scholarly journals Semaglutide for the Management of type 2 Diabetes: Clinical Evidence, Cardioprotective Effects, and Guidelines

Kardiologiia ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 60 (9) ◽  
pp. 122-133
Author(s):  
Zh. D. Kobalava ◽  
E. V. Kokhan
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Recent Decade ◽  
Cardiovascular Complications ◽  
Special Focus ◽  
Sodium Glucose Cotransporter ◽  
Novel Drugs ◽  
Cardioprotective Effects ◽  
Glucagon Like Peptide ◽  
Glucagon Like Peptide 1

Cardiovascular diseases remain a leading cause for unfavorable outcomes, including death, in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2). In the recent decade, novel drugs, including glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GPP-1-RA) and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors, have convincingly demonstrated their ability to reduce risk of cardiovascular complications in patients with DM2. This review discusses one of GPP-1-RA, semaglutide, with a special focus on the evidence-based data on its use, cardioprotective properties, and algorithms of administration consistent with current clinical recommendations.

The Use of SGLT2i and GLP-1 RA in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes in Thailand: Evidence Review and Recommendations

2021 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 1850-1865
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Glucose Lowering ◽  
Sodium Glucose Cotransporter ◽  
Evidence Review ◽  
Glucagon Like Peptide ◽  
Glucagon Like Peptide 1 ◽  
Glucose Lowering Therapy ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Selection Of

Background: Cardiovascular (CV) and renal comorbidities are common among type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients, and significantly increase the cost and burden of care. Both sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) improve key outcomes including major CV events, hospitalization for heart failure, and renal outcomes, albeit to varying degrees in different T2D populations. Materials and Methods: The authors reviewed evidence from GLP-1 RA and SGLT2i CV outcomes trials and real-world studies in Thailand and elsewhere. Results: The authors formulated recommendations to guide selection of anti-diabetes medication based on patients’ clinical characteristics and CV or renal risk profile. Conclusion: These recommendations could help guide management of CV/renal comorbidities and risk alongside glucose-lowering therapy for individual patients. Keywords: Type 2 diabetes mellitus; Cardiovascular diseases; Chronic kidney disease; Clinical outcomes; SGLT2i; GLP-1 RA

scholarly journals Treatment of type 2 diabetes: the stability of the effectiveness of hypoglycemic medications

2016 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 32-36
Author(s):  
Tat'yana Morgunova ◽  
Valentin Fadeev
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Original Research ◽  
Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 ◽  
Sodium Glucose Cotransporter ◽  
Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 Inhibitors ◽  
Glucagon Like Peptide ◽  
Glucagon Like Peptide 1 ◽  
The Stability

This article is dedicated to the problem of glycaemic durability of drugs used in treatment of type 2 diabetes. The results of studies comparing durability of glycemic control as monotherapy or in combination of metformin with different drugs: dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, sulfonylurea, inhibitors of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 are shown. The article discusses the results of original research and meta-analysis.

scholarly journals Efficacy and safety of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT-2is) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) in patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and network meta-analysis study protocol

BMJ Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
pp. e023206 ◽  
Author(s):  
Humaira Hussein ◽  
Francesco Zaccardi ◽  
Nafeesa N Dhalwani ◽  
Melanie J Davies ◽  
Kamlesh Khunti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Risk Of Bias ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Sodium Glucose Cotransporter ◽  
Glucagon Like Peptide ◽  
Glucagon Like Peptide 1

IntroductionSodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT-2is) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) are two classes of glucose-lowering drugs gaining popularity in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Current guidelines suggest patient-centred approaches when deciding between available hyperglycaemia drugs with no indication to which specific drug should be administered. Despite systematic reviews and meta-analyses being conducted within SGLT-2is and GLP-1RAs, differences across these classes of drugs have not been investigated. Therefore, this systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) will aim to compare the efficacy and safety profiles across and within SGLT-2is and GLP-1RAs.MethodsPubMed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and ISI Web of Science will be searched from inception for published randomised controlled trials conducted in patients with T2DM, with at least two arms consisting of SGLT-2is, GLP-1RAs or control/placebo. Title and abstracts will be screened by two independent reviewers with conflicts resolved by a third. Data will be extracted by the primary researcher, a random sample will be checked by an independent reviewer. Risk of bias will be assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool and overall quality of evidence will be assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach.Study characteristics, participants baseline characteristics, mean change in cardiometabolic outcomes and number of adverse events will be extracted for each study. Primary outcome will be the mean change in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) (%, mmol/mol). Initial random-effects pairwise meta-analysis will be conducted for each unique treatment comparison where heterogeneity will be assessed. A Bayesian NMA approach will be adopted where random-effects generalised linear models will be fitted in WinBUGS. Sensitivity analysis will be conducted to assess choices of prior distributions and length of burn-in and sample.Ethics and disseminationEthics approval is not required for this study. Results from this study will be published in a peer-review journal.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42018091306.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document