scholarly journals Left Atrial Function in Different Modes of Heart-Rate Lowering Therapy with Beta-Blockers in Patients with Recurrent Atrial Fibrillation and Hypertension

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 429-437
Author(s):  
E. V. Kokhan ◽  
G. K. Kiyakbaev ◽  
E. M. Ozova ◽  
V. A. Romanova ◽  
Zh. D. Kobalava
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Heart Rate ◽  
Left Atrial ◽  
Augmentation Index ◽  
Beta Blockers ◽  
Prospective Trial ◽  
Applanation Tonometry ◽  
Recurrent Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
The Impact

Aim. To study the impact of heart rate (HR) reduction with beta-blockers (BB) on left atrial (LA) function in hypertensive patients with paroxysmal or persistent mild symptomatic atrial fibrillation.Material and methods. In this open prospective trial we randomly assigned patients with hypertension, sinus rhythm, elevated heart rate (≥70 bpm), and recurrent atrial fibrillation (EHRA 2A or less) to receive BB with a target HR of less or greater than 70 bpm for at least 4 months. All the patients underwent an echocardiogram [left atrial (LA) function was assessed as emptying fraction]and applanation tonometry at baseline and after 4 months. Primary endpoint was median LA emptying fraction (LAEF) measurement at the end of the study.Results. 47 patients were randomized to group with a target HR of ≤70 bpm and 44 patients to >70 bmp. Among them 44 and 41 patients completed the study. Median follow up was 4.4 months. At the end of the study (4.5 months) median HR was 62 [60; 67] bmp in ≤70 group and 73 [72; 76] bpm in >70 group. Both groups received similar antihypertensive therapy and there were no intergroup differences in systolic and diastolic blood pressure. At the end of the study, patients in ≤70 group had significantly lower LAEF compared with >70 group (37% vs 42%; p=0.01). E’avg was lower and augmentation index was higher in ≤70 group as compared to >70. In regression analysis, after E’avg and augmentation index were included in the model, the association between LAEF and randomization group lost its significance.Conclusion. Beta blockers treatment with strict HR reduction (≤70 bpm) significantly reduced LA function as compared to lenient target HR (>70 bpm).

Abstract 168: Impact of Obesity and Atrial Fibrillation on Arterial Stiffness

2013 ◽  
Vol 33 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott R Willoughby ◽  
Kacie Dickinson ◽  
Carlee Schultz ◽  
Prashanthan Sanders ◽  
Peter Clifton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Heart Rate ◽  
Arterial Stiffness ◽  
Transfer Functions ◽  
Augmentation Index ◽  
Applanation Tonometry ◽  
Thrombotic Risk ◽  
Vascular Abnormalities ◽  
Control Subjects ◽  
The Impact

Introduction Turbulent blood flow which occurs in atrial fibrillation patients due to an irregular heart rate may lead to vascular abnormalities and increased thrombotic risk. Obesity is an important emerging substrate for the development of atrial fibrillation. Obesity is also associated with endothelial dysfunction and increased arterial stiffness. We sought to determine the impact of obesity on arterial stiffness in patients with atrial fibrillation. Methods 34 patients with atrial fibrillation (age 59±12 years,) were evaluated in lean (n=21) and obese (n=13) subgroups, and compared to age-matched lean (n=15) and obese (n=14) control subjects. Arterial stiffness was assessed using radial applanation tonometry (SphygmoCor). Heart rate adjusted aortic augmentation index (AIx: a measure of arterial stiffness) was calculated from the corresponding waveforms utilizing validated transfer functions. Results Obese controls and obese atrial fibrillation patients had significantly higher AIx (arterial stiffness) than lean controls and lean atrial fibrillation patients (p=0.003 and p=0.03, respectively: Figure). There was no difference in AIx scores between obese atrial fibrillation patients and obese control subjects (p=0.3) and between lean atrial fibrillation and lean control subjects (p=0.8). Conclusion We conclude that obesity is associated with arterial stiffness and atrial fibrillation does not add additional burden. These results suggest the interaction between obesity and atrial fibrillation may contribute to the observed increase in thromboembolic risk, in part, through vascular abnormalities other than increased arterial stiffness.

scholarly journals Effect of beta-blocker-induced heart rate lowering on left atrial function in patients with hypertension and recurrent atrial fibrillation

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
E Kokhan ◽  
G Kiyakbaev ◽  
E Ozova ◽  
V Romanova ◽  
Z.H Kobalava
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Heart Rate ◽  
Left Atrial ◽  
Prospective Trial ◽  
Study Groups ◽  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
Final Visit ◽  
Left Ventricle Mass ◽  
Recurrent Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Median Change

Abstract Background The ESC/ESH Hypertension Guidelines identify high resting heart rate (HR) as a risk factor in patients with hypertension. However, it is not known, whether pharmacological reduction in HR is associated with improvement of prognosis in patients with preserved ejection fraction. In retrospective studies beta blockers (BBs) use was associated with impaired left atrial (LA) function in hypertension, but the prospective data, concerning this relationship is scarce. Purpose To assess the effects of HR reduction with BBs on LA function in hypertensive patients with recurrent (rare paroxysms) mild symptomatic atrial fibrillation. Methods Open prospective trial included 91 patients with hypertension, elevated heart rate (≥80 bpm) and recurrent atrial fibrillation (EHRA 2A or less) with rare paroxysms to receive BBs with a target HR (sinus rhythm) of less or greater than 70 bpm. All the patients underwent an echocardiogram at baseline and at the end of the study. Conventional echo measures and extended LA measures, including the minimal and maximal LA volumes (LAVmin and LAVmax) and LA emptying fraction (LAEF) were performed. Patients were followed for 4 months on the change and assessed for primary endpoint of median LAEF measurement at the end of the study. Results 47 patients were randomized to group with a target HR of ≤70 bpm and 44 patients to >70 bmp. Among them, 44 and 41 patients completed the study (2 had AF at the final visit; 4 were lost to follow-up). Baseline median HR was 77 (75; 80) bpm. After 4.4 months of treatment, median HR was 62 (60; 67) bmp in ≤70 group and 73 (72; 76) bpm in >70 group (p<0.001). There were no intergroup differences in antihypertensive therapy and systolic (129 vs 130 mmHg; p=0.32) and diastolic (78 vs 78 mmHg; p=0.53) blood pressure. At the end of the study patients in ≤70 group had significantly lower LAEF compared with >70 group (37 vs 42%; p=0.01); a median change was −6.5 (−9.75; −3.9)% and −0.27 (−1.78; 1.18)%, respectively [estimated between group difference −5.89%; 95% confidence interval (CI): −8.06 to −3.71%]. Despite similar indices of LAVmin (22 vs 19 ml/m2; p=0.66) and LAVmax (38 vs 37 ml/m2), comparison of changes showed significant differences: median change LAVmin: 1.3 ml/m2 in ≤70 vs 0.5 ml/m2 in >70 groups (estimated between group difference −1.29%; 95% CI: −2.07 to −0.5%) and ΔLAVmax: 1.8 ml/m2 in ≤70 vs 1 ml/m2 in >70 groups (estimated between group difference −1.51%; 95% CI: −2.73 to −0.28%). E/E' and left ventricle mass index did not differ between study groups at the end of the study, but E' was significantly lower in the ≤70 group (7 vs 8.3 cm/s; p=0.04). Conclusion BB-induced HR lowering with a target ≤70 bpm significantly reduced LA function as compared to lenient target HR (>70 bpm). Although elevated HR is associated with adverse outcomes in patients with hypertension, excess HR lowering with BBs might not be beneficial in this group. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Abstract 15303: The Impact of Heart Rate on the Incidence of Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Chronic Atrial Fibrillation: The Fushimi Af Registry

Circulation ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 132 (suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Moritake Iguchi ◽  
Hisashi Ogawa ◽  
Hirofumi Sugiyama ◽  
Nobutoyo Masunaga ◽  
Mitsuru Ishii ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Heart Rate ◽  
Rate Control ◽  
Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Chronic Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
The Impact

Purpose: Previous reports suggested that lenient rate control was not inferior to strict rate control among patients with chronic atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the impact of heart rate (HR) on the incidence of cardiovascular events is not clearly understood. Methods: The Fushimi AF Registry, a community-based prospective survey, was designed to enroll all of the AF patients in Fushimi-ku, Kyoto, Japan. At present, follow-up data were available in 3,514 patients (median follow-up period, 842 days). 1,622 patients had chronic AF, and we obtained ECG findings in 1,561 patients. We divided these patients into three groups based on their heart rate; high-HR (HR≥110) (n=179), intermediate-HR (80≤HR<110) (n=695), and low-HR (HR<80) (n=687), and explored the cardiovascular events (composite of cardiovascular death, hospitalization for heart failure, and arrhythmic events). Results: Mean HR was 128±13 bpm, 93±8 bpm, and 67±9 bpm, respectively. High HR group was younger than other groups, but the prevalence of heart failure was the highest (44.7%, 37.0%, 32.3%; p=0.007) and left-ventricular ejection fraction was the lowest (56.5±14.6%, 60.7±11.9%, 62.7±10.5%; p<0.0001). Prescription of beta-blocker (37.4%, 28.9%, 30.0%) and diltiazem (2.8%, 2.9%, 4.2%) was comparable, but prescription of verapamil was the highest in high-HR group (19.0%, 12.4%, 8.0%; p=0.0001), and prescription of digitalis was the highest in low-HR group (14.0%, 18.2%, 23.4%; p=0.005). Mean CHADS2 score was 2.3±1.3, 2.2±1.3, and 2.2±1.4, respectively. In Kaplan-Meier analysis, the incidence of cardiovascular events was higher in high-HR groups than intermediate- and low-HR group (9.2%/year vs 5.8%/year, p=0.02), but was similar between intermediate- and low-HR group (6.2%/year vs 5.4%/year, p=0.3). The incidence of stroke or systemic embolism was comparable between the three groups (2.6%/year, 3.6%/year, 2.4%/year). Cox proportional hazard ratios [95%CI] of high- and intermediate-HR for cardiovascular events compared to low-HR were 1.63 [1.06-2.44] and 1.10 [0.81-1.79], respectively. Conclusions: Among chronic AF patients, the incidence of cardiovascular events was higher in the patients with high-HR, but was similar between intermediate- and low-HR groups.

Abnormal pattern of left atrial activation and asynchronous conduction predicted the occurrence of new atrial fibrillation: evidences for Bachmann’s bundle block in atrial fibrillation pathophysiology

EP Europace ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timm Seewöster ◽  
Kaloyan Marinov ◽  
Susanne Löbe ◽  
Helge Knopp ◽  
Sotirios Nedios ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Left Atrial ◽  
Mitral Annulus ◽  
Tissue Doppler ◽  
P Wave ◽  
Doppler Imaging ◽  
Activation Pattern ◽  
Recurrent Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Bachmann’S Bundle

Abstract Aims Evidences suggest that recurrent atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with left atrial (LA) remodelling. The goal of this study is to establish a method for assessment of LA remodelling and find predictors for the development of AF. Methods and results This prospective study included patients without a history of AF who were evaluated using pulsed-wave tissue Doppler imaging (PW-TDI). P-wave onset to A′-wave (PA′ interval) was measured at the septal, lateral, anterior, and inferior mitral annulus. Abnormal LA activation pattern was defined as an upward LA activation over the coronary sinus and delayed activation anterior. Left atrial asynchrony was measured as (i) the difference between the septal and lateral PA′ interval (DLS) and (ii) the standard deviation of all four PA′ intervals (SD4-PA′). The follow-up for AF recurrence (AF+) was based on symptoms and 7-day Holter electrocardiograms. Ninety-eight patients (mean age 58 ± 15 years, 47% female) were included. During a follow-up of 28 ± 9 months, AF was documented in 10%. More pronounced LA asynchrony was observed in AF+ group: DLS (AF+) 39 ± 16 vs. DLS (AF−) 20 ± 11 ms; P &lt; 0.001, and SD4-PA′ (AF+) 18.6 ± 6.4 vs. SD4-PA′ (AF−) 11.7 ± 4.2 ms; P &lt; 0.001. Abnormal LA activation was frequently observed in AF+ patients: 60% vs. 27%; P = 0.033. Electrocardiogram sign of Bachmann’s bundle block (BBB) was associated with prolongation of SD4-PA′: SD4-PA′ (BBB+) vs. SD4-PA′ (BBB−) = 18 ± 6 vs. 13 ± 4.5 ms; P = 0.007. Conclusions More pronounced LA asynchrony and abnormal LA activation pattern were associated with new-onset AF.

Discharge heart rate and clinical outcomes in hospitalized heart failure patients with coexisted atrial fibrillation

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
F Xing ◽  
X Bai ◽  
J Li
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Heart Rate ◽  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Beta Blockers ◽  
Funding Source ◽  
Proportional Hazard ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazard

Abstract Background Whether discharge heart rate for hospitalized heart failure (HF) patients with coexisted atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with long-term clinical outcomes and whether this association differs between patients with and without beta-blockers have not been well studied. Purpose We investigated the associations between discharge heart rate and clinical outcomes in hospitalized HF patients with coexisted AF, while stratified to beta-blockers at discharge. Methods The study cohort included 1631 HF patients hospitalized primarily with AF, which was from the China PEACE Prospective Heart Failure Study. Clinical outcome was 1-year combined all-cause mortality and HF hospitalization after discharge. We analyzed association between outcome and heart rate at discharge with restricted cubic spline and Cox proportional hazard ratios (HR). Results The median age was 68 (IQR: 60- 77) years, 41.9% were women, discharge heart rate was (median (IQR)) 75 (69- 84) beats per minute (bpm), and 60.2% received beta-blockers at discharge. According to the result of restricted cubic spline plot, the relationship between discharge heart rate and clinical outcome may be nonlinear (P&lt;0.01). Based on above result, these patients were divided into 3 groups: lowest &lt;65 bpm, middle 65–86 bpm and highest ≥87 bpm, clinical outcomes occurred in 128 (64.32%), 624 (53.42%) and 156 (59.32%) patients in the lowest, middle, and highest groups respectively. In the Cox proportional hazard analysis, the lowest and highest groups were associated with increased risks of clinical outcome compared with the middle group (HR: 1.289, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.056 - 1.573, p=0.013; HR: 1.276, 95% CI: 1.06 - 1.537, p=0.01, respectively). And a significant interaction between discharge heart rate and beta-blocker use was observed (P&lt;0.001 for interaction). Stratified analysis showed the lowest group was associated with increased risks of clinical outcomes in patients with beta-blockers (HR: 1.584, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.215–2.066, p=0.001). Conclusion There may be a U-curve relationship between discharge heart rate and clinical outcomes in hospitalized HF patients with coexisted AF. They may have the best clinical outcomes with heart rates of 65 - 86 bpm. And strict heart rate control (&lt;65 bpm) may be avoided for patients who discharge with beta-blockers. Figure 1 Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Other. Main funding source(s): This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program (2017YFC1310803) from the Ministry of Science and Technology of China; the CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Science (2017-I2M-B&R-02); the 111 Project from the Ministry of Education of China (B16005).

scholarly journals Associations between left bundle branch block with different PR intervals, QRS durations, heart rates and the risk of heart failure: a register-based cohort study using ECG data from the primary care setting

Open Heart ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. e001425
Author(s):  
Marc Meller Søndergaard ◽  
Johannes Riis ◽  
Karoline Willum Bodker ◽  
Steen Møller Hansen ◽  
Jesper Nielsen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Heart Rate ◽  
Left Bundle Branch Block ◽  
Bundle Branch Block ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Pr Interval ◽  
Qrs Duration ◽  
The Impact

AimLeft bundle branch block (LBBB) is associated with an increased risk of heart failure (HF). We assessed the impact of common ECG parameters on this association using large-scale data.Methods and resultsUsing ECGs recorded in a large primary care population from 2001 to 2011, we identified HF-naive patients with a first-time LBBB ECG. We obtained information on sex, age, emigration, medication, diseases and death from Danish registries. We investigated the association between the PR interval, QRS duration, and heart rate and the risk of HF over a 2-year follow-up period using Cox regression analysis.Of 2471 included patients with LBBB, 464 (18.8%) developed HF during follow-up. A significant interaction was found between QRS duration and heart rate (p<0.01), and the analyses were stratified on these parameters. Using a QRS duration <150 ms and a heart rate <70 beats per minute (bpm) as the reference, all groups were statistically significantly associated with the development of HF. Patients with a QRS duration ≥150 ms and heart rate ≥70 bpm had the highest risk of developing HF (HR 3.17 (95% CI 2.41 to 4.18, p<0.001). There was no association between the PR interval and HF after adjustment.ConclusionProlonged QRS duration and higher heart rate were associated with increased risk of HF among primary care patients with LBBB, while no association was observed with PR interval. Patients with LBBB with both a prolonged QRS duration (≥150 ms) and higher heart rate (≥70 bpm) have the highest risk of developing HF.

scholarly journals The Impact of Left Atrial Size in Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation Using Remote Magnetic Navigation

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Xiao-yu Liu ◽  
Hai-feng Shi ◽  
Jie Zheng ◽  
Ku-lin Li ◽  
Xiao-xi Zhao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Catheter Ablation ◽  
Left Atrial ◽  
Magnetic Navigation ◽  
Remote Magnetic Navigation ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
The Impact

Objective. The objective of this study was to investigate the impact of left atrial (LA) size for the ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) using remote magnetic navigation (RMN). Methods. A total of 165 patients with AF who underwent catheter ablation using RMN were included. The patients were divided into two groups based on LA diameter. Eighty-three patients had small LA (diameter <40 mm; Group A), and 82 patients had a large LA (diameter ≥40 mm; Group B). Results. During mapping and ablation, X-ray time (37.0 (99.0) s vs. 12 (30.1) s, P<0.001) and X-ray dose (1.4 (2.7) gy·cm2 vs. 0.7 (2.1) gy·cm2, P=0.013) were significantly higher in Group A. No serious complications occurred in any of the patients. There was no statistical difference in the rate of first anatomical attempt of pulmonary vein isolation between the two groups (71.1% vs. 57.3%, P=0.065). However, compared with Group B, the rate of sinus rhythm was higher (77.1% vs. 58.5%, P<0.001) during the follow-up period. More patients in Group A required a sheath adjustment (47/83 vs. 21/82, P<0.001), presumably due to less magnets positioned outside of the sheath. In vitro experiments with the RMN catheter demonstrated that only one magnet exposed created the sheath affects which influenced the flexibility of the catheter. Conclusions. AF ablation using RMN is safe and effective in both small and large LA patients. Patients with small LA may pose a greater difficulty when using RMN which may be attributed to the fewer magnets beyond the sheath. As a result, the exposure of radiation was increased. This study found that having at least two magnets of the catheter positioned outside of the sheath can ensure an appropriate flexibility of the catheter.

scholarly journals Left atrial 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a reproducibility study in sinus rhythm and atrial fibrillation

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Spartera ◽  
Guilherme Pessoa-Amorim ◽  
Antonio Stracquadanio ◽  
Adam Von Ende ◽  
Alison Fletcher ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Heart Rate ◽  
Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Sinus Rhythm ◽  
Left Atrial ◽  
Peak Velocity ◽  
4D Flow ◽  
Mean Velocity

Abstract Background Four-dimensional (4D) flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) allows sophisticated quantification of left atrial (LA) blood flow, and could yield novel biomarkers of propensity for intra-cardiac thrombus formation and embolic stroke. As reproducibility is critically important to diagnostic performance, we systematically investigated technical and temporal variation of LA 4D flow in atrial fibrillation (AF) and sinus rhythm (SR). Methods Eighty-six subjects (SR, n = 64; AF, n = 22) with wide-ranging stroke risk (CHA2DS2VASc 0–6) underwent LA 4D flow assessment of peak and mean velocity, vorticity, vortex volume, and stasis. Eighty-five (99%) underwent a second acquisition within the same session, and 74 (86%) also returned at 30 (27–35) days for an interval scan. We assessed variability attributable to manual contouring (intra- and inter-observer), and subject repositioning and reacquisition of data, both within the same session (same-day scan–rescan), and over time (interval scan). Within-subject coefficients of variation (CV) and bootstrapped 95% CIs were calculated and compared. Results Same-day scan–rescan CVs were 6% for peak velocity, 5% for mean velocity, 7% for vorticity, 9% for vortex volume, and 10% for stasis, and were similar between SR and AF subjects (all p > 0.05). Interval-scan variability was similar to same-day scan–rescan variability for peak velocity, vorticity, and vortex volume (all p > 0.05), and higher for stasis and mean velocity (interval scan CVs of 14% and 8%, respectively, both p < 0.05). Longitudinal changes in heart rate and blood pressure at the interval scan in the same subjects were associated with significantly higher variability for LA stasis (p = 0.024), but not for the remaining flow parameters (all p > 0.05). SR subjects showed significantly greater interval-scan variability than AF patients for mean velocity, vortex volume, and stasis (all p < 0.05), but not peak velocity or vorticity (both p > 0.05). Conclusions LA peak velocity and vorticity are the most reproducible and temporally stable novel LA 4D flow biomarkers, and are robust to changes in heart rate, blood pressure, and differences in heart rhythm.

scholarly journals Clinical outcomes of Japanese atrial fibrillation patients with combined valvular heart disease: the Fushimi AF Registry

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
K Doi ◽  
K Ishigami ◽  
Y Aono ◽  
S Ikeda ◽  
Y Hamatani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Heart Disease ◽  
Incidence Rate ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Valvular Heart Disease ◽  
Cardiac Death ◽  
Clinical Characteristics ◽  
Valve Disease ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background We previously reported that valvular heart disease (VHD) was not at the significant risk of stroke/systemic embolism (SE), but was associated with an increased risk of hospitalization for heart failure (HF) in Japanese atrial fibrillation patients. However, the impact of combined VHD on clinical outcomes has been little known. Purpose The aim of this study is to investigate the prevalence of combined VHD and its clinical characteristics and impact on outcomes such as stroke/SE, all-cause death, cardiac death and hospitalization for HF. Method The Fushimi AF Registry is a community-based prospective survey of AF patients in one of the wards of our city which is a typical urban district of Japan. We started to enroll patients from March 2011, and follow-up data were available for 4,466 patients by the end of November 2019. In the entire cohort, echocardiography data were available for 3,574 patients. 68 AF patients with prosthetic heart valves were excluded and we compared clinical characteristics and outcomes between 488 single VHD (103 Aortic valve disease (AVD), 315 mitral valve disease (MVD), 70 tricuspid valve disease (TVD)) and 158 combined VHD (46 AVD and MVD, 11 AVD and TVD, 66 MVD and TVD, 35 AVD and MVD and TVD). Result Compared with single VHD, patients with combined VHD were older (combined vs. single VHD: 78.5 vs. 76.0 years, respectively; p&lt;0.01), more likely to have persistent/permanent type AF (73.4% vs. 63.9%, p=0.02) and prescription of warfarin (63.1% vs. 53.8%, p=0.04). Combined VHD was less likely to have diabetes mellitus (13.9% vs. 23.6%, p=0.01) and dyslipidemia (26.6% vs. 40.4%, p&lt;0.01). Sex, body weight, hypertension, pre-existing HF were comparable between the two groups. During the median follow-up of 1,474 days, the incidence rate of stroke/SE was not significantly different between the two groups (1.58 vs. 1.89 per 100 person-years, respectively, log rank p=0.10). The incidence rate of all-cause death (7.35 vs. 5.33, p=0.65), cardiac death (1.20 vs. 0.99, p=0.91) and hospitalization for HF (5.55 vs. 4.43, p=0.53) were also not significantly different. We previously reported AVD had significant impacts on cardiac adverse outcomes in AF patients, and we further analyzed event rates between combined VHD including AVD (AVD and MVD/TVD) and without AVD (MVD and TVD). Combined VHD with AVD group had higher incidence rate of all-cause death (10.7 vs. 5.79, p=0.03) than that without AVD group. However, the incidence rate of stroke/SE (1.98 vs. 1.56, p=0.59), cardiac death (0.98 vs. 1.14, p=0.68), hospitalization for HF (8.03 vs. 5.38, p=0.17) were not significantly different between the two groups. Conclusion As compared with single VHD, the risk of stroke/SE, all-cause death, cardiac death and hospitalization for HF in combined VHD was not significantly different. Among patients with combined VHD, those having AVD had higher incidence rate of all-cause death than those without AVD. Figure 1 Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document