Enhanced Oil Recovery Improvement Using Augmented Waterflooding to Induce Fluids Flow Orientation in a Reservoir

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Celestine Udie ◽  
Fina Faithpraise ◽  
Agnes Anuka

Abstract The objective is to design a control agent that will induce fluids flow orientation in a reservoir. The specific objectives are to delineate the minimum volumetric rate of the injecting fluid that will orient and control reservoir fluids flow rate and the recovery efficiency. Next estimate the maximum flooding injection rate for high oil recovery and finally predict reservoir fluids recovery efficiency. This work estimates the minimum volumetric rate of the injecting displacing fluid that will displace and control reservoir fluids flow rate and efficiency using mobility ratio. Next it estimates the maximum injection rate of the displacing agent that will recover high oil using summation of the reservoir thickness. Finally, it predicts reservoir fluids flow rates and cumulative oil recovery using unit floodable pore volume and the daily or yearly floodable volume. A cash flow model is used here to describe and compare the revenue (Recovery bill) and the costs (Capex and Opex). The result shows that it is possible to attain a floodable volumetric sweep efficiency of 70% with a corresponding recovery factor of 66% and a floodable volumetric sweep efficiency of 80 with a corresponding recovery factor of 72%, compared to scenario - C(Oil reservoir producing under water-drive and gas injection) where recovery factor is possibly 25 to 40%. Both recovery efficiency/factor depend on the summation of the volumetric floodable ratio. The novelty in this work is the development of a control agent which can increase recovery factor from 40% to 66% or 72%

SPE Journal ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 13 (04) ◽  
pp. 432-439 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward J. Lewis ◽  
Eric Dao ◽  
Kishore K. Mohanty

Summary Evaluation and improvement of sweep efficiency are important for miscible displacement of medium-viscosity oils. A high-pressure quarter-five-spot cell was used to conduct multicontact miscible (MCM) water-alternating-gas (WAG) displacements at reservoir conditions. A dead reservoir oil (78 cp) was displaced by ethane. The minimum miscibility pressure (MMP) for ethane with the reservoir oil is approximately 4.14 MPa (600 psi). Gasflood followed by waterflood improves the oil recovery over waterflood alone in the quarter five-spot. As the pressure decreases, the gasflood oil recovery increases slightly in the pressure range of 4.550-9.514 MPa (660-1,380 psi) for this undersaturated viscous oil. WAG improves the sweep efficiency and oil recovery in the quarter five-spot over the continuous gas injection. WAG injection slows down gas breakthrough. A decrease in the solvent amount lowers the oil recovery in WAG floods, but significantly more oil can be recovered with just 0.1 pore volume (PV) solvent (and water) injection than with waterflood alone. Use of a horizontal production well lowers the sweep efficiency over the vertical production well during WAG injection. Sweep efficiency is higher for the nine-spot pattern than for the five-spot pattern during gas injection. Sweep efficiency during WAG injection increases with the WAG ratio in the five-spot model. Introduction As the light-oil reservoirs get depleted, there is increasing interest in producing more-viscous-oil reservoirs. Thermal techniques are appropriate for heavy-oil reservoirs. But gasflooding can play an important role in medium-viscosity-oil (30-300 cp) reservoirs and is the subject of this paper. Roughly 20 billion to 25 billion bbl of medium-weight- to heavy-weight-oil deposits are estimated in the North Slope of Alaska. Approximately 10 billion to 12 billion bbl exist in West Sak/Schrader Bluff formation alone (McGuire et al. 2005). Miscible gasflooding has been proved to be a cost-effective enhanced oil recovery technique. There are approximately 80 gasflooding projects (CO2, flue gas, and hydrocarbon gas) in the US and approximately 300,000 B/D is produced from gasflooding, mostly from light-oil reservoirs (Moritis 2004). The recovery efficiency [10-20% of the original oil in place (OOIP)] and solvent use (3-12 Mcf/bbl) need to be improved. The application of miscible and immiscible gasflooding needs to be extended to medium-viscosity-oil reservoirs. McGuire et al. (2005) have proposed an immiscible WAG flooding process, called viscosity-reduction WAG, for North Slope medium-visocisty oils. Many of these oils are depleted in their light-end hydrocarbons C7-C13. When a mixture of methane and natural gas liquid is injected, the ethane and components condense into the oil and decrease the viscosity of oil, making it easier for the water to displace the oil. From reservoir simulation, this process is estimated to enhance oil recovery compared to waterflood from 19 to 22% of the OOIP, which still leaves nearly 78% of the OOIP. Thus, further research should be directed at improving the recovery efficiency of these processes for viscous-oil reservoirs. Recovery efficiency depends on microscopic displacement efficiency and sweep efficiency. Microscopic displacement efficiency depends on pressure, (Dindoruk et al. 1992; Wang and Peck 2000) composition of the solvent and oil (Stalkup 1983; Zick 1986), and small-core-scale heterogeneity (Campbell and Orr 1985; Mohanty and Johnson 1993). Sweep efficiency of a miscible flood depends on mobility ratio (Habermann 1960; Mahaffey et al. 1966; Cinar et al. 2006), viscous-to-gravity ratio (Craig et al. 1957; Spivak 1974; Withjack and Akervoll 1988), transverse Peclet number (Pozzi and Blackwell 1963), well configuration, and reservoir heterogeneity, (Koval 1963; Fayers et al. 1992) in general. The effect of reservoir heterogeneity is difficult to study at the laboratory scale and is addressed mostly by simulation (Haajizadeh et al. 2000; Jackson et al. 1985). Most of the laboratory sweep-efficiency studies (Habermann 1960; Mahaffey et al. 1966; Jackson et al. 1985; Vives et al. 1999) have been conducted with first-contact fluids or immiscible fluids at ambient pressure/temperature and may not be able to respresent the displacement physics of multicontact fluids at reservoir conditions. In fact, four methods are proposed for sweep improvement in gasflooding: WAG (Lin and Poole 1991), foams (Shan and Rossen 2002), direct thickeners (Xu et al. 2003), and dynamic-profile control in wells (McGuire et al. 1998). To evaluate any sweep-improvement methods, one needs controlled field testing. Field tests generally are expensive and not very controlled; two different tests cannot be performed starting with identical initial states, and, thus, results are often inconclusive. Field-scale modeling of compositionally complex processes can be unreliable because of inadequate representation of heterogeneity and process complexity in existing numerical simulators. There is a need to conduct laboratory sweep-efficiency studies with the MCM fluids at reservoir conditions to evaluate various sweep-improvement techniques. Reservoir-conditions laboratory tests can be used to calibrate numerical simulators and evaluate qualitative changes in sweep efficiency. We have built a high-pressure quarter-five-spot model where reservoir-conditions multicontact WAG floods can be conducted and evaluated (Dao et al. 2005). The goal of this paper is to evaluate various WAG strategies for a model oil/multicontact solvent in this high-pressure laboratory cell. In the next section, we outline our experimental techniques. The results are summarized in the following section.


2014 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 205-222
Author(s):  
Hamed Hematpur ◽  
Mohammad Parvaz Davani ◽  
Mohsen Safari

Lack of experimental study on the recovery of solvent flooding in low viscosity oil is obvious in previous works. This study concerns the experimental investigation on oil recovery efficiency during solvent/co-solvent flooding in low viscosity oil sample from an Iranian reservoir. Two micromodel patterns with triangular and hexagonal pore structures were designed and used in the experiments. A series of solvent flooding experiments were conducted on the two patterns that were initially saturated with crude oil sample. The oil recovery efficiency as a function injected pore volume was determined from analysis of continuously captured pictures. Condensate and n-hexane were employed as base solvents, and Methyl Ethyl Ketone (MEK) and Ethylene Glycol Mono Butyl Ether (EGMBE) used as co-solvents. The results revealed that not only does the solvent flooding increase the recovery in low viscosity oil but also this increase is evidently higher with respect to viscous oil. But, type of solvent or adding co-solvent to solvent does not noticeably increase the recovery of low viscosity oil. In addition, further experiments showed that presence of connate water or increasing injection rate reduces the recovery whereas increasing permeability improves the recovery. The results of this study are helpful to better understand the application of solvent flooding in low viscosity oil reservoirs.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Songyuan Liu ◽  
Xiaochun Jin ◽  
Deji Liu ◽  
Hao Xu ◽  
Lidong Zhang ◽  
...  

Abstract Traditional Microbial Enhanced Oil Recovery (MEOR) technology assumes the oil recovery is increased by the biosurfactant generating by the subsurface bacteria. However, we identified that increased recovery factor is mainly contributed by stimulating the indigenous bacteria to plug the preferred waterflooding channels, which was proved at laboratory and some high-permeable oilfield, but never implemented in the waterflooding of tight oilfield. This paper presents a comprehensive study on Bio-diversion technique by stimulating indigenous bacteria covering lab research and filed operation lasting 18 months. The lab research comprised: (1) feasibility research using modified recipe and field sample on the stimulation of indigenous microorganisms; and (2) Evaluation of effectiveness of the stimulation based on lab results. A field pilot, consisting of 10 injectors, 10 producers, injecting and producing from multi-zones, reservoir temperature is about 160 F, permeabilities range from 30 md to over 100 md, daily water injection rate is about 2,000 BWPD, pre-treatment water cut is over 90%. It is observed that the water cut has decreased from 98% to 80% gradually (3-6 months after injection). Besides, the water injection index test indicates that the injection profile becomes more evenly after 9 months of microbial nutrient injection because the stimulated bacteria reduce the permeability of more permeable zones and reduce the permeability heterogeneity in the vertical direction. Sharing the field results with the industry may inspire the operators to consider one alternative environmentally friendly and cost-effective approach to increase the recovery factor of tight oil reservoirs. From the technical viewpoint, the field pilot proves that the major mechanisms of MEOR is sweeping the unswept oil by injecting the microbial nutrient to the reservoir to stimulate the indigenous bacteria to block the preferred waterflooding channels.


2016 ◽  
Vol 78 (6-6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zakaria Hamdi ◽  
Mariyamni Awang

A set of slimtube experiments is designed and presented to study the effect of cold temperature CO2 on recovery factor in reservoirs with high temperature. The comparison of the results indicates the positive effect of temperature on recovery trend in early stage as well as ultimate recovery in different injection pressures. The approach is based on a long slimtube to show the effect of temperature on the recovery. The study considers different temperatures and pressures of injection and reservoir allowing both miscible and immiscible flooding of CO2. Using non-isothermal conditions, the results show that, lowering temperature of injection can yield in higher recovery in early stage significantly. Also, considering ultimate recovery, it is observed that low temperature CO2 injection into high temperature reservoir can result in slightly higher recovery factor than isothermal injection. The reason for recovery increase is mainly due to elimination of the interfacial tension between CO2 and reservoir fluids especially near the injection point. Another finding is that the minimum miscibility pressures is lowered by means of lowering the temperature of injection which is again caused by elimination of interfacial tension between CO2 and oil. This is important because forming a single phase can increase the ability of CO2 to extract different components of the crude oil as well as lowering viscosity of the mixture, resulting in a better sweep efficiency. It appears that using liquid CO2 in high temperature reservoirs can be a promising method for better oil recovery in high temperature reservoirs. 


2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Sukruthai Sapniwat ◽  
Falan Srisuriyachai

Polymer Flooding is one of the most well-known methods in Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) technology, resulting in favorable conditions for displacement mechanism to lower residual oil in the reservoir. Polymers can lower mobility ratio by increasing the viscosity of injected water, hereby increasing volumetric sweep efficiency. Moreover, polymer adsorption onto the rock surface can help decrease reservoir permeability contrast. Due to absolute permeability reduction, the effective permeability to water is also reduced. Once the polymer is adsorbed onto the rock surface, polymer molecules can be desorbed with a chaser. This study is performed to further evaluate the effects of the adsorption and desorption process of polymer solutions to yield benefits on the oil recovery mechanism. A reservoir model is constructed by the reservoir simulation program called STAR® from Computer Modeling Group (CMG). Various polymer concentrations, starting times of polymer flooding process and polymer injection rates were evaluated with selected degrees of polymer desorption including 0, 50 and 100%. According to the results, polymer desorption lowers polymer consumption, especially at low concentrations. Polymer desorption causes polymer re-employment that is previously adsorbed onto rock surface, resulting in an increase of sweep efficiency in the further period of polymer flooding process. Furthermore, the results show that waterflooding followed by earlier polymer flooding can increase the oil recovery factor whereas the higher injection rate also enhances the recovery. Polymer concentration has relationship with polymer consumption due to the two main benefits described above. Therefore, polymer slug size should be optimized based on polymer concentration.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 115-129
Author(s):  
Julia Herrera ◽  
Luis Prada ◽  
Gustavo Maya ◽  
Jose Luis Gomez ◽  
Ruben Castro ◽  
...  

Polymer flooding is a widely used enhanced oil recovery (EOR) technology. The purpose of the polymer is to increase water viscosity to improve reservoir sweep efficiency. However, mechanical elements of the polymer injection facilities may impact the viscosity of the polymer negatively, decreasing it drastically. Mechanical degradation of the polymer occurs in case of flow restrictions with abrupt diameter changes in valves and control systems. Such flow restrictions may induce mechanical stresses along the polymer chain, which can result in its rupture. In this research, physical experiments and numerical simulations using CFD (Computational Fluid Dynamics) were used to propose a model for estimating the mechanical degradation for the flow of polymer solutions. This technique involves the calculation of velocity gradients, pressure drawdown, and polymer degradation of the fluid through geometry restriction. The simulations were validated through polymer injection experiments. The results show that with the greater volumetric flow and lower effective diameters, there is more mechanical degradation due to polymer shearing; nonetheless, this depends on the rheology properties inherent in each polymer in an aqueous solution. This method is suitable to estimate the mechanical degradation of the polymer solution in flooding facilities and accessories. Further, the results obtained could enhance the use of the polymer, calculating its actual mechanical degradation, minimizing it, or using it to support the development of new accessories.


1973 ◽  
Vol 13 (05) ◽  
pp. 274-284 ◽  
Author(s):  
P.E. Baker

Abstract Experimental studies have been carried out to determine the effects oil injection pressure and rate on formation heating by steam flooding. Heat losses, vertical sweep efficiency, and steam zone volume were determined for steam displacing water at different rates and pressures. A radial flow model was used that consisted of reservoir, overburden, and substratum, all composed of unconsolidated sand. Following are some of the results and conclusions. Heat loss to overburden and substratum, as percent of the total injected, is almost solely a percent of the total injected, is almost solely a function of time for given formation thickness, a conclusion that tends to agree with the theoretical result that percent loss is a function only of dimensionless time at/ 2 (where a is thermal diffusivity, t is time, and h is formation thickness). The volume of the steam zone was found to be a function of time and the dimensionless injection parameter will hkhf (Tb-Ti) (where Lv is parameter will hkhf (Tb-Ti) (where Lv is heat of vaporization, wi is mass injection rate, khf is thermal conductivity, Tb is saturation temperature, and Ti is initial reservoir temperature). Vertical sweep efficiency, defined in the text, depends mostly on injection rate - improving at higher rate - and bas minimal dependence on pressure and time. pressure and time. A few floods were carried out with an initial oil saturation and residual water saturation and using oils with viscosities of 18,100 and 900 cp at initial reservoir temperature. Results arc presented. A radio-frequency capacitance probe was used in some runs in an effort to measure water (liquid) saturation changes in the steam zone. Introduction Reports appearing in the literature on oil recovery by steamflooding now show that almost every aspect of the process has been studied by a variety of methods. Early experimental work 1 by Willman and colleagues demonstrated that steam is an effective oil-displacing agent in a linear flood system; theoretical methods have been developed for calculating the thermal efficiency of reservoir heating by steamflooding; and several field trials have been reported that attempted to test the over-all economics of the process. Shutter, in two papers, published work on a numerical model that includes heat loss, gravity effects, and oil recovery. Reported results of heat flow studies in an experimental steamflood model have shown that a significant portion of the injection heat is contained in the "hot water zone"; i.e., in the flooded formation but outside the steam zone. With gravity override (steam overrunning) much of this heat would be under the steam zone. Gravity override has been observed in steamflood field trials and in Shutler's numerical model. In the experiments described in Ref. 10, gravity override was noted, but was not quantitatively measured. in a new experimental project, using a new model, the pressure range was extended upward to 100 psig. At the same time, more detailed definition of psig. At the same time, more detailed definition of the steam front was obtained, providing a quantitative measure of steam zone volume and gravity override, or vertical sweep efficiency. Model floods were carried out at different pressures between approximately 1 psig and 100 pressures between approximately 1 psig and 100 psig, and at rates between 0.1 and 1.0 lb/min psig, and at rates between 0.1 and 1.0 lb/min (576 and 5,760 lb/D-ft in the 3-in.-thick model formation). In most runs the reservoir was initially saturated with water because such a series of experiments would not be practical to carry out in a reasonable period of time with viscous oil. The results of these runs, which are given in detail in the text, show the effects of pressure and rate on gravity override, steam zone volume, and heat losses under ideal fluid flow conditions. /L few runs were made with an initial oil saturation, using oils with viscosities of 18,100 and 900 cp at initial reservoir temperature. Results with 18- and 100-cp oil differed very little from those with water only; but with the 900-cp oil, gravity override increased and the steam zone pattern became definitely nonradial. This indicates pattern became definitely nonradial. This indicates that the observed pressure and rate effects should be valid for initial oil viscosities up at least 100 cp in a medium as homogeneous as the model. SPEJ P. 274


2015 ◽  
Vol 1113 ◽  
pp. 492-497 ◽  
Author(s):  
Effah Yahya ◽  
Nur Hashimah Alias ◽  
Tengku Amran Tengku Mohd ◽  
Nurul Aimi Ghazali ◽  
Tajnor Suriya binti Taju Ariffin

In this study, local isolated Xanthomonas campestries has been used from local cabbage for xanthan gum production via fermentation in shake flask. The product was then recovered with isopropanol and dried. Meanwhile, for extraction and purification of mushroom polysaccharide, we use dead edible mushroom has been used. Polysaccharide mushroom was extracted with NaOH solutions at 100 ͦ C for 24 hrs. Next, polysaccharide was precipitated separately by the addition of ethanol and the resulting polysaccharide extract were dissolved in distilled water. In the present study, different type of biopolymers was used in order to determine the oil recovery with different concentrations. Biopolymers used in this experiment are xanthan gum and mushroom polysaccharide. The properties of both biopolymers were tested for 3000 ppm and 10000 ppm of concentration. The results shown higher oil recovery factor obtained from the mushroom polysaccharide, which is 84.14%. Meanwhile, the highest recovery obtained by xanthan is about 67.44% only. As a conclusion, increasing polymer concentration will increase the oil recovery factor.


2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 018-030 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Maurich

Surfactant can displace oil which trapped by capillary effect, make it easier to be produced and finally improve oil recovery factor. However, the effectiveness of surfactant injection depends on many parameters such as surfactant-reservoir fluids properties and interaction, reservoir characteristics and its interaction with surfactant and also surfactant injection scenario or operational methods. This paper discusses about the effect of continuous surfactant injection alternating huff & puff stimulation on oil recovery factor from a quadrant of five-spot pattern in a 3D physical model made from a mixture of sands, cement and water with dimension of 15 cm x 15 cm x 2.5 cm to serve as the surrogate for oil reservoir in laboratory. In order to simulate the oil recovery from a secondary waterflooding process, 0.17 PV of formation water was injected into 3D reservoir physical model. This process could recover about 25.5% OOIP from the physical model, however the injection then shortly terminated due to a drastically increase of watercut. Residual oil then be recovered by a sequence of continuous surfactant injection alternating huff and puff stimulation method. The recovery factor by continuous surfactant injection combine with chase water drive gave a 5.5 % OOIP additional recovery and another 6.8 % OOIP after 24 hours surfactant huff & puff stimulation in the first sequence. After conducting 3 series of a combination of continuous surfactant injection alternating huff & puff stimulation, the total oil recovery from overall processes was about 51.7% OOIP. We presume that the lack of mobility control on macroscopic sweep efficiency in a 3D reservoir physical model is the rationale behind this moderate oil recovery which only produced by surfactant microscopic displacement efficiency. Nevertheless, the research shows that the combination of continuous surfactant injection alternating huff & puff stimulation obviously improve the recovery factor to some extent.


Nanomaterials ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. 1818 ◽  
Author(s):  
Afshin Davarpanah

Among a wide range of enhanced oil-recovery techniques, polymer flooding has been selected by petroleum industries due to the simplicity and lower cost of operational performances. The reason for this selection is due to the mobility-reduction of the water phase, facilitating the forward-movement of oil. The objective of this comprehensive study is to develop a mathematical model for simultaneous injection of polymer-assisted nanoparticles migration to calculate an oil-recovery factor. Then, a sensitivity analysis is provided to consider the significant influence of formation rheological characteristics as type curves. To achieve this, we concentrated on the driving mathematical equations for the recovery factor and compare each parameter significantly to nurture the differences explicitly. Consequently, due to the results of this extensive study, it is evident that a higher value of mobility ratio, higher polymer concentration and higher formation-damage coefficient leads to a higher recovery factor. The reason for this is that the external filter cake is being made in this period and the subsequent injection of polymer solution administered a higher sweep efficiency and higher recovery factor.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document