Big Entrance Hole Perforation as New Alternative Approach to Optimize Thru-Tubing Sand Control Technique While Maintaining Reservoir Deliverability for Tunu Gas Reservoir in Unconsolidated Sand Formation

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rahman Setiadi ◽  
Abdel Mohammad Deghati ◽  
Adnan Syarafi Ashfahani ◽  
Albert Richal Dading ◽  
Gany Gunawan ◽  
...  

Abstract Mahakam block with one of its gas fields, Tunu, has been developed for decades. Hundreds of wells were drilled to unlock layered sand reservoirs ranging from unconsolidated to consolidated reservoirs. Through field experience, well architecture is actively developing. The latest architecture, targeting shallow reservoirs only, is called Shallow Light Architecture (SLA). The well is completed with 3.5in production tubing cemented inside a 8.5in open-hole reservoir section. SLA is the default architecture for chemical sand consolidation (SCON) or thru-tubing screens as subsurface sand control. Perforation is performed by deep penetration (DP) hollow-carrier guns deployed with double-density to maximize open area and reduce sand production risk. DP charges were used based on the requirement to bypass near-wellbore damage, which is the same practice used in consolidated sand reservoir perforating. As more marginal reservoirs need to be unlocked, big entrance hole (BEH) perforation was initiated for the current sand control optimization alternative by SCON chemical reduction with shorter perforation intervals; and for thru-tubing metal screen performance improvement by placement in front of perforation entrance tunnels with minimum erosion risk. BEH was then studied as it has never been used previously in Mahakam with thru-tubing applications. Simulation and pilot well trials were explored to ensure that a short penetration would not significantly impact reservoir delivery on SLA wells. Inflow performance relationship (IPR) analysis resulted in slight additional drawdown compared to the calculated drawdown using DP at 2.5 MMscfd as an average gas rate in current thru-tubing sand control, which was considered acceptable from the operating envelope perspective. In total, BEH perforation was executed on ten wells with reservoir permeability range from 220 millidarcy (mD) to an extreme case of 3000 mD. Various SCON treatments were injected at optimized perforation lengths by cutting chemical costs up to 60% with sand-free production at a particular parameter and chemical type. On the other hand, in the application using screens, evaluation was not conclusive due to screen sizing issues for some installations. However, in-situ gas velocity could be reduced to the theoretical erosion velocity limit for a metal screen. This new approach to BEH charges utilization has a potential solution optimizing current SCON costs while also reducing erosion risk for the through tubing screen application to improve its performance. By using short penetration of charges, this approach was successfully implemented without jeopardizing reservoir's deliverability.

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fujian Zhou ◽  
Yiping Zong ◽  
Yuzhang Liu ◽  
Xianyou Yang ◽  
Chunming Xiong ◽  
...  

1983 ◽  
Vol 23 (01) ◽  
pp. 65-72 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth R. Kunze ◽  
Chris M. Shaughnessy

Summary The continuing search for an effective deep-penetrating sandstone acidizing system recently has focused on fluoboric acid (HBF4). Because this acid first must hydrolyze in water to produce HF, it was believed that deeper radial penetration of live acid could be achieved during matrix acidizing operations. However, a thorough experimental study has shown that typical formation temperatures will cause fluoboric acid to spend at a rapid rate similar to that of conventional hydrofluoric acid (HF), thereby severely limiting its usefulness in most sandstone formations. Furthermore, the same silica reprecipitation potential associated with HF acidizing is also inherent in the HBF4 system. Introduction It has been recognized for several years that traditional 12% HCl/3% HF systems are effective only at removing silicate damage within 1 ft (0.3 m) of the wellbore.1,2 Thus, fines and clays beyond this radius, although possibly altered, are still present and potentially mobile upon production. This ability of fines to migrate has been established in the literature.3–6 Furthermore, it has been shown6 that fines can be entrained from an outer radius of more than 5 ft (1.5 m) in a high-rate well flowing water. These observations have fueled the desire for a slower-acting sandstone acid that can remove damaging fines before they can migrate and plug. The major obstacle to deep penetration of conventional HF/HCl mixtures is their rapid reaction rate at formation temperatures with clays and grain cementing material. It has been shown that HF will spend on clays within minutes at formation temperatures.7 Therefore, to achieve net removal of material beyond 1 to 1.5 ft (0.30 to 0.45 m) would require excessive treatment volumes, which would have the undesirable effects of unconsolidating formation materials8 and undermining cement integrity. What is desired is an acid system that does not spend rapidly on formation material, thereby affording deep penetration without turning the region adjacent to the wellbore to unconsolidated sand. Various acidizing systems have been developed over the past few years with this purpose in mind.9–11 Although many of these systems have attained limited success, the problem is not considered solved entirely. Most recently,12 HBF4 has drawn attention as a possible deep-penetrating sandstone stimulation acid because it has been observed to hydrolyze slowly at room temperature to produce HF. The purpose of this work was to determine whether HBF4 would provide any damage removal advantages over conventional HF under formation conditions. In relation to this, the effect of temperature was of particular interest because experience has shown the HF reaction to be very sensitive to this factor.7 Our conclusions concerning HBF4 applicability rest on data obtained from the following experiments.When data from stirred reactions of HBF4 and HF with clay were compared, little difference was observed at typical formation temperatures.Permeability response and effluent chemical analysis data from Berea coreflood experiments failed to give evidence for increased penetration distance or different chemical response of the core.Exposure of formation core material from an interval actually producing hydrocarbons yielded data similar to those obtained with Berea, indicating that no deep penetration advantage could be expected.


2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mehmet Parlar ◽  
Raymond J Tibbles ◽  
Bala R. Gadiyar ◽  
Bryan Paul Stamm

e-Polymers ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaosen Shang ◽  
Yingrui Bai ◽  
Zengbao Wang ◽  
Quan Wang ◽  
Changyin Dong

AbstractA novel chemical-consolidation method based foam amino resin system of sand control systems in the oilfield is reported. This sand control technique is more superior to the conventional method owing to its advantages such as the outstanding resistance and lower density as well as simple process preparation. The apparent density of the foam resin system ranges from 0.528 g/cm3 to 0.634 g/cm3 at room temperature. Moreover, the system has excellent foaming properties and excellent compatibility with the formation fluids. In addition, the foam amino resin sand consolidation system was optimized and investigated. Simultaneously, the sand-fixing performance of the foam resin system was comprehensively assessed. The optimized conditions are as follows: curing temperature, 60°C; curing time, 12 h; consolidated core compressive strength, 6.28 MPa. Furthermore, the consolidated core showed remarkable resistance to the formation fluids. In summary, the foam resin system effectively met the requirements of the sand control and the horizontal wells in the oilfield.


2016 ◽  
Vol 31 (01) ◽  
pp. 004-015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mehmet Parlar ◽  
Raymond J. Tibbles ◽  
Bala Gadiyar ◽  
Bryan Stamm

2002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dezhu Liu ◽  
Houli Sun ◽  
Xiangming Liu ◽  
Jianjun Zhang ◽  
_ ZhaoPing ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcus V.D. Ferreira ◽  
Mauricio Gimenes Folsta ◽  
Angelo Vianna ◽  
Agostinho Calderon ◽  
Kazuo Miura ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhengchao Zhao ◽  
Houli Sun ◽  
Ping Zhao ◽  
Xiangming Liu ◽  
Jianjun Zhang ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
pp. 79-85
Author(s):  
Ahmed Samir ◽  
Mohammed Kassab ◽  
Ayman Hamed ◽  
Aly Abbas ◽  
Adel Salem

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document