scholarly journals Π(G,x) Polynomial and Π(G) Index of Armchair Polyhex Nanotubes TUAC6[m,n]

Author(s):  
Mohammad Reza Farahani

Let G be a simple connected graph with the vertex set V = V(G) and the edge set E = E(G), without loops and multiple edges. For counting qoc strips in G, Omega polynomial was introduced by Diudea and was defined as Ω(G,x) = ∑cm(G,c)xc where m(G,c) be number of qoc strips of length c in the graph G. Following Omega polynomial, the Sadhana polynomial was defined by Ashrafi et al as Sd(G,x) = ∑cm(G,c)x[E(G)]-c in this paper we compute the Pi polynomial Π(G,x) = ∑cm(G,c)x[E(G)]-c and Pi Index Π(G ) = ∑cc·m(G,c)([E(G)]-c) of an infinite class of “Armchair polyhex nanotubes TUAC6[m,n]”.

Author(s):  
Mohammad Reza Farahani

Let G be a simple connected graph with the vertex set V = V(G) and the edge set E = E(G),without loops and multiple edges. For counting qoc strips in G, Diudea introduced the Ω-polynomialof G and was defined as Ω(G, x) = ∑ki-1xi where C1, C2,..., Ck be the “opposite edge strips” ops of Gand ci = |Ci| (I = 1, 2,..., k). One can obtain the Sd-polynomial by replacing xc with x|E(G)|-c in Ω-polynomial. Then the Sd-index will be the first derivative of Sd(x) evaluated at x = 1. In this paper wecompute the Sd-polynomial and Sd-index of an infinite class of “Armchair Polyhe x Nanotubes”.


2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (01) ◽  
pp. 1950005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laxman Saha ◽  
Pratima Panigrahi

Due to the rapid growth in the use of wireless communication services and the corresponding scarcity and the high cost of radio spectrum bandwidth, Channel assignment problem (CAP) is becoming highly important. Radio [Formula: see text]-coloring of graphs is a variation of CAP. For a positive integer [Formula: see text], a radio [Formula: see text]-coloring of a simple connected graph [Formula: see text] is a mapping [Formula: see text] from the vertex set [Formula: see text] to the set [Formula: see text] of non-negative integers such that [Formula: see text] for each pair of distinct vertices [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] of [Formula: see text], where [Formula: see text] is the distance between [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] in [Formula: see text]. The span of a radio [Formula: see text]-coloring [Formula: see text], denoted by [Formula: see text], is defined as [Formula: see text] and the radio[Formula: see text]-chromatic number of [Formula: see text], denoted by [Formula: see text], is [Formula: see text] where the minimum is taken over all radio [Formula: see text]-coloring of [Formula: see text]. In this paper, we present two radio [Formula: see text]-coloring algorithms for general graphs which will produce radio [Formula: see text]-colorings with their spans. For an [Formula: see text]-vertex simple connected graph the time complexity of the both algorithm is of [Formula: see text]. Implementing these algorithms we get the exact value of [Formula: see text] for several graphs (for example, [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], some circulant graph etc.) and many values of [Formula: see text], especially for [Formula: see text].


Filomat ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 615-622 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohyedin Falahat ◽  
Seyed Sheikholeslami ◽  
Lutz Volkmann

A 2-rainbow dominating function (2RDF) of a graph G is a function f from the vertex set V(G) to the set of all subsets of the set {1,2} such that for any vertex v ? V(G) with f (v) = ? the condition Uu?N(v) f(u)= {1,2} is fulfilled, where N(v) is the open neighborhood of v. The weight of a 2RDF f is the value ?(f) = ?v?V |f(v)|. The 2-rainbow domination number of a graph G, denoted by r2(G), is the minimum weight of a 2RDF of G. The 2-rainbow domination subdivision number sd?r2(G) is the minimum number of edges that must be subdivided (each edge in G can be subdivided at most once) in order to increase the 2-rainbow domination number. In this paper we prove that for every simple connected graph G of order n ? 3, sd?r2(G)? 3 + min{d2(v)|v?V and d(v)?2} where d2(v) is the number of vertices of G at distance 2 from v.


2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 9-15
Author(s):  
Vida Ahmadi ◽  
Mohammad Reza Darafshe

Let  be a simple connected graph with vertex set V and edge set E. The first, second and third Zagreb indices of G are defind, respectivly by: ,   and   where  is the degree of vertex u in G and uv is an edge of G, connecting the vertices u and v. Recently, the first and second multiplicative Zagreb indices of graph  are defind by:  and . The first and second Zagreb coindices of graph are defind by:  and .  and , named as multiplicative Zagreb coindices. In this article, we compute the first, second and the third Zagreb indices and the first and second multiplicative Zagreb indices of some  graphs. The first and second Zagreb coindices and the first and second multiplicative Zagreb coindices of these graphs are also computed.


d'CARTESIAN ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 103
Author(s):  
Arthur Wulur ◽  
Benny Pinontoan ◽  
Mans Mananohas

A graph G consists of non-empty set of vertex/vertices (also called node/nodes) and the set of lines connecting two vertices called edge/edges. The vertex set of a graph G is denoted by V(G) and the edge set is denoted by E(G). A Rectilinear Monotone r-Regular Planar Graph is a simple connected graph that consists of vertices with same degree and horizontal or diagonal straight edges without vertical edges and edges crossing. This research shows that there are infinite family of rectilinear monotone r-regular planar graphs for r = 3and r = 4. For r = 5, there are two drawings of rectilinear monotone r-regular planar graphs with 12 vertices and 16 vertices. Keywords: Monotone Drawings, Planar Graphs, Rectilinear Graphs, Regular Graphs


Symmetry ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 751
Author(s):  
Ludwin Basilio ◽  
Jair Simon ◽  
Jesús Leaños ◽  
Omar Cayetano

If G = ( V ( G ) , E ( G ) ) is a simple connected graph with the vertex set V ( G ) and the edge set E ( G ) , S is a subset of V ( G ) , and let B ( S ) be the set of neighbors of S in V ( G ) ∖ S . Then, the differential of S ∂ ( S ) is defined as | B ( S ) | − | S | . The differential of G, denoted by ∂ ( G ) , is the maximum value of ∂ ( S ) for all subsets S ⊆ V ( G ) . The graph operator Q ( G ) is defined as the graph that results by subdividing every edge of G once and joining pairs of these new vertices iff their corresponding edges are incident in G. In this paper, we study the relations between ∂ ( G ) and ∂ ( Q ( G ) ) . Besides, we exhibit some results relating the differential ∂ ( G ) and well-known graph invariants, such as the domination number, the independence number, and the vertex-cover number.


2012 ◽  
Vol 04 (02) ◽  
pp. 1250017 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. TAMIZH CHELVAM ◽  
G. KALAIMURUGAN ◽  
WELL Y. CHOU

Let G be a simple connected graph with vertex set V(G) and edge set E(G). A function f : E(G) → {-1, 1} is called a signed star dominating function (SSDF) on G if ∑e∈E(v) f(e) ≥ 1 for every v ∈ V(G), where E(v) is the set of all edges incident to v. The signed star domination number of G is defined as γ SS (G) = min {∑e∈E(G) f(e) | f is a SSDF on G}. In this paper, we obtain exact values for the signed star domination number for certain classes of Cayley digraphs and Cayley graphs.


2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (01) ◽  
pp. 2050028 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shehnaz Akhter ◽  
Rashid Farooq

Let [Formula: see text] be a simple connected graph with vertex set [Formula: see text] and edge set [Formula: see text]. The eccentricity [Formula: see text] of a vertex [Formula: see text] in [Formula: see text] is the largest distance between [Formula: see text] and any other vertex of [Formula: see text]. The eccentric adjacency index (also known as Ediz eccentric connectivity index) of [Formula: see text] is defined as [Formula: see text], where [Formula: see text] is the sum of degrees of neighbors of the vertex [Formula: see text]. In this paper, we determine the unicyclic graphs with largest eccentric adjacency index among all [Formula: see text]-vertex unicyclic graphs with a given girth. In addition, we find the tree with largest eccentric adjacency index among all the [Formula: see text]-vertex trees with a fixed diameter.


2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 48-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Pirzada ◽  
B.A. Rather ◽  
T.A. Chishti

For a finite commutative ring $\mathbb{Z}_{n}$ with identity $1\neq 0$, the zero divisor graph $\Gamma(\mathbb{Z}_{n})$ is a simple connected graph having vertex set as the set of non-zero zero divisors, where two vertices $x$ and $y$ are adjacent if and only if $xy=0$. We find the distance Laplacian spectrum of the zero divisor graphs $\Gamma(\mathbb{Z}_{n})$ for different values of $n$. Also, we obtain the distance Laplacian spectrum of $\Gamma(\mathbb{Z}_{n})$ for $n=p^z$, $z\geq 2$, in terms of the Laplacian spectrum. As a consequence, we determine those $n$ for which zero divisor graph $\Gamma(\mathbb{Z}_{n})$ is distance Laplacian integral.


10.37236/309 ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Cámara ◽  
J. Fàbrega ◽  
M. A. Fiol ◽  
E. Garriga

Given a simple connected graph $\Gamma$ and a subset of its vertices $C$, the pseudo-distance-regularity around $C$ generalizes, for not necessarily regular graphs, the notion of completely regular code. We then say that $C$ is a completely pseudo-regular code. Up to now, most of the characterizations of pseudo-distance-regularity has been derived from a combinatorial definition. In this paper we propose an algebraic (Terwilliger-like) approach to this notion, showing its equivalence with the combinatorial one. This allows us to give new proofs of known results, and also to obtain new characterizations which do not depend on the so-called $C$-spectrum of $\Gamma$, but only on the positive eigenvector of its adjacency matrix. Along the way, we also obtain some new results relating the local spectra of a vertex set and its antipodal. As a consequence of our study, we obtain a new characterization of a completely regular code $C$, in terms of the number of walks in $\Gamma$ with an endvertex in $C$.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document