, 2 nd and 4 th month after the delivery, respectively. There was a significant difference in terms of breastfeeding self-efficacy between intervention and control group on the 15 th day (p<0.001), and 2 nd (p<0.001) and 4 th (p<0.001) month after the delivery. The frequency of breastfeeding problems on the 15 th (p=0.008), 2 nd (p<0.001) and 4 th (p<0.001) after the delivery was significantly different in most cases of the intervention group when compared to the controls. Conclusion : The results indicated that prenatal counseling can increase mothers’ breastfeeding self-efficacy and solves most breastfeeding problems during postpartum period. Trial registration: IRCT20100109003027N19 Key words: Self-efficacy, problems, exclusive breastfeeding, infant, counseling


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
fahimeh sehhatie shafaei ◽  
mojgan mirghafourvand ◽  
shiva havizari

Abstract Abstract Background: Breastfeeding is one of the most important interfering factors in infants’ health. Monitoring mothers’ performance and providing them with the feedback helps to increase their self-efficacy, interest in learning, and level of performance. The present research evaluates the effect of prenatal counseling on the breastfeeding self-efficacy and frequency of breastfeeding problems in mothers with previous unsuccessful breastfeeding. Methods: This randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted on 108 pregnant women with unsuccessful breastfeeding in Tabriz health centers during 2017-2018. The participants were randomly assigned to intervention and control groups. The intervention group had four prenatal counseling sessions and the controls only received routine care. Then, the mothers who gave birth to their children received a counseling session up to 4 months after the delivery. The Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy (BSES) questionnaire and the frequency of breast feeding problems checklist on the 15 th day, and 2 nd and 4 th month were completed both by the intervention and control groups. Results: The mean (SD) of breastfeeding self-efficacy was 119.3 (10.5), 128.3 (8.3) and 133.8 (10.3) in the intervention group and 105.3 (16.1), 105.7 (19.7) and 109.4 (24.7) in the control group on the 15 th day, 2 nd and 4 th month after the delivery, respectively. There was a significant difference in terms of breastfeeding self-efficacy between intervention and control group on the 15 th day (p<0.001), and 2 nd (p<0.001) and 4 th (p<0.001) month after the delivery. The frequency of breastfeeding problems on the 15 th (p=0.008), 2 nd (p<0.001) and 4 th (p<0.001) after the delivery was significantly different in most cases of the intervention group when compared to the controls. Conclusion : The results indicated that prenatal counseling can increase mothers’ breastfeeding self-efficacy and solves most breastfeeding problems during postpartum period. Trial registration: IRCT20100109003027N19 Key words: Self-efficacy, problems, exclusive breastfeeding, infant, counseling


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dacil Alvarado-Martel ◽  
Mauro Boronat ◽  
María del Pino Alberiche ◽  
María Andrea Algara ◽  
Ana M Wägner

Abstract BackgroundType 1 diabetes is a chronic disease with complex therapeutic recommendations that require day-to-day lifestyle changes. People with type 1 diabetes need to be involved in their health care in order to achieve satisfactory control of the condition. Motivational Interviewing is a communication tool that has been shown to be effective in changing behaviors in people with addictions, obesity and type 2 diabetes.Our objective is to evaluate the impact of a Motivational Interviewing intervention in patients with type 1 diabetes, through a randomized controlled clinical trial.MethodsSixty-six patients with type 1 diabetes and hemoglobin A1c>= 8% have been included and randomly assigned (computer-generated sequence, sealed envelopes, ratio 1:1) either to the intervention group or to the control group. In the intervention group, appointments every four months with the endocrinologist include Motivational Interviewing; in the control group, the appointments proceed as usual. Patients will be followed for 16 months.The primary outcome will be self-care behaviors, assessed according to a validated questionnaire, the Diabetes Self-Care Inventory-Revised Version. Secondary outcomes include: HbA1c, motivation for self-care, self-efficacy, health-related quality of life, satisfaction with professional-patient relationship, fulfillment of patients' own objectives and other sociodemographic and clinical variables related to disease control.The practitioners will receive training in Motivational Interviewing in order to help them promote adherence to self-care, encourage patient motivation and improve the doctor-patient relationship. The Motivational Interviewing intervention will be evaluated through videorecordings of the sessions and the administration of a purpose-built questionnaire, the EVEM 2.0 scale, by two psychologists, blinded to the assigned treatment. DiscussionThere is evidence that MI can improve self-care in type 2 diabetes. In T1D, however, its application has focused on adolescents, but, at present, there are no published data on the effect of MI in adults with T1D. In this study, we aim to evaluate the effect of MI on self-care and HbA1c.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document